CONTEXT:In your reflection paper for this module, put together a potential reinforcer array that you could use in an organizational setting. Include at least 10 items/experiences that you would include, and keep the budget below ~$20 for each. Why did you select these items/experiences? What variables discussed in this week’s lecture did you take into consideration when making these selections?
MODULE INFO:This module will discuss common challenges associated with determining what staff want to work for, and provide a structure for creating categories of reinforcers based upon the non-profit literature. Additionally, countless different forms of reinforcers will be shared, along with a review of the literature associated with best practices in staff preference assessment. Finally, an emphasis will be made on the idea of moving beyond contrived reinforcers to creating work environments that eliminate the role of aversive control as an essential component of leadership behavior.
Upon successful completion of this module, learners should be able to:
- Identify common errors made by leaders when selecting potential reinforcers for staff
- Determine the role of non-contingent reinforcement in business and the issues associated with it
- Identify issues related to asking staff about their potential reinforcers and strategies for overcoming those issues
- Determine what CARE (Daniels & Bailey, 2014) stands for when selecting potential reinforcers
- Identify the number and outcomes of current non-monetary reinforcer studies in ABA/OBM literature
- Select reasons that leaders should consider using non-monetary reinforcers in the workplace
- Differentiate between examples of social, tangible, work-related, engineered, and monetary reinforcers
- Determine appropriate preference assessment strategies, including how and how often preferences should be assessed
- Select the steps of the Task Enjoyment Motivation Protocol and other strategies for increasing enjoyment of work beyond contrived reinforcers
- RUBRIC
- Category5 points3 points0 pointsReflection Length* *(excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words)Reflection paper content was greater than 150 words
- .Grammar, Usage, and SpellingReflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.
- References and Utilization of Outside ResourcesThe author used references from peer-reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or moreoriginal behavioral references, outside of the assigned readings. Hyperlinks to the cited external references are provided.
- Addressing the PromptThe authors reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt, develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and supports them through empirical writing.
- ApplicationThe authors post clearly demonstrates application and relationship to the weeks assigned reading/topic.The authors post refers to the assigned topic/readingtangentially but does not demonstrate application.
- WARNING: Using Generative AI (ChatGPT or similar) is not permitted on these papers
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.