Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Chapter six discussion board

    NOTE THAT DUE DATE REMAINS UNCHANGED–Chapter six discussion board–due February 6 @ 9 am

    NOTE: Points will be deducted for the inclusion of outside references. The resources you need to complete assignments are to be found in the assigned course readings. REMEMBER, the use of ChatGPT, Bard, and other forms of AI to complete coursework is defined as a form of cheating (With the exception of the editor function in Word, which you are encouraged to utilize.).

    With regard to chapter six (Establishing Connections: Gender, Motor Vehicle Theft, and Disposal Networks) please compose a brief essay in which you deal with, at a minimum, the following:

    1.1. What role does gender play in motor vehicle theft?

    2.2. Do males and females experience motor vehicle theft differently? How so?

    3.3. Identify some of the barriers to entry which females may experience when trying to enter this world?

    4.4. Do all males seem to have the same attitude with regard to female car thieves? Explain.

    5.5. According to the researchers, how were some female car thieves able to take advantage of sexist attitudes?

    Your post should be a minimum of three well-developed paragraphs.

    Spelling, grammar, and punctuation count. Make sure you proofread your work prior to posting it. Be sure to write in complete sentences and use proper grammar to the best of your ability. Only substantive/meaningful posts will be eligible for full-credit.

    As part of this discussion board you are strongly encouraged to review and comment on a classmate’s post, though this is not required. Comments should be constructive, direct, and need not be more than a couple of sentences or a paragraph at most. Please proofread your words prior to posting.

    Book Their Own Words: Criminals on Crime, seventh edition, by Cromwell and Birzer.

    Requirements: as needed

  • Contested Place

    First complete the assigned reading and video for this Module, then address these questions as a single thread in this forum:

    1. What is being contested and what parties are involved in the conflict, as recorded in the classic documentary film Broken Rainbow? What expressive and communicative techniques does a documentary film like this use to present the material that a Social Sciences article might not be able to? How does the film evoke a sense of place? How does it move our emotions & our sense of justice?
    2. Burkhard Bilger offers an interdisciplinary perspective to a contested building in the “Mystery on Pearl Street.” First briefly summarize the dispute. Then choose one of the disciplines he uses–Law, History, Architectural History, Business–and tell us what perspective you think this discipline offers on the issue? Please support your statements with evidence from the article in the form of quotes, paraphrases & summaries, with citations.
    3. Third, tell us about a dispute over a specific place that you are aware of–it can be a conflict over the fate of a building, the use of a piece of land, forest, river, mountain, etc. Use something specific, rather than a large international dispute or a war. You may need to do some research for this question.

    Posting Requirements

    This discussion requires one initial response to the question(s) above as well as a response to one of your peers. Additional replies are encouraged, but they are neither required nor graded. Your original post should be at least 500 words and no more than 700 words, and your peer response should be no less than 100 words each. Youll be able to see a running word count as you type in the text box. Try to respond early if you can so that your classmates have enough posts to reply to. Feel free to “like” posts even if you do not respond to them. You do not need to include bibliographic citations at the end of your post.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Mystery on Pearl Street (1).pdf, Lecture 5 SP2026 (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Billing policy and procedures

    Instructions

    Create a presentation that details how MACRA will affect reimbursement and customer services. Include all of the following in your presentation:

    • 1 slide: Explain value-based purchasing.
    • 1 slide: Explain MACRA.
    • 1 slide: Explain the MIPS model.
    • 2 slides: Explain the APM and how it relates to MIPS.
    • 23 slides: Outline five quality measures that you recommend the clinic focus on.
    • Include measure title, description, and primary measure steward.
    • 23 slides: Defend your recommendations and why you feel these are the measures that the clinic should focus on.
    • 23 slides: Analyze how the reimbursement changes will benefit the patients, physicians, and the clinic.
    • 1 slide: Conclusion.

    Note: To increase stakeholder buy-in, remember to provide a minimum of three current scholarly and/or authoritative resources to support the changes you are recommending. These resources should be over and above the resources provided to you in this week’s reading list.

    Additional Requirements

    Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:

    • Written communication: Be sure that your presentation is clear, logical, and succinct. It also needs to be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • Length: 1215 slides.
    • Title and reference pages: Include a title and a reference slide. Include a minimum of three references to current scholarly and/or authoritative resources. These resources need to be over and above the resources identified for you in this week’s reading list. Current means no more than five years old.
    • APA format: Ensure in-text citations and references adhere to current APA format. For an APA refresher, consult the
    • section of the Writing Center.
    • Rubric: Review the Billing Policies and Procedures rubric so that you understand how your instructor is going to evaluate your work.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:

    • Competency 1: Develop financial strategies to address dynamic environmental forces.
    • Explain value-based purchasing.
    • Explain MACRA.
    • Competency 2: Analyze the cost and revenue implications for organizational changes due to environmental forces.
    • Explain MIPS and APM and how they are related.
    • Recommend five quality measures that the clinic should focus on, including the measure title, description, NQS domain, meaningful measure area, and primary measure standard for each selected measure.
    • Defend the given recommendation and why the clinic should focus on the selected quality measures.
    • Analyze how the reimbursement changes will benefit the patients, physicians, and the clinic.
    • Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in health care administration.
    • Write content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
    • Format citations and references in APA style.

  • Social Science Question

    NOTE: Points will be deducted for the inclusion of outside references. The resources you need to complete assignments are to be found in the assigned course readings. REMEMBER, the use of ChatGPT, Bard, and other forms of AI to complete coursework is defined as a form of cheating (With the exception of the editor function in Word, which you are encouraged to utilize.).

    Chapters six through eight assignment:

    In your own words, respond to the following. Make sure you write in complete sentences and paragraphs. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation count.

    1. Offer a brief summary of each of the three articles. Here I am looking for one or two well-developed paragraphs for each of the three articles.
    2. Compare and contrast the three articles. On which points do they converge? On which points do they diverge?
    3. What is the single most important point made in each article?

    Your submission should be a minimum of six well-developed paragraphs. Remember, a paragraph has a minimum of five sentences.

    Book

    Their Own Words: Criminals on Crime, seventh edition, by Cromwell and Birzer.

    Requirements: as needed

  • Part E

    There are many types of EXPLORATORY, QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL, and EXPLANATORY research designs that you can select for your study. For “Part E: DESIGNS!”, you will utilize Perplexity AI to help you figure out the best research design to use!

    For your work on this page, you will need to Access Perplexity AI by clicking on this link:

    The rest of the assignment has been attached in the screenshots. Please read all to fully understand the instructions of the assignment.

    Part C has been attached. This is Part C feedback: “

    1 point

    Both reflection questions are

    answered

    Responses demonstrate engagement

    with the Part B exercise

    .05 point

    At least 4-5 topics of interest

    are clearly carried over from Parts A/B

    1 point

    Research questions are provided for at

    least 45 previously identified topics

    .05 point (one or other criteria met)

    Research questions generally reflect

    and/or are consistent with the examples provided

    Questions show an effort to utilize

    the operationalized variables (e.g., unit of measurement; proposed

    timeframe) established in Part B

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Part_D_SAMPLES.docx, Part_C.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • English Question

    Answer the following questions: in essay fromat 500 words

    • Reflect back on your childhood…
      1. What types of play activities did you engage in most often?
      2. What benefits did you gain from participating in those activities?
      3. Why do you feel that you benefitted in that way?
    • Now think about today and reflect…
      1. What does your play life look like now?
      2. Do you still participate in playful activities? Why or why not?
      3. How do you integrate playful activities into your life currently, or what could you do to bring play back into your life?
      4. What would be some of the benefits of being playful at this time in your life?

    Be sure to reference the attached rubric and the for directions on the written format.

    Requirements: as needed

  • Summer program application essay help

    Prompt 1: Why are you interested in conducting open-ended research, particularly in your subject(s) of interest? What do you hope to gain by participating in SIP? What skills or mindset will be most important to bring to SIP? (400-500 words, 12pt. font)

  • Nursing Question

    Research a selected local, national, or global nonprofit organization or government agency to determine how it contributes to public health and safety improvements, promotes equal opportunity, and improves the quality of life within the community. Submit your findings in a 35 page report. As you begin to prepare this assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Nonprofit Organizations and Community Health activity to gain insight into promoting equal opportunity and improving the quality of life in a community. The information gained from completing this activity will help you succeed with the assessment.

    After completing this activity, select one of the local, national, or global nonprofit organizations or government agencies presented in the Assessment 2 Supplement: Community Resources [PDF (https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/59742/files/11164958/download)

    Research a selected local, national, or global nonprofit organization or government agency from the document provided. Determine how the organization or agency contributes to public health and safety improvements, promotes equal opportunity, and improves the quality of life within the community. Submit your findings in a 35 page report.

    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

    Explain how an organizations mission and vision enable it to contribute to public health and safety improvements.

    Provide examples of ways a local and/or global initiative supports the mission and vision and promotes public health and safety.

    Evaluate an organizations ability to promote equal opportunity and improve the quality of life in a community.

    Consider the effects of social, cultural, economic, and physical barriers.

    Be sure to go beyond simply describing what the organization does in these areas but evaluating the impact.

    Assess the impact of funding sources, policy, and legislation on an organization’s service delivery.

    Consider the potential implications of funding decisions, policy, and legislation for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community.

    Remember to actually include the policies, legislation, and funding avenues for your chosen organization.

    Explain how an organizations work impacts the health and/or safety needs of a local community.

    Consider how nurses might become involved with the organization.

    How are nurses involved within this organization?

    Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    Write with a specific purpose and audience in mind.

    Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.

    Requirements: 3-5

  • ARTICLE CRITIQUE

    Based on the Prosek et al. (2023) article:

    1. Describe the (a) population(s) (units at the construct level) and (b) sample(s) (units at the operational level).
    2. What type of sampling method did Prosek et al. use? Do you think that this method allowed them to select a good representation of the population? Why or why not?
    3. What are the (a) predictor variables at the construct level, (b) predictor variables at the operational level, (c) dependent variables at the construct level, and (d) dependent variables at the operational level?
    4. What evidence is given that suggests that these measures are valid and reliable? Provide two points of evidence: one that support measurement reliability and one that support measurement validity.
    5. How did Prosek et al.’s results compare to those from previous studies? Provide two comparisons: one example in which the the results are the same (or similar) and one in which the the results are contrary (or conflict; i.e., same variables, but different outcomes). Be sure to cite each previous study (mentioned in the article) you use in your examples. Base your comparisons only on what Prosek et al. discuss.

    Grading Rubric for Article Critique 1

    Question 1

    Full credit: correctly describes the intended population (5 pts) and at the sample (5 pts). These must be distinctly different from each other. Partial credit may be given if: only one is given; both are given, but are labeled incorrectly (i.e. population is labeled as sample and vice versa); both are given, but do not identify which is the population and which is the sample.

    Question 2

    Full credit: correctly identifies at least one of the sampling types (4 pts), clearly indicates whether or not the sample is good (2 pts), and provides a reasonable argument to support this, which includes evidence from the article (4 pts). Partial credit may be given if: the procedures for sampling are described, but the type(s) is/are not specified; there is a reasonable argument for why the sampling was or was not good, but no conclusion is given; a conclusion is given, but no argument; or the argument supporting the sampling procedure does not provide evidence from the article.

    Question 3

    Full credit: correctly describes the (a) predictor and (b) dependent variables at the construct level (5 pts) and at the operational level (5 pts). The constructs and operations must be distinctly different. Partial credit may be given if: only one level is given; each level is given, but are labeled incorrectly (i.e. construct is labeled as operation and vice versa); both levels are given, but does not identify which is the construct and which is the operation; only the predictor or dependent variable is described.

    Question 4

    Full credit: provides at least two pieces of evidence to support the reliability of measures used in the article (5 pts.) and at least two pieces of evidence to support the validity of the measures (5 pts). You only need a total of four pieces of evidence for any number of measures. You do NOT need two (or four) pieces of evidence for each measure. Partial credit may be given if: (a) reliability and validity are discussed, but it does not relate to evidence from the article, (b) there are fewer than two pieces of evidence for validity, or (c) there are fewer than two pieces of evidence for validity.

    Question 5

    Full credit: Provide two examples of how the study’s results are the same or similar to findings from previous research; cite the studies you are comparing and tell me how they are similar (i.e., what did both studies find?) (5 pts); and provide two examples of how the study’s results are different from or contradict findings from previous research; cite the studies you are comparing and tell me how they are different (i.e., what did Prosek et al. find? What did the other study find?) (5 pts). Partial credit may be given if fewer than four examples are given for similar and different results, fewer than two examples are given for either similar results or different results, or other studies are discussed but not compared to the current study.

    References

    Allee-Herndon, K., Roberts, S. K., Hu, B., Clark, M. H., & Stewart, M. L. (2021). Lets talk Play! Exploring the possible benefits of play-based pedagogy on language and literacy learning in two Title I kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal.

  • How can I earn money?

    Requirements: