Author: admin

  • Gabriela alfaro

    Submit one long pdf document – containing:

    • Course information and word count upper left corner
    • Optional: Indicate if a course evaluation has been posted either in Canvas, the school or outside app such as ratemyprofessors.com. This is an anonymous optional/honor system and will result in a 1/2 point bonus
    • Title page with title image (the exact image you LOCKED at the beginning of the project and By ____ (your name)
    • Chapter 1 and so forth
    • A MINIMUM of 5 images = 1 Title image + 4. There is no limit.
    • A minimum of 2500 words. There is no maximum
    • Works Cited MLA format
    • Outline (Typed or If you hand wrote your outline (neatly so I can read it), you can embed the screenshot of the detailed outline. I just need to see how you demonstrated the course objective of organization and logic. NOTE: this is a detailed outline. If you turn in the screenshot of a sketchy jotted down page of sprawling notes, you will receive a zero for outline. Best to type.
    • Rough notes – these are the notes you might have taken while creating this essay. These notes are not graded but serve to validate the originality of your essay. You can take screenshot of your notes. These can be messy. I just need to see how your mind organized the story.
  • ENV 305: 7-2 Final Project Submission: Global Climate Change…

    Textbook: Global Climate Change: Turning Knowledge Into Action, Chapter 9

    While reading this chapter, consider these questions:

    • What is the global demand for energy and what are the challenges of meeting this demand?
    • What are the conventional sources of power and what are some renewable sources?
    • What are the politics behind climate change and how can society build a new energy infrastructure in response?

    Final Submission: Global Climate Change Presenta!on (From all of the milestones – minus the commentary sections in the milestones)In Module Seven, you will submit a presenta!on on global climate change. It should be a complete, polished ar!fact containing all of the cri!cal elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorpora!on of feedback gained throughout the course.

    What to Submit

    Your presenta!on can be in the form of a report (up to eight pages in Word) or a slideshow (with up to 16 PowerPoint slides) or a propor!onal combina!on (e.g., four pages in text and eight slides, or two pages in Word and 12 slides, etc.). Cita!ons should be completed in APA format.

  • Ida B. Wells

    Subject of choice: Ida B. Wells In this assignment you will use one subject of choice and generate your own “prompt” to elicit a 3-5 paragraph response from two different AI options about your subject, then you will fact check the content (3 facts minimum fact checked per AI answer/post, for a total of six) You may use our text readings or online research with reliable websites. Include in your direct quotes from the sources and a citation with a weblink, title, and author (if applicable) attached is an example of the work I need completed
  • Philosophy of Nursing

    Philosophy Paper- Note that this follows the Metaparadigm Model of Nursing which includes Person, Health, Nursing, and Environment. Course Outcomes 1,2,3,4 (Summative Assessment) 1. The purpose of this paper is to develop a nursing philosophy paper which should clearly reflect your personal philosophy of nursing 2. This paper will be submitted to your ePortfolio and utilized for your capstone class, so please do your best and save it. 3. This includes a written paper that should be formatted according to APA 7th edition guidelines. 4. No maximum length to this assignment, but this paper should be at least six pages, including a reference page. Topics to include in your paper: Personal Philosophy Statement. This is one to two sentences that summarize your personal philosophy. The identification and examination of your own perspective (definition) of nursings metaparadigm of nursing, person, health, and environment, as well as the identification of other concepts that you believe should be a part of the nursing metaparadigm. c. Discuss how these concepts are interrelated in terms of how you understand and accomplish your work. Give examples. Give examples from your experiences within the course and learning objectives for the course (page 1 & 2 of Syllabus) that have influenced your philosophy of nursing. For example, Course objective 3- Discuss the influence of nursings image on the publics perception of nursing. In Discussion post 3, the video influenced my thoughts on my own background and how I can positively influence patient care and my image. One of the IHI modules maybe made you consider some of the quality and safety practices that you feel are important to your practice (Course objective #4) When you reflected on values & ethics for the Professional Identity assignment did it reinforce any of your views on ethics (Course objective #5) within your practice? Identify a nursing theorist that influences your nursing philosophy. Explain the basics of the theory. This can be a brief summary from your Nurse Theorist paper. Be careful to not use that nursing theorists view as your own! Citations should be included as appropriate. Rubric :Rubric Name: Personal Philosophy Paper Criteria Proficient 20 points Approaching Proficiency 10 points Minimally Proficient 5 points Not yet proficient 2.5 points No Evidence of proficiency 0 points Criterion Score Personal Philosophy Statement The section gives a clear definition of the students personal philosophy statement within less than 3 sentences. The section gives an adequate definition of the students personal philosophy statement. May take more than 3 sentences. The section gives a fair definition of the students personal philosophy statement. May take more than 4 sentences. The section gives a poor definition of the students personal philosophy statement. Unclear No evidence that student meets any of the Personal Philosophy Statement criteria. Score of Personal Philosophy Statement,/ 20 Personal reflection on Metaparadigm: Nursing, person, health, and environment The section gives a clear and comprehensive description of the students view of nursing as a metaparadigm. The description articulates values, beliefs, and assumptions about nursing as science and art and includes all 4 components of the metaparadigm. The section gives an adequate description of the students view of nursing as a metaparadigm. The description may or may not articulate values, beliefs and assumptions about nursing as science and art. 3 out of 4 components are provided. The section gives a fair description of the students view of nursing as a metaparadigm. The description doesnt articulate values, beliefs and assumptions about nursing as science and art. Only 2 out of 4 components are provided. The section gives a poor description of the students view of nursing as a metaparadigm. The description does not articulate values, beliefs and assumptions about nursing as science and art. The metaparadigm is implied but not articulated. No evidence that student meets any of the Personal reflection on Metaparadigm criteria. Score of Personal reflection on Metaparadigm: Nursing, person, health, and environment,/ 20 Reflection on course Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for the course and their personal philosophy The section gives a clear and comprehensive description with examples that captures the students reflection on SLOs for the course and its impact on their personal philosophy. A minimum of three (3) examples are described within this section. The section gives an adequate description of the examples that captures the students reflection on SLOs for the course and its impact on their personal philosophy. Two (2) examples are described within this section. The section gives a fair description of the examples that captures the students reflection on SLOs for the course and its impact on their personal philosophy. One example is described within this section. The section gives a poor description of the examples that captures the students reflection on course SLOs for the course and its impact on their personal philosophy. No examples are described No evidence that student meets any of the Reflection on course student learning outcomes and their philosophy on nursing. Score of Reflection on course Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for the course and their personal philosophy,/ 20 Criteria Proficient 20 points Approaching Proficiency 10 points Minimally Proficient 5 points Not yet proficient 2.5 points No Evidence of proficiency 0 points Criterion Score Influential Nursing Theorist The section gives a clear and comprehensive description of which nursing theorist has influenced the students personal nursing philosophy. (May or may not come from your Theory paper) The section gives an adequate description of which nursing theorist has influenced the students personal nursing philosophy. Not clear what connection was made. The section gives a fair description of which nursing theorist has influenced the students personal nursing philosophy. Vague The section gives a poor description of which nursing theorist has influenced the students personal nursing philosophy. Not clear on theorist or connection. No evidence that student meets any of the Influential Nursing Theorist criteria. Score of Influential Nursing Theorist,/ 20 Criteria Proficient 20 points Approaching Proficiency 10 points Minimally Proficient 5 points Not yet proficient 2.5 points No Evidence of proficiency 0 points Criterion Score APA & Mechanics Correct use of APA, 7th edition, guidelines throughout the paper. Resources referenced using APA 7th ed. With 2 or fewer errors The Philosophy of Nursing paper flows logically, contains no grammatical errors. Up to three (3) APA errors found throughout the entire paper, including the reference page. Assignment sections are not presented well with some difficulty maintaining topic fluidity and contains less than 4 grammatical errors. Up to five (5) APA errors found throughout the entire paper, including the reference page. Assignment sections are scattered with some difficulty following when read by the reviewer and contains 6 or fewer grammatical errors. Six (6) or more APA errors found throughout the entire paper, including the reference page. Assignment sections are presented illogically and difficult to follow when read by the reviewer and contains significant grammatical errors >6. No evidence that student meets any of the APA criteria. No evidence that student meets any of the Mechanics criteria. Score of APA & Mechanics,/ 20 Total Score of Personal Philosophy Paper,/ 100 Overall Score Proficient 14 points minimum Approaching Proficiency 11 points minimum Minimally Proficient 8 points minimum Not Yet 5 points minimum No Evidence 0 points minimum
  • Ida B. Wells

    Subject of choice: Ida B. Wells In this assignment you will use one subject of choice and generate your own “prompt” to elicit a 3-5 paragraph response from two different AI options about your subject, then you will fact check the content (3 facts minimum fact checked per AI answer/post, for a total of six) You may use our text readings or online research with reliable websites. Include in your direct quotes from the sources and a citation with a weblink, title, and author (if applicable) attached is an example of the work I need completed
  • Culture Response Paper

    What is the relationship between biology, cultural gender roles, sexuality, and identity?

    The material we are using for this response paper focuses on cross-cultural gender variation. Watch all clips before you begin writing. What general conclusions can you draw about biology, gender, and culture from these different examples?

    Mention at least three clips in your paper.

    Further instructions as well as the links to the short clips are attached.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Culture Response Paper.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • FINB571-Competency 2 Assessment

    This is Part 2- building on the powerpoint presentation you’re currently working on.

    Continue your work with the company you selected in the Competency 1 Assessment.

    Research your companys financial reports for 2019.

    Complete a 2- to 3-page FAQ/shareholder analysis.

    Evaluate economic conditions that influence company performance. Consider political, environmental, currency (money), global economics, and government influences on economic conditions.

    Compare market conditions with the companys performance for 2019. Conclude how the market conditions that year influenced the companys performance, such as interest rates, Federal Reserve Bank monetary policy changes, or other market conditions relevant to the company you selected.

    Analyze year-over-year performance from 2018 and 2019. Consider key metrics or ratios such as trailing PE ratio, forward PE ratio, price to book, return on assets, and return on equity in your conclusions.

    Cite references to support your assignment.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): FINCB571_Comp2_Assessment Instructions and Rubric.pdf, FINCB571_Comp2_Assessment Instructions and Rubric.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • FINB571-Competency 2 Assessment

    This is Part 2- building on the powerpoint presentation you’re currently working on.

    Continue your work with the company you selected in the Competency 1 Assessment.

    Research your companys financial reports for 2019.

    Complete a 2- to 3-page FAQ/shareholder analysis.

    Evaluate economic conditions that influence company performance. Consider political, environmental, currency (money), global economics, and government influences on economic conditions.

    Compare market conditions with the companys performance for 2019. Conclude how the market conditions that year influenced the companys performance, such as interest rates, Federal Reserve Bank monetary policy changes, or other market conditions relevant to the company you selected.

    Analyze year-over-year performance from 2018 and 2019. Consider key metrics or ratios such as trailing PE ratio, forward PE ratio, price to book, return on assets, and return on equity in your conclusions.

    Cite references to support your assignment.

  • Available orders

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Rhetorical Analysis Essay Rough Draft.pdf, Rhetorical Analysis of Some Chocolate Has a Dark Side to It.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • html coding book

    HTML (HyperText Markup Language) aik markup language hai jo websites aur web pages bananay ke liye use hoti hai. Iski madad se hum web page ka structure tayar kartay hain, jaise headings, paragraphs, images, links aur tables. HTML tags ke zariye browser ko bataya jata hai ke content screen par kaise dikhana hai.

    Agar chaho to main English, Roman Urdu, ya bilkul easy student-style version bhi likh doon ya phir school/assignment ke liye thora formal

    Requirements: