1.If a self-learning medical AI makes a life-threatening diagnostic error that its human developers cannot explain due to its “black box” nature,should the developer be held strictly liable or does the lack of human foreseeability break the chain of causation?
2.Is a criminal defense attorney’s duty to provide “zealous representation” violated if they refuse to put their client on the stand because they know but cannot prove the client intends to commit perjury?
3.Does the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine create a binding legal obligation for the international community to intervene in a sovereign state’s internal affairs or is it merely a political framework that contradicts the UN Charter’s principle of non-interference?
4.In a “no-win” accident scenario (e.g.,hitting a pedestrian vs swerving into a wall and killing the driver) should the autonomous vehicle’s manufacturer be liable for the software’s “ethical” programming choice and can a machine truly meet the “reasonable person” standard used in negligence law?
5.Can the legal right to erase ones digital past be reconciled with the constitutional right to freedom of expression and the public’s right to an accurate historical record?
6.Under what specific conditions does a lawyers duty to warn potential victims of a clients future crime override the foundational principle of attorney-client privilege?
7.If a head of state refuses to summon a legislative body despite a constitutional requirement to do so,what procedural legal principles exist to resolve the deadlock if the judiciary lacks the power to enforce its own mandate against the executive?
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.