Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Resources and development

    What is reasorces and how it helps using our society etc.

  • Psb 3002 final pro

    ONE Individual Project (Options are available as to what you can complete for this project – see below. All options for individual projects are assigned to the peer-review process.) (50% of the final grade)

    Individual Project Overview:

    Individual projects are broken down into a few different components/steps. All individual project options are listed below this overview. All individual projects required the peer-review process. The aim of these individual projects is to help you synthesize the material we are covering throughout the term (i.e. course-specific concepts, theories, etc.). Each student is only required to complete one option for the individual project – see options below. For the purposes of this course, the final project is designed to help you connect the information you learned in this course to real-life problems.

    For all individual projects, first, you will be submit your COMPLETED rough draft (i.e. your paper or presentation, interview, case study, etc.) for peer review (worth up to 10 points). Once the due date passes for the rough draft, you will automatically be assigned to review another student’s paper. Half of your final score for the individual project is assigned for your completed draft (i.e. 12.5 pts for the initial draft). The other half of your points for the initial draft are awarded once you thoroughly complete a peer review via the rubric for the assignment (i.e. 12.5 pts for your completed substantive rubric comments). Late peer review comments may not be accepted since your peers require this feedback prior to submitting their final work.

    Comments for your peer-review task must be added to the rubric areas for feedback and substantive in nature. These comments must offer your reviewee constructive feedback that they can use in revising their work for their final draft. Outlines or incomplete drafts as your initial draft of the individual project may not be accepted for credit. All options below require the peer-review process. I will not be offering feedback on the initial draft. That is the purpose of the peer-review process. If for some reason your rubric closes/glitches as you are working on it, please let me know and enter comprehensive comments in the feedback area for credit consideration. There is no guarantee credit will be awarded this way so I strongly recommend you carefully fill the required rubric.

    Note that the final draft will be due at a later date in the term (worth up to 100 points) for a total of 125 possible points for the project. I will offer feedback on the final draft. However, be sure to consider the feedback your peer reviewer offers you on how to improve your work for the final draft.

    Points for your initial COMPLETED rough draft will be granted once you have completed the peer review comments in the rubric for your assigned reviewee. Full credit is an option for students who submit BOTH their peer review completed draft and full comments on the rubric. You can do this!

    Peer Review Instructions and Guidance:

    • How do I submit a peer review to an assignment:
    • How do I know if I have a peer review assignment to complete?
    • Where can I find my peers’ feedback for peer reviewed assignments?
      Note: Similarity indexes for formal assignments in the course must be kept to 15% or less.

    Option number one: Individual Project Research Trends in Biopsychology

    I would like to see you integrate the information you have learned throughout the term to conduct a literature review related to one of the topics discussed in our text, Psychology as a Biological Science by Lindberg, under the headings Discussion Questions.

    Consider the discussion question (you may choose more than one, up to 3) and how it applies to daily life. See what you can find in current peer-reviewed primary research articles to support the ideas you decide to discuss. You can find free journal articles via the library database. The librarians are available via chat or email to help assist you with your searches and pointers on APA formatting.

    Note: You are not required to include an abstract. If you do include an abstract, please review formatting to ensure you are submitting a correctly formatted one.

    Some examples of the discussion questions found in the Lindberg textbook include:

    1. What challenges do you see that daily-life researchers may face in their studies? How can they be overcome?
    2. How do you think smartphones and other mobile electronic devices will change psychological research? What are their promises for the field? And what are their pitfalls?
    3. Pick a psychological phenomenon that you would like to know more about. What specific hypothesis would you like to test? What psychophysiological methods might be appropriate for testing this hypothesis and why?
    4. What is behind the expression use your gray matter, and why is it not entirely accurate?
    5. If you were interested in the precise time in which a particular brain process occurred, which neuroscience methods could you use?
    6. Discuss the role of evolution in understanding what humans call love or other forms of prosociality.
    7. What are the common features of the biochemistry of love and safety, and why are these important to human health?
    8. Name 34 environmental factors that influence the epigenome and describe their effects.
    9. Do you think omnivores, herbivores, or carnivores have a better chance at survival?
    10. The extensive network of multisensory areas and neurons in the cortex implies that much perceptual processing occurs in the context of multiple inputs. Could the processing of unimodal information ever be useful? Why or why not?
    11. Would you rather have a really good memory or really good metacognition? How might you train someone to develop better metacognition if he or she doesnt have a very good memory, and what would be the consequences of that training?

    Note: These are just examples from the book. You are not limited to these. Please go through the discussion questions areas in the textbook for more ideas.

    Use these discussion questions from the textbook to help you explore ideas for your paper. They discuss current trends in biopsychological research and are relevant to our course.

    Pick one three (1-3) of these discussion questions from the text and discuss how you feel this research has added to the area of biopsychology. What answers do you propose to the discussion questions? Refrain from using the first person voice in your professional writing.

    Discuss: What implications does the research have for your personal or professional life? What are some ethical, cultural (i.e. gender, sexual orientation, socio-economic status, religious), global, or legal issues related to the research you are discussing? Present in professional tone without using the first person voice.

    Use at least three (3) peer-reviewed primary journal articles for your project from the last 5 years.

    Submit a complete first draft of your paper so that your peer reviewer can offer you feedback on your writing. Points will be assigned for this assignment after you complete the review you are assigned to complete. This assignment is aimed at helping you improve your work and those of your peers, as well. Please be thorough in your comments. Be sure to add your comments to the rubric provided via the grade book.

    Your paper should be at least 2-3 pages in length (excluding references). Be sure to include an APA formatted title page and references with citations throughout the body of your work.

    The only file formats allowed will be .doc or .docx.

    Be sure to submit the FINAL revised document with the following file name: “PSB3002- ROARY_ IndProject1.doc

    Be sure to use APA formatting in your writing. You can become more familiar with these guidelines by reviewing the following resources:

    APA Formatting Links:

    That was my intial project but she graded 12/25

  • Nursing Question

    Powerpoint presentation on your drug of choice: Prednisone. You are to be dressed in office attire. The purpose of the presentation is for you to educate your colleagues on the drug you have selected. The presentation must include information about the:

    • Drug pharmacology, pharmacokinetics
    • Brand name
    • Generic name
    • Dosing
    • Indications for use
    • Side effects
    • Contraindications
    • Pregnancy class
    • You must also perform a cost analysis of the drug.
    • Provide a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug.
    • Describe the appropriate patient education.
    • What is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this patient on your case study presentation?
    • Describe the monitoring and follow-up.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Logically organized in current APA style including citation of references.
    • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles within your work.
    • PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.

  • discussion

    1. ApplicationofCourseKnowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
      • Describe a current safety concern in your practice environment.
      • Explain one HIT that could be applied to address the concern.
      • Explain how it could be applied to enhance safety.
      • Identify at least one possible unintended consequence of adopting the HIT.
      • Discuss at least one strategy for mitigating the unintended consequence.
    1. Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by :
      • Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
      • Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
      • Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
      • Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
      • Include a minimum of three different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.
    1. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage peers and faculty by asking questions, and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.
      • Peer Response: Respond to at least one peer.
      • Faculty Response: Respond to at least one faculty post.
      • Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice.
    1. Professionalism in Communication: Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
    2. Reference Citation:Use current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.
    3. Wednesday Participation Requirement: Provideasubstantiveresponse to the gradeddiscussiontopic (notaresponseto a peer or faculty),byWednesday,11:59 p.m. MTofeach week.
    4. Total Participation Requirement: Provide at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a studentpeer,and one to a faculty question)on two different days during the week.

  • Its a project

    the deadline its tomorrow night

  • MKT 5301 Unit II Discussion

    Your initial post should be at least 300 words in length.

  • Your initial post should include at least one APA-formatted scholarly, professional, or textbook reference with accompanying in-text citation to support any paraphrased, summarized, or quoted material.

    • Post 2: Response post to a classmate is due by the end of day on Tuesday.

    Post 3: Response post to a second classmate or the instructors follow-up question is due by the end of day on Tuesday.

  • If no initial posts exist to allow for a response to be made, you may submit an additional initial post addressing another aspect of the unit topic.
  • Feel free to post more responses to classmates as you read, reflect, and contribute to our discussion.

    • Companies need to understand their ability to compete and the environment in which they must compete. Of the strategy planning tools they have available, the PEST (political, economic, sociocultural, and technology) analysis has been shown to be very effective. Do you believe that companies who have a planning culture and use planning tools, such as the PEST analysis, can perform better in the long run than their industry competitors, who may not use similar planning tools? Why, or why not?

  • Research argument draft

    I have to write a research argument. And I want to write about Leftwich Tennis Center. Requirements:

  • Approximately six pages (excluding works cited)
  • A separate citation page: Works Cited, Bibliography or Reference
  • Must include five academic or government sources
  • MLA or APA format
  • Topic related to Memphis, so Leftwich Tennis Center related to it.
  • My research paper question is: How does the Leftwich Tennis Center impact community development and sports tourism in Memphis? Primary source: As a Division I tennis player, I can use my firsthand experience to explain how high-quality facilities like the Leftwich Tennis Center support athlete development, improve training conditions, and increase participation in tennis.
  • Secondary sources are:
  • so these are the links but feel free to find some more links if its works better. Also, no AI generator or others stuff.

  • Dissertation Chapter 1

    Please help me with my Dissertation Intro

    Everything to be attached, once we are matched

  • Dissertation Chapter 1

    Please help me with my Dissertation Intro

    Everything to be attached, once we are matched

  • Wood are more rarer than diamonds

    Wood are rarer than diamonds in the galaxy because trees require very specific conditions to exist, while diamonds can form naturally in many places in space.

    1. Conditions needed for wood (extremely rare)

    For a tree to exist, you need:

    A planet with the right distance from a star (habitable zone)

    Liquid water

    Oxygen and carbon dioxide balance

    Stable climate

    Soil and nutrients

    And most importantly: life already existing and evolving

    These conditions are incredibly strict. So far, Earth is the only confirmed planet with trees.

    2. Diamonds form more easily in space

    Diamonds dont need life. They form when carbon is exposed to:

    High pressure

    High temperature

    These conditions exist in many places like:

    Inside planets (e.g., Uranus and Neptune may have diamond rain)

    Around dead stars

    Even entire stars like white dwarfs can crystallize into diamond-like structures

    So diamonds can form naturally and widely across the universe.

    3. Scale difference

    Trees: Possibly only on a few rare life-supporting planets (maybe just Earth)

    Diamonds: Can exist on countless planets, stars, and cosmic environments

    Conclusion

    On a galactic scale, trees are far rarer than diamonds because they require life and very specific planetary conditions, while diamonds can form almost anywhere carbon exists under extreme conditions.