Evaluation & Summary of Implementation Progress

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Implementation Plan Completed; AACN Domain 4: Scholarship for the Nursing DisciplineImplementation plan reflects feedback from multiple sources

30 ptsExemplaryFully revised using feedback from advisor, peers, and sponsor; clearly integrates qualitative and quantitative data; template is complete and well-organized25 ptsProficientRevised using most feedback sources; includes relevant data; template is complete with minor gaps

20 ptsDevelopingPartially revised; feedback integration or data inclusion is limited; template has noticeable gaps10 ptsBeginningMinimal revision; feedback not integrated; template is incomplete or disorganized

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterventions and Implementation Strategies Aligned w/ Revisions; AACN Domain 4: Scholarship for Nursing Practice

30 ptsExemplaryInterventions are evidence-based, contextually appropriate, and clearly aligned with implementation goals and organization and population needs25 ptsProficientInterventions are mostly appropriate and aligned with goals; minor gaps in contextual fit

15 ptsDevelopingInterventions are loosely aligned; rationale or fit with population is unclear10 ptsBeginningInterventions are misaligned, unsupported, or poorly described

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Summary; Date; AACN Domain 5: Quality and SafetyFinal summary reflects a comprehensive evaluation of project progression which guides results section of DNP Project paper.

30 ptsExemplaryEvaluation includes robust qualitative and quantitative data; reflects ongoing monitoring and team engagement; clearly informs next steps25 ptsProficientEvaluation includes relevant data and monitoring; team engagement is evident; informs next steps

15 ptsDevelopingEvaluation is limited or lacks clarity; minimal data or team input; next steps unclear10 ptsBeginningEvaluation is missing or superficial; no data or team engagement evident

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing, Grammar, APA Format Domain 9: Professionalism

10 ptsExemplaryWriting is scholarly, clear, and error-free; APA formatting is accurate and consistent7 ptsProficientWriting is mostly clear with minor errors; APA formatting is generally correct

5 ptsDevelopingWriting has frequent errors or lacks clarity; APA formatting inconsistent3 ptsBeginningWriting is unclear or error-prone; APA formatting absent or incorrect

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate submissionMinus 5 points/day

0 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks

0 pts