Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Writing Question

    This assignment is already done but it need some changes to it based off the instructor notes

    THIS IS THE ASSIGNMENT

    When writing your assessment, be sure to:

    • Use the to guide the formatting and organization of your writing.
    • Cite any references to sources in a References page.
    • Include the for Assessments 2 and 3 as an appendix, after the References section.

    Organization

    Organize your reflection with the following sections:

    Title Page

    • Include a title page with the following title: Critical Reflection and Writing Process Evaluation.

    Introduction

    • Your introduction needs to identify the focus of your reflection for readers; it should be no longer than one-half page.

    Writing Process Evaluation

    • Evaluate your personal writing process in this course.
    • Be sure to include evidence by specifying important revision choices you applied in response to feedback from your instructor or your own rethinking of Assessments 2 and 3.
    • Explain how you might apply lessons learned or strategies used during the writing of the assessments in this course to future writing tasks related to your program and your chosen profession.
    • Be sure to explain how specific writing resources can be helpful.

    Systems Thinking

    • Explain how systems thinking can provide a framework for exploring the professional issue or problem that you focused on in Assessments 2 and 3.

    Professional Growth

    • Evaluate the impact of the course on your understanding of professional goals, future courses, and strategies for program success.
    • Articulate your professional strengths and opportunities for growth.
    • Identify organizations, and other resources, services, and activities that could be used for professional development to strengthen your skills.

    Conclusion

    • Your conclusion should emphasize the main themes in your paper and include the impact of this course on your understanding of your professional goals, your thoughts about future doctoral coursework, and your strategies for success in your EdD program.

    References

    • Cite any references to sources on a References page.

    Appendix

    • Include the Writing Revision Matrix documents for Assessments 2 and 3.

    THE ASSIGNMENT IS ASSESSEMENT4 BUT I AM ATTACHING ASSSESSMENT 2 AND 3 IN CASE YOU NEED TO USE THEM

    INSTRUCTOR NOTES FROM ASSESSMENT 3

    Competency 2

    Apply information literacy skills to locate and critically evaluate scholarly data, theories, and research.

    Criterion

    Support arguments with reference to scholarly literature.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Supports arguments with reference to scholarly literature.

    Faculty Comments:You have used five references from the literature to support your arguments.

    Competency 4

    Analyze the characteristics of ethical behavior and respect for diversity and civil discourse.

    Criterion

    Describe connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization, including examples.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Describes connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization, including examples.

    Faculty Comments:You have tried to explained the connections among these issues and the specialization of educational leadership. Your content, however, is not well organized so even though there is a connection to educational leadership, it is not clear as the connection from one issue to another. You need to reorganize and use connection phrase, word, and sentences.

    Criterion

    Analyze scholarly literature focused on the connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Analyzes scholarly literature focused on the connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization.

    Faculty Comments:I can see that you tried to synthesize the information but rather than show similarities among the findings in the literature, you demonstrated the differences.

    Criterion

    Evaluate challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse in a professional educational setting.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Evaluates challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse in a professional educational setting.

    Faculty Comments:Be more specific on the challenges posed by these issues and provide examples to illustrate your discussions.

    Competency 5

    Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and appropriate to purpose.

    Criterion

    Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    Your Result:BASIC

    Organizes content with some logical flow, but some transitions are missing or unclear.

    Faculty Comments:You need to add transitional sentences so that the content flows more smoothly and your ideas are linked together.

    INSTRUCTOR NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT 2

    Because this was your final submission for this assessment (you submitted the wrong paper the first time), I was a little lenient on the APA formatting. There were errors that you will want to make sure you do not make on the next assessment. Also, the Pangram report indicated that the percentage of AI generated content was still at 49%. On your next assessment it needs to be 100% human written. I am not sure how you are using AI but you need to trust your own skills and not use AI except to correct your grammar, for example. Do not let any AI program change your sentence structure or content.

    E. Waller

    Scoring Guide

    Competency 1

    Determine how action research and systems thinking apply to professional problems, challenges, or issues in education.

    Criterion

    Provide a detailed description and examples illustrating how a chosen topic relates specifically to one’s specialization.

    Your Result:DISTINGUISHED

    Provides a detailed description, examples illustrating how a chosen topic relates specifically to one’s specialization, and rationale for the chosen examples.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – You have described how this topic relates to the specialization of educational leadership.

    Criterion

    Analyze information gathered in a literature review.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Analyzes information gathered in a literature review.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – What questions were not answered in your search of the literature. Is more research needed on this topic?

    Competency 2

    Apply information literacy skills to locate and critically evaluate scholarly data, theories, and research.

    Criterion

    Evaluate scholarly articles using principles of critical thinking.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Evaluates scholarly articles using principles of critical thinking.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – Synthesize the findings by discussing how scholars or researchers shared similar ideas.

    Criterion

    Incorporate scholarly journal articles relevant to one’s study.

    Your Result:DISTINGUISHED

    Incorporates more than five scholarly journal articles relevant to one’s study and provides rationale for the chosen articles.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – You have incorporated five articles in support of your arguments.

    Competency 5

    Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and appropriate to purpose.

    Criterion

    Integrate appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and APA citation style.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Integrates appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and APA citation style.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – There are errors in your APA formatting that need to be corrected.

    THE MATRIX DOCUMENT HAS TO BE COMPLETE BASED OFF THE NOTES FROM THE INSTRUCTOR LISTED FOR ASSESSMENT 2 AND 3

    Requirements: READ CAREFULLY

  • Martin Luther King

    5 full double-spaced pages in MLA format about Martin luther king include weird facts

  • History Question

    I have this assignment due and I will provide all the information and if you can finish it earlier I will appreciate it and if there is anything let me know. I have this assignment due and make sure to be your own words not from outside resource the professor will know and add reference at the end of the page.

    Week 1: Racial Formation reflection

    In a minimum one minute and thirty second video think through any of the following and remember to reference specific arguments/points from the text including author(s) and page number:

    • Do you have to be white to uphold white supremacy?
    • Using both theoretical pieces (Racial Formation and the Possessive invest in whiteness)
    • What is your race and how do you know?
    • What does it mean for race to be a social construct?
    • How have you experienced the racialization of yourself?
    • Do you think you have a commitment to combat white supremacy?
    • Bonus:
    • Why did you take this course?
    • What do you hope to learn from this course?

    Cuyamaca ETHS Spring 2026 Week 1.mp4

    MichaelOmiHowar_2015_IntroductionRacialFor_RacialFormationInTheU.pdf

    The_Possessive_Investment_in_Whiteness_How_White_P…_—-_(1._The_Possessive_Investment_in_Whiteness).pdf

    These writings are to be in 12 font times new roman and require a minimum of 350 words to be considered for full points. Meeting the minimum doesnt necessitate full points. The responses must be well-written and have critical components to them. Inquiries to consider when completing these assignments include but are not limited to: What is the author(s) arguing? If a week has two readings, what is the conversation between the readings? Are authors agreeing? Are they differing in views? What are some overarching themes youre noticing? If specific questions should be considered, the instructor will address them in an announcement. These assignments are the main component of the class since we will be asynchronous. It is imperative that you complete them in a timely manner. If the assignment nature were to change, you will be alerted by the instructor.

    Requirements: As long as answers all the questions.

  • MGT510 M4 – Discussions and replies

    • Discuss the concepts, principles, and theories from your textbook. Cite your textbooks and cite any other sources if appropriate.
    • Your initial post should address all components of the question with a 500 word limit.
    • Reply to at least two discussion posts with comments that further and advance the discussion topic.
    • Reply to the instructor’s question.
    • APA reference style is a must.

    Requirements: as per instructions

  • MGT560 M 4 – Discussion with replies

    Directions:

    • Discuss the concepts, principles, and theories from your textbook. Cite your textbooks and cite any other sources if appropriate.
    • Your initial post should address all components of the question with a 500-word limit.
    • Reply to at least two discussion posts with comments that further advance the discussion topic.
    • Reply to the instructor’s question
    • APA reference style 7th edition is a must.

    Requirements: As per instructions

  • HTN Discussion

    You are having a busy day in your own private family practice clinic. You are happy to see a patient on your schedule that looks to be an “easy” patient. BUT here is what you see:

    A 14-year-old female soccer player has been referred for evaluation of elevated blood pressure detected at a pre-sports participation screening at her school 2 weeks ago. She is 5′ tall.

    Blood pressures obtained at the screening ranged from 137149/7580 mmHg. The school nurse has been monitoring her and has documented the same range.

    Her BP today is 136/82.

    Using the pediatric BP calculator, what is your diagnosis? In your posting, document one component of either your work up or your plan for this patient, and explain why that would be important.

  • Portfolio Project – Merchandising Journaling, Posting, & Tri…

    Assignment Instructions

    Directions

    You will complete a portion of your Portfolio Project. For detailed directions, please refer to the Portfolio Project Directions and Rubrics document available in the Course Assessments folder.

    Journal Entry Video

    Journal Entry Video

    Debits and Credits Video

    You will complete parts of your Portfolio Project throughout this course. Please download and print the document linked below to keep track of all directions and deadlines.

    Click the following link to download the Portfolio Project Directions and Rubrics:

    ACCT120 – Portfolio Project Directions and Rubrics.docx

    ACCT120 – Portfolio Project Template.xlsx

  • Module 5: Discussion — Discussion 5

    Module 5 includes three discussion questions. Please make sure to answer all sub-questions.

    First, please complete the Big Five (or OCEAN) Personality traits questionnaire.

    Please follow the direction in the document to calculate all five-factor scores and report them.

    Question 1. Please share your all five personality traits scores (e.g., Extroversion = 4.7; Agreeable = 4.2; Conscientiousness = 3.9; Openness to Experience = 3.2; Neuroticism = 1.9). Do not include the question table in your answer. Only scores for all five traits. * All scores should be in the range between 1 to 5. Please carefully see the scoring direction in the document.

    Question 2. Do you agree with your scores for each trait? Or were you surprised by the result? If so, why? Please describe how you see your own personality trait result.

    Question 3. Does an organization prefer certain personality traits? If so, which one? Please make sure to include solid reasons to choose that trait for your answer.

    Submission Instructions:

    You must read questions carefully and make sure to respond to all discussion questions. Do not include discussion questions in your post. For the initial post, aim for around 75-100 words per discussion question. Focus on answering the question clearly with your own example and experiences. For peer responses, each response should be around 80 words and focus on a specific idea from the peer’s post. Do not rephrase or agree on the idea.

  • battle of Olustee

    THE ASSIGNMENT Students will consider how the people who fought at the Battle of Olustee should be remembered and will support their position with information learned in this module. The assignment is about demonstrating knowledge of the past. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Students will recognize and identify (who, what, where, when, and historic significance) the Battle of Olustee in the history of Florida Students will recognize and identify (who, what, where, when, and historic significance) the Lost Cause in the history of Florida Students will recognize and identify (who, what, where, when, and historic significance) the United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC) in the history of Florida Students will recognize the Olustee Battlefield Historic State Park and the Olustee Re-enactment Students will develop a historical context for understanding current issues and events Students will understand the political development of Florida DIRECTIONS Write a mock letter (you aren’t required to send it) to your representative and senator in the Florida State Legislature declaring your position on whether a Union monument should be erected at the Battle of Olustee Historic State Park. Your statement must, like all good arguments, be supported with evidence from this module that demonstrates your understanding of the Battle of Olustee, the Lost Cause, and the Daughters of the Confederacy. the letter should be in paragraph format whether or not you support adding a monument is irrelevant; whether you clearly support your position with evidence from assigned course materials is most important

  • Education & Teaching Question

      Assignment 2: Identity & Classroom Culture Analysis

      Purpose

      This assignment allows you to analyze how teacher and student identities shape classroom culture. Building on Dena Simmons TED Talk and the Module 2 Identity & Classroom Culture Brief: Culturally Responsive Teaching, Identity, and Belonging (Whitfield), you will explore how emotional safety, belonging, and culturally responsive practices influence student engagement and success.

      Task Instructions

      Write a 350500 word analysis that synthesizes ideas from:

      • Dena Simmons talk: How Students of Color Confront Impostor Syndrome
      • Module 2 Identity & Classroom Culture Brief (Whitfield)

      Your analysis must address:

      1. How student identity and belonging influence engagement and academic confidence.
      2. How teachers can create emotionally safe, identity-affirming classrooms, using at least one idea from the Whitfield brief.
      3. One specific culturally responsive action or strategy you plan to use in your own future classroom to affirm diverse student identities and reduce impostor feelings.

      Your writing should be clear, reflective, anchored in the assigned materials, and aligned to APA expectations.

      Formatting Requirements

      • Length: 350500 words
      • Double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12 pt
      • APA 7 formatting (in-text citations + reference list)
      • Submit as PDF or Word document

      Submission Requirements

      Upload your file directly to Canvas.
      Only PDF or DOCX formats will be accepted.

      Due Date

      • Due: Sunday, February 8, 2026 @ 11:59 PM
      • Grace Period: Monday, February 9, 2026 @ 8:00 AM
      • Opens: January 26, 2026

      Grading (50 points)

      Assessment will be based on:

      • Integration of Simmons key ideas
      • Effective use of the Module 2 brief
      • Depth and clarity of analysis
      • Connection to culturally responsive practice
      • APA accuracy
      • Professional quality of writing

      Standards Alignment

      • InTASC Standards 2 & 3
      • CAEP Standard 1
      • GSU Conceptual Framework: Knowledge, Skills, Dispositions

    Requirements: 350+ words