Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Discussion Assignment Instructions-29-2.docx, Discussion Grading Rubric.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Author: admin
-
A&P Law Case Brief
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): GBA335 M4 Case Brief 1 Guidelines1.docx, Case 1 Brady v NFL_ 640 F3d 785.PDF
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Promoting Health in Older Adults
Please see attached. Articles should be current no more than 6 years pleaseAttached Files (PDF/DOCX): Discussion Assignment Instructions-29-2.docx, Discussion Grading Rubric.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
US Patriot Act and ADA compliance in Cybersecurity
The assignment must be a minimum of 2-4 full pages in length with a minimum of 2 – outside sources. Please be sure to follow APA guidelines for citing and referencing source. Assignments are due by 11:59 pm Eastern time on Sunday. Question 1: The US Patriot act was first enacted in 2001 after the 9/11 attacks. It was subsequently reauthorized, some parts sunsetted, and many other acts over the past 22 years. Put together a primer on how the US Patriot Act plays a role in Cybersecurity, be as thorough as possible. Question 2: Please read this policy guideline, Then you will want to do a bit more research into the Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 508. Put together a executive summary for your bosses explaining what your company’s online products must do to remain fully compliant with the ADA. Assignment Rubric ( 100 Points) Synthesis of Concepts 60 Writing Standards – APA format 20 Timeliness 20 -
Reduction of mercury (II) ion
1- Plagiarism maximum 10%
2- Reduce Ai to Zero % (when you rewrite the part that has Ai, do not change the meaning of the writing and do not use difficult words, when you read my paper, you will understand the level of my writing)
3- Check grammar, flow of writing and transitions words
4- Most of my writing is good without Ai or plagiarism, so keep it do not rewrite it, just Check grammar, flow of writing and transitions words
5- In my university they use Turnitin, if you have it, use it to check Ai and Plagiarism when you finish. Also, I will send you the report I did using Turnitin for Ai and Plagiarism
6- if you have any comment to improve my writing let me know.
7- in part 1.17- Research gap and motivation, I need you to see if it is good or need improvement, when you read my paper, you will understand what the gap is
8- in (chapter 2 Experimental) you will see most of the part highlighted as Plagiarism because it is from my published paper, so try to reduce the Plagiarism without changing the meaning.
9- in chapter 2 sections 2.2.1, 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 you will see that the first paragraph is the same for all these sections, should i keep all of them or there is any way to mention that I use the same method with same molar ratio? I couldn’t decide what should I do.
-
Reduction of mercury (II) ion
1- Plagiarism maximum 10%
2- Reduce Ai to Zero % (when you rewrite the part that has Ai, do not change the meaning of the writing and do not use difficult words, when you read my paper, you will understand the level of my writing)
3- Check grammar, flow of writing and transitions words
4- Most of my writing is good without Ai or plagiarism, so keep it do not rewrite it, just Check grammar, flow of writing and transitions words
5- In my university they use Turnitin, if you have it, use it to check Ai and Plagiarism when you finish. Also, I will send you the report I did using Turnitin for Ai and Plagiarism
6- if you have any comment to improve my writing let me know.
7- in part 1.17- Research gap and motivation, I need you to see if it is good or need improvement, when you read my paper, you will understand what the gap is
8- in (chapter 2 Experimental) you will see most of the part highlighted as Plagiarism because it is from my published paper, so try to reduce the Plagiarism without changing the meaning.
9- in chapter 2 sections 2.2.1, 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 you will see that the first paragraph is the same for all these sections, should i keep all of them or there is any way to mention that I use the same method with same molar ratio? I couldn’t decide what should I do.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): For review.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Reduction of mercury (II) ion
1- Plagiarism maximum 10%
2- Reduce Ai to Zero % (when you rewrite the part that has Ai, do not change the meaning of the writing and do not use difficult words, when you read my paper, you will understand the level of my writing)
3- Check grammar, flow of writing and transitions words
4- Most of my writing is good without Ai or plagiarism, so keep it do not rewrite it, just Check grammar, flow of writing and transitions words
5- In my university they use Turnitin, if you have it, use it to check Ai and Plagiarism when you finish. Also, I will send you the report I did using Turnitin for Ai and Plagiarism
6- if you have any comment to improve my writing let me know.
7- in part 1.17- Research gap and motivation, I need you to see if it is good or need improvement, when you read my paper, you will understand what the gap is
8- in (chapter 2 Experimental) you will see most of the part highlighted as Plagiarism because it is from my published paper, so try to reduce the Plagiarism without changing the meaning.
9- in chapter 2 sections 2.2.1, 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 you will see that the first paragraph is the same for all these sections, should i keep all of them or there is any way to mention that I use the same method with same molar ratio? I couldn’t decide what should I do.
-
Reduction of mercury (II) ion
1- Plagiarism maximum 10%
2- Reduce Ai to Zero % (when you rewrite the part that has Ai, do not change the meaning of the writing and do not use difficult words, when you read my paper, you will understand the level of my writing)
3- Check grammar, flow of writing and transitions words
4- Most of my writing is good without Ai or plagiarism, so keep it do not rewrite it, just Check grammar, flow of writing and transitions words
5- In my university they use Turnitin, if you have it, use it to check Ai and Plagiarism when you finish. Also, I will send you the report I did using Turnitin for Ai and Plagiarism
6- if you have any comment to improve my writing let me know.
7- in part 1.17- Research gap and motivation, I need you to see if it is good or need improvement, when you read my paper, you will understand what the gap is
8- in (chapter 2 Experimental) you will see most of the part highlighted as Plagiarism because it is from my published paper, so try to reduce the Plagiarism without changing the meaning.
9- in chapter 2 sections 2.2.1, 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 you will see that the first paragraph is the same for all these sections, should i keep all of them or there is any way to mention that I use the same method with same molar ratio? I couldn’t decide what should I do.
-
Reduction of mercury (II) ion
1- Plagiarism maximum 10%
2- Reduce Ai to Zero % (when you rewrite the part that has Ai, do not change the meaning of the writing and do not use difficult words, when you read my paper, you will understand the level of my writing)
3- Check grammar, flow of writing and transitions words
4- Most of my writing is good without Ai or plagiarism, so keep it do not rewrite it, just Check grammar, flow of writing and transitions words
5- In my university they use Turnitin, if you have it, use it to check Ai and Plagiarism when you finish. Also, I will send you the report I did using Turnitin for Ai and Plagiarism
6- if you have any comment to improve my writing let me know.
7- in part 1.17- Research gap and motivation, I need you to see if it is good or need improvement, when you read my paper, you will understand what the gap is
8- in (chapter 2 Experimental) you will see most of the part highlighted as Plagiarism because it is from my published paper, so try to reduce the Plagiarism without changing the meaning.
9- in chapter 2 sections 2.2.1, 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 you will see that the first paragraph is the same for all these sections, should i keep all of them or there is any way to mention that I use the same method with same molar ratio? I couldn’t decide what should I do.
-
case study
CASE OF KIAN VIGNETTE:
Kian is a 17-year-old gay, cisgender male from a middle-class Iranian-American family. He is being
referred to counseling by his mother, who expressed concern about his increasing depressive
symptoms and lack of direction regarding college and career planning. His mother attributes some
struggles to his ADHD diagnosis from middle school. As a junior in high school, Kian describes
upcoming career decisions as “overwhelming and stressful.”
Academic Performance: Kian maintains strong grades in English literature, creative writing, and
art classes, where teachers praise his originality. However, he struggles with focus in mathematics,
sciences, and business courses, describing them as “meaningless” and “not for people like me.”
Work Experience: Kian recently quit a part-time administrative job at his uncle’s accounting firm
after three months. The family arranged this position believing office experience would be
“practical,” but Kian received feedback about missing deadlines and appearing disengaged. He felt
“completely out of place” but enjoyed occasional tasks like drafting newsletters that used his
creative skills.
Interests and Aspirations: Kian is passionate about creating digital art, reading graphic novels,
and analyzing science fiction films. He dreams of working as a concept artist for films or illustrating
graphic novels but frequently expresses self-doubt: “I’m creative, but probably not talented enough
to make it professionally.” He has never taken formal art classes and worries his self-taught skills
aren’t “legitimate.”
Family Dynamics: His mother runs a real estate agency, and his father is an architect who
immigrated from Iran. Both work extensive hours and frequently discuss financial pressures. His
older brother Darius recently graduated with an accounting degree and secured a prestigious firm
position, earning frequent family praise for his “practical” career choice. When Kian shares artistic
interests, family responses include “be realistic about making money” and “art is a nice hobby, but
you need a real career.”
Kian came out to his parents six months ago. While they expressed acceptance, he senses subtle
shifts in family dynamics and sometimes wonders if they worry about additional challenges he
might face.
Current Challenges: Kian describes himself as “non-confrontational” and often retreats when
family discussions about his future become intense. He feels anxious about college applications
and struggles with “living in two worlds” – his authentic interests versus family expectations. His
goals include figuring out “how to be excited about my future instead of dreading it” and finding “a
way to honor my family while being true to myself.”
3 hours ago
1. What new insight or perspective about the case did you gain during your discussion that you would like to apply to your future work? (one paragraph minimum)
2. What specific content from the reading(s) did you find of most value to your conceptualization/discussion? (one paragraph minimum)
3. What additional questions regarding the theory/theories and/or the theoretical applications do you still have?
Requirements: 3 paragraphs