|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplains Why a Multi-threaded or Single-threaded Solution is Most Effective for Each Scenario
|
2 ptsDistinguishedComprehensively explains why a multi-threaded or single-threaded solution is most effective for each scenario fully supporting the explanation with applicable information from credible sources.1.76 ptsProficientExplains why a multi-threaded or single-threaded solution is most effective for each scenario mostly supporting the explanation with applicable information from credible sources. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped.
1.54 ptsBasicMinimally explains why a multi-threaded or single-threaded solution is most effective for each scenario somewhat supporting the explanation with applicable information from credible sources. The explanation is underdeveloped.0.96 ptsBelow ExpectationsAttempts to explain why a multi-threaded or single-threaded solution is most effective for each scenario; however, does not support the explanation with applicable information from credible sources, and the explanation is significantly underdeveloped.0 ptsNon-PerformanceThe explanation of why a multi-threaded or single-threaded solution is most effective for each scenario is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. |
2 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrites Scenario 1 such that the Most Effective Solution is a Single-Threaded Process, and Explains Why a Single-threaded Solution is Most Effective for This Scenario
|
1 ptsDistinguishedWrites a comprehensive Scenario 1 such that the most effective solution is a single-threaded process, and clearly and comprehensively explains why a single-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario, fully supporting the explanation with applicable information from credible sources.0.88 ptsProficientWrites a Scenario 1 such that the most effective solution is a single-threaded process, and clearly explains why a single-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario, supporting the explanation with applicable information from credible sources. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.
0.76 ptsBasicWrites a limited Scenario 1 such that the most effective solution is a single-threaded process, and minimally explains why a single-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario, somewhat supporting the explanation with applicable information from credible sources. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.0.64 ptsBelow ExpectationsAttempts to write a Scenario 1 such that the most effective solution is a single-threaded process and explain why a or a single-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario; however, does not support the explanation with applicable information from credible sources, and significant details are missing and unclear.0 ptsNon-PerformanceScenario 1 and the explanation of why a single-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions. |
1 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrites Scenario 2 such that the Most Effective Solution is a Multi-threaded process, and Explains why a Multi-threaded Solution is Most Effective for This Scenario
|
1 ptsDistinguishedWrites a comprehensive Scenario 2 such that the most effective solution is a multi-threaded process, and clearly and comprehensively explains why a multi-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario, fully supporting the explanation with applicable information from credible sources.0.88 ptsProficientWrites Scenario 2 such that the most effective solution is a multi-threaded process, and clearly explains why a multi-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario, supporting the explanation with applicable information from credible sources. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.
0.76 ptsBasicWrites a limited Scenario 2 such that the most effective solution is a multi-threaded process, and minimally explains why a multi-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario, somewhat supporting the explanation with applicable information from credible sources. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.0.64 ptsBelow ExpectationsAttempts to write a Scenario 2 such that the most effective solution is a multi-threaded process and explain why a multi-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario; however, does not support the explanation with applicable information from credible sources, and significant details are missing and unclear.0 ptsNon-PerformanceScenario 2 and the explanation of why a multi-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions. |
1 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrites Scenario 3 such that the Most Effective Solution is Either a Single-threaded or Multi-threaded proces, and Explains Why a Multi-threaded or Single-threaded Solution is Most Effective for This Scenario
|
1 ptsDistinguishedWrites a comprehensive Scenario 3 such that the most effective solution is either a single-threaded or multi-threaded process, and clearly and comprehensively explains why a multi-threaded or single-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario, fully supporting the explanation with applicable information from credible sources.0.88 ptsProficientWrites a Scenario 3 such that the most effective solution is either a single-threaded or multi-threaded process, and clearly explains why a multi-threaded or a single-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario, supporting the explanation with applicable information from credible sources. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.
0.76 ptsBasicWrites a limited Scenario 3 such that the most effective solution is either a single-threaded or multi-threaded process, and minimally explains why a multi-threaded or a single-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario, somewhat supporting the explanation with applicable information from credible sources. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.0.64 ptsBelow ExpectationsAttempts to write a Scenario 3 such that the most effective solution is either a single-threaded or multi-threaded process and explain why a multi-threaded or a single-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario; however, does not support the explanation with applicable information from credible sources, and significant details are missing and unclear.0 ptsNon-PerformanceScenario 3 and the explanation of why a multi-threaded or a single-threaded solution is most effective for this scenario are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions. |
1 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
|
0.34 ptsDistinguishedDisplays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.0.3 ptsProficientDisplays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
0.26 ptsBasicDisplays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.0.22 ptsBelow ExpectationsFails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.0 ptsNon-PerformanceThe assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. |
0.34 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Communication: APA Formatting
|
0.33 ptsDistinguishedAccurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.0.29 ptsProficientExhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
0.25 ptsBasicExhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.0.21 ptsBelow ExpectationsFails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.0 ptsNon-PerformanceThe assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. |
0.33 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Communication: Page Requirement
|
0.33 ptsDistinguishedThe length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.0.29 ptsProficientThe length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
0.25 ptsBasicThe length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.0.21 ptsBelow ExpectationsThe length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.0 ptsNon-PerformanceThe assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. |
0.33 pts
|
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.