quantitative nursing research study

Please use this article for the paper and follow the directions and rubric exactly. Use a freshman tone, simple vocabulary, avoid advanced wording, explain straightforwardly, and with some grammatical errors.

I attached the quantitative research article critique worksheet as a guide

Spiller, K., Ossenberg, C., Takashima, M., & Henderson, A. (2025). Comparable achievement of workplace performance of student and graduate nurses: A quantitative cohort evaluation. Nurse Education in Practice, 82, 104205.

The purpose of this assignment is to help you develop skills in critically analyzing a quantitative nursing research study for its rigor, reliability, validity, and relevance to evidence-based practice (EBP). You will evaluate the research articles design, methods, findings, and implications while demonstrating professional writing and APA formatting skills.

Instructions

1. Select a peer-reviewed quantitative nursing research article published within the last five years. (Systematic reviews, Mixed Method or Qualitative studies will NOT be accepted nor valid for grading)

• Ensure the topic aligns with nursing practice or healthcare delivery.
• Students who do not meet the quantitative nursing research article are subject to receive a zero on this assignment.
• Attach a PDF copy of the article to your submission or provide a link from the college library database for the instructor to view the article.

1. Use the Quantitative Research Article Critique Worksheet as a guide to help you with your paper.

• Please ensure that your Quantitative Research Article contains vital components from your worksheet and your rubric.

1. Write a 36 page paper (excluding title and reference pages) addressing each of the areas below.
2. Format your paper in APA 7th edition style.

• Include a title page, headers, in-text citations, and a reference page.
• Use clear, professional, and scholarly writing.
• Nursing faculty will monitor AI usage, and any elevated percentage will warrant point deductions.

1. Assignment will be accepted and graded via Turnitin. Submitting your assignment through other methods will not be accepted (email, in-person delivery, Canvas Messenger, etc.).

Formatting Requirements

• Length: Max of 6 pages (excluding title page and references). Those exceeding the length will have points deducted as per assignment rubric.
• Please note that no Abstract is needed.
• Format: APA 7th edition
• Font: 12-point Times New Roman, double-spaced
• References: Include the article and any additional scholarly sources used to support your thoughts, or rationales. (You may use your book but ensure you cite it appropriately.)

Purpose of the Study

The student evaluates how clearly the studys purpose and explains why the research was necessary and relevant to nursing practice.

10 to >8.0 pts

Exemplary

Purpose clearly stated; strong justification and relevance to nursing practice

8 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

The purpose is somewhat clear, but the justification is limited.

6 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Purpose unclear or missing

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Hypotheses

The student assesses whether the studys hypotheses or research questions, discusses their testability, and connects them to prior research or theory.

5 to >4.0 pts

Exemplary

Clearly stated, testable, supported by theory/literature

4 to >3.0 pts

Proficient

Fairly clear, but it lacks a solid theoretical foundation.

3 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Unclear or missing hypotheses

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Methodology

The student is able to describe and evaluate the quantitative research design, explaining why it was appropriate (or not) for the study and noting its strengths and weaknesses.

15 to >12.0 pts

Exemplary

Quantitative design appropriate and well-explained

12 to >9.0 pts

Proficient

The design is suitable, but the details are limited and not very clear.

9 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

The design is either inappropriate or not clearly described.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Sample

The student describes the target population, sampling method, and sample size, as well as the generalizability of the findings.

5 to >4.0 pts

Exemplary

The population and sampling methods are clearly outlined and applicable to broader contexts.

4 to >3.0 pts

Proficient

The sample is partially explained, with minor restrictions mentioned.

3 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

The sample is either poorly described or biased.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Measures

The student accurately identifies independent and dependent variables, explains how they were measured, and evaluates the validity and reliability of the instruments used.

15 to >12.0 pts

Exemplary

The variables are clearly defined, and the student provides a thorough explanation of the tools used, including their reliability and accuracy.

12 to >9.0 pts

Proficient

The student’s description highlights certain reliability or validity concerns while appropriately referencing the instruments used.

9 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

The student’s variable descriptions are vague or inaccurately measured, and there is an insufficient explanation of the tests or instruments used within the study.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Procedures and Data Analysis

The student explains the data collection process, ethical safeguards, and evaluates the strengths or weaknesses of the study’s methods. They demonstrate their understanding of statistical tests, assessing whether they fit the data type and exploring if alternative approaches could have improved the analysis.

15 to >12.0 pts

Exemplary

The student clearly explains the data collection steps, provides an excellent description of ethical implications, and includes appropriate evaluations of data collection. Statistical tests are clearly described, and the study’s results are well explained.

12 to >9.0 pts

Proficient

Certain steps for data collection are vague, with minor ethical or procedural concerns highlighted. The tests are somewhat appropriately described but lack sufficient explanation.

9 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

The description lacks clarity about the data collection process, presents weak ethical considerations, and/or fails to properly evaluate the data collection methods. Tests were vaguely described, and the study’s results are unclear.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Results

The student interprets and explains the studys findings, connects them to the hypotheses, and discusses implications for nursing practice.

10 to >8.0 pts

Exemplary

Findings are clearly presented and align well with the hypotheses, with strong implications for nursing practice.

8 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

The description of results are somewhat clear but offers only a limited discussion on how they relate to the hypothesis and their implications for nursing practice.

6 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Provides unclear findings in the results or missing implications for nursing practice. The discussion lacks sufficient focus on how the hypothesis connects to the findings.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Summary/Conclusion

The student summarizes the study clearly, assess its overall value, and suggest logical next steps for future research.

15 to >12.0 pts

Exemplary

Offers a brief summary of the study, emphasize its significance, and suggest future directions for nursing research.

12 to >9.0 pts

Proficient

Offers a partial summary that doesn’t clearly convey the study’s impact, lacks depth, and provides vague recommendations for future research.

9 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

The conclusion/summary is weak or missing and fails to outline the next steps for future research.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

APA Format & Scholarly Writing

Assesses adherence to APA 7th edition formatting, organization, clarity, and academic tone. Grammar, punctuation, and professional writing style are evaluated here.

10 to >8.0 pts

Exemplary

Adheres to APA 7th edition meticulously, presenting clear, concise, and scholarly writing with no grammatical errors. AI content percentage remains below 20%.

8 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

There are minor APA 7 or writing errors were noted, but the overall writing is clear and well-organized. The AI percentage ranges between 20 and 35%.

6 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

The writing contains significant APA errors and poor-quality writing, making it hard to follow. The AI detection percentage exceeds 35%.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Scholarly Resource Criteria

0 pts

Full Marks

A minimum of two scholarly, peer-reviewed sources should be used to provide background context, ensuring the resources are from within the last five years.

0 pts

No Marks

5 point deduction for using less than 2 scholarly, peer-reviewed sources for background context or used articles greater than 5 years.

0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Assignment Length Criteria

0 pts

Full Marks

0 Points Given: The length of the assignment meets the criteria: Minimum of 3 page in length; Maximum of 6 pages in length. (Not including Title or Reference Pages)

0 pts

No Marks

5 Points Deducted: The assignment fails to meet the requirement for length or exceeds the maximum page length. (Not including title or reference pages