Category: Research & Summaries

McDavid et al. (2019). Chp. 4.

McDavid, James C., Huse, Irene & Hawthorn, Laura R.L. (2019). Performance evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice (3rd edition). Sage Publications, Ltd. ISBN 9781506337067

Review each question and answer accordingly. For short answer responses, use full sentences and leverage the resources in the module to guide your responses. If you cite or closely paraphrase the readings or videos, make sure you adequately cite that material.

1. Measurement validity types do not exhaust the possible types of construct validity. True/False
2. According to McDavid (2019), what is a unit of analysis? Second, provide three examples of unit of analysis that could be part of an evaluation.
3. Instruments drafted by the evaluator should be pretested before they are used in a program evaluation. True/False
4. Among the four levels of measurement, nominal measures have two properties: they categorize, and they rank. True/False
5. Fundamentally, measurement is the process of developing and applying instruments that translate constructs into observables. True/False
6. Annual income expressed in dollars is a good example of a measure that has all the properties of a ratio level of measurement. True/False
7. To be valid, a measuring instrument must have no random error in the data that are collected using it. True/False
8. Proxy measurement is where program outcomes are measured as a proxy for program outputs. True/False
9. What are the key characteristics of ordinal measures? Give three examples.
10. Interval measures have all the properties of nominal and ordinal measures. True/False
11. Describe a process that you would use, including the measuring instrument and the actual data collection procedure, to measure the level of formal education of program participants in an evaluation of an employment training program. How would you know whether the measure was reliable? How would you assess the validity of the measure?
12. According to McDavid et al. (2019), what are the key characteristics of nominal measures? Give three examples.
13. If people are the main unit of analysis in an evaluation of an employment training program, then their employment status (currently employed versus currently not employed) is an example of a construct that could be measured for each person in the study. True/False
14. To calculate test-retest reliability, an evaluator must be using a before-after research design where program participants are measured before and after they receive the program. True/False
15. What are the key characteristics of interval measures? Give three examples.

Need help from a meta-analysis expert!!!

Recreate all forest plots from the primary analysis (pages 2225). Then, replicate the secondary analysis from page 26 in Stata, presenting its forest plots with the same structure, options, columns, labels, model and formatting as the primary analysis. use Stata software

my paper, surpass cvot, surpass 4, surpass j-mono attached. for surpass 2, 3, and 6; these are the links

For this assignment, you will complete the Research Paper project outlined in Creating a Research Paper (Word Module 2, Pages WD 2-1 to WD 2-63) in your textbook. The research topic, along with all necessary content, is provided in the textbook. Your task is to format and structure the paper according to the MLA documentation style, ensuring that you follow all guidelines and instructions specified in the textbook.

In addition to completing the research paper as directed, you will add a concluding paragraph as the final paragraph of the essay and provide a summary in your own words, demonstrating your understanding of the topic.

Save your completed assignment as a Word document using the following file name format: SP26OL_A1_YourFirstName.docx

Important:

• Assignment must be completed using the instructions given in the text, and completed assignment must be submitted in MS Word format (.docx). Assignment submitted in any other format will not be graded, and the student will receive a grade of 0 (zero) on the assignment.
• The project must be completed by you. Giving or receiving aid unauthorized by the instructor on assignments is a form of academic dishonesty. Refer to the student handbook or course syllabus for additional information.

Grading Rubrics

1. Followed MLA Documentation Style (margin, header, author and course information, line spacing, title format) – 10 points
2. Use of MS Word features (first line indentation, footnote, in-text (parenthetical) citations, and inserting sources) – 10 points
   • Note: In Office 365, Insert Citation under References is not available. In such cases, manually add the in-text citations. Make sure you have followed the MLA Documentation Style.
3. Sources are properly cited and listed on the Works cited page – 8 points
   • Note: In Office 365, Bibliography under References is not available. In such cases, manually add the sources on the Works Cited page. Make sure you have followed the MLA Documentation Style.
4. No syntax and mechanical errors. – 8 points
5. File name in the SP26OL_A1_YourFirstName.docx format – 4 points

Points: 100

Length: Minimum of 5 full pages (not including title page and references)
Format: APA (7th edition)

Assignment Overview

In this assignment, you will select one communication theory and conduct an in-depth scholarly analysis of it. The goal is for you to become an expert on your chosen theory by engaging deeply with its origins, evolution, applications, and limitations. This is not a surface-level overview; rather, you are expected to demonstrate mastery of the theory through careful reading, synthesis, and critical evaluation of scholarly research.

You must locate and read the original article or book in which the theory was first introduced and use it as a foundation for your analysis. In addition, you will incorporate current peer-reviewed research to show how the theory has been applied, tested, critiqued, and extended over time. You may choose a theory you plan to use in your final paper, and doing so is encouraged.

Content Requirements

Your paper should address the following components:

• Background of the Theory and Theorist(s):
  Explain the historical context in which the theory emerged, key assumptions, core concepts, and the scholar(s) who developed it.
• Foundational and Scholarly Research:
  Engage directly with the original theoretical work and integrate additional peer-reviewed sources that help explain and support the theory.
• Current State of Research:
  Discuss how the theory is being used, tested, or expanded in contemporary communication research.
• Critiques and Limitations:
  Identify and analyze scholarly critiques, weaknesses, or limitations of the theory.
• Future Directions and Relevance:
  Explore where the theory may be headed, its continued relevance, and potential areas for future research or application.

Evaluation Criteria (100 points total)

Your paper will be evaluated based on the following criteria (see attached rubric):

• Understanding & Background of the Theory
• Use of Foundational & Scholarly Research
• Discussion of Current Research
• Critiques & Limitations
• Future Directions & Relevance
• Writing Quality (clarity, tone, grammar, and style)
• Organization & APA Format

Expectations

Your writing should be clear, well-organized, and professional. Claims must be supported with scholarly evidence, and all sources must be cited correctly using APA format. This assignment is designed to strengthen your research skills and deepen your theoretical understanding, so thoughtful analysis and synthesis are essential. I HAVE ATTACHED A EXAMPLE AND THE LESSON POWERPOINT FOR THIS WEEK.

O% AI. FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS AND ENSURE THE PAPER HAS THE OUTLINE DESCRIBED BY THE INSTRUCTIONS.

Participatory evaluation ensures that the evaluation focuses on locally relevant questions that meet the needs of the community. Participatory approaches are co-designed with the community and include stakeholders in every step of designing and conducting an evaluation, including analyzing findings and implementing changes based on the findings. More information about participatory evaluations can be found below.

Initial Proposal Specification: KRK Aviation

Task: Prepare a formal Initial Proposal (800 1,000 words). Deadline: Due Week 3 (February 5th). Submission Format: MS Word, 1.5 spacing, 2.54 cm margins.

1. Core Project Data (Non-Negotiable)

• Airline Name: KRK
• Business Model: Premium/Executive regional travel (Max 25-30 seats).
• Base: Al Bateen Executive Airport (AZI), Abu Dhabi.
• Initial Investment: AED 20 Million (Must show how this covers startup fees/deposits).
• Financial Strategy: High initial costs; No profit in the first few years. Focus on growth and market presence first.
• Role Allocation:
  • CEO & Support: [Al Marhoon]
  • Product Specialist: [Mert]
  • Market & Brand Specialist: [Alusted]
  • HR & Quality Specialist: [AlShamsi]
  • Finance & Sales Specialist: [Alamoodi]

2. Detailed Section Requirements

Section 1: Introduction & Topic Justification

• Introduce KRK as a premium startup at Al Bateen Executive Airport.
• Justification: Explain why AZI is better than AUH/DXB for executives (speed, privacy).
• Routes: Define the first two routes: Abu Dhabi (AZI) to Riyadh (RUH) and Abu Dhabi (AZI) to Jeddah (JED). Explain the business and religious tourism demand for these specific cities.

Section 2: Aircraft Selection (The “Mert” Role)

• Research Task: You must research and recommend the best aircraft type for KRK.
• Criteria: It must be a small aircraft or regional jet (max 25-30 seats). Look into models like the Embraer ERJ 135or Dornier 328JET in executive configurations.
• Interior: Describe how it will be reconfigured for an “all-first-class” experience (similar to Emirates First Class quality).

Section 3: The 5-Year Vision

• Mention that while we start with 2 routes, we will scale to a maximum of 5 destinations by Year 5.
• Clearly state that the goal for the first 24 months is brand building and operational safety, not immediate profit.

Section 4: Combined Weekly Action Plan (Feb 5 April 1)

• Create a table showing what each department ([Al Marhoon], [Mert], [Alusted], [AlShamsi], [Alamoodi]) will do every week.
• The plan must end the week before the “Team File” is due (April 1).

3. Rubric Compliance & Quality Control

• Word Count: 800 1,000 words. (Do not go under or over).
• Academic Integrity: The content must be original. AI and Similarity scores must be below 20% on Turnitin.
• Referencing: Any data used (airport fees, aircraft specs, market trends) must be cited using Harvard Referencing.
• Visual Aids: Include at least one table or diagram (e.g., a route map or the action plan table).

Question for the expert: Ive found that only SURPASS-CVOT and SURPASS-4 report the complete MACE endpoints, while the other SURPASS trials (17) do not consistently include all components. As a meta-analysis expert, what should I do if I currently have only two trials with complete MACE data? Can I still include the other SURPASS trials?

I also came across a meta-analysis that included one phase 2 trial, five international phase 3 trials, and one regional phase 3 trial in Japan, as long as each trial had at least one MACE-4 event. That approach fits their objective, but my goal is stricter: I want to include only studies that report all MACE-3 (or MACE-4) components. What is the best approach in my case?

RCTS with complete mace endpoints:

After reading Chapter 4 of Decision Making for Emergency Managers, do the emerging trends connect you to the concept of being a true believer principle, as discussed in Chapter 3, Extreme Ownership?