Author: admin

Review the session content for writing a research question:

Use the following template to create your submission for this assignment:

• (Word doc)

Complete the following:

1. Choose a health issue that interests you and is relevant to community medicine. This could be from a case you saw on a community experience in S01.
2. Write a short introduction explaining the chosen health issue and its relevance. State the research question and explain why it is important to investigate. Use the following form to create your search strategy to help find evidence to write your introduction
6. (Word doc)
7. Define the PICO(T) elements related to the research question. Clearly describe the Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparison, Outcome, and Time elements.
8. Explain how the research question meets the FINER criteria. Specifically, describe how the research question is Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, and Relevant.

Word count does not include the words already in the template or the listed references.

Your Turnitin score will be impacted by the words in the template and the listed references. We are aware of this and will not consider just the score but will look at the details to see what is flagged.

Writing Requirements

• Length: 500 ( +/- 10%) words (References and template wording are excluded from the total word count.)
• 1-inch margins
• Double-spaced pages
• 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
• Standard English usage and mechanics
• Organized, original presentation of ideas
• At least one scholarly reference related to the research question cited using the current edition APA reference and citation style
• Example
• In-text: (Schumacher et al., 2023)
• Reference: Schumacher, L. M., Ard, J., & Sarwer, D. B. (2023). Promise and unrealized potential: 10 years of the American Medical Association classifying obesity as a disease. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1205880. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1205880

reate a Research Question

Create a Research Question

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Introduction/ Research Gap

40 to >32.0 pts

Above Average

Clearly introduces the health issue with strong relevance to community medicine supported by strong evidence; the gap in existing research is well-defined and importance is convincingly explained.

32 to >26.0 pts

Average

Introduces the health issue with relevance supported by evidence; the gap in existing research is defined and importance is explained.

26 to >20.0 pts

Below Average

The health issue is introduced but lacks clarity or relevance or not supported by evidence; the gap in existing research is vague or underdeveloped.

20 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Introduction is unclear or missing; the gap in existing research is absent or poorly articulated.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Research Question and PICOT Elements

20 to >16.0 pts

Above Average

All five elements (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time) are clearly and specifically defined with strong alignment to the research question.

16 to >13.0 pts

Average

Most PICOT elements are defined and generally align with the research question.

13 to >10.0 pts

Below Average

Some PICOT elements are missing or poorly defined; limited alignment with the research question.

10 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

PICOT elements are mostly missing or incorrect; no clear connection to the research question.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

FINER Criteria

20 to >16.0 pts

Above Average

Thorough explanation of how the question meets all FINER criteria (Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, Relevant) with strong justification.

16 to >13.0 pts

Average

Explains how the question meets most FINER criteria with reasonable justification.

13 to >10.0 pts

Below Average

Addresses some FINER criteria but lacks depth or clarity in justification.

10 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

FINER criteria are minimally addressed or not explained.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Academic Writing

20 to >16.0 pts

Above Average

Writing is clear, concise, and well-organized; grammar and spelling are excellent; sources are properly cited.

16 to >13.0 pts

Average

Writing is mostly clear and organized; minor grammar or citation issues.

13 to >10.0 pts

Below Average

Writing lacks clarity or organization; noticeable grammar or citation errors.

10 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Writing is unclear or disorganized; frequent grammar issues; citations missing or incorrect

20 pts

Total Points: 100

Please follow all the indications above, I also included the rubic