Words: 2500 to 4000 | Pages: 6 to 10 pages (normal formatting)
Questions:
- How, in what ways, and to what extent might this example of engineering failure(s) relate to the concepts discussed in this course regarding High Reliability Organisation Theory?
- How, in what ways, and to what extent might this example of engineering failure(s) relate to the concepts discussed in this course regarding Normal Accident Theory?
- How, in what ways, and to what extent might this example of engineering failure(s) relate to the concepts discussed in this course regarding Regulation of Technology and/or Regulatory Capture?
Before you start
- Understand the task requires application and analysis, not description
- Take a clear position for each question
- Use independent research beyond lecture material
For each question (Q1, Q2, Q3)
- Define the theory briefly and precisely
- Apply the theory directly to the Boeing case
- Analyse how and why the theory explains the failure
- Assess the extent to which the theory is valid
- Challenge the theory by identifying limitations or contradictions
- Support all claims with evidence
- Identify missing or uncertain information
Content requirements
- Link theory and case study clearly in every paragraph
- Use specific factual examples from the case
- Show clear cause and consequence relationships
- Address all parts of the question: how, in what ways, and to what extent
Analysis expectations
- Go beyond stating relationships and explain mechanisms
- Weigh concepts against each other where relevant
- Show critical judgement rather than simple agreement
- Distinguish between evidence based conclusions and opinion
Evidence
- Use external sources to support arguments
- Base claims on verifiable facts
- Avoid unsupported or generic statements
Missing information
- Identify gaps in available data or transparency
- Explain how these gaps affect the strength of your analysis
Writing quality
- Ensure each sentence contributes to the argument
- Maintain clarity and precision
- Avoid repetition and unnecessary description
- Keep the writing direct and purposeful
What to avoid
- Retelling the Boeing case without analysis
- Rewriting lecture content without application
- Staying neutral or descriptive
- Making claims without evidence
- Using vague or generic statements
Final check
- Clear position stated in each answer
- Theory and case consistently linked
- Analysis completed, not just description
- Evidence used to support claims
- Limitations or missing information identified
- Full question addressed including extent
Key principle
- The task is to demonstrate reasoning and judgement, not to provide a correct answer
NOTE:
- One full PDF file with detailed instructions, lectures, course notes will be provided later
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.