Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Masters of Social Work Personal Statement Essay University o…

    Provide a narrative essay addressing the following areas (as applicable) Why is the USF MSW program a good fit for you and for achieving your goals? Why is now the right time to apply to our MSW program? If you have a GPA below the minimum requirement, please discuss issues you faced at that time and why you now have the readiness for graduate education

    make up something good for the 1st question, for the second question right now is a good time because i graduated with my BSW in december 2025 and after taking a semester off and getting some field experience im ready to get back into learning more. my gpa is not below the minimum requirement.

  • Discussion Board

    Which value would you opt for option value for wildlife or Non consumptive use value? and why.

    Please commet and reply to two of your classmates.

  • Paper (1)

    NO COVER PAGE PLEASE Your paper should be 5-6 pages long (double-spaced, 12 font) not including the references and title page). You should have a reference page of at least eight (8)academic sources, including at least five (5) primary research sources that specifically answer the review question. Use APA format for references and citations. All papers must be submitted to be reviewed for similarity, any paper with a score of 20% or higher in the similarity index, will receive an automatic 0, and will not be reviewed until the similarity score is below 20%. Step by step directions and a rubric is posted below. After your paper has been corrected and graded, you have the option to revise your literature review paper in order to improve your writing and correct your mistakes. If there is a significant improvement, the grade will be increased. Revisions are due a week after receiving feedback. Instructions: Your paper needs to follow the following criteria: 1 Choose a problem faced by clients in your practice area that you think is important and would like to learn more about (Use Activity 1 to identify the problem). 2 Use your knowledge of PICO to develop a well-built narrow clinical question. For example: In adult patients with total hip replacements (P), how effective is pain medication (I) compared to aerobic stretching (C) in controlling post-operative pain (O)? (the development of the PICO question should not be included in the paper) (Use discussion 2 & 3). 3 Write a five (5) to six (6) page literature review paper on the standing knowledge of the chosen question. 4 Include a minimum of five (5) journal articles, at least three (3) from nursing journals. However, make sure that the (5) journals are the ones analyzed and synthesized in the results and discussion sections. 5 The body of the paper should be made of the following titled sections: Title (introduction), Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. 6 Provide a specific and concise tentative title for your literature review paper (You may use the results or at least the variables in the title). 7 The abstract is not required 8 Include a 1-page introduction of your topic (background information), the focus/aim of your review. The introduction should include a statement of the problem, briefly explain the significance of your topic study, and act to introduce the reader to your definitions and background. Must include your main statement (i.e. the purpose of this review is…{PICO Question}). 9 The method section should include sources, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, levels of evidence, and other information that establishes credibility to your paper (Use discussion 4 & 5). 10 The results should summarize the findings of studies that have been conducted on your topic. For each study, you should briefly explain its purpose, procedure for data collection, and major findings. This is the section where you will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of studies (Use discussion 6 and activity 2). 11 Submit a table of the studies as per the matrix development (see discussion 7). 12 The discussion should be like a conclusion portion of an essay paper. It serves as a summary of the body of your literature review and should highlight the most important findings. Your analysis should help you to draw conclusions. In this section, you would discuss any consensus or disagreement on the topic. It can also include any strengths and weaknesses in general of the research area. If you believe there is more to research, you may include that here. 13 Finally, you will need to conclude your paper. At this point, you have put substantial effort into your paper. Close this chapter with a summary of the paper, major findings, and any major recommendations for the profession. 14 In general, your paper should show a sense of direction and contain a definite central idea supported with evidence. The writing should be logical, and the ideas should be linked together in a logical sequence. The ideas need to be put together clearly for the writer and for the reader. 15 Papers will be graded by rubric. When preparing to work on an assignment it is a good idea to review the rubric for the assignment. The rubric identifies the important points that will be graded as well as the description of the information that should be provided to receive all of the points in each section of the assignment. Reviewing the rubric before you begin a paper and then once again as you complete the paper will give you confidence that you included the required information and will receive maximum points for each section. See the grading rubric for this assignment. 16 Format references and citations using APA guidelines.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): table lesson 7 student (1).pdf, Lesson 6 activity (1).pdf, discussion 2-7 (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Preparing to hire

    Preparing for recruitment involves several mandatory steps to prevent liabilities to the agency. This includes considering recruitment methods, screening exams, and background checks. However, it is important to understand the legalities of these processes. Their use can violate antidiscrimination laws if an employer uses them to discriminate based on race, color, sex, national origin, religion, disability, or age (40 or older). Unless the employer can justify the test or procedure under the law, the use of these tests can also violate antidiscrimination laws if they disproportionately exclude people in a particular protected group. For this assignment, as the HR director of “For The People IT Design Center” or your selected organization, prepare the hiring manager to recruit for a position of your choice. In a 34 page paper: Compare the different types of recruitment methods. Select one to use in your company and describe why this is your chosen method. Compare two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. How will you show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test? What is the purpose of content validity tests? Analyze the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process. Discuss the policies and practices that should be in place for internal candidates applying for the position. Describe inadvisable preemployment inquiries as you are preparing for the interview phase. Explain how these could lead to hiring liabilities and what policies you will have in place to avoid any perceived risks. Describe what should be included in the offer to the selectee. Describe your documentation process and explain how long documents should be retained. Additional Requirements Your paper should also meet the following requirements: Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. Standard formatting: Include one-inch margins, appropriate headers, and a title page. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting. Review the Evidence and APA Links to an external site. section of the Writing Center for guidance. Length: 34 typed, double-spaced pages, excluding title page and reference page. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. Review the Preparing to Hire rubric to familiarize yourself with the required criteria for this assignment. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria: Competency 1: Examine the effect of the employment process on current work environments. Compare the different types of recruitment methods. Select one to use in the company and describe why this is the chosen method. Discuss the policies and practices for internal candidates applying for the position. Competency 2: Analyze trends and changes in the laws on diversity, gender, and harassment. Compare two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. Discusses how it will show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test. Discusses the purpose of content validity tests. Competency 3: Apply the laws and safety issues in the workplace. Analyze the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process. Describe what should be included in the offer to the selectee, describe the documentation process, and explain how long documents should be retained. Competency 5: Create strategies for recovery from exposure to liabilities. Describe inadvisable preemployment inquiries, explain how these could lead to hiring liabilities, and include the policies that have to be in place to avoid any perceived risks. Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the human resources profession. Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the human resources profession. Week 4 Assignment: Preparing to Hire Week 4 Assignment: Preparing to Hire Criteria Ratings Pts Compare the different types of recruitment methods. Select one to use in the company and describe why this is the chosen method. 22.5 to >19.13 pts DISTINGUISHED Evaluates the different types of recruitment methods. Selects one to use in your company and discusses why this is your chosen method and supports with details from scholarly sources. 19.13 to >15.75 pts PROFICIENT Compares the different types of recruitment methods. Select one to use in your company and describe why this is your chosen method. 15.75 to >0 pts BASIC Lists the different types of recruitment methods. Selects one to use in your company and describe why this is your chosen method and key information is missing. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not compare the different types of recruitment methods or does not select one to use in your company or does not describe why this is your chosen method. / 22.5 pts Compare two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. Discusses how it will show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test. Discusses the purpose of content validity tests. 19.5 to >16.58 pts DISTINGUISHED Analyzes two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. Discusses how it will you show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test. Discusses the purpose of content validity tests. Supports ideas with details from scholarly sources. 16.58 to >13.65 pts PROFICIENT Compares two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. Discusses how it will you show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test. Discusses the purpose of content validity tests. 13.65 to >0 pts BASIC Discusses two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. Lists how it will you show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test. Shares the purpose of content validity tests. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not compare two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. Does not discuss how it will you show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test. Does not discuss the purpose of content validity tests. / 19.5 pts Analyze the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process. 19.5 to >16.58 pts DISTINGUISHED Evaluates the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process and supports with details from scholarly sources. 16.58 to >13.65 pts PROFICIENT Analyzes the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process. 13.65 to >0 pts BASIC Discusses the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process and key information is missing. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not analyze the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process. / 19.5 pts Discuss the policies and practices for internal candidates applying for the position. 19.5 to >16.58 pts DISTINGUISHED Discusses and analyzes the policies and practices for internal candidates applying for the position and supports with details from scholarly sources. 16.58 to >13.65 pts PROFICIENT Discusses the policies and practices for internal candidates applying for the position. 13.65 to >0 pts BASIC Lists the policies and practices for internal candidates applying for the position and key information is missing. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not list the policies and practices for internal candidates applying for the position. / 19.5 pts Describe inadvisable preemployment inquiries, explain how these could lead to hiring liabilities, and include the policies that have to be in place to avoid any perceived risks. 19.5 to >16.58 pts DISTINGUISHED Discusses inadvisable preemployment inquiries, explains how these could lead to hiring liabilities, includes the policies that have to be in place to avoid any perceived risks, and supports with details from scholarly sources. 16.58 to >13.65 pts PROFICIENT Describes inadvisable preemployment inquiries, explains how these could lead to hiring liabilities, and includes the policies that have to be in place to avoid any perceived risks. 13.65 to >0 pts BASIC Itemizes inadvisable preemployment inquiries, discusses how these could lead to hiring liabilities, and includes the policies that have to be in place to avoid any perceived risks, but key information is missing. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not itemize inadvisable preemployment inquiries, discuss how these could lead to hiring liabilities, or include the policies that have to be in place to avoid any perceived risks. / 19.5 pts Describe what should be included in the offer to the selectee, describe the documentation process, and explain how long documents should be retained. 19.5 to >16.58 pts DISTINGUISHED Discusses what should be included in the offer to the selectee, describes the documentation process, explains how long documents should be retained, and supports with details from scholarly sources. 16.58 to >13.65 pts PROFICIENT Describes what should be included in the offer to the selectee, describes the documentation process, and explains how long documents should be retained. 13.65 to >0 pts BASIC Lists what should be included in the offer to the selectee, describes the documentation process, and explains how long documents should be retained, but key information is missing. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not list what should be included in the offer to the selectee, describe the documentation process, or explain how long documents should be retained. / 19.5 pts Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the human resources profession. 30 to >25.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Communicates in a manner that is scholarly and professional that addresses the intended audience and is free of grammatical and mechanical errors. 25.5 to >21 pts PROFICIENT Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the human resources profession. 21 to >0 pts BASIC Communicates in a manner that is professional for members of the human resources profession, but manner is not scholarly as there is inconsistency with grammar and mechanics. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the human resources profession. / 30 pts Total Points: 0 Choose

  • Policy Topic Research Article Critique

    Projects submitted up to 48 hours after due date will receive a 30-point deduction.

    Projects submitted more than 48 hours late will receive a zero for the assignment.

    Evidence of plagiarism will result in a zero for this assignment and or disciplinary actions.

    Your Copyleaks score is generated automatically when you submit to the Dropbox. Your score will be available in the gradebook and should be no greater than the 15% mark. If it is higher than 15% similarity, please re-submit with revisions prior to the due date.

    Please wait to begin this assignment until your Policy topic is approved.

    For this assignment, please critique one peer-reviewed journal article that has a research focus that pertains to the policy topic you have selected for this course. Using the guidelines outlined in the assignment rubric (see below), your paper should:

    Use the following as a guide as you write your paper and use these as headers for your assignment. Review APA formatting for proper formatting for headers.

    • Include a summary of the article
    • Discuss/critique the research methodology and how conclusions were reached
    • State whether or not it supports your policy
    • State how authors could disseminate this information to the public.

    Please ensure that your paper

    1. is in APA format. Click on the link to see a sample paper
    4. This is a generic paper–introductory/conclusion paragraph, abstract, charts, and graphs are not required)
    5. Includes a title page and reference page per APA (no abstract required).
    6. Is written in scholarly language (refrain from using first-person such as “I” or “you”).
    7. At least 600 words in length (not including title or reference page).
    8. Is from a scholarly/peer-reviewed healthcare or nursing journal from the last five years (
    10. )
    11. Has a Copyleaks Score of 15% or less.
    12. Cite your article in correct APA format and submit a PDF copy of your article as an attachment to the assignment.

    the topic is Maternal Health disparities

    copy leaks less than 15%

  • Social Work Question

    Initial Post (due by 11:59pm EST on Saturday):

    Working individually, respond to the prompts below using the additional context provided below about the Riverton East vignette and the CBPR framework discussed in class.

    Brief Riverton East Vignette Addition (for this practice activity):

    As part of the Riverton East revitalization efforts, a local nonprofit coalition has received preliminary funding to evaluate community concerns related to housing stability, access to food, and neighborhood safety. Previous evaluations conducted by outside consultants resulted in low participation and community mistrust. Several long-term residents have expressed frustration that research keeps happening to us, not with us. The coalition is now considering a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach to guide the next phase of evaluation and action.

    Step 1: Identifying the CBPR Team

    Based on the Riverton East context, identify at least four stakeholder groups that should be included in a CBPR team.

    For each group, briefly explain:

    • Why their involvement matters
    • What perspective or expertise they bring

    Consider the following when completing this step: Which community members are most directly affected by the issues being explored, and who else needs to be at the table to support meaningful change?

    Step 2: Applying the CBPR Process

    Select three steps from the CBPR process and describe what each step might look like specifically in Riverton East.

    Choose from:

    • Recruiting and training community researchers
    • Determining evaluation questions
    • Planning and structuring the research
    • Carrying out the research
    • Presenting findings and recommendations
    • Facilitating action
    • Evaluating the process
    • Reflection and learning
    • Maintaining gains

    Consider the following when completing this step: How would these steps help address past mistrust and support community buy-in?

    Step 3: CBPR or Not?

    Answer briefly:

    • Why is CBPR an appropriate (or necessary) approach for Riverton East at this stage?
    • What risks or challenges might arise if CBPR is not implemented thoughfully?

    Peer Response Post (due by Monday at 11:59pm EST):

    Review one peers CBPR plan for Riverton East. Respond to two of the three prompts below:

    1. CBPR Alignment Check
    • Identify one place where your peers proposal strongly reflects CBPR principles (e.g., shared decision-making, community ownership, empowerment).
    • Explain why this element strengthens community trust or long-term change.
    1. Power & Participation Analysis
    • Where do you see power being shared with community members?
    • Where might power still unintentionally remain with professionals or institutions?
    1. Feasibility & Ethics Reflection
    • Identify one potential challenge (e.g., time, training, representation, sustainability).
    • Offer one suggestion to strengthen the CBPR approach while staying aligned with ethical practice.

    Requirements: Follow Instructions

  • Sexual reproduction in flowering plants all topics clearly m…

    Clear explanation

    Requirements:

  • Topic 8 DQ 1

    According to Skakni (2017), not all doctoral learners who receive high marks in their coursework successfully complete their doctoral programs. As such, an A grade in RES-815 does not necessarily lead to an approved dissertation signed by the Dean of the College of Doctoral Studies. It will require a combination of skill sets beyond academic success that will contribute to growing as a learner and a scholar. It will require learners to work not only independently but also collaboratively, partnering with residency faculty and the dissertation committee. How can the adjustment to and mindset of the independent researcher contribute to working productively as a professional with your committee?

  • research paper Case summary

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Research Paper – Case Summary Grading Rubric.pdf, Research Paper Case Summary Assignment Instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Marketing research based on primary data

    As with secondary data, primary data is used to determine the target market or markets that may be in need of a product or service. Unlike secondary data, which can be found from existing sources, primary data is gathered by using one or more collection methods. In this assignment, you will identify an existing product or service for which you feel should have primary data gathered. Complete the following for this assignment: Describe a possible new consumer product or service to be provided to a specific market by a real or a fictitious company that you believe should be researched via primary data. Select a country in which to market your product or service. What are the demographics (age, gender, income, and so on) of the primary target market that you would consider the best fit for your new product or service? Explain why you believe it is important to have primary data for the product or service. Identify the data that should be gathered through primary research. How would you suggest gathering this data? Identify possible mistakes the enterprise providing the product or service might have made, had they relied only on secondary data. Once complete, submit your assignment to your instructor. Refer to the Marketing Research Using Primary Data rubric to ensure you have met the requirements of the assignment prior to submitting. Include a title page. The length of this paper should be determined by the content. As stated previously for all assignments, your paper should generally follow APA guidelines in structure, format, citations, and references. In addition, the paper should be in Word or RTF format. Refer to Campus resources Academic Success Center Links to an external site. and Evidence and APA Links to an external site. as needed. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria: Competency 1: Evaluate marketing research. Explains the need for and importance of primary data. Competency 2: Analyze a potential market, based on data. Describes a consumer product or service to be researched via primary data. Describes the target market for a product or service. Identifies data that should be gathered through primary research, and how the data should be gathered. Week 4 Assignment: Marketing Research Based on Primary Data Week 4 Assignment: Marketing Research Based on Primary Data Criteria Ratings Pts Describes a consumer product or service to be researched via primary data. 12.5 to >10.63 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes a consumer product or service to be researched via primary data and explains the objective of conducting associated marketing research. 10.63 to >8.75 pts PROFICIENT Describes a consumer product or service to be researched via primary data. 8.75 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies a consumer product or service to be researched via primary data. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not identify a consumer product or service to be researched via primary data. / 12.5 pts Describes the target market for a product or service. 12.5 to >10.63 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes the target market for a product or service, and describes the possible viability of the product in that target market. 10.63 to >8.75 pts PROFICIENT Describes the target market for a product or service. 8.75 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies but does not describe the target market for a project or service. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe the target market for a product or service. / 12.5 pts Explains the need for and importance of primary data. 12.5 to >10.63 pts DISTINGUISHED Explains the need for and importance of primary data, and identifies possible mistakes the enterprise providing the product or service might have made, had they relied only on secondary data. 10.63 to >8.75 pts PROFICIENT Explains the need for and importance of primary data. 8.75 to >0 pts BASIC Explains general needs for primary data, but not for this specific product. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not explain the need for and importance of primary data. / 12.5 pts Identifies data that should be gathered through primary research, and how the data should be gathered. 12.5 to >10.63 pts DISTINGUISHED Identifies data that should be gathered through primary research, how the data should be gathered, and how analysis of the results might affect business decisions. 10.63 to >8.75 pts PROFICIENT Identifies data that should be gathered through primary research, and how the data should be gathered. 8.75 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies either the data that should be gathered through primary research, or how the data should be gathered. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not identify data that should be gathered through primary research, and how that data should be gathered. / 12.5 pts