Category: Nursing

Integumentary systemplease follow the template and please make sure that the plag report doesnt have too many similarities

In week 3, you must complete a worksheet analyzing a case study. For this session, here is the case study under consideration:

In an outpatient care setting, a healthcare risk management case arises due to the inappropriate delegation of duties by a nurse practitioner (NP) to a medical assistant (MA). The NP, overwhelmed by patient volume and time constraints, delegates tasks beyond the MA’s scope of practice, leading to potential risks to patient safety.

1. ApplicationofCourseKnowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.

• • Do you recommend criminalizing healthcare errors as an effective approach to holding healthcare providers accountable for their mistakes? Why or why not?
  • How can healthcare providers balance the goal of high-quality care with the potential risks and consequences of errors?
  • Are current legal and regulatory frameworks adequate to address healthcare errors? If so, why? If not, what changes are necessary to ensure the regulations best serve clients and providers?

1. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage peers by asking questions, and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice:

Review of Current Healthcare Issues

If you were to ask 10 people what they believe to be the most significant issue facing healthcare today, you might get 10 different answers. Escalating costs? Regulation? Technology disruption? Social Determinant such as environment/community, education, access/quality to healthcare?

These and many other topics are worthy of discussion. Not surprisingly, much has been said in the research, within the profession, and in the news about these topics. Whether they are issues of finance, quality, workload, or outcomes, there is no shortage of changes to be addressed.

In this Discussion, you examine a national healthcare issue and consider how that issue may impact your work setting. You also analyze how your organization has responded to this issue.

This Assessment invites you to apply your pharmacological knowledge to a real-world scenario. You will be tasked with developing a personalized medication plan, considering factors such as genetics, age, ethnicity, and pathophysiological changes. This assignment emphasizes the importance of ethical and legal considerations in advanced practice, requiring you to justify your clinical decisions and write complete medication orders. The study questions and required readings will serve as essential tools to guide your analysis and support your evidence-based approach.Complete the Patient Case Study Template. The template will include the following:

• Describe and outline the specific medications you would prescribe for the provided patient. In your description, be sure to consider factors such as genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, behavior, and/or possible pathophysiological changes due to disease (e.g., renal failure, heart failure, liver failure).
• Discuss the ethical and legal considerations of the personalized plan.
• Write a complete medication order for all medications prescribed.
• Use and cite at least three scholarly sources published within the past 5 years, and follow the APA format for in-text citations and reference list.

To prepare:

• Complete the Cardiovascular System Patient Case scenario.
• Utilize course resources, clinical practice guidelines, and scholarly sources published within the past 5 years to assist you in completing the cardiovascular system patient case.
• Download the Patient Case Study Template.

please refer to the 2 previous posted questions. I attached th initial one you did .

Write a 58 page paper with an introduction, a description of the literature search process, an evaluative annotated bibliography for eight scholarly articles, and a conclusion.

For this assessment, write a 58 page paper with an introduction, a description of the literature search process, an evaluative annotated bibliography for eight scholarly articles, and a conclusion. Review the scoring guide to understand the assignment’s requirements, especially regarding headings, page length, and number of articles to summarize.

• Write an introduction paragraph about your practice site, practice problem, population, stakeholders, and PICO problem statement.
  • Include a thesis statement.
  • Include your project’s importance and why it will help the practice site.
  • Incorporate any instructor feedback.
• Find eight scholarly sources using Capella’s library related to your chosen practice problem and possible intervention(s). Visit for help finding articles in the Capella library.
  • The length of this section should be one paragraph.
  • Describe your literature search strategy. Include keywords, search phrases, databases used, articles found, inclusion/exclusion criteria, number of articles retained, and why.
  • Explain why you chose the literature.
• Using the MEAL plan, summarize the eight scholarly articles. Revisit as needed.
  • Write one paragraph for each article with the study purpose, method, design, results, and context about how the study contributes to the body of literature.
  • Include notation if the article is research or quality improvement.
• Format a conclusion paragraph that summarizes the assessment.

APA Style and Scholarly Writing

• Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
  • Write with a specific purpose in mind.
  • Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards.
• Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
  • Include APA citations and references for a minimum of eight scholarly references.
  • Format the annotated bibliography to APA standards.
  • Include APA-formatted level headings.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

• Length: Your report should be 58 pages long, excluding the title and references pages.
• References: Include APA-formatted citations and references for at least eight scholarly references no more than five years old. Use for guidance in citing sources and formatting your paper in proper APA style. See the for more APA resources specific to your degree level.
• APA Format: Use the to help you write and format your literature review. An abstract and running header are not required, but be sure to include the following:
  • A title page and references page.
  • Appropriate section headings.
• Additional Information: In addition to an introduction with a thesis statement and a conclusion, use the following section headings to format the body of your paper to ensure thorough content coverage and flow.
  • Search strategy.
  • Annotated bibliography.
• Naming Convention: Save the document you are submitting using the following format.
  • Last Name, First Name – Assessment 3 Attempt #.

I attached the first part of this assignment. this is the second part.

Write a 35 page plan demonstrating the skills of summary and synthesis in the development of an introduction, description of both the population and the stakeholders, a problem question, and a conclusion.

For this assessment, write a 35 page plan demonstrating the skills of summary and synthesis in the development of an introduction, description of both the population and the stakeholders, a problem question, and a conclusion. Review the scoring guide to understand the assignment’s requirements, especially regarding headings and page length.

• Write an introduction by synthesizing the context of Section II from the Professional Practice Report assessment.
  • Provide a summary using the MEAL plan for the practice site and problem. Revisit as needed.
    • Much of the information will come from your Professional Practice Report.
      • Make sure to address instructor feedback, if any, from the previous assessment and incorporate the feedback into your introduction.
    • Include your concise problem statement.
      • Remember that a good problem statement is one to two sentences and includes both the problem and a measurable objective.
    • Include a thesis statement that addresses the content from the Professional Practice Plan.
  • Describe the population at the practice site in terms of role, age range, diagnosis, procedure, etc.
    • The length of this section should be one paragraph.
    • In the description, be as specific as possible and provide details to convince the reader who your population is.
    • Consider the following when describing the practice problem:
      • What collective factors would include or exclude participation?
      • Is there both a primary and secondary population?
  • Describe the stakeholders at the practice site and their roles in the practice problem.
    • The length of this section should be two to three paragraphs.
    • Consider the following when describing the stakeholders:
      • Describe the stakeholders at the proposed practice site.
      • Explain plans to tailor your message to stakeholder groups.
      • Describe your strategy for obtaining cooperation and collaboration at your proposed site.
  • Formulate a problem question using the PICO format. Provide the details of each component of your PICO question.
    • The length of this section should be one paragraph.
    • Remember the PICO is a question; therefore, you should have appropriate punctuation.
    • Make sure to label the components of your PICO question.
  • Provide a conclusion synthesizing the concepts described in the Professional Practice Plan in a well-formatted paragraph.
    • Make sure not to include any new information in the conclusion.

APA Style and Scholarly Writing

• Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
  • Write with a specific purpose in mind.
  • Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards.
• Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
  • Include APA citations and references for a minimum of four scholarly references.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

• Length: Your report should be 35 pages long, excluding the title page, references page, and appendices. Be sure also to submit a PDF of the scholarly source you chose to summarize.
• References: Include APA-formatted citations and references for at least four scholarly references no more than five years old. Visit for help finding articles in the Capella library. Use for guidance in citing sources and formatting your paper in proper APA style. See the for more APA resources specific to your degree level.
• APA Format: Use the to help you write and format your report. An abstract and running header are not required but be sure to include the following:
  • A title page and references page.
  • Appropriate section headings.
• Additional Information: In addition to an introduction with a thesis statement and a conclusion, use the following section headings to format the body of your paper to ensure thorough content coverage and flow.
  • Population.
  • Stakeholders.
  • Problem question.
• Naming Convention: Save the document you are submitting using the following format.
  • Last Name, First Name – Assessment 2 Attempt #.

Instructions:

Involvement in policy-making requires a serious focus and a broad understanding of the identified topics. Your text includes excellent step-by-step instructions for advocating for or against a specific topic. You will research your topic on various websites, including advocacy, social media, and news sites. It’s important that you get a robust view of your topic. It is also recommended that you review the legislative agenda topic for your congressman or congresswoman. You will be contacting a state or federal official related to this topic later in the semester, so you should know their positions on the topic.

You will submit a fact sheet of your identified problem. Information regarding how to construct a fact sheet can be found on pages 293-294 of your text. Please support your submission with both scholarly sources and current events articles from reputable websites. I would like my fact sheet to be titled, “The hidden Mental Health Crisis in Our Emergency Rooms”. I have attached the discussion forum i wrote from this week, which should reflect the fact sheet. I have also attached a fact sheet that I downloaded from online. I would like for you to make this fact sheet look more like the example fact sheet with pictures and colors.

1. Analyze the importance of folk medicine practices and folk healers to African-Americans in the rural setting, including the role of access to care and structural inequities.
2. Analyze the nurseclient interaction and discuss how culturally insensitive communication can contribute to disparities in maternal health outcomes.
3. Evaluate at least two communication barriers encountered by non-Navajo nurses in the when providing care to Navajo clients, and discuss advocacy strategies to improve culturally and linguistically appropriate services.
4. Your post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.
5. This discussion gets submitted through AI and turnitin detection, so similarity report has to be 20% or less.

Unit 4: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence

Instructions

Purpose

In the Matrix Table assignment in Unit 3, you provided four resources that, after your survey/analysis/synthesis of the literature, support the intervention you determined is the optimum choice for your scholarship project.

Directions

For this assignment, you are required to utilize the appropriate JBI Critical Appraisal Tool for each of those 4 resources. The appraisal tools can be accessed from your Unit 3 learning resources or by utilizing the following link:

After you have determined which of the Tools is appropriate for each resource, you will download the Word file of the Tool and fill it out completely. You will have a total of 4 completed Tools.

When completing each JBI Critical Appraisal tool, you must do more than select Yes/No/Unclear/Not Applicable. For each checklist item, include a brief rationale (1-2 sentences) explaining why you selected that response based on the evidence from the article.

In addition, you must upload a PDF of the full-text article for each resource. Within each PDF, highlight or annotate the specific sections of the article that correspond to your responses for the JBI checklist items. This documentation should clearly show where you located the information used to make each appraisal judgement.

Once you have completed the 4 Tools, you will download the assignment template.

The first 2 columns in the template are self-explanatory.

Having conducted a critical appraisal of the 4 resources for this assignment, in column 3, you will discuss if the outcome of your appraisal provides satisfactory support for the intervention you have identified, OR if your appraisal suggests you need to return to the literature to find additional, more suitable support for your selected intervention.

Indicate Include or Not Include in the 3rd column and provide your discussion about the outcome of your appraisal, and if it provides support for your identified intervention, or if you need to search for additional support.

Here is an overview of the table contained in the template.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

The assignment requires you to upload all four PDF file of the full-text article that supports the intervention with highlighted or annotated sections corresponding to the JBI checklist items for your faculty to review.

Upload all 4 of your completed appraisal tools and the assignment template document to this assignment Dropbox