Week 4 AssignmentCore Competencies
Self-Evaluation & Growth Action Plan
Submission Type
Single PDF upload: Competency self-rating, 1-page reflection (2 strengths, two growth areas), and Competency Growth Action Plan (template)
Introduction
In practice, you will be expected to self-assess, set goals, and pursue lifelong learning. This activity invites you to critically evaluate your strengths and areas for growth as an FNP. By developing a Competency Growth Plan now, you are practicing the same skills you use throughout your professional life to stay current and competent. Self-assess against FNP core competencies and develop a realistic growth plan with clear strategies, milestones, and reflection points.
Assignment
- Review the (p. 27) and rate your proficiency- Advanced Level nursing education
- Write a one-page reflection identifying the top two strengths and the top two growth areas.
- 1.3c Incorporate knowledge from nursing andother disciplines to support clinical judgment.
- 2.4f Employ context driven, advanced reasoning tothe diagnostic and decision-making process
- Complete the Competency Growth Action Plan with concrete strategies (e.g., shadowing, CE, case practice), timeline, and milestones.
See the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Rubric
Week 4: Core CompetenciesSelf-Evaluation & Growth Action Plan Rubric
Week 4: Core CompetenciesSelf-Evaluation & Growth Action Plan Rubric
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent & Comprehensiveness
|
50 to >45.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThoroughly addresses all required elements with depth, accuracy, and clear alignment to objectives.45 to >40.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses most required elements with adequate accuracy and alignment to objectives.
40 to >25.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsAddresses some required elements but lacks depth, detail, or clear alignment to objectives.25 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not adequately address required elements; incomplete or inaccurate. |
50 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Clarity
|
24 to >21.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe writing is clear, concise, and well-organized with logical flow and formatting that enhances readability.21 to >19.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsOrganization and clarity are generally organized with some minor lapses in flow or clarity. Formatting is acceptable.
19 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsOrganization is inconsistent; writing lacks clarity; and formatting distracts from readability.12 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe writing is disorganized and unclear; formatting is missing or incorrect. |
24 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection & Professional Insight
|
8 to >7.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsDemonstrates deep reflection, critical thinking, and strong connection to professional practice.7 to >6.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsProvides adequate reflection and some connection to professional practice.
6 to >4.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsProvides superficial reflection with limited connection to practice.4 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsNo meaningful reflection or professional insight is provided. |
8 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics & APA
|
8 to >7.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe assignment accurately and consistently follows APA Style. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.7 to >6.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe assignment consistently follows current APA Style with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes. Mostly meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.
6 to >4.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe assignment has numerous errors in APA Style. Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style. May not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.4 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe assignment has significant errors in APA Style. Does not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment. |
8 pts
|
Total Points: 90
WRITE MY PAPER
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.