Author: admin
-
Discussion post 6
Children with emotional/behavior disorders can be a challenge in any classroom. What positive approaches can teachers use to address – 1. Out of Seat behavior? 2. Mean comments? 3. Late Homework? 4. Off Task behavior? 5. Bullying? -
the effectiveness of international aid in reducing poverty
assignment: essay writing word limit: 800-1000 words topic: the effectiveness of international aid in reducing poverty should include: 1 introduction, 2 paragraphs for the body, and conclusion. back up arguments with citations. use the Harvard referencing method
-
Pest Analysis
Please complete. Instructions uploaded. You would be completing Part 2. I have also uploaded an example, which includes Parts 1 and 2. Please make sure you complete Part 2.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): DNP_SWOT_Analysis_Part 1 and 2 Student Sample Spring 2019.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Professional Values – Service Learning and Reflection
- Discuss the significance of service learning in nursing.
- Discuss the nurses role in health promotion services to the community.
- Reflect on personal experience with service learning in nursing practice.
- Explore how service learning might help to address the nursing shortage.
- All submissions should have a title page and a reference page.
- Utilize a minimum of three scholarly resources.
-
Personal code of ethics in authentic, equitable, and inclusi…
MN003 Managing Authentically and Ethically Overview For this Performance Task Assessment, you will reflect on your personal and professional values and how these combine in your personal code of ethics. You will define what it means to be an authentic, emotionally intelligent, and inclusive manager, analyze how your values inform their managerial ethics, develop a personal code of ethics to guide decision making and behavior in a managerial role, and explore how you will use these ethics in influencing for positive social change. Assessment Submission Length: 7- to 10-page personal code of ethics Instructions To complete this Assessment, do the following: In the MN003_Assessment_Template file, complete your work on your personal code of ethics, using your Pre-Assessment submission as a starting point and incorporating any feedback as appropriate. Be sure to adhere to the indicated assignment length. Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively. Important Information on Interpreting the Assessment Rubric (click to expand) Achievement vs. Mastery of the Competency Mastery of this Competency means that 80% or more of the rows have been assessed as Exceeds Expectations and no rows have been assessed as Does Not Meet Expectations. Achievement of this Competency means that all rows are assessed at Meets Expectations or above (but lower than the 80% threshold required for Mastery). Assessment of Individual Rubric Rows In order to achieve Meets Expectations for a particular row of the rubric, you must have adequately completed all criteria in that row. This means that you have addressed all required elements to the required level of quantity and/or quality. In order to achieve Exceeds Expectations for a particular row of the rubric, you must have adequately completed all criteria in the row, and in addition, your response must reflect a depth and breadth of knowledge and expertise. Examples of this includebut are not limited tothe following: You provide additional, specific, and/or particularly relevant examples to illustrate points made. You seamlessly incorporate your original thoughts and diverse, credible, and relevant academic sources, when applicable, to express your viewpoint or develop a persuasive argument. You demonstrate a deeper understanding of the subject that draws from discipline-specific knowledge and theory and incorporates the viewpoints of a diverse set of business and management thought leaders. You draw additional connections between multiple, complex topics to support your explanations. You are able to apply your knowledge in unique, creative, and/or innovative ways. You thoroughly break down concepts into simpler parts and use your understanding of business to make connections. Your analysis is insightful and original. You design processes, products, and/or solutions that are creative, high-quality, and innovative. You consider diverse perspectives and relevant social, ethical, and business-related issues when proposing new ideas or formulating judgments. All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring. This Assessment requires submission of one 7- to 10-page personal code of ethics, excluding title page and references. Save this file as MN003_firstinitial_lastname (for example, MN003_J_Smith)]. You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu. Important Note: As a student taking this Competency, you agree that you may be required to submit your Assessment for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted Assessment materials will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such materials. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Usage Policy posted on the Turnitin.com site. Being an Authentic, Equitable, and Inclusive Manager For this Assessment, you will reflect on the meaning of authenticity, equity, and inclusivity as they apply to your role as a manager. In this scenario, you have been selected by your organization to participate in a peer mentoring group for managers. The group has had its first meeting, during which the group moderator (i.e., the master mentor) has stressed the importance of having a clear understanding of who you are as a manager, the principles you will use to guide your managerial decision making, and how you will use your influence as a manager to be an agent of positive social change. You and your fellow mentees have each been charged with identifying your core values and beliefs and using them as a foundation for your personal code of ethics. For the next meeting you are to prepare one 7- to 10-page personal code of ethics that addresses the following: Your definitions of authenticity, equity, and inclusivity as they relate to the role of a manager Core beliefs and values that have shaped you as a person How these definitions, values, and/or beliefs combine to form your personal code of ethics as a manager How you will use this personal code of ethics and your emotional intelligence to be an effective agent for positive social change As you prepare your reflection, be sure to cover all items outlined, including the incorporation of references to appropriate academic sources, such as those found in the Learning Activities or those in the Walden Library. Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment. Part 1: Authenticity, Equity, and Inclusivity (approximately 12 pages) Analyze what authenticity means to you as it applies to the role of a manager. Examine what an inclusive and equitable workplace is, including a description of its features, as well as an analysis of its impact on employees and the organization as a whole. Be sure to include specific examples and appropriate references to scholarly sources to support your analysis. Summarize the role of a manager in promoting an authentic, equitable, and inclusive workplace. Be sure to incorporate references to scholarly sources to support your summary. Part 2: Beliefs, Values, and Personal Codes of Ethics Core Beliefs and Values (approximately 2 pages) Analyze the key values, beliefs, and/or experiences that have shaped you and that guide your thinking and behavior. Explain how these values, beliefs, and/or experiences have influenced your workplace behavior in the past. Identify three specific instances where you have had to make ethical choices. For each instance: Describe the situation and the various courses of action you could have taken; Explain what you ultimately decided and why; and Explain whether you would make the same decision today. Analyzing Others Personal Codes of Ethics (approximately 12 pages) Analyze the personal codes of ethics of other individuals. Address the following: Locate at least two examples of personal codes of ethics (or codes of conduct) online and attach them as appendices to your paper. For each example, identify at least two specific aspects that resonate with you and/or that you would find helpful in guiding behavior as a manager. Additionally, for each example, provide at least one specific area that you believe could be improved. Creating Your Personal Code of Ethics (approximately 2 pages) Create your personal code of ethics. Address the following: Identify 35 core beliefs, values, or principles that will guide your behavior and decision making as a manager. Propose 23 specific behaviors for each belief, value, or principle to show how they are demonstrated in action. (Note: Behaviors are specific actions that are observable by others.) Begin each proposed behavior with the phrase I will… Reflecting on your past experiences when you have had to make ethical choices, how will having a clearly defined personal code of ethics help you clarify your choices and make your decisions in the future? Part 3: You as a Change Agent (approximately 12 pages) Propose how you will use your code of ethics to be an even more effective agent for positive social change. Be sure to include specific examples and details to support your assertion. Describe how using your emotional intelligence, as well as other management and leadership skills, can help you be more effective as a change agent. Be sure to include specific examples and details to support your assertion. Also the pre assessment needs to be filled out Pre-Assessments are your opportunity to practice applying module content before final submission of your Competency Assessment. To complete this Pre-Assessment, do the following: Review the Assessment Instructions and the rubric to ensure you understand the requirements for the Assessment. Download the MN003_Assessment_Template (Word document). Using the MN003_Assessment_Template, prepare an outline, including a draft References section, of your personal code of ethics. Ensure that your outline includes both major and minor points. For information on outlining strategies please visit the following site from the Writing Center: https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/writingprocess/outlining Before submitting your Pre-Assessment, be sure to use the rubric to ensure that you have met all requirements and are satisfied with your submission. Use your submission and any feedback you may garner to improve and refine your final Assessment. Note that you do not need to resubmit your Pre-Assessment to address any feedback given.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): MN003_Rubric.pdf, MN003_CompetencyDescription.pdf, MN003_AssessmentTemplate.docx, MN003_CompetencyDescription.pdf, MN003_Rubric.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Non Profit Essay
Use the Video of the recorded pages of the textbook to answer midterm questions. Instructions on PDF. For Question 1, you can find each topic by chapter names
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): CSS 300 Midterm.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Compare and contrast essay
Overview
For this capstone, you will write a / essay examining how two topics are similar, different, or a combination of both similar and different. However, this isn’t just about off items of comparison or it’s about helping readers understand your topic in new and meaningful ways, supported by your careful and scholarly research.
Some examples of strong / topics include:
- Remote learning vs. traditional classroom education
- Instagram vs. TikTok as marketing platforms
- Electric vs. hybrid vehicles’ environmental impact
- Online vs. traditional banking services
- Plant-based vs. lab-grown meat alternatives
The best / essays come from genuine curiosity about how things work and relate to each other. Think of yourself as a detective looking for interesting connections and meaningful differences that others might have missed. When you dig deeper than surface-level comparisons, you often discover fascinating insights that can change how people see both topics.
Learning Outcomes
By completing this capstone, you will:
- Develop coherent compositions with clear statements, supporting , and logical
- Apply appropriate rhetorical strategies based on , purpose, and context
- Analyze texts critically to identify arguments, , and rhetorical techniques
- Apply effective composition strategies to produce polished final drafts that demonstrate attention to clarity, coherence, and correctness
- Construct effective arguments using , , and counterarguments
Core Requirements
Length: words
Sources: 2 (cited using )
: point-by-point structure
Perspective: Written in (no I or me)
Format: 8th edition
: Underlined in the
Detailed Requirements
Every effective / essay includes the following essential features. As you develop your essay, consider how you will incorporate each element:
Feature
Strong Topic Choice
Your topic should be:
- Specific enough to analyze deeply
- Complex enough for meaningful comparison
- Well-researched with available
- Academically acceptable
*You should avoid the following topics: (choosing one of these topics will result in a 0)
- Death penalty
- Euthanasia
- Abortion
- Drug Legalization
- Religious debates
- Gun rights
- Global Warming
Clear
- States whether topics are similar, different, or both
- Presents your three main points
Example: While both Netflix and HBO offer streaming entertainment, they differ significantly in their content strategy, user interface, and pricing models.
Focused
- Choose 3-4 specific aspects to /
- Each point should be substantial enough for a full paragraph
- Support each point with from your sources
Effective
- with underlined
- Body paragraphs following a point-by-point structure
- Clear topic sentences for each comparison
- Strong s between ideas
- Thoughtful
Strategic Use of
- Integrate quotes and information from
- Use to support your comparison/
- Properly all ()
Resources
-
Developing Individuals and Teams
MN002 Developing Individuals and Teams Overview For this Performance Task Assessment, you will complete key tasks that are important in developing individuals and developing teams. In Part 1, you will use a simulation platform to conduct a one-on-one coaching session with an employee who has recently shown signs of disengagement and reduced motivation. You will then reflect on this experience as it relates to your individual development as a manager and as a coach. In Part 2 of the Assessment, you will focus on developing teams. You will research the team charter, often used as a way to quickly build team cohesion and commitment, and will then develop a team charter for a team you know welleither one you are currently part of or one you have been part of in the past. By demonstrating skills in these areas, you will develop foundational competence in helping both individuals and teams achieve results and stay motivated and engaged. This Assessment incorporates the Business Skill for Good of coaching and mentoring. Assessment Submission Length: 810 pages total, not including team charter examples (4- to 5-page coaching plan and a 4- to 5-page team charter, plus reflection) Instructions To complete this Assessment, do the following: Review the Simulation Session Guide (PDF) document and follow the instructions to create a portal account, which you will then use to schedule your live, online simulation session. Review the MN002 Simulation Preparation (PDF) document. Review the Simulation Orientation video: Walden University, LLC. (2021). Simulation orientation [Video]. Walden University Brightspace. Schedule and complete your live, online simulated coaching conversation. In the MN002_Assessment_Template_Part1 file, complete your coaching plan, using your Pre-Assessment submission as the basis for your live, online simulated coaching conversation and then reflecting on the experience. In the MN002_Assessment_Template_Part2 file, complete your team charter draft. Be sure to adhere to the indicated assignment length. Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively. Important Information on Interpreting the Assessment Rubric (click to expand) Achievement vs. Mastery of the Competency Mastery of this Competency means that 80% or more of the rows have been assessed as Exceeds Expectations and no rows have been assessed as Does Not Meet Expectations. Achievement of this Competency means that all rows are assessed at Meets Expectations or above (but lower than the 80% threshold required for Mastery). Assessment of Individual Rubric Rows In order to achieve Meets Expectations for a particular row of the rubric, you must have adequately completed all criteria in that row. This means that you have addressed all required elements to the required level of quantity and/or quality. In order to achieve Exceeds Expectations for a particular row of the rubric, you must have adequately completed all criteria in the row, and in addition, your response must reflect a depth and breadth of knowledge and expertise. Examples of this includebut are not limited tothe following: You provide additional, specific, and/or particularly relevant examples to illustrate points made. You seamlessly incorporate your original thoughts and diverse, credible, and relevant academic sources, when applicable, to express your viewpoint or develop a persuasive argument. You demonstrate a deeper understanding of the subject that draws from discipline-specific knowledge and theory and incorporates the viewpoints of a diverse set of business and management thought leaders. You draw additional connections between multiple, complex topics to support your explanations. You are able to apply your knowledge in unique, creative, and/or innovative ways. You thoroughly break down concepts into simpler parts and use your understanding of business to make connections. Your analysis is insightful and original. You design processes, products, and/or solutions that are creative, high-quality, and innovative. You consider diverse perspectives and relevant social, ethical, and business-related issues when proposing new ideas or formulating judgments. All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring. This Assessment requires submission of two documents, each completed in appropriate scholarly format. The first is a reflection on your experience with the coaching conversation completed in your simulation, in the form of a 4- to 5-page coaching plan. Save this file as MN002_firstinitial_last name_Part1 (for example, MN002_J_Smith_Part1). The second is a 4- to 5-page Team Charter and additional reflection as indicated. Save this file as MN002_firstinitial_lastname_Part2 (for example, MN002_J_Smith_Part2). You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu. Important Note: As a student taking this Competency, you agree that you may be required to submit your Assessment for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted Assessment materials will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such materials. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Usage Policy posted on the Turnitin.com site. Developing Individuals and Teams In this Assessment, you will play the role of a new manager who is engaging in development activities for your team. As a new manager, you are being asked to provide evidence to your senior leader of the types of activities you are engaging in to further develop individuals on your teamand the team as a whole. In line with that request, you will complete two activities and create two documents that you will present to your manager: a coaching plan (for individual performance management) and a team charter (for team development). As you prepare your coaching plan and your team charter, be sure not only to cover all items outlined, but incorporate appropriate examples, where applicable, as well as citations for relevant academic sources, such as those found in the Learning Activities or those in the Walden Library. Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment. Part 1: Coaching for Performance For this part of the Assessment, you will act as a new manager who has become concerned about what appears to be declining motivation and engagement on the part of one of your employees. You have spoken to your senior leader about your concerns, and she has asked you to document your interactions with the employee so that she can support you in becoming a more seasoned coach for your team. Your task is to prepare for and conduct an appropriate and effective coaching conversation with this employee using a simulation platform. You will then reflect on your experience by preparing a 4- to 5-page write-up of your interaction that will serve as the basis for ongoing coaching for the employee, as well as for yourself. First, make any modifications, as appropriate, to the Coaching Conversation Checklist section of the MN002 Assessment Template Part1 that you submitted for your Pre-Assessment. Also be sure to note any questions you may have for your own coach to discuss when you debrief with them later. Then, complete the live, online simulation experience. After you have completed the online, simulated coaching conversation with the employee, use the following outline as the basis of the remainder of your coaching plan, in which you walk through the experience and reflect upon the following: Did you accomplish the objectives you set out to accomplish? Explain why or why not. What effects (positive and negative, if applicable) did your preparation have on the outcome? Provide a rationale to support your assessment. What do you feel you did particularly well in your coaching session? If you were going to hold the coaching session again, what might you have done differently, or what improvements would you make? How did the employee respond within the coaching session? What is your prediction for how the employees behavior will change (or not) as a result of this coaching session? What insights did you gain that would be helpful for future coaching sessions with the employee? As a conclusion to your coaching plan, choose at least one specific action you will take as a result of this experience to aid you further in your development as a manager and as a coach. Part 2: Developing Your Team For this part of the Assessment, you will use a team you know well (either a team you are currently a part of or one you have been a part of in the past) to serve as the team you are leading (for the purpose of this exercise) and for which you will develop a 4- to 5-page first draft of a team charter that will be shared with the team and finalized at a later date with team input and buy-in. Additionally, as part of the documentation you will share with your manager, you will identify strategies to help your team develop and will evaluate the effectiveness of the charter to meet that goal. Be sure to disguise the names of the organization and of any team members to protect privacy. To complete this task, address the following: Design your own team charter for your chosen team, being sure to address the following: Describe the mission or purpose of the team. Identify three to five specific and measurable goals or outcomes that collectively define success for the team in terms of fulfilling its mission. Provide the names (disguised) of team members, describe their official team roles (if any), and indicate the key strengths of each team member in terms of their functional skills and knowledge, as well as their work style and approach. List specific and behavioral ground rules that team members are expected to abide by in their work together and explain how violation of any of these ground rules will be handled within the team. Outline the teams approach to resolving conflicts that may arise as the team works together. As a final part of the team charter, include an Appendix (to be provided only to your manager) that includes the following: Based on your assessment of the members of the team and their strengths, skills, and work styles/approach, explain two or three strategies you plan to use to further develop the team and its members. In addition, because your manager is also concerned with ensuring a strong and viable leadership pipelineor overall bench strength in the succession planpropose three specific actions you will take in the next 23 months as first steps in choosing and mentoring your successor as leader of this team. Consider how you will choose the individual (what qualities will you look for?), how you will first propose the mentoring relationship, and what that first mentoring meeting might look like. Defend your rationale for selecting the specific goals, ground rules, and approaches to conflict resolution you drafted for the team, including how these guidelines will help the team develop and meet those goals. As part of your response, note any potential risks or challenges you may face as you implement the team charter, as well as what approach you will take to manage those challenges. Also needed is the Pre-Assessment Pre-Assessments are your opportunity to practice applying module content before final submission of your Competency Assessment. In Part 1 of your two-part Assessment for this Competency, you will be asked to engage in a live, online, simulated individual coaching experience where you will play the role of coach with an employee. Part 2 of the Assessment involves developing a draft of a team charter for a team you know well. This Pre-Assessment activity will help you prepare for your final Assessment. To complete this Pre-Assessment, do the following: Review the Assessment Instructions and the rubric to ensure you understand the requirements for the Assessment. Download and review the MN002 Simulation Preparation (PDF) document. Download the MN002_Assessment_Template_Part1 (Word document) and complete the section entitled Coaching Conversation Checklist, in which you will detail how you will approach the coaching session with the employee and what you plan to discuss with them based on the information provided in the scenario background document. Complete the Checklist by writing a script or detailed notes for each item. Submit the completed Coaching Conversation Checklist section of MN002_Assessment_Template_Part1. Before submitting your Pre-Assessment, be sure to use the rubric to ensure that you have met all requirements and are satisfied with your submission. Use your submission and any feedback you may garner to improve and refine your final Assessment. Note that you do not need to resubmit your Pre-Assessment to address any feedback given.Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): MN002_Rubric.pdf, MN002_AssessmentTemplate_Part2.docx, MN002_AssessmentTemplate_Part1.docx, Walden Simulation Session Guide.pdf, MN002_Sim_Prep.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Research Paper/Documented Essay Project
- A documented essay or research paper is an essay written by you that includes quotations or paraphrases from other people who have written about the same topic. The quoted or paraphrased material should expand on what you wrote in the essay.
- Remember the Analysis Essay from Module 3? I want you to turn it into a documented essay/research paper.
- That means you are not writing a new essay. You are taking the Analysis Essay from Module 3 and putting in quotations and/or paraphrases from three sources:
- One Regular Book–A book about the author of your short story and his/her works
- One Reference Book–An entry in an encyclopedia-type book that discusses the short story
- One Journal Article–An article in a journal that discusses the short story
- You only need one quotation or paraphrase from each of the three sources listed above.
- You are welcome to quote/paraphrase more, but the minimum is one quotation/paraphrase from each.
- In other words, there should be at least three quotations/paraphrases in the final essay.
- See the sample Documented Essay.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): LegerKelliMod3 Revision.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Military PowerPoint
Need a PowerPoint done based a on military OPORD I have some parts completed already. I also have examples.
Requirements: Until complete