Please follow the instruction
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Zara Strategy Final Assignment (Jan 2026).pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Please follow the instruction
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Zara Strategy Final Assignment (Jan 2026).pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Discussion Post: Trauma, Suicide, and Cyberstalking
1) PTSD Diagnostic Criteria in Adults
Although PTSD is often used loosely in popular culture, the DSM-5 defines specific criteria for adults (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013):
James and Gilliland (2017) emphasize that careful assessment is essential, as trauma reactions vary and not all distress following a traumatic event meets full PTSD criteria.
2) Suicide Clues and Warning Signs
James and Gilliland (2017) differentiate suicide clues from suicide warning signs:
All suicidal gestures should be taken seriously. Even behaviors that appear minor or attention-seeking indicate significant psychological pain (Shneidman, 1996). Crisis interventionists must respond promptly to assess lethality, provide support, and prevent escalation.
3) Cyberstalking and Its Impact
Cyberstalking is the use of electronic communicationsocial media, email, or text messagingto harass, intimidate, or threaten an individual. Victims may experience (James & Gilliland, 2017; Sheridan & Grant, 2007):
Crisis interventionists can help by validating the victims experiences, assisting with safety planning, connecting victims with legal and technological resources, and helping restore a sense of empowerment and control over their environment.
Biblical perspective: The Bible emphasizes caring for the vulnerable and oppressed: Defend the weak and the fatherless; uphold the cause of the poor and the oppressed (Psalm 82:3, New International Version). In crisis work, supporting victims of cyberstalking reflects this principle of protection and justice.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
James, R. K., & Gilliland, B. E. (2017). Crisis intervention strategies (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Shneidman, E. S. (1996). The suicidal mind. Oxford University Press.
Sheridan, L., & Grant, T. (2007). Is cyberstalking different? Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(6), 627640. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160601053697
Psalm 82:3. (New International Version)
Similar to Paper One, Paper Two has a lot of supporting materials to help you craft your paper. This includes paper instructions (which are long and detailed but worth reading!), a grading rubric, a checklist, and an example paper from a prior semester. If you look over ALL FOUR items, your chances of getting a good grade will improve dramatically!
! You must use this dataset for paper 2. Use of any other dataset will result in an automatic ZERO for the assignment.
Additional Supporting Material for Paper II
Paper II FINAL Rubric
Paper II FINAL Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Title Page Criteria (1 point)
1. Header (in ALL CAPS)
2. Page number
3. Descriptive Title (in bold)
4. Your Name
5. Your University
6. Perfect APA formatting
1 pts
Meets all criteria
0 pts
Does not meet all criteria
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Methods Section Criteria (15 points)
1. Includes section titles in proper APA format
2. Provides participant data (demographics) accurately and thoroughly in APA format
3. Provides demographic table callout
4. Discusses consent
5. Describes the formatting of the material (e.g. Paper Survey, Online Survey, etc.)
6. Describes participant selection
7. Describes the independent variable(s) in detail so a reader could replicate your study design
8. Describes the dependent variable(s) in similar detail, including they type of scale used and scale endpoints
9. Describes the procedure in detail
10. Avoids repetitiveness.
15 to >14.0 pts
Meets all criteria
14 to >9.0 pts
Mets at least 8 criteria
9 to >4.0 pts
Meets at least 6 criteria
4 to >0.0 pts
Meets at least 4 criteria
0 pts
Meets 0 to 3 criteria
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Results Section Criteria (10 points)
1. Provides three statistical analyses (minimum) on three different dependent variables
2. Includes independent and dependent variable names for each analysis consistent with the same names used in the methods section
3. Provides statistical outcomes in proper APA formatting (italics for letters, rounding to two decimals, etc.)
4. Provides all relevant numbers for each analysis (e.g. percentages for the chi square; means and SDs for each condition in the independent variable)
5. Analyzes hypotheses-relevant variables
10 to >9.0 pts
Meets all criteria
9 to >6.0 pts
Meets at least 4 criteria
6 to >3.0 pts
Meets at least 3 criteria
3 to >0.0 pts
Meets at least 2 criteria
0 pts
Meets 0 to 1 criteria
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Discussion Section Criteria (2 point)
1. Reviews the hypothesis
2. Compares the findings to the hypotheses
3. Avoids statistical numbers
2 pts
Meets all criteria
1 pts
Meets 2 criteria
0 pts
Meets 0 to 1 criteria
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Tables Criteria (4 point)
1. Includes all four tables with callouts in-text
2. Demographics table (the descriptives table for age and frequency tables for gender and race)
3. Chi square table (with crosstab table and chi square table)
4. One ANOVA tables (with descriptives, ANOVA table, and post hoc table as needed)
5. One additional ANOVA table or one t-Test table (with descriptive table and t-Table)
4 to >3.0 pts
Meets all criteria
3 to >2.0 pts
Meets 3 criteria
2 to >0.0 pts
Meets 2 criteria
0 pts
Meets 0 to 1 criteria
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Writing Quality Criteria (3 points)
1. Uses proper spelling and punctuation
2. Has good transition between sentences
3. Includes good detail that informs the reader about important information in each paper section
4. Avoids plagiarism
5. Appropriately uses Artificial Intelligence for feedback (and NOT to generate original content)
3 to >2.0 pts
Meets all criteria
2 to >1.0 pts
Meets 2 to 3 criteria
1 to >0 pts
Meets 0 to 1 criteria
3 pts
Total Points: 35
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Paper II – Example Paper 1 – Counterfactuals (2025 AI) (1).docx, Paper II Instructions – The Short Version.docx, Paper II – Study One M R D Checklist (2025 AI).docx, Paper II – Example Paper 1 – Counterfactuals (2025 AI).docx, Paper II – Study One M R D Rubric (2025 AI).docx, APA Formatting Cheat-Sheet – Numbers and Statistics Guide (1).pdf, Paper II – Study One M R D Instructions (SMSDT Spring 2026)-1.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Untitled document.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): _Module_5_Assignment rubric.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Reflecting upon your own experience as a student on a self paced online module, and bringing in other examples from academic literature, discuss the main responsibilities of students undertaking an online module and suggest ways in which students can co create an active learning environment
of food assistance programs. Choose one that you would like to do more research on.
Answer the following questions about the organization:
Requirements: Follow
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): SBAR HANDOFF REPORT 01-31-26.docx, Detailed Problem Based Clinical Care Plan Revised_080625.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.