Author: admin

  • Medication Reconciliation Assignment

    Assignment

    Overview:

    This assignment is designed to help develop and demonstrate your skills in medication reconciliation, ensuring patient safety and continuity of care. In this assignment, you will be given a scenario and a patient that you will be “seeing” in the clinical setting. You will be reviewing that patient’s home medication list and comparing the list to your admission orders. After reviewing the two lists and taking a deep dive into the medications listed, you will create a list of recommendations to bring up with the patient’s Primary Healthcare Provider when they round on your patient for the day, addressing any missing medications or safety issues.

    Scenario:

    Mary Ann is a 68-year-old female with a past medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and Type II Diabetes. She also has chronic arthritic knee pain, which she manages with over-the-counter medications. She denies using alcohol and has no known allergies. She presented to the hospital with severe flank pain and had a CT scan of the abdomen with IV contrast, which showed a large left-sided kidney stone with ureteral obstruction. She is being admitted to the medical floor and will be having a lithotripsy in the morning.

    Her blood pressure is 155/68, heart rate is 62, Temperature is 99.0, and respiratory rate is 20 and non-labored. She is alert and oriented, has a normal S1 & S2, and has no murmurs. She has clear lung sounds bilaterally. She has normal bowel sounds. Her extremities are warm with 2+ Radial and DP pulses. She has bilateral 2+ lower extremity edema. She is currently reporting an 8/10 pain in her left abdomen/flank area. She has a BMI of 38. She lives alone at home. Her husband died several years ago, and she has two daughters who live out of state. Her morning lab work showed abnormal values of a WBC count of 15,000, Creatinine of 2.4, and a glucose of 210. All other labs were normal.

    Home medications:

    • Aspirin 81 mg PO 1xD
    • Metformin 500mg PO 2xD
    • Lisinopril 40mg PO 1xD
    • Metoprolol 50mg PO 2xD
    • Ibuprofen 600mg PO q6h PRN
    • Tylenol 500mg PO q6h PRN
    • Atorvastatin 40mg PO 1xD taken in the evening
    • Multivitamin PO 1xD

    Inpatient medication orders:

    • Aspirin 81 mg PO 1xD
    • Metoprolol 75mg PO 2xD
    • Tylenol 650mg PO Q6H PRN for mild pain 1-3 out of 10
    • Atorvastatin 40mg PO 1xD QPM
    • Humalog insulin sliding scale (SC) ACHS
    • Glu<60 call provider
    • Glu 61-150 No Coverage
    • Glu 151-200 2 Units SC
    • Glu 201-250 4 Units SC
    • Glu 251-300 6 Units SC
    • Glucose >300 call provider
    • Heparin 5000 units Q8H SC
    • Lasix 20mg PO 1xD

    Assignment Tasks:

    In an MS Word document, please complete the following tasks:

    Section 1. Home Medication List Rationale:

    In paragraph form, look at each medication on the home medication list and give a brief overview of each medication including the drug class, indication for administration (what medical diagnosis in the scenario is the drug treating specifically), safe dose range compared with current dose, basic medication administration details, most common and life-threatening side effects, and monitoring parameters (labs, vital signs, physical assessment findings, etc.) You should have at least 1 paragraph for each medication you are reviewing. All information in this paragraph should be cited with an appropriate reference (Nursing Drug Guide, Pharm/Med Surg Textbook, ATI Book, etc. – please do not use websites like drugs.com, WebMD, etc.)

    Section 2. Hospital Medication List:

    Your patient has been admitted to the hospital, and you have your inpatient admission medication orders. Review this list and, in paragraph form, answer the following questions.

    Are there any home medications missing? If yes, do you think they were omitted for safety reasons? Vital sign abnormalities? Lab abnormalities? Or was it an accidental omission?

    Are there any medications ordered that are not on the home medication list? If so, why do you think this medication was ordered? For new medications, give a medication overview similar to section 1, with a rationale for why the medications are ordered.

    Are there any medications that are not on either list that you believe should be included on the patient’s medication list (PRN medications, prophylactic medications, etc).

    Provide a rationale (with a cited resource) on how you support your information in this section.

    Section 3. Compile a final medication list for the inpatient stay to recommend to the patient’s primary healthcare provider based on the first 2 sections. This section can just be a list of medications, similar to the ones you received in the initial scenario. Your rationale should be provided in the above sections.

    Your paper should be written in the current APA format and have a title page, a body with the 3 sections above, and a reference page. Please make sure all references are cited appropriately within your paper. Please reach out to the writing center for assistance with APA format or completing the assignment if needed.

    Medication Reconciliation Assignment Rubric

    Medication Reconciliation Assignment Rubric

    CriteriaRatingsPointsSection 1

    A full overview is given for each medication on the home medication list, with a particular focus on patient safety.

    25.1 to 40 pts

    A partial overview is given for each medication on the home medication list, with a focus on patient safety.

    10.1 to 25 pts

    The review of medications is incomplete and lacking detail. Major safety information is missing from the overview. Or the assignment is not submitted on time.

    0 to 10 pts

    /40 pts

    Section 2

    A detailed overview of new medications on the hospital medication list is given. Missing medications are properly identified with a rationale for their omission with consideration for appropriateness of the medication use and a focus on patient safety.

    15.1 to 30 pts

    An overview of new medications on the hospital medication list is given, but some details are lacking. Missing medications are properly identified with a rationale for their omission with consideration for the appropriateness of the medication use. Some safety details are missing.

    5.1 to 15 pts

    The overview of new medications on the hospital medication list is lacking detail. Rationale for missing medications is sparse. There is a lack of consideration for patient safety shown.

    0 to 5 pts

    /30 pts

    Section 3

    A safe medication list is created considering the patient’s home medication list, inpatient hospital medication list, and physical exam findings reported in the scenario.

    5.1 to 15 pts

    There are major medications missing from the new mediation list that should be considered based on the scenario details.

    0 to 5 pts

    /15 pts

    Grammar

    There are little to no grammatical errors within the paper. The paper is written in full sentences/paragraph form without excessive medical jargon and abbreviations.

    5.1 to 10 pts

    There are a few grammatical errors which do not detract from the meaning of the paper. There is some use of medical jargon within the paper or abbreviations which are not defined before use.

    0.1 to 5 pts

    There are major grammatical errors within the paper that detract from the meaning of the paper. The paper is not written in full sentences/paragraph format and does not flow like a formal written paper.

    0 to 0 pts

    /10 pts

    APA formatting

    There are fewer than 3 APA formatting errors with appropriate citations throughout the paper.

    3.1 to 5 pts

    The paper contains 3-5 APA formatting errors with appropriate citations within the paper.

    0.1 to 3 pts

    There are more than 5 APA formatting errors or there is a lack of citations within the paper.

    0 to 0 pts

    /5 pts

    Choose a submission type

  • Paper 6

    Write a minimum of 1500 word paper discussing how effective and ineffective interagency organizations (including local, state, federal, and volunteers responded to the following disasters:

    The attacks of 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, and Deepwater Horizon. Include what lessons were learned and how emergency management has changed its preparations, mitigations, and recovery for the next disaster. Include the consequences if not changing based on lessons learned moving forward.

  • IRC Building Codes: R314 Smoke Alarms and R315 Carbon Monoxi…

    Power point – My toopic is – These two IRC Building Codes: R314 Smoke Alarms R315 Carbon Monoxide Alarms Instructions- Include topic title and the names of each team member on first slide. – Express at least 5 key narrative points. – Include at least 3 images. – Minimum of 6 slides, maximum of 12. – Customize and edit text (do not just paste in original text). – Use font sizes of 18 points or larger. – Simplify and summarize all content to make it clear and easy to understand. – Graphics should be professional but also express a unique vibe (avoid using pre-built template graphics). – Spell check content.
  • MINDMAP TO STORYBOARD

    This assignment is broadly taken from Thomas (2025) Do It Yourself (DIY) 4.1 (Brainstorm a Mindmap on Your Topic) and 4.2 (Drawing a Storyboard) exercises. You may use any pay or free online mapping or storyboard generating software (NOT AI). Your drawings may be digital or hand-drawn, then scanned/photographed and copied/pasted into your MS Word document, applicable sections.

    Part 1 – Drawing a Mindmap:

    Begin with your prima facie (research question) question from Module / Week 2 Case Study Methodology Assignment (or a more appropriate edited version based on the instructors feedback of that assignment)

    Select a minimum of 10 core sources

    Broadly synthesize the sources to discover themes, disagreements, dilemmas, ideas, lines of inquiry, etc.

    As you organize these sources, draw your mindmap (See Thomas (2025) Figure 4.2 Key Features of a Mindmap

    o Besides your prima facie question, your mindmap should contain at least 5 nodes drawn from your prima facie question

    o As you continue to organize and arrange material by relevance, you should include at least 5 buds which should sprout off of at least 2 nodes. You may need to do more research.

    Part 2 Drawing a Storyboard:

    If required, adjust your prima facie question to fit your desired research direction (see the Thomas (2025) Table 4.1 Prima Facie Questions to Revised Topics)

    Chart a storyboard narrative of your intended literature review

    o Besides your revised prima facie question, your storyboard should contain a minimum of 10 nodes or waypoints and 4 key references. Again, you may need to do more research.

    o Your storyboard narrative should integrate a range of relevant issues

    Provide an audit of your activities. More than a simple log of decisions, this should annotate your critical reflection and analysis that resulted in edits, changes to your research question, evolution of your research aims, and why.

    Additional Requirements

    Materials submitted to fulfill requirements in one course may not be submitted in another course. Concerns about the propriety of obtaining outside assistance and acknowledging sources should be addressed to the instructor of the course before the work commences and as necessary as the work proceeds.

    In addition to the course texts and the Bible, the required references above will be from peer-reviewed scholarly sources that have publication dates no older than 5 years, exception: irrefutable seminal sources.

    • Sources of information from Wikipedia, dictionaries, websites, blogs, and encyclopedias will not be accepted.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Mindmap to Storyboard Assignment Instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 5 Discussion

    REQUIRED READINGS

    Buppert, C. (2021). Nurse practitioners business practice and legal guide (8th Ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning LLC.: Burlington MA.

    • Ch. 5 Prescribing
    • Ch. 6 Hospital Privileges

    Please also read the following.

    • AARP Public Policy Institute. (n.d.). Removing Barriers to Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Care: Hospital Privileges. Retrieved from
    • OConnor, A. W., Helfrich, C. D., Nelson, K. M., Sears, J. M., Jensen, P. K., Engstrom, C., & Wong, E. S. (2023). Full practice authority and burnout among primary care nurse practitioners. Nursing Outlook, 71(6), 102056.

    After educating yourself on this weeks topics through the required readings, respond to each of the following:

    • What is the purpose and process for obtaining prescription privileges in the state in which you live (clearly identify) of practice as Nurse Practitioner?
    • What do you see as the advantages and disadvantages of having a DEA license as a Nurse Practitioner?

    Refer to the following required readings for the following.

    Consider the following scenario and reply to the questions. The hospital near where you live has an aging population of attending physicians who are nearing retirement. Historically, only the attending physicians have had hospital privileges including in the Emergency Room where NPs have not practiced. The NPs have cared for patients in the outpatient clinics. There are a growing number of FNPs who travel to other areas to work.

    • What would you do as an FNP to assist with the process of promoting the hospital administration to allow NPs hospital privileges? Consider attendance at meetings, what research you would bring, who the key players are, and how it impacts the community in which you reside.

    AARP Public Policy Institute. (n.d.). Removing Barriers to Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Care: Hospital Privileges. Retrieved from

    Holmes O, Kinsey-Weathers S. The case for full practice authority. Nursing. 2016 Mar;46(3):51-4. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000480602.37640.a1. PMID: 26910092.

    Notes:

    • Be sure to address all elements of the Discussion Prompt in order to receive full credit.
    • Initial post is due by Wednesday 11:59PM EST & at least two replies to peers by Sunday 11:59PM EST.
    • Responses must include a minimum of 250 words in the initial post which does not include quoted material and required references.
    • The minimum two required responses to peers and faculty must include a minimum of 75 words which does not include quoted material or references.
    • Minimum of two scholarly sources are required: a) one in-class source that must be referenced and cited and b) one outside scholarly sourcereferenced and cited.
  • Mile Stone#2

    Milestone 2

    You will need to design each user interface (UI) that is needed for the system. You can

    build the screens from the requirements you wrote up in Milestone 1. Your interfaces

    should look fairly realistic and give me a good idea how the system might really look (and

    work). You will want to have colors and pictures along with

    buttons/textfields/dropdowns/tabs etc. Your interfaces do not have to have actual buttons

    and features that work. They can be simply images that demonstrate how the UI should

    look when it is done. Do not hand draw anything.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): annotated-Milestone201_Group3.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Mile Stone#2

    Milestone 2

    You will need to design each user interface (UI) that is needed for the system. You can

    build the screens from the requirements you wrote up in Milestone 1. Your interfaces

    should look fairly realistic and give me a good idea how the system might really look (and

    work). You will want to have colors and pictures along with

    buttons/textfields/dropdowns/tabs etc. Your interfaces do not have to have actual buttons

    and features that work. They can be simply images that demonstrate how the UI should

    look when it is done. Do not hand draw anything.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): annotated-Milestone201_Group3.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Integrating Theory and Research for Evidence-Based Practice(…

    Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 250-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions:

    • What did you learn from your classmate’s posting?
    • What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?
    • What clarification do you need regarding the posting?
    • What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings?

    All sources should be cited using APA format. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and format should be correct and professional.

    READ AND RESPOND THE POST

    Methods of Knowing in Nursing Practice

    Knowledge acquisition in nursing is a complicated process that goes beyond textbooks and classroom lectures. As a nurse in the emergency department and interventional radiology, I’ve learned that knowing includes formal education, clinical experience, and critical examination of information sources. Understanding how we know what we know is critical to providing safe, evidence-based patient care.

    Assessing Information Validity and Accuracy

    Evaluating information accuracy necessitates a methodical approach rather than taking sources at face value. Patterson et al. (2025) discovered that nurses frequently evaluate information based on factors such as accuracy, relevance, authority, purpose, and currency. However, their research found a troubling finding: most nurses depend on surface-level evaluation criteria rather than doing in-depth critical examination. For example, nurses frequently accept material merely because it appears in a peer-reviewed journal, without critically scrutinizing the methodology or applicability to their patient population. Patterson et al. (2025) stressed that the inclusion of citations does not ensure authenticity because information might be distorted or taken out of context. In my emergency department practice, I verify material by cross-referencing several sources, reviewing the author’s credentials, and determining whether the research population is representative of my patient demographics, when time is appropriate.

    Evidence-Seeking Hierarchy

    The evidence hierarchy ranks systematic reviews and meta-analyses at the top, with randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and expert opinion at the bottom. When making patient care decisions, I mostly rely on clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews, which provide synthesis evidence that has been rigorously evaluated. Atalla et al. (2025) found that nurses with higher levels of knowledge and good attitudes toward evidence-based practice are more competent in applying research findings to clinical scenarios. Their findings revealed significant positive associations between EBP knowledge, abilities, and use, implying that comprehending the evidence hierarchy improves clinical decision-making.

    In my personal life, I frequently make decisions based on firsthand experience and reliable sources. However, my nursing education has influenced how I approach personal health information, leading me to seek out respected medical websites rather than social media posts. This dual approach illustrates what Atalla et al. (2025) refer to as the combination of research evidence, clinical competence, and individual valuesthe three pillars of evidence-based practice.

    Personal Experience and Knowledge Acquisition.

    My nursing education career exemplifies the combination between formal and experiential learning. Working in interventional radiology, I learned procedural protocols through didactic training, but genuine competency came through repeated practice and coaching from more experienced colleagues. Patterson et al. (2025) observed that nurses commonly utilize their previous clinical knowledge to assess the credibility of new material, asking themselves whether the new evidence is consistent with their professional experience. This is consistent with my experience; when confronting unexpected clinical settings in the emergency department, I combine textbook knowledge with trends I’ve seen in comparable patient presentations.

    Best Practices for Increasing Nursing Knowledge

    Effective knowledge acquisition in nursing necessitates deliberate tactics. Atalla et al. (2025) discovered that self-efficacy is an important mediator between EBP facilitators and nursing competences, implying that nurses who trust in their abilities to collect and utilize evidence have better practice competency. Their findings indicated that facilitator elements, such as training opportunities and supportive leadership, have a strong favorable impact on EBP competency. As a result, excellent practices include attending continuing education classes, joining journal clubs, and developing mentorship relationships. Patterson et al. (2025) suggested that nurses shift away from basic evaluation checklists and toward more advanced critical appraisal procedures, such as lateral reading and methodical analysis. As I go into nursing education, understanding these best practices will help me teach future nurses to be discriminating consumers of healthcare information, ultimately improving patient outcomes through evidence-based treatment.

    References

    Atalla, A. D. G., El-Ashry, A. M., & Mohamed, S. M. S. (2025). The relationship between evidence-based practices facilitators and barriers among nurses and their competencies: self-efficacy as a mediator. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 114.

    Patterson, B., Diekema, A. R., Hopkins, E. (Betsy) S., Wilson, D., & Schvaneveldt, N. (2025). Is this professionally correct?: understanding the criteria nurses use to evaluate information. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 113(4), 298309.

    Requirements: 270

  • Capital budget analysis

    For this assignment, you will be provided with a spreadsheet containing projected numbers for two different patient services programs. You will need to download the Program Projections [XLSX] spreadsheet and use it to conduct your analysis. Instructions You are a member of the financial services department at Benson Regional Medical Center. The chief financial officer and chair of the capital budgeting committee, Dana Foster, has requested that you perform some capital analysis of two proposed patient service programs. You have been provided with a spreadsheet that covers much of the projected financials for each of the proposed programs. Your task is to perform an analysis of that information and provide your recommendation to the capital budgeting committee as to which program they should pursue. You have been asked to create a presentation to present your findings to the capital budgeting committee. Using the provided spreadsheet, complete a capital budgeting analysis on the information provided in the spreadsheet. Specifically, you will need to identify a net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and a discounted payback period for proposed Program #1 and Program #2. You will present your finding in a presentation. Design a PowerPoint presentation for the capital budgeting committee that includes all of the following: Create a brief 1-2 slide description of the proposed programs. Develop a comparison between the cash flow projects of each program from Year 0 to Year 5. Highlight the differences. Compare the results and interpretation of the discounted payback period between both programs. Compare the net present value (NPV) for each program. Compare the Internal rate of return (IRR) for each program. Develop a recommendation for which program the capital budgeting committee should take into consideration. Include supporting rationale. Formatting Requirements The presentation should be 8-10 slides in length and include speaker notes with each slide.
  • Transition of care and patient safety using Modified Early W…

    Conduct a literature search to identify the most effective interventions or changes for addressing your chosen problem. You can use three articles from your critical appraisal for part of the literature review( link is in the attachments to the critical appraisal paper). In addition, you will need to find two more articles related to your topic. Therefore, your literature review should include a total of five articles. Develop a clearly stated desired outcome for practice change. Use evidence from the reviewed literature to answer the clinical question and support the proposed outcome(s). Key Guidelines for the Literature Review: Selection of Literature: Carefully choose resources that provide the best available evidence related to the issue. Consider the hierarchy of evidence (strongest information first) and ensure the findings are relevant to your clinical question. Sources: Include at least five resources, such as professional journals, peer-reviewed articles, clinical guidelines, and other contemporary sources related to nursing within the last 5 years Critical Appraisal: Evaluate the five selected resources using the appropriate criteria outlined in your text. Summary of Findings: Summarize the findings of the five appraised resources. Discuss the pros and cons of each and their relevance to the clinical question.This paper should be a maximum of 5-8 pages. (usually, each article should be summarized within two to three paragraphs.) Refer to the provided document, Outline for EBP for detailed expectations regarding the structure

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): criticalappraisalfinal.docx, Outline for EBP Paper-Presentation 2025.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.