Category: Social Science

  • computer ethics

    Choose one of the following ACM Code of Ethics case studies: Please no Plagiarism, No AI. no chat bots original response please

    In your post:

    • State which case you chose.
      Provide a brief summary of the situation in your own words.
    • Identify one or two ACM Code of Ethics principles that apply.
      Explain why these principles are relevant to the case in 4 sentences.
    • Create three guiding questions that will help your classmates analyze the case.
      • Technical question: Focus on design decisions, system configuration, or implementation.
      • Ethical question: Focus on professional responsibility or competing values.
      • Stakeholder-impact question: Focus on who benefits, who might be harmed, or whose interests may be overlooked.

    Example question types (do not copy):

    • Technical: What design or configuration decision increased risk in this case, and what alternative approach might reduce that risk?
    • Ethical: Which ACM Code principle should take priority in this situation and why?
    • Stakeholders: Which group of stakeholders may experience the greatest impact from this decision?

    Spring 2026 Term

    Week Five: Readings

    Week Five Reading

    CIS 50 Weekly.png

    book-open-page-variant-outline.png

    Ethics for Tech Developers and Tech Consumers

    This week, we focus on ethical responsibilities from two connected perspectives: technology consumers and technology professionals. You will read about issues such as privacy, data collection, informed consent, intellectual property, bias, environmental impact, professional codes of conduct, and everyday ethical decision-making. By the end of the reading, you should be able to explain how ethical responsibilities apply not only to developers and IT professionals, but also to ordinary users of technology in daily life.

    Reading Tips

    Use the guiding questions to support your reading.
    The guiding questions are there to help you focus on key ideas, not just memorize examples. Use them to:

    • Identify where the reading explains the ethical responsibilities of both tech consumers and tech professionals.
    • Notice how the reading connects personal choices, professional codes, and larger social impacts.
    • Prepare for discussion by considering how your own experiences with technology shape your ethical views.

    Other reading strategies you can include:

    • Preview the reading before diving inscan headings and key terms first.
    • Engage criticallyask yourself: What responsibilities do I have as both a user and possible creator of technology?
    • Relate the material to real lifethink about apps, devices, online platforms, or services you already use.
    • Take notes in your own words so you can better track how consumer ethics and professional ethics overlap.
    • Use this to help you take notes.

    Week 5 Reading: Ethics for Tech Developers and Tech Consumers

    Tech Consumer Responsibilities

    Considering the typical audience for this course, nearly everyone reading this reading is a consumer of technology. Think about how many digital tools you interact with throughout a typical day. You may check your smartphone for messages, browse social media, stream music or video, play games, complete schoolwork on a laptop, collaborate using cloud-based tools, or track health data through wearable devices. Technology is embedded in how people communicate, learn, work, and entertain themselves.

    Because technology is so deeply integrated into everyday life, consumers also face ethical questions. The reading introduces several key areas where consumers should think critically about their responsibilities and choices.

    • Protecting personal privacy and data Do you know where your personal information is stored and who has access to it? Does every service that collects data truly need that information?
    • Awareness of data collection Do users have meaningful control over what data companies collect and how it is shared, sold, or analyzed?
    • Informed consent When you accept terms of service, are you knowingly agreeing to what happens to your information? Can you change your mind later?
    • Recognizing unethical companies Do you ever investigate whether companies engage in discriminatory or unfair practices, and does that influence whether you support them?
    • Respecting intellectual property Do actions such as pirating software, music, or games have ethical implications? Does it matter whose work is being copied?
    • Social and environmental impacts What happens to devices when they are replaced? Does consumer demand contribute to electronic waste or environmental harm?
    • Technology and bias Some digital systems, such as facial recognition or recommendation algorithms, may amplify bias or exclude certain groups. How might everyday user behavior reinforce these patterns?

    Thinking about these questions helps individuals move beyond passive technology use and become more thoughtful digital citizens who understand the broader consequences of their choices.

    Key Idea

    Consumers influence the technology ecosystem through the platforms they use, the companies they support, the data they share, and the behaviors they normalize online.

    Technology Career Roles and Professional Ethics

    For students entering technology careers, ethical concerns expand beyond consumer behavior. If you choose to pursue a technology career, you may work in roles such as:

    • Software Engineer
    • Data Scientist
    • Cybersecurity Analyst
    • Systems Administrator
    • Network Architect
    • Cloud Architect
    • UI/UX Designer
    • DevOps Manager
    • AI Computer Scientist
    • IT Support Specialist

    In these roles, your work may affect customers, coworkers, vendors, employers, and the general public. That means ethical responsibility becomes part of your daily professional practice. In these roles, professionals have ethical relationships with employers, customers, coworkers, vendors, and the wider public.

    When working in these careers, you will interact with many different people who each bring their own expectations and perspectives. Conflicts can arise when these perspectives clash or when different groups prioritize different outcomes. A company may prioritize secrecy, efficiency, or profit, while customers may prioritize truthfulness, safety, and trust. Ethical practice therefore requires more than technical skill. It requires judgment, reflection, and the willingness to evaluate competing interests carefully.

    Think of all of the people that you will have an ethical relationship with as a part of your technology-based profession. This diagram represents some of the main relationships you will experience in your IT careers.

    IT Professionals Ethical Relationships Diagram titled IT Professional Ethical Relationships. A large central circle labeled You is surrounded by seven smaller circles representing groups affected by a technology professionals decisions. The surrounding circles are labeled: Your Company, Your Boss(es), Your Customers (Clients), Your Vendors (Partners), Your Peers, Your IT Users, and Society at Large. The diagram illustrates the different stakeholders an IT professional has ethical responsibilities toward.Often, the details of these relationships may be spelled out (at least partially) via various relationship agreements. These agreements can take many forms (i.e. contracts, non-disclosure agreements, license agreements, professional codes of conduct, etc.) with many of these forms having both ethical and legal ramifications. But at other times, the details of the relationships are not spelled out at all! And, as a result, conflicts can certainly arise when it becomes evident that there are competing interests being considered and viewed through conflicting personal lenses.

    Reviewing the is great starting point for considering the additional ethical responsibilities of a tech. This document attempts to codify the ethical responsibilities of tech professionals. Such codes helps practitioners think more intentionally about public welfare, honesty, transparency, privacy, accountability, competence, and fairness.

    Case Study: Apple Batterygate

    Let’s explore these tensions through the Apple Batterygate case. In 2020, Apple agreed to pay $113 million to settle consumer fraud lawsuits related to older iPhones being slowed down or shutting off unexpectedly. Apple later said the performance changes were intended to preserve battery life, but many consumers believed the company had not been honest about what it was doing and that the changes pushed users toward buying newer devices.

    This case raises ethical questions about transparency, planned obsolescence, corporate responsibility, and environmental harm. From the companys perspective, the pressure to maintain sales growth may encourage decisions that benefit profits. From the customers perspective, the issue may look like deception, loss of trust, and unnecessary electronic waste. From the employees perspective, the case introduces deeper professional questions: what should a developer, marketer, customer service worker, or salesperson do if they are asked to participate in practices they believe are unethical?

    Key Idea

    The same technology decision can look very different depending on whether it is viewed through the lens of executives, employees, customers, or the broader public.

    Think About It

    If you worked at a company and were asked to support a practice that was legal but felt deceptive or harmful, what factors would shape your response? Would your answer change depending on your role in the organization?

    Different Perspectives in the Apple Case

    When looking at the Apple “Batterygate” situation, the ethical issues can look very different depending on a person’s role. Thinking about these perspectives helps you understand why technology ethics often involves competing priorities.

    Apple Executive Perspective
    An executive may focus on maintaining product sales and market growth. If older devices continue working well, fewer customers may purchase newer models. From this viewpoint, decisions may prioritize company strategy, intellectual property protection, and long-term competitiveness.

    Apple Customer Perspective
    A customer may see the issue differently. If a phone suddenly becomes slow or shuts down, the user may feel misled or believe the company intentionally degraded the product. Customers may expect transparency, reliability, and honesty about how their devices function.

    Technology Employee Perspective
    Employees inside the company may face difficult ethical decisions. Developers might be asked to build software that intentionally slows devices. Marketing teams might be asked to promote upgrades even if the messaging feels exaggerated. Customer service staff may be expected to provide explanations they know are incomplete. These situations can create tension between workplace expectations and personal ethical values.

    Think About It

    If you were working at a technology company and discovered a practice that felt deceptive or harmful to users, what options would you have? Would your response depend on your role or your job security? Review the policies from or any other company to help you understand thier ethical practices.

    Stockholders vs. Stakeholders

    In technology organizations, a common ethical conflict appears between: the difference between stockholders and stakeholders. Stockholders, or shareholders, own part of a company and are mainly concerned with financial returns such as stock value and dividends. Stakeholders are a broader group that includes employees, customers, suppliers, and local communities, all of whom are affected by company decisions even if they do not own shares.

    These groups do not always want the same things. Stockholders may prioritize short-term profitability, while stakeholders may be more concerned with product quality, long-term stability, ethical treatment, privacy, job security, environmental responsibility, and social impact. The reading suggests that corporate leaders often prioritize stockholder interests, even when those priorities conflict with the well-being of other groups.

    Understanding this distinction helps explain why ethical conflicts arise so frequently in technology organizations. It also shows why professional codes and personal ethics matter: they can provide guidance when business incentives push individuals toward choices that may harm others.

    Company Codes of Conduct

    In addition to professional codes such as the ACM Code, many organizations adopt their own internal codes of conduct. The as an example of a company that publicly shares its code of conduct and clearly defines expectations for employees, customers, and vendors.

    Topics covered in such codes often include leadership obligations, intellectual property, conflicts of interest, gifts, bribery, insider trading, anti-corruption laws, and harassment. Importantly, company codes may also define procedures for reporting concerns through supervisors, human resources, ethics committees, hotlines, or anonymous reporting tools.

    These policies matter because they make ethical expectations more visible and provide practical ways for people to respond when problems arise. Comparing a company code of conduct with a broader professional code can also help individuals see where the two align and where they differ.

    Why This Matters

    A code of conduct is not just a formal document. It can shape workplace culture, clarify expectations, and provide real pathways for reporting and resolving ethical concerns.

    Company Codes of Conduct

    Many organizations publish their own codes of conduct to define expectations for employees and business partners. These documents explain ethical standards, professional responsibilities, and procedures for reporting concerns.

    The code of conduct published by the company behind Enterprise Rent-A-Car, National Car Rental, and Alamo. Their code outlines expectations related to leadership behavior, conflicts of interest, intellectual property, harassment policies, anti-corruption laws, and insider trading.

    Enterprise also provides multiple ways for employees to report ethical concerns, including supervisors, human resources, ethics committees, and a confidential ethics hotline that is available 24 hours a day.

    Example Resource:

    Why This Matters

    Codes of conduct make ethical expectations visible and provide clear pathways for employees to report concerns. Comparing company policies with professional codes such as the ACM Code of Ethics can help you understand how organizations attempt to translate ethical principles into real workplace practices.

    Everyday Decision-Making and Personal Ethics

    Think about what all of this means for everyday life. Ethical choices in technology are not limited to famous scandals or corporate policy documents. They also appear in ordinary moments: what services we support, how we treat others online, how we respond to questionable requests, and how consistently we live according to our values.

    What about your own personal code of ethics. What values guide your decisions? Which areas of your ethical thinking feel clearly defined, and which feel uncertain or situational? What happens when your own values conflict with expectations from school, work, family, religion, culture, or community? Can a person change their ethical position over time, and if so, under what conditions?

    The reading does not provide one fixed answer. Instead, it invites intentional reflection. Its purpose is to help you become more aware of the principles, conflicts, and responsibilities that shape ethical decision-making in both personal and professional interactions with technology.

    Pause and Reflect

    If you were to write your own personal code of ethics for technology use and professional practice, what principles would you include first? Which principles might be hardest to apply consistently?

    Key Terms

    • ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct A widely recognized professional code that outlines ethical responsibilities for computing professionals.
    • accessibility Designing technology usable by people of varied abilities.
    • accountability Being responsible for decisions and outcomes.
    • anti-corruption laws Laws designed to prevent bribery, fraud, and unethical influence in business and government.
    • audit trail A record of actions taken within a system.
    • bias Systematic error that unfairly influences results.
    • bribe Something of value offered to influence a decision or action for the givers benefit.
    • conflict of interest A situation in which personal interests interfere with the ability to make fair and unbiased decisions.
    • fairness Ensuring equitable treatment and outcomes.
    • gift Something of value given without an expectation of return or influence.
    • harassment Unwelcome conduct that creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment.
    • informed consent Knowing and voluntarily agreeing to how information, rights, or choices are handled.
    • insider trading Buying or selling securities based on material, nonpublic information.
    • integrity Honesty and trustworthiness of data and systems.
    • intellectual property Creations of the mind that are legally protected, such as software, music, writing, inventions, or designs.
    • personal code of ethics An individuals own set of guiding principles for making moral and professional decisions.
    • planned obsolescence Designing products to become outdated, undesirable, or less functional over time so consumers will replace them.
    • privacy A persons right to control information about themselves.
    • professional code of conduct A formal set of ethical standards that helps guide the behavior of members of a profession.
    • stakeholder Any person or group affected by a companys decisions, including employees, customers, suppliers, and communities.
    • stockholder A person or institution that owns shares in a company and is primarily concerned with financial return.
    • tech consumer A person who uses digital devices, apps, platforms, or online services in daily life.
    • transparency Clear explanation of what a system does and why.
    • whistleblower Someone who reports wrongdoing despite personal risk.
  • computer ethics

    please respond to hayden

    I have chosen to discuss Dark UX Patterns, as I feel that’s a relatively prevalent issue with apps today. Dark patterns are essentially actions and design choices made by one or many people to guide users towards a preferred option, even if that wasn’t the user’s intent or first pick. I’d argue this infringes upon sections 1.3 and 3.1, but it’s a bit hard to pin it down given the variety in situations and context that are applicable. 1.3 is to be honest and trustworthy, which some UX is blatantly not as it opens links on it’s own, leads users down a false path, or selects the most expensive options by default. These same things also conflict with 3.1, which is simply the idea that public good should be the core of how it’s designed, which these patterns do not align with.

    Let’s use Steam as an example platform. Steam, for those who don’t know, is an online digital retail platform providing a front to sell games, software tools, and in rare cases, gaming hardware. It also provides a swath of community tools such as forums, dedicated pages for exploring user-created modifications for software, and a library to explore what you’ve purchased. By default, when Steam is ran for the first time after a PC restart, shutdown, or just exiting the application, it loads into the storefront, dazzling the user with whatever big sale is currently going on, software recommended for them, and things that are being played by friends. It also pops up a separate window showing new releases, steep discounts, and upcoming things to pre-order. This, I feel, is a clear but subtle push to get the user to purchase something by displaying these, well, ads by default.

    Ethically, as according to the previously mentioned principles, it’s not really for the public good. Sure, they’re merely informing users of new things they might like, or discounts on what they want, but they’re a retailer, they need to make that money. There’s also the issue of the store being the default page you get sent to, as there are actually setting for changing that to any other page, as well as turning off the pop-up window, but they’re buried in settings and poorly-labeled, which perhaps isn’t the most honest decision.

    It’s privately-owned, not really stakeholders to impact. Gabe Newell, the owner of Valve, which is the company behind Steam, would maybe get a dent put in his income, but that’s the most that would happen as far as I understand.

  • computer ethics

    please respond to victor with 150 words

    The case study I chose was Workplace Behavior.

    Brief Summary: Diane joined a top research team led by Max, a brilliant but abusive technical leader. After a small error, Max insulted Diane publicly and excluded her from a live demo. When Diane reported the behavior to manager Jean, she was told to “grow up.” The team has a pattern of Max verbally attacking staff and removing womens names from academic papers as punishment.

    Relevant ACM Code Principles:

    1.4 (Fair Access): This principle requires professionals to “promote fair participation of all people.” Maxs pattern of removing only womens names from manuscripts shows discriminatory retaliation that eliminates these team members equal access to professional credit and advancement.

    3.3 (Well-being of Colleagues): This principle requires creating “safe, healthy, and productive work environments.” Jean violated this by dismissing Dianes complaint and treating abuse as a normal cost of success which justified psychological harm.

    Guiding Questions:

    Technical: What specific version control or manuscript submission protocols could be implemented to prevent a single team leader from removing contributor names without review?

    Ethical: How should a computing professional balance the pressure to keep a “brilliant” but abusive team member against the need to maintain a mentally safe workplace for everyone?

    Stakeholders: What additional harms might result for the tech industry if institutional cultures continue to allow abusive behavior in exchange for innovation?

  • Criminal Legal System (CLS) Critique (TII)


    NO USE OF ANY AI

    DIRECTIONS

    Using what you have learned thus far in the course, your task is to critically analyze the criminal legal system (CLS) by answering the questions below. Be sure that your responses are detailed, thorough, and clearly demonstrate specific things you have learned and your ability to use your sociological imagination. Your response should be at least 750 words.

    Be sure you complete your work in Google Docs, number your responses so they correspond to the prompts/questions below, and then save them in a PDF format for submission. And avoid at all costs doing anything that might compromise the academic integrity of your work.

    PROMPTS/QUESTIONS

    1. What are the various components of the criminal legal system (CLS) — sometimes referred to at the criminal justice system (CJS) — and what are their functions?
    2. (A) What is incarceration? (B) What is meant by mass incarceration? Why is mass incarceration considered problematic?
    3. What justification(s) for punishment does incarceration meet?
    4. Does incarceration actually help reduce crime? Why or why not? Support your position.
    5. What would Sutherland say about using incarceration as a form of punishment? Based on his theory of differential association, would he be for or against incarceration? Support your position.
    6. What would Hirschi say about using incarceration as a form of punishment? Based on his control theory, would he be for or against incarceration? Support your position.
    7. If you could change one thing about the CLS in order to make it more effective, what would you change and why?

    YOUR NUMBERED RESPONSES TO THESE QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ATTACHED AS A PDF FILE. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE GUIDELINES MAY RESULT IN A ZERO.

    Revised Academic Honesty Statement Beginning 3/11/26:

    The usage of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in this course is prohibited. You may NOT use AI to help with summarizing information, generating ideas, proofreading/editing, or anything else for assignments in this course. In other words, do NOT use AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grammarly, Quillbot, etc. for any reason, no matter how innocuous it may seem. You are still required to complete your assignments in Google Docs so that we have a clear version history if needed.

    Below is a list of suggestions to help you avoid Turn It In flagging your work as AI generated in error.

    Ways to Help Reduce the Likelihood of Turn It In Flagging Your Work as AI Generated:

    • Steer Clear of Grammar Tools: The use of automated “style improvers” (like Grammarly*) can make text too uniform and polished, which AI detectors identify as artificial. If you want help improving your writing, utilize the
    • Ditch Paraphrasing Tools: Paraphrasing tools (like Quillbot) often keep original sentence structures and rhythms, which AI detectors will flag.
    • Use Your Personal Voice: AI lacks personal experience. Add unique anecdotes, specific examples, or personal analysis to your work to showcase the fact that the work is your own.
    • Abstain from Perfectly Uniform Structure: Avoid having a consistent, “perfect” rhythm in every paragraph and avoid overly formal, monotonous, or generic language. AI tends to be very consistent; human writing has more “burstiness” (varied sentence lengths and complexity).
    • Draft in Stages: Write in your own voice over a period of time utilizing Google Docs so that you have a clear version history if you are accused of academic dishonesty.
    CLS Critique (1)
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    CLS Components

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

    Mass Incarceration Discussion

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

    Justifications for Incarceration

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

    Effectiveness of Incarceration

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

    Sutherland

    15 pts

    Full Marks

    7.5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 15 pts

    Hirschi

    15 pts

    Full Marks

    7.5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 15 pts

    Proposed Change

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

    Properly Formatted/Numbered

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

    Mechanics

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

  • Criminal Legal System (CLS) Critique (TII)

    DIRECTIONS

    Using what you have learned thus far in the course, your task is to critically analyze the criminal legal system (CLS) by answering the questions below. Be sure that your responses are detailed, thorough, and clearly demonstrate specific things you have learned and your ability to use your sociological imagination. Your response should be at least 750 words.

    Be sure you complete your work in Google Docs, number your responses so they correspond to the prompts/questions below, and then save them in a PDF format for submission. And avoid at all costs doing anything that might compromise the academic integrity of your work.

    PROMPTS/QUESTIONS

    1. What are the various components of the criminal legal system (CLS) — sometimes referred to at the criminal justice system (CJS) — and what are their functions?
    2. (A) What is incarceration? (B) What is meant by mass incarceration? Why is mass incarceration considered problematic?
    3. What justification(s) for punishment does incarceration meet?
    4. Does incarceration actually help reduce crime? Why or why not? Support your position.
    5. What would Sutherland say about using incarceration as a form of punishment? Based on his theory of differential association, would he be for or against incarceration? Support your position.
    6. What would Hirschi say about using incarceration as a form of punishment? Based on his control theory, would he be for or against incarceration? Support your position.
    7. If you could change one thing about the CLS in order to make it more effective, what would you change and why?

    YOUR NUMBERED RESPONSES TO THESE QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ATTACHED AS A PDF FILE. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE GUIDELINES MAY RESULT IN A ZERO.

    CLS Critique (1)
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    CLS Components

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

    Mass Incarceration Discussion

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

    Justifications for Incarceration

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

    Effectiveness of Incarceration

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

    Sutherland

    15 pts

    Full Marks

    7.5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 15 pts

    Hirschi

    15 pts

    Full Marks

    7.5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 15 pts

    Proposed Change

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

    Properly Formatted/Numbered

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

    Mechanics

    10 pts

    Full Marks

    5 pts

    Adequate Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 10 pts

  • Childhood Trauma and Brain Development

    The purpose of this assignment is to analyze The Boy Who Was Raised As a Dog text by Bruce D. Perry and Maia Szalavitz.

    Assignment Instructions

    Choose a case study in The Boy Who Was Raised as a Dog to focus on for this assignment and imagine the person in the case study is your client.

    Introduction

    Summarize the case study you chose.

    Engage

    • Apply knowledge of human behavior and person-in-environment to explain skills the social worker needs to engage with the client.
    • Identify other professionals you would collaborate with and explain what their role would be.
    • Cite research to support your ideas.

    Assess

    • Consider the ACEs questionnaire. Assess the adverse childhood experiences the client was exposed to that are found on the ACEs questionnaire.
    • Identify other adverse childhood experiences the client was exposed to that are not identified on the current ACEs questionnaire.
    • Citing research, explain the impact of the adverse childhood experiences you identified.

    Research and describe at least one culturally responsive intervention to assist the client.

    • Examples include psychoanalytic, behavioral, cognitive, person-centered, feminist, et cetera.

    Develop a treatment plan for the client using the evidence-based method of intervention you researched.

    • Identify two short term goals and two objectives for each goal.
    • Identify two long term goals and two objectives for each goal.
    • Explain how you would negotiate, mediate, and advocate on the clients behalf.
    • Apply research to support your ideas.

    Evaluate the effectiveness of your plan.

    • Explain how you will evaluate the clients progress.
    • Consider the clients diversity needs in your evaluation.

    Conclusion

    Conclude your paper by summarizing how you used micro, mezzo, and macro skills in working with this client.

    Additional Requirements

    The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:

    • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
    • Number of resources: Most literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
    • Length of paper: No minimum or maximum required, but make sure to be comprehensive with your responses.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
  • Agriculture Environmental Science and Sustainability

    For this assignment you will amend and clean up the answers to the 8 questions listed below:The edit should correlate with the response given please no plagiarism, no a i no chat bots.

    The questions and answers are based on NPS, Monitoring California’s Mediterranean Ecosystem.

    2. What were the main points addressed in the video?

    The video talk and explans that the Mediterranean ecosystems are very rare biodiversity hotspots that exist in only five of the regions around the world, which includes southern California. It also highlights how national park, cabrillo national monument, and santa monica mountains national recreation area work to work to protect the ecosystems.

    Some of the new information I learned

    One thing I did learn about was that mediterranean ecosystems exist only in five places area worldwide, which makes them extremely rare and important for biodiversity. I also learned that the long term ecological monitoring can reveal the population declines early.

    3. What new information did you learn?

    Another one I learned about is the terminology

    Biodiversity hotspot which is considered a region that contains a high number of terrestrial and aquatic species which a lot is unique in that area but is also Anthropogenic threats.

    Habitat fragmentation the process where large habitats in the wild are spilt into lower fragmented habitats.

    4. What did you find most interesting about the video? How or did the video
    connect with your area of study or interests?

    One aspect of the video I found interesting was the recovery of the fox island. It was a interesting to discover that the living things went from being endangered in 2004 in becoming among the fastest mammals in recoveries in under the endangered species act by 2016. The video relates to environmental science because it it outlines how research monitoring that managers make choices to preserve the ecosystems and wildlife.

    5. Note and define any (a minimum of two) new terminology you learned from this presentation.

    1.Marine reserve an ocean area where certain activites including fishing which is regulated or limited to conserve ocean habitats and animals.

    2.Habitat fragmentation the approach where spacious habitats are less spilt and is due to human activity like transport routes and cites.

    6. Explain how did the video touch on any of the three principles of sustainability?

    The video addressed the three pillars of sustainability environmental defenseeconomic sustainability and social equity.

    The video bridged the gaps fill between economic resilience, and social equity.

    Touched on topics that covered, addressed, highlighted, explored, and presented the Effectiveness

    Emphasizing the three pillars of sustainable improvement environmental, social and economic to help guarantee long term effectiveness

    7. What did you like best and least about the video style?

    What I loved about this video style was the authentic glimpse into the field, featuring genuine scientists with each of them sharing there work

    By centering on science professionals in their environment the video felt both individual and learning related.

    I loved the direct subjective analysis from scientists managing the work process

    Working in the field in their natural habitat the action behide the scenes field based.

    8. Was the video informative? Clear message and visually appealing? Why, or why not?

    the video was very informative and easy to follow. It presents why protecting the marine ecosystems and biodiversity is essential. The description of marine reserves and wildlife monitoring helped illustrate these actions allow the ecosystems to recover.it also helped the viewers to be more accuarete and impactful.

  • Computer ethics

    Computer Ethics Legal Exploration

    Select one of the following cases.

    Your Task

    Write a short response of 12 pages (about 500 words) explaining the case and reflecting on its legal significance. Please no plagiarism,no a i no chat bots.

    This is not a formal research paper. Focus on:

    • clear explanation
    • thoughtful reflection
    • connection to real-world technology issues

    Tip
    You do not need to summarize every detail of the case. Focus on the main legal issue, who was affected, and why the decision matters.

    What to Include

      1. What happened? Briefly explain the case and what situation led to the legal issue.
      2. What was the legal issue? Identify the main legal question or dispute involved.
      3. What was the outcome? Describe what decision was made by the court, regulators, or policymakers.
      4. Who was affected? Identify the people, groups, or stakeholders impacted.
      5. Why does it matter? Explain why this case is important for technology law and policy.
      6. Additional source: Find and briefly discuss one credible source related to your case.
        • Consider these questions as you write:
          • What law or legal principle is central to this case?
          • How does the case show the challenges of applying law to new technologies?
          • Do you agree with the legal outcome? Why or why not?

    Using Credible Sources

    For this assignment, include at least one credible source related to your chosen case.

    Examples of credible sources include:

    • reputable news organizations
    • government or court websites
    • academic journals or university publications
    • legal commentary from established organizations
    • policy or research institutes

    A credible source usually:

    • identifies the author or organization
    • provides evidence or citations
    • comes from a reputable publication
    • is relevant to the case
    • Week 4 Chapter Reading: Defining Ethics, Law, and TechnologyIntroductionBefore we can analyze ethical issues in technology, we first need to understand the language used when discussing ethics. Words such as ethics, morals, values, responsibility, and law are often used interchangeably, but they do not mean the same thing. Careful ethical reasoning requires us to define these terms clearly so that we can communicate with precision and avoid confusion.Technology professionals frequently encounter situations where something is legally allowed but still raises ethical concerns. A company may comply with the law while still making choices that feel invasive, manipulative, or unfair. Understanding this distinction is important because ethical responsibility often extends beyond mere legal compliance. In technology, the question is not only Is this allowed? but also Is this right?Because modern technologies such as artificial intelligence, social media platforms, and large-scale data collection operate across entire populations, decisions made by designers, developers, and organizations can affect millions of people. Ethical reflection therefore becomes a necessary part of responsible technological practice, not an optional extra.Pause and Reflect

      Think about a digital service you use often, such as a social media platform, shopping app, or streaming service. Can you identify one practice that is probably legal but still raises ethical concerns for you? What makes it feel ethically questionable?Why Ethics Matters in TechnologyTechnology is not neutral. Every technological system reflects decisions made by people, and those decisions shape how that technology affects individuals, communities, and society. Social media algorithms influence what information people see. Artificial intelligence can affect hiring and employment opportunities. Data collection systems determine how personal information is gathered, stored, and sold. Automation changes how work is performed and who may lose access to jobs or opportunities.Because technology can influence large populations, ethical reflection becomes critical in the design and use of technological systems. A system may be efficient, profitable, or legally compliant while still producing unfair outcomes. This is why computer ethics asks us to examine not only what technology does, but also whose interests it serves, whose needs it ignores, and whose risks it increases.Key Idea

      Technology is rarely neutral. The design decisions made by developers and organizations shape how technology affects individuals, communities, and society.Why This Matters

      Modern technologies operate at scale. A single design decision can affect thousands or millions of users. That means ethical problems can become systemic, shaping access, privacy, fairness, and power across entire communities.Key Ethical TerminologyEthics refers to principles and standards used to determine right and wrong behavior.Morals are personal beliefs about what is right or wrong.Virtues are positive character traits such as honesty, fairness, and courage.Integrity means acting consistently according to ethical principles.Stakeholders are the individuals or groups affected by a decision or technology.Corporate Social Responsibility is the idea that organizations should consider social and environmental consequences, not only profit, when making decisions.Ethical vs. LegalEthics and law are related, but they are not the same. Laws are formal rules created and enforced by governments. Ethics refers to broader principles about what people should do, even when the law is silent.Sometimes an action is both ethical and legal, such as protecting user data and respecting privacy. Sometimes an action is legal but unethical, such as collecting large amounts of personal data without meaningful transparency. Sometimes an action may be ethical but illegal, such as whistleblowing to expose harmful wrongdoing. And sometimes an action is both illegal and unethical, such as identity theft, cyber fraud, or unauthorized hacking.Key Idea

      An action being legal does not automatically mean it is ethical. Technology professionals often need to evaluate the broader social impact of their decisions beyond what the law requires.Diagram of a four-quadrant ethical vs. legal matrix. The vertical axis represents ethical versus unethical actions and the horizontal axis represents legal versus illegal actions. The four quadrants illustrate: ethical and legal actions, ethical but illegal actions, legal but unethical actions, and actions that are both illegal and unethical.Ethical vs. Legal Matrix

      Legal Illegal
      Ethical Ethical & Legal

      Actions that follow both moral principles and the law.

      Example:
      Protecting user data and respecting privacy.

      Ethical but Illegal

      Actions intended to prevent harm but that break the law.

      Example:
      Whistleblowing.

      Unethical Legal but Unethical

      Actions allowed by law but ethically questionable.

      Example:
      Excessive user data collection.

      Illegal & Unethical

      Actions that violate both law and ethics.

      Example:
      Hacking or identity theft.

      Think About It

      Think about an app you use regularly, such as social media, shopping, or streaming.

      What personal data does the company collect about you?

      Do you think their practices are:

      • Ethical and legal
      • Legal but unethical
      • Ethical but illegal

      Explain why.Examples of Technology LawsThe reading highlights several examples of laws that attempt to regulate technology. In California, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) gives residents rights related to their personal information, including the right to know what data companies collect, request deletion of that data, and opt out of data sales. The California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) expands these protections and strengthens enforcement.At the federal level, laws such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the Childrens Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) address unauthorized access, childrens privacy, and digital copyright issues.Internationally, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union is one of the most influential privacy laws, requiring consent for data collection and granting people rights over their own information.When Laws Lag Behind TechnologyOne reason the distinction between ethics and law matters in technology is that technology often evolves faster than laws. Legal systems usually respond slowly, while technological innovation can spread rapidly. As a result, technology professionals often face situations where legal guidance is incomplete, outdated, or unclear.Real-World Example

      The FacebookCambridge Analytica scandal involved personal data from millions of users being collected and used for political advertising without clear consent. Even though some practices were technically legal at the time, they raised serious ethical concerns about privacy and manipulation.Another example is facial recognition technology, which has been used for surveillance and identification in ways that many critics argue threaten privacy and can reinforce racial bias. Algorithmic bias in hiring systems offers another case: some AI systems have reproduced unfair patterns from historical data and created discriminatory outcomes, even before laws fully addressed those harms.These examples show why ethical reflection is necessary even when technology operates within legal boundaries. An organization may follow existing law and still create harm. Ethical reasoning helps us identify those harms earlier and more clearly.Critical Thinking and Personal LensesThe chapter closes by returning to a familiar idea from the previous week: personal lenses. Ethical decisions are often shaped by personal experiences, education, culture, and values. These lenses influence what people notice, what they consider harmful, and what solutions they find acceptable.Critical thinking requires us to analyze information carefully, recognize biases, define our terms, and consider multiple perspectives before making judgments. This skill is especially important in technology, where different groups may experience the same system in very different ways.Pause and Reflect

      Choose one example from this chapter: data privacy, facial recognition, algorithmic hiring, or social media algorithms. What is one reason a person might see the issue mainly as a legal problem, and what is one reason another person might see it mainly as an ethical problem? What does that comparison reveal about the importance of critical thinking?Ultimately, understanding ethics, law, and technology begins with careful definitions and disciplined reasoning. Laws establish minimum rules for behavior, but ethics asks deeper questions about human dignity, fairness, responsibility, and social impact. In technology, where innovation often outruns regulation, ethical reasoning is essential for deciding not only what we can build, but what we should build.End of Chapter Key Terms

      • Ethics Principles and standards used to determine right and wrong behavior.
      • Morals Personal beliefs about what is right or wrong.
      • Virtues Positive character traits such as honesty, fairness, and courage.
      • Integrity Acting consistently according to ethical principles.
      • Stakeholders Individuals or groups affected by a decision or technology.
      • Corporate Social Responsibility The idea that companies should consider social and environmental impacts when making decisions.
      • Law Rules created and enforced by governments to regulate behavior.
      • ethical vs. legal The distinction between what is morally right and what is formally permitted by law.
      • CCPA The California Consumer Privacy Act, which gives California residents rights related to personal data.
      • CPRA The California Privacy Rights Act, which expands California privacy protections and enforcement.
      • CFAA The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, a federal law addressing unauthorized access to computer systems.
      • COPPA The Childrens Online Privacy Protection Act, which protects the personal data of children under 13 online.
      • DMCA The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which addresses digital copyright and intellectual property protections.
      • GDPR The General Data Protection Regulation, a major European Union privacy law.

    The week’s topicTechnology Law and Policy: Ethical and Legal Challengesexplores how ethical principles apply to real-world privacy cases, focusing on consent, data protection, and the responsibilities of individuals and organizations in digital environments.

    Watch: |

    Guiding Questions

    • How do we balance innovation in technology with the protection of individual rights?
    • What does ethical responsibility look like in digital environments where actions are often invisible or automated?
    • How can we tell when a technical solution is ethically soundnot just legally compliant?

    Watch:

    Guiding Questions

    • What does privacy mean to you, and how do you see it changing in todays digital world?
    • Why might it be important for people who build technology to study ethics?
    • How could giving users more choices about their data help build trust between companies and customers?

    Analysis: Scenarios / Case Studies

    Review the following three scenarios. Briefly explore each one, then choose one scenario to use for both this week’s discussion and assignment. Once you select one, go into more depth by reviewing all the materials for that scenario.


    At a Glance:

    Schrems II was a major court case in Europe that changed how companies like Facebook and Google can move peoples personal data between countries. The court said U.S. laws did not protect European citizens privacy well enough, especially from government surveillance. This decision forced companies to rethink how they handle international data and raised big questions about how to protect privacy across borders.

    Resources:

    Guiding Questions:

    • How did the Schrems II ruling challenge the adequacy of international data protection agreements like Privacy Shield?
    • What ethical tensions arise when balancing national security interests with individual privacy rights?
    • How should companies navigate conflicting legal obligations between jurisdictions while maintaining ethical data practices?

    2.

    At a Glance:

    In Lane v. Facebook, users found out that Facebooks Beacon program was sharing their online purchases with friendswithout clear permission. Many people did not know this was happening, and it felt like a serious invasion of privacy. The case led to a lawsuit and showed how tech companies can cross ethical lines when they do not explain what they are doing with user data.

    Resources:

    Guiding Questions:

    • In what ways did Facebooks Beacon program fail to uphold user consent, and what ethical principles were violated?
    • How can platforms ensure transparency in data collection and sharing without overwhelming users with technical details?
    • What responsibilities do companies have when designing systems that affect user privacyeven if users do not fully understand them?

    3.

    At a Glance:

    This study looked at how privacy laws like and actually work in real life. It found that even when companies follow the rules, peopleespecially those from marginalized groupsoften still struggle to protect their privacy. The research shows that laws alone are not enough; we need better design and clearer tools to help everyone stay safe online.

    Resources:

    Guiding Questions:

    • Why might legal compliance still fall short of protecting user privacy in practice?
    • How can technology design better support users in understanding and managing their privacy choices?
    • What responsibilities do organizations have to ensure privacy protections work fairly for all users, including marginalized groups?

    Additional Resources

    What you can expect:

    A high quality explanation and answer with in your time limit

    Quick responsive communication

    Original explanations and answers with any outside resources cited

  • Computer ethics

    Computer Ethics Legal Exploration

    Select one of the following cases.

    Your Task

    Write a short response of 12 pages (about 500 words) explaining the case and reflecting on its legal significance. Please no plagiarism,no a i no chat bots.

    This is not a formal research paper. Focus on:

    • clear explanation
    • thoughtful reflection
    • connection to real-world technology issues

    Tip
    You do not need to summarize every detail of the case. Focus on the main legal issue, who was affected, and why the decision matters.

    What to Include

      1. What happened? Briefly explain the case and what situation led to the legal issue.
      2. What was the legal issue? Identify the main legal question or dispute involved.
      3. What was the outcome? Describe what decision was made by the court, regulators, or policymakers.
      4. Who was affected? Identify the people, groups, or stakeholders impacted.
      5. Why does it matter? Explain why this case is important for technology law and policy.
      6. Additional source: Find and briefly discuss one credible source related to your case.
        • Consider these questions as you write:
          • What law or legal principle is central to this case?
          • How does the case show the challenges of applying law to new technologies?
          • Do you agree with the legal outcome? Why or why not?

    Using Credible Sources

    For this assignment, include at least one credible source related to your chosen case.

    Examples of credible sources include:

    • reputable news organizations
    • government or court websites
    • academic journals or university publications
    • legal commentary from established organizations
    • policy or research institutes

    A credible source usually:

    • identifies the author or organization
    • provides evidence or citations
    • comes from a reputable publication
    • is relevant to the case
    • Week 4 Chapter Reading: Defining Ethics, Law, and TechnologyIntroductionBefore we can analyze ethical issues in technology, we first need to understand the language used when discussing ethics. Words such as ethics, morals, values, responsibility, and law are often used interchangeably, but they do not mean the same thing. Careful ethical reasoning requires us to define these terms clearly so that we can communicate with precision and avoid confusion.Technology professionals frequently encounter situations where something is legally allowed but still raises ethical concerns. A company may comply with the law while still making choices that feel invasive, manipulative, or unfair. Understanding this distinction is important because ethical responsibility often extends beyond mere legal compliance. In technology, the question is not only Is this allowed? but also Is this right?Because modern technologies such as artificial intelligence, social media platforms, and large-scale data collection operate across entire populations, decisions made by designers, developers, and organizations can affect millions of people. Ethical reflection therefore becomes a necessary part of responsible technological practice, not an optional extra.Pause and Reflect

      Think about a digital service you use often, such as a social media platform, shopping app, or streaming service. Can you identify one practice that is probably legal but still raises ethical concerns for you? What makes it feel ethically questionable?Why Ethics Matters in TechnologyTechnology is not neutral. Every technological system reflects decisions made by people, and those decisions shape how that technology affects individuals, communities, and society. Social media algorithms influence what information people see. Artificial intelligence can affect hiring and employment opportunities. Data collection systems determine how personal information is gathered, stored, and sold. Automation changes how work is performed and who may lose access to jobs or opportunities.Because technology can influence large populations, ethical reflection becomes critical in the design and use of technological systems. A system may be efficient, profitable, or legally compliant while still producing unfair outcomes. This is why computer ethics asks us to examine not only what technology does, but also whose interests it serves, whose needs it ignores, and whose risks it increases.Key Idea

      Technology is rarely neutral. The design decisions made by developers and organizations shape how technology affects individuals, communities, and society.Why This Matters

      Modern technologies operate at scale. A single design decision can affect thousands or millions of users. That means ethical problems can become systemic, shaping access, privacy, fairness, and power across entire communities.Key Ethical TerminologyEthics refers to principles and standards used to determine right and wrong behavior.Morals are personal beliefs about what is right or wrong.Virtues are positive character traits such as honesty, fairness, and courage.Integrity means acting consistently according to ethical principles.Stakeholders are the individuals or groups affected by a decision or technology.Corporate Social Responsibility is the idea that organizations should consider social and environmental consequences, not only profit, when making decisions.Ethical vs. LegalEthics and law are related, but they are not the same. Laws are formal rules created and enforced by governments. Ethics refers to broader principles about what people should do, even when the law is silent.Sometimes an action is both ethical and legal, such as protecting user data and respecting privacy. Sometimes an action is legal but unethical, such as collecting large amounts of personal data without meaningful transparency. Sometimes an action may be ethical but illegal, such as whistleblowing to expose harmful wrongdoing. And sometimes an action is both illegal and unethical, such as identity theft, cyber fraud, or unauthorized hacking.Key Idea

      An action being legal does not automatically mean it is ethical. Technology professionals often need to evaluate the broader social impact of their decisions beyond what the law requires.Diagram of a four-quadrant ethical vs. legal matrix. The vertical axis represents ethical versus unethical actions and the horizontal axis represents legal versus illegal actions. The four quadrants illustrate: ethical and legal actions, ethical but illegal actions, legal but unethical actions, and actions that are both illegal and unethical.Ethical vs. Legal Matrix

      Legal Illegal
      Ethical Ethical & Legal

      Actions that follow both moral principles and the law.

      Example:
      Protecting user data and respecting privacy.

      Ethical but Illegal

      Actions intended to prevent harm but that break the law.

      Example:
      Whistleblowing.

      Unethical Legal but Unethical

      Actions allowed by law but ethically questionable.

      Example:
      Excessive user data collection.

      Illegal & Unethical

      Actions that violate both law and ethics.

      Example:
      Hacking or identity theft.

      Think About It

      Think about an app you use regularly, such as social media, shopping, or streaming.

      What personal data does the company collect about you?

      Do you think their practices are:

      • Ethical and legal
      • Legal but unethical
      • Ethical but illegal

      Explain why.Examples of Technology LawsThe reading highlights several examples of laws that attempt to regulate technology. In California, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) gives residents rights related to their personal information, including the right to know what data companies collect, request deletion of that data, and opt out of data sales. The California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) expands these protections and strengthens enforcement.At the federal level, laws such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the Childrens Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) address unauthorized access, childrens privacy, and digital copyright issues.Internationally, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union is one of the most influential privacy laws, requiring consent for data collection and granting people rights over their own information.When Laws Lag Behind TechnologyOne reason the distinction between ethics and law matters in technology is that technology often evolves faster than laws. Legal systems usually respond slowly, while technological innovation can spread rapidly. As a result, technology professionals often face situations where legal guidance is incomplete, outdated, or unclear.Real-World Example

      The FacebookCambridge Analytica scandal involved personal data from millions of users being collected and used for political advertising without clear consent. Even though some practices were technically legal at the time, they raised serious ethical concerns about privacy and manipulation.Another example is facial recognition technology, which has been used for surveillance and identification in ways that many critics argue threaten privacy and can reinforce racial bias. Algorithmic bias in hiring systems offers another case: some AI systems have reproduced unfair patterns from historical data and created discriminatory outcomes, even before laws fully addressed those harms.These examples show why ethical reflection is necessary even when technology operates within legal boundaries. An organization may follow existing law and still create harm. Ethical reasoning helps us identify those harms earlier and more clearly.Critical Thinking and Personal LensesThe chapter closes by returning to a familiar idea from the previous week: personal lenses. Ethical decisions are often shaped by personal experiences, education, culture, and values. These lenses influence what people notice, what they consider harmful, and what solutions they find acceptable.Critical thinking requires us to analyze information carefully, recognize biases, define our terms, and consider multiple perspectives before making judgments. This skill is especially important in technology, where different groups may experience the same system in very different ways.Pause and Reflect

      Choose one example from this chapter: data privacy, facial recognition, algorithmic hiring, or social media algorithms. What is one reason a person might see the issue mainly as a legal problem, and what is one reason another person might see it mainly as an ethical problem? What does that comparison reveal about the importance of critical thinking?Ultimately, understanding ethics, law, and technology begins with careful definitions and disciplined reasoning. Laws establish minimum rules for behavior, but ethics asks deeper questions about human dignity, fairness, responsibility, and social impact. In technology, where innovation often outruns regulation, ethical reasoning is essential for deciding not only what we can build, but what we should build.End of Chapter Key Terms

      • Ethics Principles and standards used to determine right and wrong behavior.
      • Morals Personal beliefs about what is right or wrong.
      • Virtues Positive character traits such as honesty, fairness, and courage.
      • Integrity Acting consistently according to ethical principles.
      • Stakeholders Individuals or groups affected by a decision or technology.
      • Corporate Social Responsibility The idea that companies should consider social and environmental impacts when making decisions.
      • Law Rules created and enforced by governments to regulate behavior.
      • ethical vs. legal The distinction between what is morally right and what is formally permitted by law.
      • CCPA The California Consumer Privacy Act, which gives California residents rights related to personal data.
      • CPRA The California Privacy Rights Act, which expands California privacy protections and enforcement.
      • CFAA The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, a federal law addressing unauthorized access to computer systems.
      • COPPA The Childrens Online Privacy Protection Act, which protects the personal data of children under 13 online.
      • DMCA The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which addresses digital copyright and intellectual property protections.
      • GDPR The General Data Protection Regulation, a major European Union privacy law.

    The week’s topicTechnology Law and Policy: Ethical and Legal Challengesexplores how ethical principles apply to real-world privacy cases, focusing on consent, data protection, and the responsibilities of individuals and organizations in digital environments.

    Watch: |

    Guiding Questions

    • How do we balance innovation in technology with the protection of individual rights?
    • What does ethical responsibility look like in digital environments where actions are often invisible or automated?
    • How can we tell when a technical solution is ethically soundnot just legally compliant?

    Watch:

    Guiding Questions

    • What does privacy mean to you, and how do you see it changing in todays digital world?
    • Why might it be important for people who build technology to study ethics?
    • How could giving users more choices about their data help build trust between companies and customers?

    Analysis: Scenarios / Case Studies

    Review the following three scenarios. Briefly explore each one, then choose one scenario to use for both this week’s discussion and assignment. Once you select one, go into more depth by reviewing all the materials for that scenario.


    At a Glance:

    Schrems II was a major court case in Europe that changed how companies like Facebook and Google can move peoples personal data between countries. The court said U.S. laws did not protect European citizens privacy well enough, especially from government surveillance. This decision forced companies to rethink how they handle international data and raised big questions about how to protect privacy across borders.

    Resources:

    Guiding Questions:

    • How did the Schrems II ruling challenge the adequacy of international data protection agreements like Privacy Shield?
    • What ethical tensions arise when balancing national security interests with individual privacy rights?
    • How should companies navigate conflicting legal obligations between jurisdictions while maintaining ethical data practices?

    2.

    At a Glance:

    In Lane v. Facebook, users found out that Facebooks Beacon program was sharing their online purchases with friendswithout clear permission. Many people did not know this was happening, and it felt like a serious invasion of privacy. The case led to a lawsuit and showed how tech companies can cross ethical lines when they do not explain what they are doing with user data.

    Resources:

    Guiding Questions:

    • In what ways did Facebooks Beacon program fail to uphold user consent, and what ethical principles were violated?
    • How can platforms ensure transparency in data collection and sharing without overwhelming users with technical details?
    • What responsibilities do companies have when designing systems that affect user privacyeven if users do not fully understand them?

    3.

    At a Glance:

    This study looked at how privacy laws like and actually work in real life. It found that even when companies follow the rules, peopleespecially those from marginalized groupsoften still struggle to protect their privacy. The research shows that laws alone are not enough; we need better design and clearer tools to help everyone stay safe online.

    Resources:

    Guiding Questions:

    • Why might legal compliance still fall short of protecting user privacy in practice?
    • How can technology design better support users in understanding and managing their privacy choices?
    • What responsibilities do organizations have to ensure privacy protections work fairly for all users, including marginalized groups?

    Additional Resources

    What you can expect:

    A high quality explanation and answer with in your time limit

    Quick responsive communication

    Original explanations and answers with any outside resources cited