This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIdentification of Key 1980s Developments

25 to >22.5 PtsExcellentThorough, accurate discussion of major developments.22.5 to >20.0 PtsProficientCovers developments well; minor gaps.

20 to >17.5 PtsDevelopingLimited list or vague explanation.17.5 to >0 PtsNeeds ImprovementMissing or inaccurate.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeConnection to Reaganomics/Tech/Pop Culture/Foreign Policy

20 to >18.0 PtsExcellentClear and insightful connections to societal impact.18 to >16.0 PtsProficientGood explanation; some detail lacking.

16 to >14.0 PtsDevelopingBasic or unclear connections.14 to >0 PtsNeeds ImprovementLittle/no connection.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeModern Impact

20 to >18.0 PtsExcellentStrong explanation of how 1980s legacy shapes today.18 to >16.0 PtsProficientSome connection to modern society.

16 to >14.0 PtsDevelopingWeak connection.14 to >0 PtsNeeds ImprovementNo meaningful connection.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeReflection & Personal Insight

20 to >18.0 PtsExcellentDeep reflection supported by historical examples.18 to >16.0 PtsProficientGood reflection with minor issues.

16 to >14.0 PtsDevelopingSurface-level reflection.14 to >0 PtsNeeds ImprovementNo personal insight.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWriting Quality & Requirements

15 to >13.5 PtsExcellent12 pages, clear, organized.13.5 to >12.0 PtsProficientMinor issues

12 to >10.5 PtsDevelopingSeveral clarity/structure issues.10.5 to >0 PtsNeeds ImprovementNot meeting requirements.

15 pts