Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Week 2 Adverse Events

    Instructions:

    Read the attached article, ‘Investigating Adverse Events in Long-Term Care Facilities’ (Module 2 reading). Then review the following mini-case study scenario and answer the critical thinking questions.

    Deliverables to be uploaded into the drop box

    • A PowerPoint presentation with an embedded video of you presenting your information or a voice-over
    • PDF of the peer-reviewed article you found to support your operational solution

    Mini-Case Study Scenario:

    You are the Patient Safety and Quality Coordinator for a long-term care facility. Your facility has recently experienced an increase in adverse events related to falls and medication errors, resulting in resident harm and survey deficiencies. Leadership is prioritizing the improvement of patient safety culture and practices across the facility. You have been asked to draft a brief action plan describing how your facility can investigate and reduce adverse events to improve resident outcomes.

    Critical Thinking and Solution Identification:

    1. Using 5-Why root cause analysis, identify at least two root causes of the adverse events occurring in your facility (one related to falls, one related to medication errors) and explain why these errors or gaps occur.
    2. Describe two specific programmatic or operational changes your facility could implement to reduce adverse events in alignment with patient safety improvement frameworks.
    3. Explain how data/information technology could be used to monitor and report progress on your plan to reduce adverse events.
    4. Discuss how your plan would help the facility meet applicable accreditation or licensing standards related to patient safety and quality in long-term care.
    5. Cite at least one relevant point from the assigned article to justify your proposed approach. Cite the point in APA format within the text of your presentation and as part of a reference page/slide at the end of the presentation.
    6. Find a supporting reference to your suggested operational change. The article must be peer-reviewed and from a source ranked on the JANE journal guide (https://jane.biosemantics.org/faq.php). Cite your supporting point in APA format.

    Rubric

    Critical Thinking Rubric

    Critical Thinking Rubric

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Use of 5-Why root cause analysis.

    5 to >0.0 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Description of two programmatic or operational changes.

    5 to >0.0 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Explanation

    5 to >0.0 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Discuss

    5 to >0.0 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Citation

    Cite at least one relevant point from the assigned article, APA format.

    5 to >0.0 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Citation from a journal found on the JANE journal guide.

    Cite at least one relevant point from the assigned article, APA format.

    5 to >0.0 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    5 pts

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Module_2_Patient_Safety_Mini_Case_Rubric.docx, Module 2 – Investigating adverse events in long-term care facilities- a systematized review.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 5 Case Study

    Week 5 Case Study

    Students in their first graduate level pharmacology course are confused with the recommendations for hypertension (HTN) and treatment choices after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and with heart failure (HF). The drugs used several years ago and still seen commonly on the acute care floors the students work are not the ones now assuming a stronger role in cardiac health issues. For one, the primary order of which meds are selected for an initial level of blood pressure control has seemed to change.

    Help your fellow students by explaining the following changes.

    1. Which classification of drugs has taken the first-choice role in most patients with early hypertension? Is it wrong to select a thiazide diuretic or a beta blocker as was once done?
    2. Is there another primary choice for African American patients? Why?

  • Case incident study

    Hello I have attached case study + questions and grading rubric. Please only use text book and no outside resources for answers.

    6th edition, PH Series in Human Resources Management (Pearson

    Education Canada), Larry Suffield, 2020

    if you dont have the book I can share a source

    you will find the book in the bookshelf. Need to only use materials from Chapter 1-6

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Case Incident.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Business Law Question

    Requires six (6) pages of analysis. Each reaction paper counts as five percent (5%) of your grade. This is not a creative essay. Please show me you actually read the assignment closely [For example, you might write, on page 12 the author says xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Then, tell me your thoughts and analysis of the quote and why it is important or not in your personal opinion. Please show me at least ten (10) page numbers from the assigned reading where you believe a significant statement is made. Please use Microsoft Word, double spaced, 12-point font, no title page or footnotes required. Points will be reduced for papers that are not stapled. Only official university absences are acknowledged. Otherwise, late assignments will not be accepted for any reason; you may submit assignments as early as you desire, without penalty. If you plan to be absent from class or have any other circumstances that may prevent you from submitting your assignment on time, you need to submit your assignment early. You must submit work both to eCourses and before class, on-paper. ONLY THOSE ASSIGNMENTS SUBMITTED ON PAPER, ON-TIME WILL BE GRADED. Note that the purpose of the assignments is for you to read the articles and react to them. The study of law requires actual reading to absorb. Accordingly, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for reaction papers is considered plagiarism and consequences for any such use may include, but not be limited to, a zero (0) for the class along with more serious consequences to be determined by the University. Using AI is of no utility for these assignments since you are presenting your own thoughts and not an explanation of the article or anyone elses thoughts regarding the article or its contents.

    Requirements: 6 pages

  • Case incident study

    Hello I have attached case study + questions and grading rubric. Please only use text book and no outside resources for answers.

    6th edition, PH Series in Human Resources Management (Pearson

    Education Canada), Larry Suffield, 2020

    if you dont have the book I can share a source

    you will find the book in the bookshelf. Need to only use materials from Chapter 1-6

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Case Incident.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Theological Position Paper- TECHNOLOGY

    Theological Position Paper

    please provide a copy of copuleaks ai detection report as well.

    Each student will also write a minimum 1800 word paper that thoroughly explains his or her theological position regarding the particular contemporary cultural issue addressed. This paper should be an expansion of the students theological position articulated during ones presentation and include at least 5 additional scholarly sources than those connected the course pack or texts used in this course. Sources for your theological position paper, must be documented using either APA or the Turabian/Chicago Manual of Style and include a bibliography. Any theological position paper that does not follow proper formatting guidelines will automatically receive a 10% deduction. As the primary research element of this class, students will be expected to invest significant time in developing a position through research and thoughtfully supporting that position using the various elements of the Wesleyan Quadrilateral. Further details regarding the scope of research and the content of these papers will be discussed in week 4.

    These papers will be graded as follows:

    Articulated a Well-Reasoned Theological Position Regarding the Contemporary Cultural Issue

    20 points

    Theological Position Clearly and Reasonably Supported by the Various Elements of the Wesleyan Quadrilateral

    20 points

    Integration of 5 Quality Scholarly Resources to Support Personal Position as Cited in Bibliography (in addition to course pack or text).

    15 points

    Structure and Organization of Argument Made

    10 points

    Overall Quality of Writing (Punctuation, Grammar, Spelling, Bibliography, )

    10 points

    Total Points

    75 points

    In addition, your paper must be properly formatted, double-spaced, and cannot exceed a maximum of 2500 words. (Please be advised that each Contemporary Issues Theological Position Paper not adhering to these stated expectations and formatting guidelines outlined in the Written Assignments section of the syllabus below will receive an automatic 10% deduction). No late Contemporary Issues Theological Position Paper will be accepted. Please consult the Written Assignments portion of this syllabus under Class Policies for more important details.

    On the date your topic is due, each student must do the following to complete their submission requirements in Canvas:

    1. Under the Assignments tab, upload your Theological Position paper

  • Ice essay

    informative essay about ICE i wanna start with the attention getter like the pledge of allegiance with the liberty and justice for who? people w disabilities or different color? highsholets detained?

  • RUA: Health History and Physical Assessment

    Please don’t use ai language and be clear, concise, and informative. The instructor isn’t so much grading on the grammer used but more focused on the health assessment and history part and utilizing the skills given. Let me know if anything else seems clear. The essay is to be in apa format and it’s 10 pages total but I still need to do a cover page so disregard the cover page and just start on the actual content. Find someone to do a health assessment on or make it up. include some things that went wrong during the interview process and what to do in the future. Don’t include the name of the interviewee or the relation they have to me.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): NR302_Health_History_Guidelines.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Annotated Bibliography

    Instructions are listed in the document below.

    disregard the section about “Highlighted excerpts from the cited sources used must be attached to the back of the term paper submission in an appendix and clearly labelled. Including more than just the excerpts (for instance, including the entire journal article) will result in the marker not considering that source when assigning a grade.” T

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): COIS-FRSC-2750H-W-W01_ Computer Crime and Forensics (Annotated Bibliography).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Annotated Bibliography

    Instructions are listed in the document below.

    disregard the section about “Highlighted excerpts from the cited sources used must be attached to the back of the term paper submission in an appendix and clearly labelled. Including more than just the excerpts (for instance, including the entire journal article) will result in the marker not considering that source when assigning a grade.” T