Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): WIDA_PerformanceDefinitions_SpeakingWriting.pdf, SIR 1 7 Steps- students sample.docx, 1SIR7Stepstemplate.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): WIDA_PerformanceDefinitions_SpeakingWriting.pdf, SIR 1 7 Steps- students sample.docx, 1SIR7Stepstemplate.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Template random siap pakai untuk apapun
Requirements:
Follow the instructions in the Homework file (attached below). Check your file before submitting it. Converting the file in pdf and submitting can be helpful but it is not necessary. I will not give a second chance for submitting the wrong file or missing basic information like the name of the student, calculation, etc.
I am attaching the HW1 below. Make sure to work on those questions carefully as those questions are very related to the upcoming Exam 1.
Requirements: as needed
Instructions
Imagine that you are a project manager with a large hospital. You are responsible for facilitating the selection of a new healthcare information system. You are asked to preview the Epic EHR, Allscripts MyWay EMR, and Waiting Room Solutions demos.
Explore all of the product modules and functions, such as the user-friendliness (interface and ease of use), patient search functionality, release of information and retrieval, record tracking, web-based standards, internet and intranet use, regulatory requirements, etc.
Create a comparison table or matrix for the various functions.
In a 2-3 page paper, provide an assessment and explanation of how product features would or would not potentially support interoperability and basic integration standards.
Provide a recommendation for a new healthcare information system based on your assessment of each product.
Your paper should be in APA format.
Submit the comparison table and paper.
Resources
Waiting Room Solutions. Go to youtube and search “Waiting Room Solutions Demo” to view this product.
Allscripts MyWay EMR. Go to youtube and search “Allscripts Demo” to view this product.
Grading Rubric
Assignment 1: Integration and System Functions
Points
Student created a comparison table or matrix for the various functions.
20
Student provided thorough outline of the functions for each product.
40
Student provided an assessment and explanation of how product features would or would not potentially support interoperability and basic integration standards
40
Total
100 points
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2018 AHIMA Entry- Level Competencies Health Information Management Baccalaureate Degree
Domain I. Data Structure, Content, and Information Governance
Competency
I.6. Evaluate data dictionaries & data sets for compliance with government standards
Domain III. Informatics, Analytics, and Data Use
Competency
III.1. Examine health informatics concepts for the management of health information.
III.2. Analyze technologies for health information management.
III.6. Manage data within a database management system.
III.7. Identify standards for exchange of health information.
Attached is the rubric.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Week 2 Assignment_ Integration and System Functions__ – HIMA410 I002 Winter 2026 – APEI.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Length: 6 8 pages
Assignment Instructions:
1. I’ve chosen British Columbia and Ontario for the two provinces to compare to.
2. Research Legislative Frameworks:
o Identify and review the child welfare legislation for each selected jurisdiction
(e.g., Child, Youth and Family Services Act in Ontario, Child, Family and
Community Service Act in British Columbia).
Need to focus on areas including the:
Definitions of child abuse, neglect, and maltreatment
Processes for child protection investigations and interventions
Rights of children and families
Permanency planning (e.g., foster care, adoption, family reunification)
Indigenous child welfare provisions
Roles and responsibilities of child welfare agencies
3. Compare Key Elements
using a table to highlight the similarities and the differences of the two
and analyze the implications of these differences for children, families, and service
providers.
o Example categories for comparison:
Age of protection
Duty to report
Indigenous considerations (e.g., jurisdiction and cultural preservation)
Types of court orders and timelines for permanency
4. Discuss Strengths and Weaknesses
Evaluate the strengths of each jurisdiction’s legislation.
Identify gaps or areas for improvement in each framework.
5. Incorporate Contextual Factors
Consider how local context (e.g., demographics, geography, Indigenous
population) influences child welfare policies and practices.
6. Bill C-92
include a brief discussion of how federal laws (e.g., An Act respecting First
Nations, Inuit and Mtis children, youth and families) interacts with provincial
legislation.
Write a 6-8 page paper in APA 7th edition
Introduction: Overview of the jurisdictions and rationale for selection.
Legislative Analysis: Detailed comparison of key legislative elements.
Strengths and Weaknesses: Evaluation of the frameworks.
Discussion and Conclusion: Implications for practice, children, and
families including a discussion of Bill C-92.
Websites:
https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/17c14
https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/00_96046_01
https://www.ocswssw.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Duty-to-Report-under-the-Child-and-Family-Services-Act-20180430.pdf
https://free.bcpublications.ca/civix/document/id/hstats/hstats/1746824023
https://www.ipc.on.ca/en/part-x-cyfsa/introduction/overview-of-the-cyfsa
https://youthrex.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/YouthREX-FS-Take-5-Key-Takeaways-from-Ontarios-CYFSA-Review.pdf
In this plan, please based on the learning of this week, submit one PDF or Word document with these required sections:
Tips – Your submission may consider the following these headings
Step 1 User stories (needs)
Step 2 Hardware mapping using 4-block model
Step 3 Software mapping
Step 4 Network plan
Step 5 Packet switching + protocol explanation
Step 6 EA blueprint
Step 7 Recommendation summary
Requirements: as needed
Scent Marketing
Your M2 Practitioner Application will require devoted inquiry, assimilation, reflection, and refinement in order to achieve the highest possible score. Specifically, you are to take the scenario listed below, address it in full, and submit your work in accordance with the instructions contained herein. This is an independent assignment to be completed by you and you alone. Sharing work with fellow students, supplying advice to your student peers, gaining assistance from outside parties, and similar actions will constitute violations of the academic code of conduct and will carry significant penalties in accordance with University policy.
The Challenge
One of your M2 readings focused on scent marketing. Scent is being used increasingly in certain business contexts to create more pleasing customer experiences. By conducting some Internet research, you’ll quickly come to see that the strategic use of scent, in fact, is being used by at least some in the healthcare industry, with some applications being obvious and others less so.
For this Practitioner Application, you are to place yourself in the role of Marketing Director for a soon-to-be-established cosmetic surgery center based in the city of your choice. (An actual city must be selected as this assignment calls for formal market research.) The entity will be known as Cardiff Cosmetic Surgery and it will offer the usual and customary array of services provided by cosmetic surgery centers. (If you aren’t familiar with this modality of healthcare, conduct Internet or field research to gain a proper understanding.) The practice’s owner desires using scent to improve the patient experience and has requested your assistance and expertise. Your task is to investigate scent research, seeking insights regarding common applications, healthcare-specific applications, and applications which might be particularly helpful in cosmetic surgery contexts. Then, supply a report which communicates research findings and provides scent recommendations and associated methods of application which have the potential to enhance the experiences of patients receiving services at the establishment.
The Submission Requirement
Your submission in its entirety (i.e., all inclusive) must be AT LEAST 1200 words. It is to be typed (or pasted) directly into the Moodle posting window, after which you will submit your work. After submission, students are advised to verify that the assignment was submitted successfully by revisiting the submission link in advance of the assignment deadline. (Warning: After the assignment deadline, do not return to the M1 Practitioner Application to check the status of your submission, as doing so can change the submission date, forcing issuance of penalties for lateness.) Note that attachments of any kind are prohibited and will carry no points value. Given the length of the submission, it is advised that students prepare it in a word processing program, and when finalized, copy and paste the actual text (not the file!) into the Moodle posting window. Moodle can be very finicky and often will distort formatting, so care must be taken in preparing your submission. It is understood that Moodle formatting is limited; simply make your submission look as nice as possible.
Submissions must incorporate a minimum of ten (10) references, with at least three (3) being from scholarly academic journals. (If you cannot ascertain whether a journal does or does not qualify as scholarly academic, contact the Noel Library and request assistance.) References must be prepared using the latest version of APA style, as referenced in the . You may purchase this manual from most any bookstore or from APA directly, or you may consult the many helpful online resources which demonstrate APA style. If you opt to purchase or otherwise acquire this book, you’ll find Chapter 10 to be monumentally helpful, as it presents examples for presenting any reference imaginable. If you opt against acquisition of the APA manual and make use of online guidance, be absolutely certain that the associated websites indeed are providing information from the latest edition of the APA manual (7th Edition, 2020). The test of whether your references are or are not correct and compliant rests with the guidance supplied in the current edition of the APA manual. As penalties for infractions are severe, as noted below, do not take preparation of references lightly.
Note that one should never simply copy-and-paste references from websites or other databases, as these frequently contain errors—-which will become your errors and will be penalized, accordingly. Note also that relying on reference software for preparing references is high risk, as results sometimes do not conform with APA style. The safest way to ensure that your references are prepared correctly is to acquire the APA manual and then manually assemble your references following associated guidance.
As Moodle formatting is limited, APA style applies only to the preparation and presentation of references. In-text citations, of course, must be included. Treat this as a formal report, rather than an informal web post.
Incomplete or otherwise noncompliant reference sections which do not follow the guidance provided in the will result in a 30-point deduction. To avoid this deduction, your entire reference section must be compliant with all guidelines.
In presenting your overall work, identify the title, your name and student ID number, and submission date at the top of your submission and supply the following headings and subheadings, exactly as they appear below, placing each in bold text:
Assessment Criteria
Your submission will be assessed based on the following:
Take care when determining word counts; Moodle automatically supplies these details to instructors. If word count requirements are not met, a 30-point deduction is assessed. (Note that Moodle’s word count algorithm may differ from the one used by your word processor, presenting yet another reason supporting an early submission, affording adjustment opportunities, if needed.)
Also, take care to note the deadline for this assignment. Late submissions will be accepted for up to 24 hours beyond the deadline; however, a 30-point deduction for lateness will be assessed. Submissions received more than 24 hours beyond the deadline are automatically scored zero points.
Further, take care to note that submissions are to address the inquiry presented in the noted instructions in full. Alterations to the inquiry as presented herein are prohibited and will result in submissions being scored zero points.
Good luck!
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): VOIM115 – W6 Macro and Form Controls Assignment Directions and Rubric-2.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
ASSIGNMENT: Using your outline and annotated bibliography from Touchstones 1.2 and 2.2, draft a 6-8 page argumentative research essay on your chosen topic.
As this assignment builds on Touchstone 2.2: Create an Annotated Bibliography, that Touchstone must be graded before you can submit your research essay draft. Although unrelated by topic, Touchstone 3.1 must also be graded before you can submit your research essay draft.
In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review .
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. Refer to the Sample Touchstone for additional guidance on structure, formatting, and citation.
1. Argumentative Thesis Statement
Have you included a thesis in your introduction that includes a clear, arguable stance and 3-4 supporting reasons?
2. Argument Development
Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?
Is the argument supported using persuasive rhetorical appeals and page/paragraph-numbered source material (i.e., direct quotations, paraphrasing, and summary)?
Is your essay 6-8 pages (approximately 1500-2000 words, not including your references or reflection question responses)? If not, which details do you need to add or remove?
Does the essay consist of at least seven paragraphs an introduction, five body paragraphs (with at least one for the counterarguments and rebuttals), and a conclusion? Are the body paragraphs ordered logically to strengthen the argument, and do they all contain accurate evidence from credible sources?
Do your topic sentences make original and supportable points? Do your topic sentences directly support your thesis statement?
3. Research
Have you introduced, contextualized, and cited outside sources effectively using at least some direct quotations (3-5 total), summary, and paraphrase techniques and included page/paragraph-numbered parenthetical citations?
Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?
Have you referenced a range of 5-7 credible sources, and does each source have at least one accurate in-text citation in the essay?
Have you properly formatted your citations according to APA style guidelines?
Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay and do the sources listed there match those cited in the essay?
4. Reflection
Have you answered all reflection questions including specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight in all responses?
Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Michael Brown – English Comp II – Create an Annotated Bibliography.docx, EJ1076463.pdf, ECII Sample Touchstone 32 (2).pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.