Phil minority Tay/ Thelma

**answer this discussion for 2 students

Minority Report

After watching the movie, if a system like Pre-Crime could ever be perfected, would it be something you think society should have? Moreover, if it could be perfected, what would that mean for free will?

Example 1

A flawlessly accurate pre-crime system, akin to the one depicted in Minority Report, would remain highly contentious as it penalizes individuals for actions they have not yet committed. This challenges the principle that justice should be founded on actual behavior rather than anticipated actions. Even in the absence of errors, it raises significant issues regarding personal liberty, potential misuse of authority, and whether the prevention of harm justifies the infringement of autonomy. Furthermore, it presents a philosophical quandary concerning free will. If the system is indeed infallible, it suggests that our decisions are predetermined, rendering free will a mere illusion. Conversely, if individuals possess the ability to alter their predicted futures, then the system cannot be deemed truly perfect. This indicates that one cannot simultaneously achieve both absolute prediction and authentic human freedom.

example 2

In the movie the precrime system would challenge the idea that actions are what crimes are but if those actions have not yet happened then there would be no action to judge. This system could be taken advantage of if someone were able to intercept the card before anyone else they would be able to change the future in many ways. But if it were to be perfected then I think that it would be a good system, but there would need to be a system to catch the person as the crime is happening or slightly before because if people just get pulled of the street for things that did not happen yet then it might look as if the system is punishing people for just thinking. I think that if it were to be perfected there would be no downsides to it and thus it would always work as intended and be a net good for society at large while at the same time protecting as much freedom as it could.

example 3

Honestly, even if a system like Pre-Crime could be made perfect, I still dont think its something society should have. It sounds good in theory, stopping crimes before they happenbut it just doesnt feel right to punish someone for something they havent actually done yet. People can change their minds at any second, and taking that chance away feels unfair.

It also makes me think a lot about free will. If Pre-Crime were truly perfect, that would mean our actions are already decided before we even make them. Thats kind of scary, because it takes away the idea that we control our own choices. A big part of being human is having the ability to choose between right and wrong, and to learn from our mistakes.

So even though it might make the world safer, I feel like it would take away too much freedom. And without that freedom, it doesnt really feel like were living our own lives anymore.

WRITE MY PAPER

Comments

Leave a Reply