Category: Social Science

  • computer ethics

    please respond to jacob with 150 words

    When I was exploring my data through Google, I saw a detailed and extensive history of my searches, websites, and YouTube videos that I’ve been watching or scrolling on Shorts. I wasn’t too surprised, I knew they kept logs of my history, however, I didn’t expect all of this to be available off of my browser itself. TikTok was similar, and I can tell how much information they store because of how good the algorithm is into playing videos that interest me. Google collects browsing activity, location data, device information, and app usage. YouTube and TikTok both collect watch time, interactions and engagements, device data, and behavioral patterns. The most surprising thing was seeing how extensive and how far back Googles data goes. It seemed like there were endless pages to scroll on, and I even made it to some stuff accessed a year and a half ago. For TikTok, the algorithm seemed to adapt way too much. I could watch a TikTok about one specific game, then I am getting bombarded with other TikToks about the same game on my For You page. On both platforms, it is clear that by data is being used to “tailor” ads to my preferences as well as improve algorithms. TikTok seems to be focused more on the engagement aspect whereas Google is more focused on the ad revenue.

    A lot of ads I see seem to be something tailor to anything I’ve searched up (or sometimes even talked about out loud). I looked up an address for a glasses store, and google bombarded me with ads for several other online glasses stores. TikTok seems to primarily put out content to keep me as engaged as possible, so that I stay on the app longer, and inherently view more ads. Both systems seem very accurate and influential. TikTok feels more-so since it can dictate what I consume within minutes, and seems to have a more “addicting” output on life.

    I don’t feel as if I have the most control over my data, even though there are options to disable their monitoring. I’ve turned off the data monitoring options for both platforms, yet everything still seems virtually the same. I also feel as if most people would struggle to understand what these companies are doing with out data.

    The people who benefit the most from these data collection systems are the corporations who control them. No matter how it’s looked at, their sole purpose is to generate revenue for Google or TikTok. Whether it’s selling data to other companies, or just using your own data to try and get you to look at some ads you might like, they benefit infinitely more than anyone else. There are also some risks to this, as many people are prone to believing misinformation, The use of our data is hardly ever involved in fact-checking before being bombarded by algorithms. There should be a fine line between data collection and consumptions, and there should be a lot of transparency (worded in simple English) how data is used in it’s entirety. Personalization of data collection should also be completely transparent and easy to maneuver. The users, companies, and governments should be held accountable to some regard. The government should protect it’s people, companies should be less greedy, and consumers should think rationally.

    The evidence connection I made correlated with out reading from this week about privacy and data ethics. The reading said “phones, apps, websites, and digital systems constantly collect, analyze, and share data, often without full user awareness” which is exactly what is found in my Google and TikTok data.

    The biggest difference between the two companies is that Google tends to collect data for long term use, whereas TikTok is everchanging and takes seconds to minutes to adapt. Google’s data also tends to feel more invasive because of how everything is stored (seemingly permanently unless you delete it yourself) and uses a lot more of your personal data then TikTok does.

  • computer ethics

    For this computer ethics assignment you will log into google and create a page:

    • Create your portfolio website
    • Set up structure using headings or pages
    • Add a brief homepage introduction
    • Select your case study


    Platform

    • Google Sites (recommended)

    shared via link

    Example Portfolio

    Use this example as a reference for structure and organization:

    Your design does not need to match this exactly. Focus on clarity and organization.

    Getting Started

    Google Sites

    1. Go to sites.google.com, sign in with your Google account, and select the “Student Portfolio” template from the Template Gallery for a pre-made structure.
    2. Customize Structure: Rename the default pages (e.g., Classes, Activities) in the “Pages” tab to fit your Case Study. Add new headings or pages.
    3. Design & Theme: Select a theme to change fonts and colors to match your personal style.
    4. Publish and Share: Click “Publish,” create a unique URL slug (e.g., sites.google.com/view/john-doe-portfolio), and share this link for assignment.

    Adobe Express (

    1. Access Adobe Express: Log in via adobe.com/express
    2. Create a Website project
    3. Click the + (plus) button on the dashboard, then select the Web page option to open the builder.
      Choose Layout: Start with a blank canvas for complete control, or choose a pre-designed template suitable for portfolios, presentations, or project reports.
    4. Add sections for each required area
    5. Publish your page

    Tip
    You can organize your project as multiple pages OR one scrolling page with sections.

    Your Task

    • Create your portfolio website
    • Set up structure using headings or pages
    • Add a brief homepage introduction
    • Select your case study

    Important: Focus on structure only. Do NOT complete full sections yet.

    Required Headings (Structure Only)

    • Case Study Selection
    • Background Summary
    • Ethical Analysis
    • Impact Analysis
    • Broader Implications
    • Reflection
    • Reflection Questions
    • References

    What to Include This Week

    • Homepage:
      • Case title
      • 23 sentence summary
      • Why it matters (12 sentences)
    • Case Selection: A real-world computing ethics case
    • Sources: At least 2 credible sources

    Submission Instructions

    1. Publish your website
    2. Copy your link
    3. Submit in Canvas
  • ECE 334.

    The Eugenics Movement in the USA in the beginning of the 20th century was so powerful that it contributed to legislation that ultimately curtailed emigration to the United States. It greatly influenced the passage of the Quota Laws of the 1920s which favored immigrants from Northern Europe, specifically White Anglo-Saxon Protestants (WASPS). It viewed immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe as “undesirable” or “dysgenic.” Describe your reaction to the content of the Cold Spring Harbor website illustrating these points. Discuss what may have surprised or interested you the most. What is your understanding of why eugenics was referred to as a pseudoscience? Which groups were targeted and why? Describe your perception of how the Eugenics Movement in the USA during the beginning of the 20th century paralleled Hitler’s ideas in Germany in the 1940s. Make sure you adequately answer this considering the point value of 10. Write at least 5 sentences and respond to at least one other student’s posting.

  • computer ethics

    please respondto wilmer with 150 words no plagiarism. no ai no chat bots

    In reviewing Instagram’s ad preferences and Reddit’s ad settings I discovered that both systems , systems collect detailed behavioral data such as what I look at what I click on how long I spend with the content and inferred interests based on that activity. Guess , Guess what? Instagram also , also uses advertiser data and cross-platform tracking through the Meta ecosystem while Reddit relies on subreddit activity sharing patterns and sometimes partner data outside of the app. What caught my attention is how automated and passive this tracking is even , even when I’m not directly interacting with the ads and how activities outside the platform can shape what I see. Guess what? This data is primarily used for personalized advertising content recommendations and user engagement prediction to keep people on the platform longer creating noticeable patterns where similar content and ads continue to repeat based on past behavior. Instagram feels more granular and commercially focused while Reddit , Reddit feels more , more nurturing and community-based but still uses similar data analysis methods. I feel like I’m only partially in control because most tracking is enabled by default and the settings aren’t completely transparent or easy to understand that can make it difficult for the average , average user to manage it all. In terms of power and ethics companies and advertisers benefit the most while users can be harmed by not understanding the amount of data collected or how it shapes what they see so governments and platforms must share the responsibility to promote transparency and protection.

  • Child / Adolescent Sensory Seeker Socialization Group

    it is a group proposal paper. my part is abstract. should be 125-200 words.

    Abstract

    This is a proposal for a treatment group for children and adolescents on the autism spectrum that present with sensory input needs.

  • doctoral orientation

    please respond to keith with 200 words no plagarism no ai no chat bots original response

    How would you define education?

    I would define an education as a framework for learning the fundamentals of multiple subjects until an understanding of the matter is retained or mastered. The education system consists of acquiring skills such as research and analytical thinking that align with one’s personal perspective and assist in reinforcing one’s decision-making process. Being educated is not solely restricted to academics; it can be found and learned in social settings and ethical environments as well. Obtaining an education is essential to personal and professional growth because it aids individuals in the quest for knowledge and facilitates opportunities for career advancements.

    How does education make a better, or worse, society?

    Education’s role in society is to foster intellectual development and create foundations that will preserve the social and economic structures of civilization. It’s intended to be comprehended and passed on to the following generations that will continue innovation and uphold the ideals of fundamental inquiry. Education’s objective in society is also to promote professional growth, which will broaden opportunities and decrease disparities among the public. Based on its caliber and/or accessibility, education can hinder or improve the structures of society. When it’s impartial to who has access to it, education can promote logic and analytical skills that lead to production and economic growth. When it’s exclusive and/or biased, it limits opportunities and sustains inequality, further widening the disparity gap.

    What is the state of the US educational system today, and how is this education and this degree going to make our educational system better?

    The State of the educational system in today’s society is lopsided and often caters to developed areas within the country. Underfunded regions, particularly communities with people of color, typically have schools that have fewer resources, with larger class sizes, which can contribute to lower student performance and limit educational growth. According to Bridges et. al. (2012), “Despite the importance of postsecondary education to the economic and social vitality of the U.S. and the individuals who pursue this academic goal, the educational pipeline to and through college is broken for communities of color, the fastest-growing segment of the population” (para. 1).

    What 1-2 strategies would you recommend to make education better?

    Two recommendations to facilitate the betterment of education in modern society are inclusion and mental health support programs. Requiring mental health programs as early as grade school, to aid children who suffer from PTSD due to life’s inequalities, could help teachers prepare more centered lesson plans that support educational growth. Many students don’t have the opportunity to realize their full academic potential due to socioeconomic status, so mandating inclusive courses that are offered to students in better-funded areas could further expand an underdeveloped mind and increase opportunities to eliminate future disparities. Utilizing resources and providing appropriate direction will allow greater course correction within the educational system. Having a doctoral degree in health care administration will allow me to promote a healthier atmosphere among children in grades K-12 by introducing real-world expertise from the healthcare field into developmentally appropriate environments. According to Price (2017), “What we need more than anything is leadership” (Chapter 9, para.10)

    References:

    Bridges, B. K., Awokoya, J. T., Messano, F., & UNCF, F. D. P. R. I. (FDPRI). (2012). Done to Us, Not with Us: African American Parent Perceptions of K-12 Education. Retrieved 2026,.

    Price, B. D. (2017). Saving K-12: what happened to our public schools? how do we fix them? Anaphora Literary Press. 2026,

  • doctoral orientation

    please respond to to mary with 250 words please no plagiarism,no chat bots no ai

    How would you define education?

    Education, viewed through the lens of leadership in an academic setting, is the intentional process of developing knowledge, skills, values, and self-awareness that enables individuals to influence others effectively and ethically. This process occurs across formal, informal, and experiential contexts and plays a critical role in preparing individuals for work, citizenship, lifelong learning, and ethical decision-making.

    Beyond merely acquiring information, education fosters critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and moral reasoning, which are essential for sound judgment, decision-making, and responsible leadership. In this regard, education not only prepares individuals to lead but also influences how leaders learn from experiences, adapt to complexity, and empower others within organizations and communities.

    Education is not solely a scientific concept; it is also understood differently by various interest groups, making it challenging to define. One approach to gain clarity is to examine the “ways of talking about education” (Drpinghaus, (2013), which highlights the central dimensions of education as understood by different people, whether in an Educational Lab or elsewhere. It is important to recognize that concepts of education have a normative background, and our understanding of the term reflects visions, values, goals, and ideas regarding how educational objectives should be achieved.

    What is the role of education in society? How does education make a better, or worse, society?

    Education plays a foundational role in society by shaping how individuals think, act, and engage in social, economic, and political life. Ideally, education equips people not only with knowledge and skills but also with the ability to think critically, reason ethically, and take on civic responsibilities. Through education, societies transmit shared values, cultural norms, and expectations, while also preparing individuals to adapt to change and contribute positively to the common good. From a leadership perspective, education helps develop informed citizens and ethical leaders by fostering self-awareness, empathy, and accountability. It creates opportunities for social mobility, innovation, and democratic participation, enabling individuals to thoughtfully tackle complex problems rather than accepting authority or tradition without question.

    What is the state of the US educational system today? In essence, is our K-12 educational system working or not working? Include and cite relevant data to support your assertion.

    The current state of the U.S. K12 education system is uneven. While it is structurally sound, it is not consistently or equitably effective. National data indicate that although access to education and graduation rates are relatively strong, there are serious concerns about student learning outcomes and the system’s overall capacity.

    According to the 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), average reading and math scores for 4th- and 8th-graders remain below pre-pandemic levels. Reading scores have continued to decline, while recovery in math scores has largely stalled. The learning loss attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic persists, with students losing an estimated half a grade level in math and one-third of a grade level in reading. Recovery has been slow and uneven across different states and districts.

    At the same time, the national high school graduation rate has reached 87%, suggesting that the system is successful in advancing students through K12. However, graduation rates do not necessarily reflect mastery of content or readiness for the next steps, especially considering the stagnant achievement data. (nces.ed.gov)

    Florida exhibits many of the national trends regarding education, but it faces additional challenges. The state is experiencing one of the most severe teacher shortages in the country, with thousands of classrooms being led by non-certified teachers. This situation is largely attributed to low pay and high turnover rates. These shortages disproportionately impact high-poverty schools, which in turn affects the quality of instruction. Additionally, Florida students have shown limited academic recovery post-pandemic on NAEP assessments, reflecting broader national patterns.

    Finally, as a doctoral student/graduate, what 1-2 strategies would you recommend to make education better? In other words, how is this education and this degree going to make our educational system better?

    As a doctoral student/graduate, one of the most powerful contributions to improving education is the ability to bridge the gap between research and real-world practice, leading to tangible improvements in instruction and learner outcomes. Too often, educational policy and classroom decisions are driven by tradition, ideology, or shortterm pressures rather than evidence. Advanced doctoral training equips scholars and practitioner leaders to critically evaluate research, use data responsibly, and translate findings into evidence-based interventions that improve instruction, equity, and learner outcomes. By serving as informed decision-makers, advocates, or leaders, doctoral graduates can help ensure that educational reforms are grounded in what actually works rather than what is politically expedient.

    References:

    Drpinghaus, Andreas, Andreas Poenitsch, and Lothar Wigger. 2013. Einfhrung in die Theorie der Bildung. Grundwissen Erziehungswissenschaft. Darmstadt : Wiss. Buchges.

    National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). The Nations Report Card (NAEP). U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from

  • Doctoral Orientation

    For this weeks DQ and as we begin our educational journey it is preferable to learn about education, its role in society, and its hopefully ambitions. With that, address the following please no plagiarism,no ai no chat bots response should be 400 words :

    How would you define education?

    What is the role of education in society? How does education make a better, or worse, society?

    What is the state of the US educational system today? In essence, is our k-12 educational system working or not working? Include and cite relevant data to support your assertion.

    Finally, as a doctoral student/graduate, what 1-2 strategies would you recommend to make education better? In other words, how is this education, and this degree, going to make our educational system better?

  • Research In Industrial Safety

    please respond to eric with 250 words no plagairism no ai. no chat bots

    In complex operational environments, it is important to recognize that safety outcomes are not solely the result of individual behavior but are heavily influenced by the systems in which people work. While it may be tempting to assume that incidents occur because workers are not paying attention, research in occupational safety consistently shows that human error is typically a byproduct of broader organizational and environmental factors rather than the root cause.

    Human error can be understood through categories such as slips, lapses, and mistakes. Slips and lapses are unintentional and often occur during routine tasks or when attention is divided. Mistakes involve decision-making errors that may originate from inadequate training, unclear procedures, or insufficient information (Reason, 2000). These types of errors are predictable and often linked to conditions such as fatigue, time pressure, or poorly designed workflows. When these conditions exist, even highly skilled and experienced workers are more likely to make errors.

    From an operational leadership perspective, the key is to move beyond asking who failed? and instead ask what in the system allowed this to happen? This shift toward systems thinking is critical. Blaming individuals can create a culture of fear, discourage reporting, and ultimately limit the organizations ability to learn and improve. In contrast, examining the system by examining procedures, equipment design, communication pathways, and production pressures will allow leaders to identify and address the underlying contributors to incidents (Dekker, 2014).

    One of the most effective approaches to achieving this shift is the implementation of a just culture. In this type of environment, individuals are not punished for unintentional errors but are held accountable for reckless or intentional violations. This distinction is important because it encourages transparency and reporting. When employees feel safe to report near-misses and hazards, organizations gain valuable insights into vulnerabilities that might otherwise go unnoticed. Over time, this leads to stronger systems and fewer incidents.

    Additionally, incorporating human factors principles into operations is essential. This involves designing tasks, tools, and processes that align with human capabilities and limitations. Simplifying procedures, reducing cognitive overload, and ensuring clarity in communication can significantly reduce the likelihood of error. Well-designed systems act as safeguards, preventing small mistakes from escalating into serious incidents.

    To engage leadership effectively, it is important to connect these concepts to operational performance. Safety is not separate from productivity but its key driver. Incidents disrupt operations, increase costs, and impact workforce morale. By focusing on system improvements, organizations can enhance both safety and efficiency. Data-driven insights, such as trends in near-misses or recurring failure points, can help demonstrate where system-level changes will have the greatest impact.

    Ultimately, human error is inevitable, but system failures are preventable. Strong leadership recognizes that building resilient systems and not blaming individuals, is the most effective way to reduce risk and improve performance. As professionals, we have a responsibility to apply research-based principles to influence leadership thinking and drive sustainable change.

    Open-ended question:

    What strategies have you seen or would recommend to help leadership teams transition from a blame-focused mindset to one that prioritizes system design and continuous learning?

    References

    Dekker, S. (2014). The field guide to understanding human error (3rd ed.). Ashgate Publishing.

    Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. BMJ, 320(7237), 768770.

  • Research in Industrial Safety

    please respond to scott with 200 words no plagerism no a i no chat bots

    As a safety professional working for the Department of Defense, we provide not just oversight of government assets that are undergoing a CNO or non-CNO shipyard availabilities but are also subject matter experts with regards to safety, fire safety, and the industrial environment that is ship repair. Many would assume that our role is simply pointing out discrepancies and walking away, but in fact we more, so much more. Our profession relies on science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), but also social sciences. Its important in our business to understand types of leadership, and behavioral sciences as it pertains to safety.

    Throughout the day our safety professionals wear different hats both official and unofficial within an organization, some official such as responsible for safety and health, compliance, worker compensation, however unofficially they fill roles of marriage counselor, financial researcher, and maybe even the company softball team manager (Schneid, 2016).

    Many would think theres no way we could do all of that but walking the deck plates we are often viewed as ears to management or leadership. Some even view us as the enemy, a way to stop production work or tell them what they are doing something wrong, typically these are the deck plate supervisors who see us as a hindrance to production, but to others we are an ear, someone to listen to their problems, or vent concerns.

    When incident occurs, we are quick to blame the worker, saying just pay attention, do your job, or just wear your PPE. However, there are times that its just not that simple. We as an organization have an obligation to ensure that we are providing a working environment that is free from known hazards. We must look at the employee wholistically, considering everything that plays a role in keeping that employee safe.

    Human error does play a role in incidents but is the error intentional or unintentional? Slips or lapses in memory or incorrect decisions based on inadequate knowledge is an example of unintentional human error. Are we providing the right type of training or providing the right type of personnel protective equipment for the task? When was the last time that operating procedures were reviewed or updated? As industry changes and production methods evolve so must our safety mitigations, new processes require a new risk evaluation to determine the overall impact to the employees. Are the current safety mitigations enough? Not to mention PPE is a last resort. Behavioral Base Safety considers unsafe conditions that influence unsafe behaviors (Kaila, 2013). So again, we must look at the whole employee. As a professional we do our best to separate what is going on in our life from work, however we have all experienced times when home spills into work, such as the loss of a family member, stressor about money or relationships.

    The more serious are the intentional errors like purposely deviating from procedure or safety requirements. But again, what drives this decision? Are we placing too much demand on a single employee, an unstaffed job site or just the glare of the all might dollar? That falls on management, by all means complete the job in a timely manner, but pushing and side-stepping safety requirements will have a more detrimental impact on the job and company.

    In closing, consider the why behind both what motivates the employee and what were the contributing factors to an incident or near miss. We must take complete ownership of a situation and consider what could we have done differently and not be so quick to take the shortcut and blame the employee.

    What do you feel are the largest stressor to a safety professional?

    References:

    Kaila, H. L. (2013). Behavior Based Safety in Organizations: A Practical Guide. India: I.K. International Publishing House Pvt. Limited.

    Schneid, T. D. (2016). Labor and Employment Issues for the Safety Professional. United Kingdom: CRC Press.