Category: Nursing

  • DRUG PROJECT

    I already selected the drug FAMOTIDINE

    Select a drug from the given list for your assignment and inform me of your choice (via Canvas inbox). Once I have confirmed your selection, review at least five academic articles. Then, organize your findings into a table that encapsulates the key information about the drug, including the author, publication date, title of the article, source, and page number. Ensure that the references are formatted according to APA guidelines. You have the option to present the references on a separate page instead of incorporating them into the table.




  • Core competencies- Self eval

    Week 4 AssignmentCore Competencies

    Self-Evaluation & Growth Action Plan


    Submission Type

    Single PDF upload: Competency self-rating, 1-page reflection (2 strengths, two growth areas), and Competency Growth Action Plan (template)

    Introduction

    In practice, you will be expected to self-assess, set goals, and pursue lifelong learning. This activity invites you to critically evaluate your strengths and areas for growth as an FNP. By developing a Competency Growth Plan now, you are practicing the same skills you use throughout your professional life to stay current and competent. Self-assess against FNP core competencies and develop a realistic growth plan with clear strategies, milestones, and reflection points.


    Assignment

    • Review the (p. 27) and rate your proficiency- Advanced Level nursing education
    • Write a one-page reflection identifying the top two strengths and the top two growth areas.
      • 1.3c Incorporate knowledge from nursing andother disciplines to support clinical judgment.
      • 2.4f Employ context driven, advanced reasoning tothe diagnostic and decision-making process
    • Complete the Competency Growth Action Plan with concrete strategies (e.g., shadowing, CE, case practice), timeline, and milestones.

    See the rubric for specific grading criteria.

    Rubric

    Week 4: Core CompetenciesSelf-Evaluation & Growth Action Plan Rubric

    Week 4: Core CompetenciesSelf-Evaluation & Growth Action Plan Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent & Comprehensiveness

    50 to >45.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThoroughly addresses all required elements with depth, accuracy, and clear alignment to objectives.45 to >40.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses most required elements with adequate accuracy and alignment to objectives.

    40 to >25.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsAddresses some required elements but lacks depth, detail, or clear alignment to objectives.25 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not adequately address required elements; incomplete or inaccurate.

    50 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Clarity

    24 to >21.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe writing is clear, concise, and well-organized with logical flow and formatting that enhances readability.21 to >19.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsOrganization and clarity are generally organized with some minor lapses in flow or clarity. Formatting is acceptable.

    19 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsOrganization is inconsistent; writing lacks clarity; and formatting distracts from readability.12 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe writing is disorganized and unclear; formatting is missing or incorrect.

    24 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection & Professional Insight

    8 to >7.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsDemonstrates deep reflection, critical thinking, and strong connection to professional practice.7 to >6.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsProvides adequate reflection and some connection to professional practice.

    6 to >4.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsProvides superficial reflection with limited connection to practice.4 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsNo meaningful reflection or professional insight is provided.

    8 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics & APA

    8 to >7.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe assignment accurately and consistently follows APA Style. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.7 to >6.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe assignment consistently follows current APA Style with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes. Mostly meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

    6 to >4.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe assignment has numerous errors in APA Style. Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style. May not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.4 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe assignment has significant errors in APA Style. Does not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

    8 pts

    Total Points: 90

  • nursing discusion

    Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 1 of your fellow classmates with at least a 250-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions:

    • What did you learn from your classmate’s posting?
    • What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?
    • What clarification do you need regarding the posting?
    • What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings?

    All sources should be cited using APA format. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and format should be correct and professional.

    Discussion Board Rubric

    REPOST AND REPOND

    The deployment of a bar-code medication administration (BCMA) system within a 200-bed acute care facility significantly contributes to improved patient safety, more precise medication administration, and a reduction in preventable adverse events. By using BCMA, nurses will scan patients wristbands and medications prior to administration to ensure accuracy and compliance with the five rights. Though intuitive, proper education with practice and follow-through will ensure nurses are able to integrate BCMA into their workflows. If teaching practices are not implemented and enforced properly, the system could be unused or improperly used.

    The overall objective of this teaching plan is multifold: nurses will understand how to properly scan medications and patients bands and verify the correct medications. They will know how BCMA decreases chances of administering the wrong medication to patients. Nurses will identify barriers to BCMA technology and know who to contact to help problem solve any difficulties. They will also learn how to report problems with medication errors and workflow improvements through quality improvement committees. To address these multiple objectives, a blended learning approach will be used. Hands-on demonstrations will allow nurses to practice scanning medications and patient identification bands. Nurses will simulate real-life cases to practice administration of multiple medications to a patient within a short period of time. Workshop activities will allow nurses to role-play administration barriers including scanning mistakes, system messages, and misprinted barcodes. Workshops will allow nurses to practice approaching the BCMA tech team to ensure proper problem solving techniques are followed. Online modules will allow nurses to reference how to use the system at any time. Peers who understand the system will mentor new nurses for a few weeks while on their unit, allowing for a resource for questions when they arise.

    Potential barriers to implementation include resistance to change, difficulty with technology, workflow interruptions/increase in workload, and time to complete education. Many nurses tend to feel that BCMA creates another step in their process, especially if they are feeling rushed with high acuity patients. Equipment failures such as unreadable barcodes, damaged packaging, scanner issues, and interruption in internet-based technology may lead to BCMA deficiencies (Grailey, Hussain, Wylleman, et al., 2023). Workflow may be negatively impacted by BCMA as nurses on med-surg units may feel as though scanning each medication slows down rounding and causes more pressure to work faster. Some nurses have taken to workarounds when implementing BCMA because of these fears. Another barrier is time; often, it is difficult to find block times to complete education in an acute care setting. Adult learners have different learning styles. Some nurses may have a harder time with tech versus others. Thus, it is important to use different teaching methods including visual, hands-on, and web-based training. Grailey et al. (2023) also recognize barriers are not individual knowledge and skill level. Nurses work in ward cultures and peer groups are accountable for BCMA successes and failures. Ergonomic design can impact the efficiency of BCMA technology as well.

    BCMA is a safe and effective evidence-based practice. Mahmoud, Al-Khani, and Hassans (2025) study evaluates how BCMA increases safe practices when administering medications. BCMA decreases chances of administering the wrong drug or wrong patient by scanning both the patients identification band and medication pack. Preventable adverse events decrease while nurses confidence increases when administering medications with BCMA technology. Nurses who fail to use BCMA are more likely to make an error. Patients also reported feeling safer when nurses used BCMA properly. Like Mahmoud et al. (2025) found, Grailey et al. (2023) study showed that nurses felt BCMA took longer to complete rounds. However, BCMA allows nurses to skip manual double checks and documentation taking up less time in nurses workflows.

    I would share Mahmoud et al. (2025) study with colleagues to show how BCMA not only benefits patients but improves workflow and efficiencies. Once nurses understand how BCMA could benefit them, they are less likely to feel like the technology is another task on their checklist.

    Various methods will be used to evaluate this teaching plan. A checklist will be used to watch nurses perform BCMA medication administration. An end-of-implementation survey will be distributed to ask questions regarding BCMA barriers, confidence in using the system, and how nurses felt about the teaching methods. As with any new implementation, rates of medication errors will be monitored and compared to previous years. This will overall benefit patient safety in the healthcare facility.

    References

    Grailey, K., Hussain, R., Wylleman, E., et al. (2023). Understanding the facilitators and barriers to barcode medication administration by nursing staff using behavioral science frameworks . BMC Nursing, 22:378.

    Mahmoud, A., Al-Khani, A., & Hassan, R. (2025). Impact of barcode medication administration on patient safety in acute care settings . BMJ Open, 15 (11) e109619.

  • can you make this care plan for me on a mom in the post part…

    can you create this care plan for me without using AI and it can be simple about a mom on a post partum unit she doesnt need to have any complications it can be a healthy patient who gave birth

  • case study 3

    ATI Nurse’s Touch: The Leader Case 3 Interprofessional Communication

    Submit before completing this activity if you have not already done so.

    Instructions

    Once logged in, go to My ATI, select the Learn tab and select ATI Nurse’s Touch: The Leader Case 3 Interprofessional Communication. Watch the video in each stage and answer the multiple-choice questions that follow the video to move through the stages. The questions following the videos are not graded and will provide a rationale for the answer provided.

    • Overview (0:31)
    • Stage 1 (0:30)
    • Stage 2 (0:38)
    • Stage 3 (0:45)
    • Stage 4 (0:30)
    • Stage 5 (0:41)

    Clinical Reflective Questions

    After watching the videos, answer the following questions in a Microsoft Word document. Refer to the learning material presented in this module for guidance.

    1. What tool could the nurse have used when reporting to help her give Dr. Craig the information he needed to determine what actions he needed to take?
    2. Why did Beverly ask Dr. Craig to go to the conference room with her?
    3. How well do you think Beverly addressed the providers concerns? Anything she might have added?
    4. Do you think Beverly should have addressed the providers negative comments to the nurse (I dont want to waste any more time talking to you.)?
    5. What do you think about the way Beverly is introducing SBAR to her unit and hospital?
    6. What are your impressions of Beverly as a leader? Would you like to work with her?
    7. What might be some of the downfalls of a transformational leadership style?

    Submission and Assessment Guidelines

    • Create a document with your name, date, and course number. Number your response for each question. Respond to all prompts in 3-5 sentences.
    • Include a minimum of 2 scholarly references in APA format (with in-text citations) dated within the past 5 years.
      • Scholarly References:A scholarly reference refers to a source of information that is considered reliable and credible, has been vetted by experts, and contributes to the body of knowledge in a particular discipline. Examples of scholarly references include peer-reviewed journal articles, dissertations and theses, academic books published by university press, .gov or .org websites, and textbooks. Scholarly references need to be current within the past five years unless it is seminal work. Seminal work refers to a publication that has had a profound and lasting impact on a particular field of study. For example: Benner, P. (1984). Novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Addison-Wesley.
    • Be sure to connect your responses to the course content and previous learning experiences.
    • Upload the completed document in one of the following formats: .DOCX, .PDF.
    • Review the assignment Rubric for grading criteria.

    Rubric

    NUR 338 The Leader Cases Activity Rubric

    NUR 338 The Leader Cases Activity Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse Content & Critical Thinking

    50 ptsExemplaryLearner responds to all prompts with no more than 5 sentences each. Responses are detailed and show a deep understanding of the topic. No key details are missing.45 ptsProficientLearner responds to all prompts in 3-5 sentences. Responses show good understanding and accuracy but may lack one key detail for completeness.

    40 ptsCompetentLearner responds to all prompts in at least 3 sentences. Responses show basic understanding and clarity but are missing up to two key details for completeness.35 ptsNeeds ImprovementLearner provides limited responses. Responses are under 3 sentences or incomplete or missing three or more key details.0 ptsNot EvidentLearners responses are missing, unclear, or inaccurate.

    50 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Evidence

    20 ptsExemplaryLearner supports the responses with seamlessly integrated, relevant, and current evidence that enhances the credibility and strength of the work without interrupting the flow of writing. Uses more than 2 scholarly sources that are published within the past five years.18 ptsProficientLearner supports the responses with well-integrated, relevant and current evidence that provides support, is cited clearly, and contributes to the credibility of the work. Citations may cause minor interruptions to the flow of writing. Uses at least 2 scholarly sources that are published within the past five years.

    16 ptsCompetentLearner supports the responses with integrated, relevant, and current evidence that mostly supports the work, with occasional disruptions to the flow of writing. Uses at least 2 scholarly sources that are published within the past five years.14 ptsNeeds ImprovementLearners evidence is poorly integrated into the responses, causing significant disruptions to the flow of writing. Evidence is not relevant or current. Scholarly resources provided do not meet requirements.0 ptsNot EvidentLearners presentation lacks support and evidence.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Professional Voice

    20 ptsExemplaryLearners assignment is well-organized and fully adheres to submission guidelines. Formatting is professional and enhances readability. Tone is professional, considerate of differing viewpoints, and engaging.18 ptsProficientLearners assignment is organized, and formatting follows submission guidelines. Tone is generally professional and considerate of other viewpoints, with minor lapses.

    16 ptsCompetentLearners assignment is adequately structured but has some organizational weaknesses. Formatting meets basic submission requirements. Tone contains occasional lapses in professionalism or limited engagement with different viewpoints.14 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe document has noticeable organizational issues, making it difficult to follow. Formatting is inconsistent or does not fully meet submission guidelines. Tone is inconsistent in professionalism and engagement or lacks respect for differing viewpoints.0 ptsNot EvidentThe document lacks clear structure and organization. Formatting is missing or does not follow submission guidelines. Tone is unprofessional and lacks respect for differing viewpoints.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and Style

    10 ptsExemplaryLearners responses include in-text citations with corresponding references in APA format listed at the end of the document. Responses are free from grammatical, spelling, and APA formatting errors.9 ptsProficientLearners responses include in-text citations with corresponding references in APA format listed at the end of the document. Responses have 1-3 differing grammatical, spelling, and/or APA formatting errors.

    8 ptsCompetentLearners responses include in-text citations with corresponding references listed in APA format at the end of the document. Responses have 4-6 different grammatical, spelling, and/or APA formatting errors.7 ptsNeeds ImprovementLearners responses are missing in-text citations. References may be listed at the end of the document in APA format. Responses have 7 different grammatical, spelling, and/or APA formatting errors.0 ptsNot EvidentLearners responses are missing in-text citations and corresponding references at the end of the paper. Responses have more than 7 different grammatical, spelling, and/or APA formatting errors.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

  • case study 1

    Overview

    The purpose of this assignment is to explore the importance of effective communication and teamwork in healthcare settings. Watch the two videos below and respond to the four questions.

    Instructions

    Watch (6:47).

    Watch (4:34).

    Citation: QSEN Institute. (2012, November 1). QSEN: The Lewis Blackman story (Part two) & (Part three) [Video]. YouTube.

    Respond to the following in 3-5 sentences each. Include a minimum of 2 scholarly references in APA format (with in-text citations) dated within the past 5 years. See submission guidelines below.

    1. Discuss the role of communication and teamwork in Lewis Blackmans case.
    2. Identify specific instances where communication breakdowns occurred.
    3. Propose strategies to improve communication and teamwork among healthcare professionals to prevent similar incidents.
    4. Describe misplaced professionalism and its impact of patient outcomes.

    Submission and Assessment Guidelines

    • Create a document with your name, date, and course number. Number your response for each question. Respond to all prompts in 3-5 sentences.
    • Include a minimum of 2 scholarly references in APA format (with in-text citations) dated within the past 5 years.
      • Scholarly References:A scholarly reference refers to a source of information that is considered reliable and credible, has been vetted by experts, and contributes to the body of knowledge in a particular discipline.
  • Introduction and methodology

    Directions

    Write the beginning of your paper, including:

    1. Introductory paragraph: Include a clear, concise purpose statement that is one-half page with no citations and no heading.
    2. Methodology: Include a description of what methods you will use to gather and analyze project data. It should be one-half page with citations as applicable.
    3. References: Include all references used in this section.

    You are encouraged to use to help minimize writing errors.

    What to Submit

    Your introduction and Methodology in Microsoft Word

  • Clinical decision support poster

    Read the following scenario.

    Your facility received the flowing performance data after implementing a clinical decision support system (CDSS). The goal is to have 100% compliance with CDSS use.

    • CDSS use among providers was 81.4%
      • 76% of providers approved of the newly implemented CDSS
      • Cited reasons for not using CDSS included mistrust of the system and a fear of potential diagnostic errors

    Based on the above performance data and metrics, design an interprofessional educational poster to mitigate the mistrust of the proposed CDSS and help increase compliance. Address the following requirements.

    1. Download the . Read the directions on the template. Use of this template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name.
    2. Include the required information in the appropriate section of the Clinical Decision Support Poster template.
    3. Use APA in-text citations and complete references to support your writing.
    4. Follow APA rules for grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scholarly writing.
    5. Abide by Chamberlain Universitys academic integrity policy.

    Include the following sections in the poster (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric):

    1. Problem Identification
      1. Identify the intended audience.
      2. Present the concern.
      3. Use the provided performance data.
    2. Benefits
      1. Discuss at least three benefits of using CDSS.
      2. Include statistical data supporting CDSS use.
      3. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
    3. Risks
      1. Describe at least three risks associated with bypassing the use of alerts in the CDSS.
      2. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
    4. Strategies
      1. Provide at least three strategies for providers to increase the use of CDSS.
      2. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
    5. Reflection
      1. Reflect on your learning and consider how the knowledge will improve your effectiveness as an advanced practice nurse.
      2. Discuss how you may use this tool in your practice.
    6. Presentation Format
      1. Ensure the poster is professional in language, tone, and appearance.
      2. Ensure the poster is well organized and balanced spatially including words and graphics (if used).
    7. References
      1. Provide 2 scholarly sources using correct APA formatting.
  • Week for HIPAA discussion

    Week 4 Idea Paper

    Instructions

    Concept/idea Paper. Due by Sunday of Week 4, 11:59 PM EST

    Submit an 3 page concept/idea paper IAW APA format on an approved topic (see pre-approved topics in the syllabus). Paper organization will include (use as headings):

    • Introduction.
    • Problem Statement.
    • Relevance and Significance.
    • References (at least five).

    2. Pre-approved research topics:,,,

    Authentication/Digital signatures
    Data collections tools (hardware & software)
    E-business/e-commerce security
    End user security issues.
    Government vs. commercial organization security issues.
    HIPAA
    Identity Theft
    ID&IH Management and Legal Issues
    Instant Messaging security.
    Intrusion detection.
    Sarbannes Oxley
    Security Threats & Vulnerabilities
    Wireless technology security

    The concept/idea paper “sets the stage” for your research paper – which will be on the same topic, assuming your paper receives a passing grade.

    This assignment is a summative assessment for Course Objective 4.

    Assignment Criteria ( 100 Points)
    Synthesis of Concepts 60
    Writing Standards – APA format 20
    Timeliness 20

  • Maternity: Identify one of your policies specific to your sp…

    Purpose

    This clinical learning assignment aims to prepare students for engagement and patient care, develop students’ understanding of social determinants of health (SDOH), healthcare disparities, health equity, structural racism, and the impact on the community population. The priority nursing action plan will heighten students awareness of nurses role in advancing health equity for all and mitigating disparities.

    – this assignment has 2 parts- 1) create a priority nursing action plan and 2) Identify one (1) of your policies specific to your specialty and explain how healthcare inequity is addressed.

    – Part 1 is already completed

    PART 2 is what has to be completed.

    -For that,a policy has to be chosen, it will be attached below (medical social worker assessment) and you have to explain how healthcare inequity is addressed.

    -half a page of answer is enough.

    -use APA citations and include in-text citations too (minimum 2)

    – NO PLAGIARISM should be found

    – Write in simple words

    -This is an assignment in my OB (Maternity) class and I want you to write the paper using this policy of the hospital that I go to. we do clinicals at the labor and delivery floor and the mother and baby floor. (NCH)

    – Mechanics, spelling, punctuation, and grammar should be logical and professional

    – This is the question to be answered: Identify one (1) of your policies specific to your specialty and explain how healthcare inequity is addressed.

    -lmk if you have any questions