Author: admin

  • Concept Attainment Model and Concept Mapping Integration in…

    Concept Attainment Model – Integrating Technology/Media within Concept Mapping Lesson In this technical assignment, you will use the Concept Attainment Model to design a lesson that integrates technology/media resources. You will integrate concept mapping into the lesson. A Concept map must be attached/included. (Not a rubric for how it will be graded but the actual concept map.) The media or technology may be used to introduce the lesson, for skill development, formative assessment, etc. When you submit the lesson design, make sure that you have included necessary information (ppt file, link to a site you used, etc.) so that I can access the technology you have included. Evidence of students being challenged to do the following should be present in the unit: Build on students’ prior knowledge. Students will examine content from different perspectives. Students will explore relationships among concepts. Critical thinking is promoted. Students’ curiosity is engaged A template for this lesson plan is provided. I strongly encourage you to use the template to guide your work in order to ensure that the required components of the lesson are included. Make sure you go back and review the exemplar in PHASE ONE and design the lesson following that model throughout. Remember to complete the highlighted sections to include the research behind the use of the model. This accounts for 10% of the grade. Complete the template and submit in Canvas.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): EDL 703 Rubric ADDIE Phase Two Lesson Plan Two.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Essay outlining

    For this assignment, you will be outlining your essay according to the thesis statement you produced. You will devote a paragraph to each main point mentioned in your thesis statement. Assignment Instructions Follow the directions below to complete the activity: Step 1 | Gather the thesis statement you constructed in Activity #1. An outline is a way for you to begin the process of organizing your thoughts. It is an extension of your thesis statement, and it allows you to begin seeing how your essay will possibly come together. Step 2 | Open the Extended Paragraph Plan template below, and outline your essay using the steps discussed on the Extended Paragraph page in this module. Outlines ARE NOT set in stone. They are simply a way for you to plan out your writing so that you will have a clear direction for your thoughts. For all of the essays you will construct in class, we will be using the following Extended Paragraph Plan to outline the papers. Extended Paragraph Plan.docx
  • Nursing Question

    please read this and respond

    Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 1 of your fellow classmates with at least a 250-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions:

    • What did you learn from your classmate’s posting?
    • What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?
    • What clarification do you need regarding the posting?
    • What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings?

    All sources should be cited using APA format. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and format should be correct and professional.


    POST

    Knowledge acquisition is fundamental to nursing practice, where evidence-based decision-making can directly impact patient outcomes. As both an individual and a healthcare professional, I use multiple approaches to learning and knowing to gather, validate, and apply information. Understanding how we know what we know and critically evaluating the reliability of that knowledge is essential for safe, effective nursing practice.

    Validating information requires a systematic approach that considers the source, methodology, and corroboration of data. In my professional practice, I employ several strategies to determine accuracy. First, I evaluate the credentials and expertise of the source, prioritizing peer-reviewed literature and established clinical guidelines from organizations such as the American Nurses Association or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Second, I examine the methodology used to generate the information, looking for rigorous research designs, appropriate sample sizes, and transparent reporting of limitations. Third, I seek corroboration across multiple reliable sources rather than relying on a single reference (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023).

    In my personal life, I apply similar principles but may accept lower levels of evidence depending on the stakes involved. For instance, when researching a new recipe, a TikTok or Instagram post from trusted food bloggers are appropriate. However, when making health-related decisions for my family, I consult medical literature and healthcare providers, applying the same critical thinking skills I use professionally.

    The hierarchy of evidence model ranks information sources based on their methodological rigor and reliability, with systematic reviews and meta-analyses at the apex, followed by randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, case reports, and expert opinion at the base (Flanagan & Beck, 2024). This framework guides my information-seeking behavior in distinct ways across different contexts.

    In clinical settings, I primarily seek information from the upper levels of the hierarchy. When developing care plans or implementing new interventions, I consult systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines based on meta-analyses, and high-quality randomized controlled trials. For example, when administering new chemotherapy medications to oncology patients, I reference the Oncology Nursing Societys evidence-based guidelines, which integrate findings from numerous rigorous studies. This approach ensures that my nursing practice reflects the best available evidence and minimizes potential harm to patients.

    My personal information-seeking tends to draw from lower levels of the hierarchy, though this varies by context. For everyday decisions, like choosing household products or planning recreational activities, I often rely on consumer reviews, expert opinions, or advice from friends and family. However, for significant decisions affecting health or financial well-being, I elevate my standards and seek higher-quality evidence, demonstrating that the stakes of a decision should influence our evidential requirements.

    My nursing knowledge has developed through multiple pathways. Formal education provided foundational theoretical knowledge through textbooks, lectures, and laboratory simulations. Clinical rotations and preceptorships offered experiential learning, where I applied theoretical concepts in real-world settings under supervision. Continuing education, professional conferences, and journal clubs have facilitated ongoing knowledge development throughout my career. Additionally, tacit knowledge gained through repeated clinical experiences has refined my clinical judgment and pattern recognition abilities (Benner, 2001).

    Determining accuracy in nursing knowledge requires ongoing verification. I cross-reference new information with established evidence, consult with experienced colleagues, and observe patient outcomes when implementing interventions. For instance, when learning a new wound care technique, I not only study evidence supporting it but also monitor healing progression in my patients and discuss observations with wound care specialists. This triangulation of evidence, expert consultation, and outcome evaluation enhances confidence in knowledge accuracy.

    Evidence-based practice represents the gold standard for knowledge acquisition in nursing. This approach integrates the best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). Best practices include regularly reviewing current literature, participating in professional development activities, engaging in reflective practice, collaborating with interdisciplinary teams, and maintaining healthy skepticism that prompts ongoing questioning and learning.

    Understanding how we acquire and validate knowledge is crucial for professional nursing practice. By applying hierarchical evidence frameworks, employing critical evaluation skills, and integrating multiple ways of knowing, nurses can provide safe, effective, evidence-based care while continuing to grow professionally.

    References

    Benner, P. (2001). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice (Commemorative ed.). Prentice Hall.

    Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

    Flanagan, J., & Beck, C. T. (2024). Polit & Beck’s Nursing Research (12th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.

    Requirements: 260

  • Skin

    Choose one topic from the list below and explore it through the lens of anatomy, physiology, and clinical or societal relevance. In your post: Clearly explain the concept and its biological foundations. Connect it to at least one real-world condition, disease, or population-level issue. Reflect on why this topic matters in your intended field of study or future professional role (e.g., nursing, nutrition, sports performance, communication sciences, occupational therapy, medical lab science). Pose a thought-provoking question or make a connection that invites others to build on your ideas. topic : Repair of the integument after injury (e.g., wound healing, burns, scarring).
  • Undefined

    Follow the directions below to complete the activity: Step 1 | Write your rough draft. Using the extended paragraph plan, construct the first draft of your essay. Step 2 | Submit your draft to Brainfuse for review. Having an outside entity like Brainfuse review a paper before it’s submitted for grading is like having an extra pair of eyes to check for mistakes and make sure everything makes sense. It’s important because sometimes when we’re so close to our work, we might miss errors or overlook things that could be improved. Getting another person’s perspective can help us catch mistakes we might have missed and provide helpful suggestions for making the paper better. Ultimately, having an outside review can increase the quality of the paper and improve our chances of getting a better grade. Please go to the Writing Center tab and follow the prompts. Choose “Academic Essay” when prompted and then navigate through the submission page. You will be asked to upload your completed rough draft towards the end. It typically takes Brainfuse 24 hours to return your feedback, so do not wait until the last minute to submit it. Step 3 | Edit Your Paper Once you receive your report from Brainfuse, use it to revise your paper. You will turn in the corrected paper in the next assignment. Here, I need you to submit the Brainfuse Report you received. Step 4 | Submit Your Brainfuse Report Once you have completed all activities, follow the directions below to submit your assignment. Select the Start Assignment button to begin the assignment submission. Locate and upload the activity from your computer, mobile device, Google Drive, or Office 365. Click the Submit Assignment button.

  • Discussion

    Respond to this prompt in 350 words or more: Do you believe that you are more of an entity theorist or an incremental theorist? Why? Which theory do you think is most reinforced in educational settings? Why?
  • Basic concepts in criminal law

    The instruction is in the drop box

    the book if needed information how to access is below

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): WHERE TO FIND THE BOOK.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Bucket list

    Need to be done as instructed without any AI detection when put to test.
  • Processing fluency and its effect on cognitive reasoning and…

    Please find and add 1 new Literature Review into the Literature Review Section. And also add the reference into the references section.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Registered Report.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Case study

    MGT205 Principles of Management Spring 2026 Case 1 Case 1 consists of three questions taken directly from your textbook. Please answer these questions to the best of your ability based on the assigned readings. Your case is due Wednesday February 25 by 11:59 pm. The correctness of your answers will be judged by how close your answers are to the authors answers. You will be assessed as follows: Appearance: 25 points. Your paper must be typed, or computer generated with a cover sheet. The cover sheet should contain the class, the assignment, your name and the date or semester. Format: 25 points. Your paper should be double spaced. Print the question first, in bold, skip a line and then write your answer. Content Answers: 100 points. The correctness of your answer will be judged by how close it is to the answers given by the books author. The questions, which can be found at the end of chapter 2 are as follows: 1. Why do modern companies need managers? 2. What lessons did we learn from the Hawthorne studies? Summarize Barnards contributions on cooperation and acceptance of authority. 3. Explain contingency management. Appearance 25 Format 25 Content 100 Total 150 Upload your case in Week 5 folder link labeled Case 1 upload link no later than Wednesday February 25 11:59 pm.