Author: admin

  • Lab 7

    All instructions are in their I need intro, pre questions and sweeter, then calculations, then post questions and then conclusion.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Lab Activity 7 – Keplers Laws – 1301.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • TLMT331 week 1

    see attached, respond to each student individually

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): TLMT331 week 1 discussion responses.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • week 5

    Patient case study (fictional) for BSN students nearing graduation

    Patient ID: MRN 000123456 (fictional) Name: Thomas Riley (Mr. Riley) Age: 68 Sex: Male DOB: 08/14/1957 Date of admission: 02/07/2026 Admission source: ED from home via EMS Code status: Full Code Allergies: Penicillin (rash)

    Presenting complaint: Progressive shortness of breath for 3 days, increased lower-extremity swelling, cough with white sputum, orthopnea (needs 3 pillows), decreased exercise tolerance.

    Past medical history:

    • Chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), diagnosed 5 years ago (EF 30%)
    • Coronary artery disease (stented 3 years ago)
    • Hypertension
    • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema-predominant
    • Type 2 diabetes mellitus, diet-controlled
    • Chronic kidney disease stage 3a (eGFR ~52 mL/min/1.73 m2)
    • Hyperlipidemia
    • Osteoarthritis of knees

    Surgical history:

    • CABG x1 (no), PCI with stent 3 years ago
    • Left knee arthroscopy

    Social history:

    • Lives with wife in single-level home
    • Retired factory worker
    • Former smoker: 40 pack-year history, quit 5 years ago
    • Alcohol: occasional wine
    • No illicit drug use
    • Support: spouse able to assist; adult daughter nearby

    Home medications (prior to admission):

    • Metoprolol succinate 100 mg PO daily
    • Lisinopril 20 mg PO daily
    • Furosemide 40 mg PO daily (often misses doses)
    • Spironolactone 25 mg PO daily
    • Atorvastatin 40 mg PO nightly
    • Tiotropium inhaler 18 mcg daily
    • Albuterol inhaler PRN (uses 23 times/day)
    • Aspirin 81 mg PO daily
    • Multivitamin

    Allergies: Penicillin rash

    Initial ED assessment / triage vitals:

    • T: 99.1F (37.3C)
    • HR: 110 bpm, regular
    • BP: 160/92 mmHg
    • RR: 26 breaths/min
    • SpO2: 88% on room air, improves to 94% on 4 L/min nasal cannula
    • Pain: 2/10 (chest tightness occasionally)

    Physical exam (on admission):

    • General: Alert, anxious, mild respiratory distress
    • HEENT: No JVD at 30 degrees (note: JVD present when more upright)
    • Lungs: Bilateral crackles at bases, decreased breath sounds with expiratory wheeze; mild use of accessory muscles
    • Cardiac: Tachycardic, S1/S2, S3 present, no murmurs noted
    • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender
    • Extremities: Bilateral pitting edema to mid-shins, cool peripheries
    • Neuro: Alert and oriented x3

    Initial diagnostics:

    • CXR: Cardiomegaly with pulmonary vascular congestion and bilateral interstitial/alveolar edema, small bilateral pleural effusions
    • ECG: Sinus tachycardia, no acute ischemic changes
    • BNP: 1,200 pg/mL (elevated)
    • Troponin I: 0.02 ng/mL (normal)
    • ABG on 4 L NC: pH 7.45, PaCO2 34 mmHg, PaO2 70 mmHg (mild hypoxemia)
    • CBC: WBC 9.8 x10^9/L, Hgb 13.2 g/dL, Hct 39%, Plt 210 x10^9/L
    • BMP: Na 132 mmol/L, K 4.8 mmol/L, Cl 98 mmol/L, HCO3 22 mmol/L, BUN 28 mg/dL, Creatinine 1.4 mg/dL (baseline 1.2), Glucose 150 mg/dL
    • LFTs: within normal limits
    • Echo (prior record): EF 30% (last year)
    • Urinalysis: trace protein, otherwise unremarkable
    • Sputum culture: sent (pending)

    ED course and admitting diagnosis:

    • Primary: Acute decompensated heart failure (HFrEF exacerbation), likely precipitated by missed diuretic doses and possible COPD exacerbation
    • Secondary: COPD exacerbation, volume overload
    • ED treatment: Supplemental oxygen, IV loop diuretic (furosemide 40 mg IV bolus), nebulized albuterol/ipratropium, started on scheduled IV furosemide infusion protocol pending response, placed on telemetry, continuous pulse oximetry.
    • Admitted to telemetry/medical-surgical step-down unit under cardiology.

    Hospital day 1 plan & orders (sample):

    • Continue oxygen titrated to SpO2 92%
    • Furosemide IV 40 mg bolus then 10 mg/hr infusion (adjust per urine output and daily weights)
    • Metoprolol hold until euvolemic and HR <100; resume later per cardiology
    • Continue lisinopril 20 mg PO daily (hold if creatinine rises >30% or K >5.5)
    • Spironolactone hold while on IV diuresis
    • Nebulized albuterol/ipratropium q6h PRN for wheeze
    • VTE prophylaxis: sequential compression devices (consider LMWH once stable)
    • Daily labs: BMP, BNP qAM
    • Strict I&O, daily weight each AM
    • Cardiology consult for HF management and medication titration
    • Respiratory therapy for inhaler technique, nebulizer treatments, pulmonary toilet
    • Diet: cardiac (2 g sodium), diabetic-consistent as needed
    • Education: low-sodium diet, medication adherence, activity tolerance, when to call provider
    • Discharge planning: assess home support, f/up with cardiology & primary care within 1 week, consider home health if needed

    Nursing assessment data (ongoing):

    • Urine output: first 6 hours after IV furosemide bolus: 800 mL; next 12 hours: 1,200 mL
    • Weight: admission 95 kg; prior baseline 90 kg (weight gain 5 kg)
    • Vitals (12 hours after admission): T 98.6F, HR 96, BP 138/84, RR 20, SpO2 93% on 2 L NC
    • Breath sounds: crackles improved slightly; dyspnea decreased from moderate to mild
    • Peripheral edema decreased to ankles (pitting 1+)
    • Blood glucose: 160 mg/dL fasting
    • BMP (12 hours): Na 130, K 4.6, Creatinine 1.45 mg/dL, BUN 30

    Potential and actual nursing diagnoses (examples):

    • Impaired gas exchange related to pulmonary edema and COPD exacerbation as evidenced by SpO2 88% on room air and bilateral crackles.
    • Excess fluid volume related to compromised regulatory mechanism (heart failure) as evidenced by weight gain, peripheral edema, pulmonary congestion, BNP elevated.
    • Activity intolerance related to decreased cardiac output as evidenced by dyspnea on exertion and tachycardia with minimal activity.
    • Risk for electrolyte imbalance related to diuretic therapy as evidenced by diuretic orders and borderline creatinine/BUN elevation.
    • Deficient knowledge regarding disease process and medication adherence related to missed diuretic doses.

    Nursing care plan interventions (examples with rationale and expected outcomes):

    1. Oxygen therapy and respiratory support
    • Intervention: Administer O2 to maintain SpO2 92%; monitor respiratory rate, work of breathing, ABGs.
    • Rationale: Improve oxygenation, decrease work of breathing.
    • Expected outcome: SpO2 92%, RR <22, decreased dyspnea.
    1. Fluid removal and monitoring
    • Intervention: Administer IV furosemide per order; monitor urine output hourly during infusion, record daily weights, assess mucous membranes and skin turgor, monitor electrolytes and renal function qAM.
    • Rationale: Reduce volume overload, prevent renal impairment and electrolyte disturbances.
    • Expected outcome: 0.51.0 kg weight loss/day initially, decreased edema, stable creatinine.
    1. Prevention of complications
    • Intervention: Telemetry monitoring for arrhythmias, fall risk precautions, VTE prophylaxis.
    • Rationale: HF patients at risk for arrhythmias, falls, and thromboembolism.
    • Expected outcome: No arrhythmias requiring emergent intervention, no falls, no DVT.
    1. Medication management and reconciliation
    • Intervention: Reconcile meds, clarify home diuretic adherence, educate on medication purposes and schedule, coordinate with pharmacy for discharge meds (ensure diuretic dosing and potassium monitoring).
    • Rationale: Prevent readmission due to nonadherence and optimize HF regimen.
    • Expected outcome: Patient verbalizes meds and doses, demonstrates inhaler technique.
    1. Education and discharge planning
    • Intervention: Teach low-sodium diet, daily weights, recognition of worsening HF signs (increased SOB, >23 lb overnight gain), when to seek care; arrange follow-up appointments; involve spouse in teaching.
    • Rationale: Early recognition prevents readmission; caregiver involvement improves adherence.
    • Expected outcome: Patient and spouse demonstrate understanding and plan for outpatient follow-up.
    1. Mobility and activity progression
    • Intervention: Encourage graded activity as tolerated, monitor vitals with ambulation, provide rest periods.
    • Rationale: Prevent deconditioning while avoiding cardiac stress.
    • Expected outcome: Activity tolerance improves, HR and BP within acceptable range during activity.

    Progress notes example (Hospital day 2 morning):

    • Subjective: Denies chest pain; reports breathing easier, requires 2 pillows at night now. States will try to take furosemide at home but sometimes forgets.
    • Objective: Vitals stable, SpO2 94% on 2 L NC, RR 18, HR 86, BP 130/78. Lungs: decreased crackles. Urine output last 24 hrs: 2,400 mL. Weight 92 kg (down 3 kg from admission). BMP: Na 131, K 4.4, Creatinine 1.35 mg/dL.
    • Assessment: Responding to diuresis; stable for step-down care. Needs med teaching and discharge planning.
    • Plan: Continue diuretic per protocol, hold spironolactone until assessment by cardiology, schedule cardiology follow-up, begin discharge teaching, consider home diuretic supply and home health for initial medication reconciliation and weight monitoring.

    Lab trends to monitor:

    • Daily BMP (Na, K, Cr, BUN)
    • BNP trends
    • Weight and I&O
    • Oxygenation and ABGs if indicated
    • ECG/Telemetry for arrhythmias
    • Sputum culture results (if infectious etiology suspected)

    Discharge considerations (anticipated if stable by day 34):

    • Transition IV diuretics to oral high-dose furosemide (e.g., 80 mg PO daily or as individualized) with clear instructions and pharmacy reconciliation
    • Reinstate guideline-directed medical therapy (beta-blocker, ACE inhibitor) with cardiology input; titration outpatient
    • Arrange cardiology appointment in 37 days
    • Provide written and teach-back education: low-sodium diet, daily weights, medication schedule, inhaler technique, signs/symptoms requiring immediate care
    • Consider home health for weight, vitals, medication reconciliation for first 12 weeks
    • Provide referral to CHF clinic or heart failure management program

    Student tasks / learning activities (for evaluation):

    1. Perform focused cardiopulmonary assessment and document findings.
    2. Calculate fluid balance for prior 24 hours and interpret significance.
    3. Formulate 3 prioritized nursing diagnoses with supporting data.
    4. Create a 24-hour nursing care plan with specific interventions, rationales, and measurable outcomes.
    5. Demonstrate proper inhaler technique and teach-back with spouse.
    6. Identify potential medication interactions/contraindications (e.g., ACE inhibitor + spironolactone with rising creatinine/K).
    7. Develop discharge teaching checklist and complete a teach-back session (document results).
    8. Recognize signs of worsening HF and when to escalate care.
    9. Interpret BMP trend and suggest nursing actions for abnormal K or creatinine changes.
    10. Communicate change-of-shift report including SBAR to receiving nurse.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Clinical Course Level 4 DPCD (2).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • HR in the News

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Instructions for HR in the News.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion board module 4

    What do I want you to do?

    Determine whether or not you are getting enough sleep. Discuss what you could do to improve your sleep, and the risks you take when not getting enough sleep.

    Why do I want you to do it?

    Sleep is how our bodies and brains heal and grow. Without sleep, we suffer!

    How do I want you to do it?

    1. Determine whether or not you are sleep deprived. Take this to get some data.
    2. Compose a discussion board post that is at least 200 words long.
    • Report the score you received on the sleep quiz. Describe how much sleep you are currently getting and whether or not you feel sleep deprived.
    • Discuss some steps that you could personally take to improve your sleep. You can use the and Chapter 4 in the textbook to help you.
    • Explain what could happen to you if you did not get enough sleep.
    1. Post a reply to a classmate in at least 25 words. Give them advice or ask them a question.
  • Management Question

    Foreign Currency and Currency Valuations in International Business

    Have you ever wondered what happens to a U.S. exporter or importer when the value of the U.S. dollar drops? Is it good for the exporter? or is it bad for the exporter? Is it bad for the importer?… think for a moment…

    Welcome to Foreign Currency, Currency Exchanges, and Currency Valuations

    Watch this video, and take some notes.

    Assignment Instructions and Requirements

    Ready? Review Chapter 14 and after you watch this video, I’d like to hear your perspective regarding a real-world case involving How China is managing the value of its currency; then answer these questions:

    1. What do you think about China’s currency manipulation? is it good or bad for us here in the U.S.? why or why not
    2. If the value of the U.S. dollar decreases, what would be the implications for American exporters? is it bad, or is it good? Explain why.
    3. If the value of the U.S. dollar increases, what would be the implications for American importers? is it bad, or is it good? Explain why.
    4. If the value of the U.S. dollar increases, what would be the implications for American exporters? is it bad, or is it good? Explain why.

    Be sure to specifically address and answer each question

    How to submit this assignment

    Create a video to answer the 4 questions above.

    You are an International Business Consultant

    Your computer camera must be on, the audience must be able to see you

    Video length: Minimum time 2 minutes; Maximum time 3 minutes

    Videos under 2 minutes will not receive credit for this assignment, your video presentation must be at least 2 minutes long

    Options to create the video

    • Canvas – The video can be done using the video selection in the Canvas Assignment. Be sure to plan out your presentation so it flows well to cover the required material within the time frame.

    or

    • YouTube Video – create your own video and upload it to YouTube Unlisted Videos YouTube will give you a link. Copy and paste the YouTube link to the assignment.

    Requirements: Instructions Attached

  • Medical terminology

    i put all the instruction in the file which is easy after i post it i will send you the student paragraph and you will write a response like the instruction

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): discusiion assigmne.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Writing Question

    Research the library and Write a three to five page APA formatted essayon the pros and cons of the US retreat from the Kyoto Accords.

    Individual Assignment Resources:

    Each URL below is available from inside the APUS library pagePaste the URL in the browser window, while logged into the library.

    APA GUIDELINES

    Submission Instructions:

  • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detractfrom the overall message.
  • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to APA style
  • and formatting.

    Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

    Requirements: Three to five pages minimum

  • Customer Churn Prediction Using Classification Models

    Goal

    Each group (maximum 2) need to select different classification dataset and compares three data mining models you have already covered, then explains why one works better.

    Methodology Process is as follows:

    Part A Dataset selection (Telco Customer Churn dataset)

    Each group must pick a dataset that:

    is classification (binary or multi-class)

    is not used by any other group – for my Group is (Telco Customer Churn dataset)

    Different sector: healthcare, marketing, finance, education, cybersecurity, etc my Case (marketing).

    Use Kaggle warehouse to pick your data (uploaded)

    Part B Models to run (must include a baseline)

    Each group must run three models:

    0R or 1R (baseline)

    Naive Bayes

    Decision Tree (e.g., J48/C4.5 in Weka)

    Part C What to report (beyond accuracy)

    Cover page

    Data Description and understanding

    o The size of data, number of records, number of features, the target class, how balanced are the classes.

    Preprocessing

    o Handle missing values (remove or impute must state which)

    Evaluation

    o How you split the data?

    o For each model report: Accuracy, Confusion matrix, Recall, F1, Precision.

    Feature importance / interpretability

    o For Decision Tree:

    provide the top splitting features (root + next level) and

    include a screenshot of the tree or rules

    o For Naive Bayes:

    list the top 5 most informative features (or top conditional probabilities per class, depending on tool)

    Error analysis

    o Provide some error analysis such as which class is most often misclassified?, provide 2-3 possible reasons (data, imbalance, noise, overlap)

    Conclusion

    o Which model is best and why (refer to F1/precision/recall, not only accuracy)

    o One limitation + one improvement idea

    Deliverables

    3-6 pages report (template headings you can enforce)

    Results table comparing the three models

    Screenshots/export from the tool (confusion matrix + tree)

    Dataset reference (source + brief description)

    Data Sources:

    UCI Machine Learning Repository:

    Kaggle Dataset:

    Hint: if you use Excel, below is an important video

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Syllabus.docx, CASE STUDY 1.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Article review 2

    Chapter 7 focuses on deposits and the regulations related to them. This assignment requires you to find a recent news article (less than three years old) from a reputable news agency related to deposits. Examples of reputable finance-related sources include the American Bankers Association, Wall Street Journal, Forbes, USA Today, etc. After locating a relevant article, you will write a 300- to 500-word review of the article. The topic of your review offers flexibility.

    Some ideas include discussing how it relates to the textbook, ways the article helped expand your understanding of the subject, and an argumentative essay supporting or disagreeing with the author. You are not limited to these options, but your review should be appropriate for an academic setting.