Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Assignment 4 Adult Recreation Article Summary

    Assignment 4: Adult Recreation Article Summary (4 pages total, 2 of content-APA format)

    Select an article about Adult Recreation that sparks your interest. Do not use any previously used article.

    Pg. 1- Title Page

    Pg. 2- Paraphrase your article (each paragraph should have a reference)

    Pg. 3- Based on the information that you read, form an opinion about what the definition of adult recreation is and why it is important. Use evidence from your article to back your opinion (THIS MUST BE REFERENCED!)

    Pg. 4- Reference Page

    Remember the following:

    • When paraphrasing, you must be able to read an article and take the information that you have read, put it in your own words with the same meaning the author is conveying and you MUST ALWAYS give the author credit for his/her information as it is not your idea or information you have learned from the author, therefore, EVERY SINGLE PARAGRAPH MUST HAVE A REFERENCE.
    • There are NO one sentence paragraphs
    • Paragraphs must have 5-7 sentences

    Rubric:

    Title Page: 3 pts

    Content: 10 pts

    Reference Page: 3 pts

    APA Format: 4 Pts

    I will attach the previously used articles in the attachment section

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 309973-Adult-Recreation-and-Its-Importance-for-Health-and-Well-edited-docx.docx, 310372-Adult-Recreation-Article-Summary-rev-docx.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Leading with Evidence, Accountability, and Collaboration

    Overview: Effective nurse leaders make evidence-informed decisions, manage teams and resources efficiently, and uphold professional and regulatory standards. In this assignment, youll respond to a structured case scenario that challenges you to apply leadership skills in evidence-based practice, team coordination, and professionalism. Scenario: You are a newly promoted nurse manager in a hospitals step-down unit. Staff have reported low morale, frequent overtime, and unclear workflows. A recent safety audit revealed missed documentation and inconsistent follow-up on patient falls. An evidence-based rounding protocol was introduced six weeks ago, but staff buy-in has been low. Tensions between night and day shifts are increasing, and a regulatory inspection is scheduled next month. Your Task: Write a 7501000 word response addressing the following prompts. Use your learning from Weeks 46 to guide your leadership decisions. Part 1: Evidence-Based Leadership Identify one barrier to implementing the rounding protocol and explain how you would address it as a leader. Apply one implementation or change strategy (e.g., education, shared governance) to improve staff engagement. Describe how you would evaluate whether the protocol is improving outcomes. Part 2: Collaboration and Operations Describe how you would collaborate with the healthcare team to improve shift communication and resolve team tensions. Identify one leadership strategy to support staffing, scheduling, or resource use during this challenging period. Briefly explain how you would approach conflict management in this scenario. Part 3: Professional Identity and Accountability Identify one professional nursing standard or regulatory guideline relevant to this case (e.g., documentation, incident reporting). Explain how you would promote professionalism and accountability among staff. Describe your role as a leader in preparing for the upcoming regulatory inspection. Tips for Success: Be practical and solutions-oriented in your approach. You do not need to use citationsfocus on showing your understanding and leadership reasoning.

  • Selecting a Health Information System – An Interprofessional…

    The following discussion assignment includes one initial post and two peer replies.

    ———

    The assignment simulates a real-world scenario where students act as decision-makers tasked with developing a strategic plan to replace a failing HIT system. Students will take a holistic approach, incorporating elements of discovery, needs analysis, and stakeholder engagement. These tasks will include forming a project committee, selecting a committee chair and project manager, and addressing critical aspects such as usability, interoperability, cost-effectiveness, and long-term scalability.

    In this assignment, you will create a comprehensive project plan to replace St. Harmon Hospitals aging electronic health record (EHR) system with a modern, AI-enhanced platform. The hospitals leadership has set an ambitious 18-month timeline for the project, requiring careful resource planning, milestone tracking, and stakeholder engagement. Your plan should account for all project phases, including initiation, planning, system design, data migration, training, go-live preparation, and stabilization.

    To enhance your process, you will utilize the Microsoft Copilot AI tool to assist with writing and developing your project plan, including resource allocation, timeline predictions, budget modeling, and risk assessment. When writing your prompt for the AI tool to develop the project plan, provide the necessary background and detail based on the case study to ensure that the plan produced aligns with the hospitals expectations and objectives.

    By leveraging these tools, you will gain insights into how technology can support complex project management tasks. Your aim is to ensure your plan aligns with the hospitals strategic objectives while addressing challenges such as staff engagement, data integrity, and system interoperability.

    After completing your project plan, reflect on the outputs provided by the AI tools and the strategies you employed.

    Key objectives of this exercise include:

    1. Understanding the challenges and opportunities associated with HIT system replacement.
    2. Learning to conduct a thorough needs analysis that addresses the diverse requirements of various stakeholders.
    3. Exploring strategies for managing organizational change and stakeholder buy-in.
    4. Applying best practices in project planning to ensure the successful implementation and adoption of the new system.

    Overview of Assignment Components

    • Case Study: An in-depth look at St. Harmon Hospitals decision to modernize its outdated EHR system. This case study highlights critical pain points, such as a lack of interoperability and user dissatisfaction, providing a foundational context for the project.
    • Guides and Frameworks: Documents on effective selection and implementation of EHR systems, covering aspects like readiness assessments, stakeholder involvement, and vendor evaluation.
    • Lessons from Real-World Examples: Insights into successful HIT system modernization efforts, including lessons on reducing inefficiencies, optimizing workflows, and managing organizational change.

    Deliverables

    Students will submit a detailed project plan that includes:

    • A needs analysis addressing the perspectives of various user groups.
    • Selection criteria for the project committee, chair, and manager.
    • A roadmap outlining timelines, milestones, and critical dependencies.
    • Strategies for ensuring interoperability, user training, and system testing.
    • Budgetary considerations and risk mitigation strategies.

    Through this assignment, students will enhance their ability to evaluate complex technological systems and lead transformative projects that support improved healthcare delivery. The exercise is designed to bridge academic learning with practical, real-world application, preparing students to be leaders in the dynamic field of health informatics.

    • What were the most challenging aspects of creating a project plan for the HIT system replacement, and how did you address them?
    • What key insights did you gain about the complexities of replacing a Health Information Technology system?
    • Looking back, is there anything you would have done differently in your project plan or needs analysis? Why?
    • If faced with a similar scenario in a real-world setting, how might you adapt your approach based on the lessons learned from this assignment?
    • How did the AI tool assist you in developing your project plan? What specific tasks or challenges did it help streamline or improve?
    • Were there any limitations or frustrations you encountered when using the AI tool? How did you work around them?
    • How do you envision the role of AI evolving in HIT projects, such as system replacement? Do you think it will become indispensable, and why or why not?

    Here are some suggested discussion prompts (HIT System Replacement Project Plan) to help guide you with your discussion post after you complete the assignment

    • Challenging Aspects in Action
    • Share one specific section from your project plan (e.g., needs analysis paragraph, timeline chart, or risk matrix) that you found most difficult to create. What made it challenging, and what steps did you take to resolve those challenges?
    • Insights from the Case Study
    • Point to one detail from the St. Harmon Hospital case study that directly influenced a decision in your plan (e.g., lack of interoperability, staff dissatisfaction). How did that detail shape your approach, and what insight did it give you about the complexities of system replacement?
    • Looking Back with Evidence
    • If you could redo part of your plan, identify one decision point(such as project committee structure, vendor criteria, or training approach) that you would change. Show a snippet of what you originally wrote and explain how you would revise it now and why.
    • Real-World Adaptation
    • Think about your own workplace (or a healthcare setting youve observed). How would you adapt one strategy from your St. Harmon project plan to fit that environment? Provide a concrete example that connects classroom work to practice.
    • AI Tool Contribution
    • Include a screenshot or excerpt of one output generated by Microsoft Copilot (or another AI tool you used). Which part of your plan did it shape (timeline, budget, risk analysis, etc.)? What did you keep from the AIs draft, and what did you have to edit or discard?
    • AI Tool Limitations
    • Describe one instance where the AI tool gave you an output that was inaccurate, incomplete, or unhelpful. How did you recognize the problem, and what specific adjustment did you make to fix it?
    • Future of AI in HIT Projects – Based on your actual experience using AI in this project, do you think tools like Copilot could become indispensable in future HIT replacement projects? Provide one example from your work on this assignment that supports your conclusion.

    Instructions:

    • Initial Discussion Post: Each initial response must be at least 400 words without references, demonstrate course-related knowledge, and include a minimum of three (3) peer-reviewed sources.
    • Peer Replies: In addition to the initial response, the learner is required to reply to two (2) other learners responses. Each reply must be at least 250 words without references, demonstrate course-related knowledge (integration of the course textbook), and include at least three (3) peer-reviewed sources. They are due by 11:59 p.m. CST on the Sunday of the assigned week.

    Reply to the following 2 posts as separate entries:

    First post:

    Hello All,

    When I first mapped out the 18-month implementation timeline for St. Harmon Hospitals EHR replacement, I assumed the hardest parts would be the technical pieces, data migration, interoperability, system configuration, and budgeting. But once I actually broke the project into phases, Planning & Governance, Design & Preparation, Pilot & Testing, and Rollout & Stabilization, I realized the real challenge wasnt technical at all. It was human.

    During Months 13, when I focused on planning and governance, I struggled more than I expected with defining leadership roles. On paper, identifying a committee chair and project manager seems simple. In reality, I had to think through hospital dynamics, who holds influence, who clinicians trust, and how decisions will actually get made. Research shows that leadership involvement and clear governance structures strongly influence EHR success (McAlearney et al., 2010), and that really shaped how seriously I took this early phase. I realized those first three months set the tone for the entire 18-month journey. If trust and clarity are not established early, everything else becomes harder.

    The Design & Preparation phase (Months 46) was where the timeline started to feel more personal. I added workflow observation sessions before system configuration because I didnt want the hospital to repeat the same mistakes that led to dissatisfaction with the current system. Reading about physician resistance being tied to workflow disruption, not just technology, made me rethink my approach (Boonstra & Broekhuis, 2010). Instead of focusing on building the system, I focused on understanding how people actually work. That shift from technology centered to people centered planning felt like a turning point in the project.

    The Pilot & Testing phase (Months 712) reinforced another important lesson: implementation cannot be rushed or rigid. I intentionally placed pilot testing in lower risk departments first so we could learn before expanding. Research on sociotechnical systems highlights how culture, communication, and adaptation influence success just as much as software functionality (Cresswell & Sheikh, 2013). Seeing that reflected in my own timeline made me realize that flexibility is not a weakness in planning it is necessary.

    Finally, when I reached the Rollout & Stabilization phase (Months 1318), I initially treated go live as the finish line. But after reviewing the literature, I understood that stabilization is often where success or failure becomes clear. Rushed implementations can reduce productivity and even create patient safety concerns (Jones et al., 2014). That is why I built in phased implementation, user adoption tracking, and ongoing support rather than assuming everything would normalize immediately after go live.

    Using Microsoft Copilot helped me structure the timeline and organize milestones, especially when mapping dependencies across phases. It was great for outlining risks and sequencing tasks. However, its responses felt very mechanical at first. It did not naturally account for staff morale, burnout, or resistance. I had to refine prompts and layer in the human considerations myself.

    Overall, this timeline helped me see that replacing an EHR is not about installing software within 18 months. It is about guiding people through change. Technology enables transformation, but leadership, communication, and trust determine whether that transformation succeeds.

    Thank you,

    Tatiana Vasquez

    References

    Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M. (2010). Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC health services research, 10, 231. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-231

    Cresswell, K., & Sheikh, A. (2013). Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. International journal of medical informatics, 82(5), e73e86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.007

    Jones, S. S., Rudin, R. S., Perry, T., & Shekelle, P. G. (2014). Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Annals of internal medicine, 160(1), 4854. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-1531

    McAlearney, A. S., Robbins, J., Hirsch, A., Jorina, M., & Harrop, J. P. (2010). Perceived efficiency impacts following electronic health record implementation: an exploratory study of an urban community health center network. International journal of medical informatics, 79(12), 807816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.09.002

    Second post:

    Initial Discussion Post: Health Informatics System Replacement Plan

    It takes both technical know-how and strong leadership to replace an old Health Information Technology (HIT) system, which is a challenging organizational shift. One of the most difficult parts of creating a project plan for upgrading St. Harmon Hospital’s antiquated electronic health record (EHR) system was striking a balance between the hospital’s ambitious 18-month timeframe and the practicalities of workflow redesign, data migration, and staff training. The case study emphasized the significance of early stakeholder engagement by showing that the failure of the current system was caused by staff discontent and poor usability in addition to technological restrictions.

    This work made me realize how important the needs-analysis and discovery phases are to the long-term success of a project. Even the most sophisticated AI-enabled technology runs the danger of being poorly adopted if clinician pain points, interoperability gaps, and organizational readiness are not explicitly identified. To guarantee that decisions mirrored actual clinical workflows rather than just administrative priorities, a multidisciplinary project committee comprising clinical champions, IT leadership, and operational staff had to be formed.

    The project planning process was greatly aided by the usage of Microsoft Copilot, especially in terms of timeline structure, risk identification, and deliverable organization. However, meticulous human scrutiny was necessary for AI outputs. Copilot produced budget estimates and milestone recommendations with efficiency, although it sometimes underestimated the amount of time required for user stabilization and training. This reaffirmed the idea that AI should not be used to replace expert judgment, but rather as a tool to assist in decision-making.

    I would give change management and communication tactics even more importance if I were faced with a comparable real-world system replacement, especially during training and go-live. Proactive participation can lessen disruption and exhaustion, while resistance to change is a predicted obstacle. All things considered, this assignment showed that successful HIT replacement requires more than just satisfying technical criteria; it also requires integrating technology with people, procedures, and organizational culture.

    18-Month EHR Replacement Timeline

    MonthsProject PhaseKey ActivitiesMonths 12InitiationExecutive sponsorship, project charter, committee formationMonths 34Discovery & Needs AnalysisWorkflow assessments, stakeholder interviews, system requirementsMonths 56Vendor SelectionRFP process, vendor demos, contract negotiationMonths 79System Design & ConfigurationBuild workflows, configure AI tools, interoperability planningMonths 1011Data Migration & ValidationData mapping, testing, integrity checksMonths 1213Training & Change ManagementStaff training, super-user development, communication planningMonth 14Go-Live PreparationFinal testing, contingency planningMonth 15Go-LiveSystem launch, command center supportMonths 1618Stabilization & OptimizationIssue resolution, workflow optimization, performance evaluationThis visual timeline highlights the interdependence of planning, implementation, and stabilization phases and underscores why HIT replacement must be approached as an organizational transformation rather than a technical upgrade.

    References

    Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M. (2010). Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 231.

    McGinn, C. A., Grenier, S., Duplantie, J., Shaw, N., Sicotte, C., Mathieu, L., Leduc, Y., Lgar, F., & Gagnon, M. P. (2011). Comparison of user groups perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: A systematic review. BMC Medicine, 9, 46.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-46

    Otte-Trojel, T., de Bont, A., van de Klundert, J., & Rundall, T. G. (2014). How outcomes are achieved through patient portals: A realist review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(4), 751757.

    West, V. L., Borland, D., & Hammond, W. E. (2015). Innovative information visualization of electronic health record data: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(2), 330339.

  • A Nursing Practice Improvement Project

    Please make those corrections on Manuscript Section I-III

    -For the problem and background, add some quantifiable data to back up your statements. This could be overall national data on the impact of your problem and the data at your site that supported why this was picked out of all of the problems that could have been addressed.

    -Make sure level 1 headings are centered and level 2 headings

    Headings are on the left side.

    -For the rounding, how will you ensure

    accountability? Make sure to put in if they are charting it or if there

    is some other way to note that rounding was done.

    -For the setting, don’t forget to share how many beds,

    staff, etc.

    -For the outcomes, think about adding quantifiable

    data to back up words like “increase” or “decrease”.

    This way, you have a specific goal in mind.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): MSN Project Manuscript Section I-III.docx, Project Manuscript Section IV-V Guidelines.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Nursing Question

    Objective:

    The purpose of this assignment is to explore and analyze regulatory agencies that play a critical role in governing health and the healthcare system within the United States. This will help you understand the frameworks that guide healthcare practice, especially as it relates to your role as a Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) graduate. (CSLO #6, #7)

    Instructions

    1. Prepare a Policy Analysis Paper (see following sections containing Rubric and Assignment details).

    Requirements: follow rubric instruction

  • Applied Mathematics Question

    The assignment does not require Excel, so please solve it manually and show all calculations.

    Requirements:

  • Writing Question

    This is the last portion of the assessment, where you will put everything together and add the final components.

    The full paper was broken into three parts to allow you to focus on smaller segments, receive feedback, and apply what was learned throughout our time together. As you continue at Capella, you will complete full papers as individual assessments. The goal is for you to take what you learn about business concepts and how to build a paper, gather evidence, utilize feedback, and practice APA style each time you have an assessment.

    Note: This assessment is the final of three written assessments where you will put everything together and add the final components.

    Using the same organization, complete the following:

    • Revisit the organizations website and look for evidence of teamwork or the presence of teams, including in pictures and project descriptions.
    • Locate the paragraphs you wrote for the prior two assessments.
    • Consider the following scenario:

    Your chosen organization has determined that its mission statement needs to be updated accurately to reflect its strategy for the upcoming year, so you are forming a small team to work through this problem. Which functions do you want to select team members from? Why? What ethical principles does your team need to consider when making updates to a mission statement? Finally, what critical thinking questions does your team need to ask to update the mission statement? (Note: You will not be creating a new mission statement for this assessment.)

    • Step 1: Download and save .
    • Step 2: Copy your paragraphs from the prior assessments into the template.
    • Step 3: Write the following paragraphs (additional paragraphs can be created as needed) using POETS:
      • Paragraph 1: Explain reasons for choosing team members from two functional areas for developing a mission statement.
        • Describe the skills and characteristics that make a good team member.
      • Paragraph 2: Describe what ethical principles a team needs to consider when making updates to a mission statement.
        • Why are ethics important for updating a mission statement?
      • Paragraph 3: Describe the critical thinking questions a team needs to answer to update a mission statement.
        • Why are these critical thinking questions important for updating a mission statement?
    • Step 4: Add an introduction paragraph.
    • Step 5: Add a conclusion paragraph.
    • Step 6: Include all reference list citations and in-text citations.

    Requirements: read carefully

  • Film paper

    The length of the paper should be four to five pages, using double-space type. The paper should be divided into different sections, each addressing question 1, question 2, etc, and the question being addressed needs to be written out before it is addressed. This is because I need to be clear which question is being addressed. Be sure that your online submission has a cover page (which doesnt count as a page number) that states the name of the film you are discussing, your name, your email, the date, and the title Film Discussion Paper for AMST-3100 on the cover. Choose one of the following three movies from the 1960s, watch the movie, and address the set of questions for that movie in your paper. Of course you will need to rent, purchase, stream, or check the movie out from a library. These movies should be readily available. While you may discuss these movies all you like, your paper must reflect your own ideas and your own writing. Students may not team up to write this film paper. I am also providing a link to a film analysis site that offers an excellent analysis of each of these movies to help get you into the analytical mode. The grading criteria for your paper is as follows: writing style and clarity. substantive insights to the 1960s and critical thinking skills. application of our textbooks, web notes, and outside resources to your points. Dr. Strangelove (1964) Film analysis link: Film Discussion Questions. 1. Dr. Strangelove is a dark satire made at a time when there was a very real possibility of nuclear annihilation. Who or what was parodied in this movie? (Identify as many issues or themes as you can, and much of this parody involves Cold War leaders, and assumptions, policies, etc). 2. Identify specific real events of the 1950s and early 1960s that are important backdrops to understanding Dr. Strangelove. Remember, this movie features the Cold War as the central backdrop. What are the important events that happened in the 1950s and early 60s that are relevant to this movie? 3. Before Dr. Strangelove, the public was given the notion that the two superpowers had achieved Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), and therefore it would be irrational for either side to initiate war. Presumably we should feel somewhat secure with this notion. How does the movie Dr. Strangelove respond to the argument that nuclear war is unlikely because it is irrational? (Hint: How are the leaders depicted in this movie? Are they rational? What does this say about the assumptions behind MAD?) 4. What does this movie suggest happens to a society when its members are placed in a constant state of apocalyptic fear, such as the case of fear culture or panic culture that we saw during the Cold War in the 1950s and early 60s, air raid shelters and all? Does such fear cause people to behave differently? What kinds of social and foreign policies are people likely to lean toward in a panic culture? Who benefits from this, and who loses? (For example, why were hawkish conservatives like Joseph McCarthy and the HUAC promoting fear culture in the 1950s? What did they and the military industrial complexes of the US and the USSR have to gain by promoting such fears? How did hawkish conservatives portray reform liberals like Martin Luther King, Jr and others who sought domestic reforms? Was there a hidden agenda here?)

  • Film paper

    The length of the paper should be four to five pages, using double-space type. The paper should be divided into different sections, each addressing question 1, question 2, etc, and the question being addressed needs to be written out before it is addressed. This is because I need to be clear which question is being addressed. Be sure that your online submission has a cover page (which doesnt count as a page number) that states the name of the film you are discussing, your name, your email, the date, and the title Film Discussion Paper for AMST-3100 on the cover. Choose one of the following three movies from the 1960s, watch the movie, and address the set of questions for that movie in your paper. Of course you will need to rent, purchase, stream, or check the movie out from a library. These movies should be readily available. While you may discuss these movies all you like, your paper must reflect your own ideas and your own writing. Students may not team up to write this film paper. I am also providing a link to a film analysis site that offers an excellent analysis of each of these movies to help get you into the analytical mode. The grading criteria for your paper is as follows: writing style and clarity. substantive insights to the 1960s and critical thinking skills. application of our textbooks, web notes, and outside resources to your points. Dr. Strangelove (1964) Film analysis link: Film Discussion Questions. 1. Dr. Strangelove is a dark satire made at a time when there was a very real possibility of nuclear annihilation. Who or what was parodied in this movie? (Identify as many issues or themes as you can, and much of this parody involves Cold War leaders, and assumptions, policies, etc). 2. Identify specific real events of the 1950s and early 1960s that are important backdrops to understanding Dr. Strangelove. Remember, this movie features the Cold War as the central backdrop. What are the important events that happened in the 1950s and early 60s that are relevant to this movie? 3. Before Dr. Strangelove, the public was given the notion that the two superpowers had achieved Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), and therefore it would be irrational for either side to initiate war. Presumably we should feel somewhat secure with this notion. How does the movie Dr. Strangelove respond to the argument that nuclear war is unlikely because it is irrational? (Hint: How are the leaders depicted in this movie? Are they rational? What does this say about the assumptions behind MAD?) 4. What does this movie suggest happens to a society when its members are placed in a constant state of apocalyptic fear, such as the case of fear culture or panic culture that we saw during the Cold War in the 1950s and early 60s, air raid shelters and all? Does such fear cause people to behave differently? What kinds of social and foreign policies are people likely to lean toward in a panic culture? Who benefits from this, and who loses? (For example, why were hawkish conservatives like Joseph McCarthy and the HUAC promoting fear culture in the 1950s? What did they and the military industrial complexes of the US and the USSR have to gain by promoting such fears? How did hawkish conservatives portray reform liberals like Martin Luther King, Jr and others who sought domestic reforms? Was there a hidden agenda here?)

  • Writing Question

    You have completed the first few paragraphs in the paper we are building and received feedback.

    You will now create the following paragraphs based on the course content we covered. You will align the new knowledge of business functions (operations, marketing, IT, human resources (HR), and finance) with your chosen organization.

    You are encouraged to utilize the feedback you received in the prior assessment to help guide you while writing.

    Note: This assessment is the second part of three written assessments that build on each other and must be completed in order.

    You are encouraged to utilize the feedback you received in the prior assessment to help guide you while writing.

    Using the same organization you researched for your first assessment, complete the following:

    • Access the organizations website and research the different departments of the organization, such as marketing, HR, IT, operations, and finance.
    • Identify two functional areas you feel are essential to the organizations success.
    • Review the QuickStart: Functional Areas of Business media piece to support your understanding of these concepts.

    Before you begin writing, refer to the Assessment Illustration 2 and then complete the following:

    • Step 1: Download and save .
    • Step 2: Answer the questions on the top of the template:
      • Using your same organization, identify two functional areas you feel are essential to the organization’s success.
    • Step 3: Write the following two (24 paragraphs as needed) paragraphs using POETS:
      • Paragraphs 1 and 2: Evaluate the importance of two functional areas for a chosen business organization.
        • Describe the important critical thinking skills to drive success for each functional area.
        • Explain what ethical principles apply to each functional area in day-to-day work.

    Note: Delete any remaining example content that is inside the square brackets.

    Challenge: Using course resources, attempt APA style for your references and add in your in-text references. You will need this for the final assessment, so add it now and get feedback!

    Requirements: read carefully