Category: Research & Summaries

• Prompt: Design your study as a quantitative study. Identify whether a survey or experimental design would be more appropriate.

• If using a survey design, outline a method plan that includes the survey design, population and sample, instrumentation, variables, and data analysis and interpretation.
• If using an experimental design, outline a method plan that includes the participants and design, variables, instrumentation and materials, experimental procedures, threats to validity, procedure, analysis, and interpretation.
• Requirements: Include at least one research article that justifies the use of quantitative design for your study. Minimum of three pages of text doubled spaced. APA format.
• References:
• Chapter 8
• Read article – Meadows, K. A. (2003). So you want to do research? 4: An introduction to quantitative methods. British Journal of Community Nursing, 8(11), 519-526.
• Read article – Bolarinwa, O. A. (2015). Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Nigerian postgraduate medical journal, 22(4), 195-201.

• Activity
• Link:
• Read article – Queirs, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017).
• Follow the link to the video and read article. In a two-page reflection, answer the questions below:

• 1)What are the strengths and weaknesses associated with the utilization of quantitative research methods in the study you’ve developed for your written assignment?
• 2)Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of using quantitative approaches, considering factors such as data precision, generalizability, and the potential for uncovering patterns or trends.
• 3)How might the choice of quantitative methods impact the validity and reliability of your research findings?
• Requirement: APA format
• Reference:Chapter 8
• Read article – Meadows, K. A. (2003). So you want to do research? 4: An introduction to quantitative methods. British Journal of Community Nursing, 8(11), 519-526.
• Read article – Bolarinwa, O. A. (2015). Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Nigerian postgraduate medical journal, 22(4), 195-201.

Please redo all forest plots using STATA software (no ChatGPT, please, as per adviser and panel guidelines). Ensure the following for all plots:

• Tirzepatide N, comparator N, and events/N remain visible in the left panel.
• Heterogeneity statistics and random-effects model details appear below the figure.

Specific updates:

• Forest plots 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3: HRs are already extracted from the studies; simply recreate the plots (my plot seems inaccurate, esp the CI lines).
• Forest plot 5.4: Add composite CV death/hospitalization/urgent visit + hospitalization for heart failure (these are after hospitalization for unstable angina); recalculate hazard ratios, then generate the forest plot.
• Forest plot 6.1: Recreate (my plot seems inaccurate).
• Forest plot 6.2: Remove SURPASS-J mono (due to zero events); recalculate RR and weights, then generate the forest plot.
• 20$ TIP WILL BE GIVEN FOR A QUALITY OUTPUT

Please redo all forest plots using STATA software (no ChatGPT, as per adviser and panel guidelines). Ensure the following for all plots:

• Tirzepatide N, comparator N, and events/N remain visible in the left panel.
• Heterogeneity statistics and random-effects model details appear below the figure.

Specific updates:

• Forest plots 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3: HRs are already extracted from the studies; simply recreate the plots.
• Forest plot 5.4: Add composite CV death/hospitalization/urgent visit + hospitalization for heart failure (these are after hospitalization for unstable angina); recalculate hazard ratios.
• Forest plot 6.1: Recreate as is.
• Forest plot 6.2: Remove SURPASS-J mono (due to zero events); recalculate RR and weights

In this presentation, students are to choose an organization that they are familiar with or that is of interest to them.

Present to an audience of the organizations leaders. You are to analyze the current state of an organizations identity and culture. From this analysis, evaluate alignment between the organizations identity, the organizations culture, the policies that guide the organization, and the practices that have shaped it. As you research these aspects, identify areas of organizational strengths and areas of misalignment. Clearly present your findings. Students are encouraged to apply course concepts, research additional sources not assigned by the professor, and apply the literature as evidence to support their ideas in this presentation.

Include the following major sections in your presentation:

• introduction;
• analyze the current state of an organizations identity and culture;
  evaluate alignment between the organizations identity, culture, policies, and practices;
• identify areas of organizational strengths and areas of misalignment. Clearly present your findings.
• conclusion.

Students are to prepare a 12 – 15 (Max) slide presentation. The presentation slide count does not include the title, reference, or appendix slides. Each slide should have brief, key points displayed with images that visually tell the story

Include a minimum of ten (10) quality references; five (5) that come from scholarly sources – included at the end of your presentation. A minimum of 10 references are required to achieve At Standard.

Hi, the study is about the “Use of negative inspiratory force to determine the need for positive pressure ventilation in patients post extubation” will attachedI want to convert the protocol introduction into a manuscript introduction. I will attach the NIF protocol. I will also attach directions and examples of each and how protocol introduction differs from manuscript introduction. please DON’T Use AI generation or ChatGPT.

Hi, the study is about the “Use of negative inspiratory force to determine the need for positive pressure ventilation in patients post extubation” will attached

I want to convert the protocol introduction into a manuscript introduction. I will attach the NIF protocol. I will also attach directions and examples of each and how protocol introduction differs from manuscript introduction. please DON’T Use AI generation or ChatGPT.

General Paper Requirements:

1) Papers should be a minimum of 3 full double-spaced pages of content, excluding the
References page; the paper should be as long as it needs to be to answer the prompt
2) Follow APA guidelines (in-text citations and References page)
3) 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins
4) Use multiple peer-reviewed articles to support your paper
5) Limit the use of direct quotes from the articles (paraphrase and cite)
6) Be free of grammatical, syntactical, and spelling errors
7) Not include the use of personal anecdotes or opinions

Prompt: Choose a real-world case or some type of offending behavior and:

a. Identify two criminological theories that could explain the behavior(s) involved

b. Compare and contrast how each theory accounts for the behavior

c. Evaluate which theory offers the strongest explanation and why

d. Propose one program or effort from your selected strongest theory to address the

behavior or reduce offending

Correct all the annotations given in the PDF attachment. Also, attached is the project template that has to be used exactly. No additional titles, all titles and table of contents from the template have to be exact. Conclusion part of the project show not have outcomes, as this is a proposed change project.

Kennedy, Ashley Graham. (2024). Science and public policy: A philosophical introduction. Routledge. ISBN 9781032317403

McDavid, James C., Huse, Irene & Hawthorn, Laura R.L. (2019). Performance evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice (3rd edition). Sage Publications, Ltd. ISBN 9781506337067

1. Kennedy (2024), in Scientific evidence, argues that “contemporary science” relies on methodological naturalism. What does this mean for program evaluation? Moreover, how do the expectations of methodological naturalism shape discussions about program evaluation? Leverage examples from McDavid et al. (2019) to support your discussion.
2. According to Castillo & Strunk (2025), what is CritQuant? How does this approach differ from traditional practices in quantitative research?