Module 2 Comment 2 Phil

For the qualitative study, I selected Stone, Wainwright, and Guest (2025), a systematic review examining social influences

on transitions to or from long-term (chronic) pain. The research purpose to explore how social factors shape patients

experiences aligns directly with a qualitative synthesis design, which is appropriate for integrating multiple qualitative

findings. The review included 71 studies with 1,291 participants, ensuring a broad representation of perspectives; this

sampling strategy provided sufficient depth for thematic analysis but was limited by the primary studies heterogeneity.

Data collection in the original studies involved interviews, focus groups, and diaries, while the review applied rigorous

thematic synthesis to combine findings across studies. Trustworthiness was addressed through double coding, iterative

analysis, and transparent inclusion criteria, enhancing credibility, dependability, and reflexivity. Ethical considerations

were accounted for at the primary study level, and the review ensured that only ethically conducted research was

included. Overall, the study provides rich insights into the social context of chronic pain, contributing to nursing theory

and informing patient-centered interventions (Stone et al., 2025).

For the quantitative study, I selected Ntenkaire, Mukasa, Muwanguzi, Mikka, and Lunkuse et al. (2026), a mixed-method

study investigating attrition and associated factors among patients on chronic antihypertensive therapy at Mulago

Hospital, Uganda. The research purposeto identify prevalence and predictors of therapy attritionaligns with a

quantitative approach embedded within a mixed-methods design, which allows measurement and statistical analysis. The

study included 400 patients, providing an adequate sample size for multivariable analysis and statistical power. Data

collection involved structured questionnaires, medical record review, and objective clinical measurements. Analysis used

logistic regression to identify factors associated with attrition, supporting internal validity. Reliability was strengthened

through the use of validated instruments and standardized procedures, while validity was supported by controlling for

potential confounders. Ethical considerations were carefully addressed, including informed consent, institutional ethical

approval, and participant confidentiality. The study provides actionable evidence to guide interventions aimed at

improving adherence and chronic disease outcomes (Ntenkaire et al., 2026).

Comparison:

Qualitative and quantitative research contribute complementary knowledge. The qualitative review emphasizes lived

experiences, social context, and patient-centered insights, using rigor and trustworthiness to ensure credible findings

(Stone et al., 2025). The quantitative study emphasizes measurable outcomes, reliability, and validity, generating evidence

to support interventions and policy (Ntenkaire et al., 2026). Both approaches are essential for comprehensive evidence-

based nursing practice.

Reflection:

Understanding both qualitative and quantitative designs strengthens my ability as a nurse practitioner to integrate patient

experiences with measurable outcomes. This dual perspective enhances clinical decision-making, supports evidence-

based interventions, and promotes holistic, patient-centered care that improves adherence and health outcomes (Stone et

al., 2025; Ntenkaire et al., 2026).

Reference:

Ntenkaire, N., Mark, K. M., Muwanguzi, P., Mikka, B., Lunkuse, S., Mubiru, J., . . . Kalyango, J. N. (2026). Attrition and associated factors among patients on chronic antihypertensive therapy at mulago hospital, uganda: A mixed method study. PLoS One, 21(2), 20. doi:

Stone, S., Wainwright, E., & Guest, A. (2025). Social influences in the experience of transition to or from long-term (chronic) pain: A systematic review of qualitative research studies. PLoS One, 20(7), 22.

WRITE MY PAPER

Comments

Leave a Reply