Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Hand foot and mouth disease (coxsackievirus)

    Paper 4 pages

    1.Introduction

    a.Type of pathogen

    b.Name of pathogen, relevant family name, and proper binomial nomenclature

    c.Is the pathogen transmissible or opportunistic (part of the normal flora)

    d.Associated infections/diseases

    2.Structure of Assigned Pathogen

    a.Describe morphology of pathogen

    b.Appropriate visualization technique (staining and microscopy)

    c.Describe any relevant virulence factors

    3.Interaction between Microbe and Host Immune System

    a.Describe relevant innate responses

    b.Describe relevant adaptive responses

    c.Do not discuss vaccines here.

    4.Infectious Disease Information

    a.Describe the infectious disease caused by the microbe including:

    i.Conditions including sign and symptoms

    ii.Duration

    iii.Complications

    iv.Predisposing factors

    v.Is it opportunistic

    5.Principles of Epidemiology

    a.Incidence and Prevalence of disease (age, location, time of year)

    b.Reservoirs, Mode of Transmission, Portals of Exit and Entrance

    c.If relevant, is the disease classified as endemic, epidemic, pandemic.

    d.Is this a reportable disease. Explain why.

    6.Prevention

    a.Appropriate PPE

    b.Lifestyle, hygiene, and environmental factors

    c.Any relevant vaccines or prophylactic medications

    7.Treatment

    a.Discuss relevant pharmacological agents and supportive treatments

    b.Are there any incidences of antimicrobial resistance?

    8.Clinical Relevance

    a.What critical information should a nurse know about this pathogen if it presents in their practice?

    9.Concluding Summary

    a.All high-quality academic papers conclude by summarizing the main points.

    Other requirements

    4-6 written pages not including Title and Reference pages

    No Abstract needed

    APA formatted

    Minimum of four scholarly references

    Quotations are not allowed. Quotes are not acceptable in scientific papers. Work should be paraphrased in your own words.

    Plagiarism is not acceptable. TurnItIn scores over 25% will automatically be evaluated for plagiarism.


    Microorganism Profile Grading Rubric:

    Criteria

    Satisfactory

    Needs Improvement

    Unsatisfactory

    No Submission

    Structure of Assigned Microbe

    CSLO 2

    The student has thoroughly described the structure of the assigned microbe in detail, including the microbiological tools that would be necessary to observe the organism and virulence factors.

    (Up to 10 points)

    The student has partially described the structure of the assigned microbe in detail, and/or microbiological tools that would be necessary to observe the organism or virulence factors are missing.

    (Up to 7 points)

    The student has insufficiently described the structure of the assigned microbe in detail, and the microbiological tools that would be necessary to observe the organism and virulence factors are missing.

    (Up to 3 points)

    Component not included or assignment was not submitted.

    (0 points)

    Infectious Disease Information

    CSLO 10

    The student has thoroughly described the infectious disease caused by the assigned microbe, including conditions, duration of infection, complications, and predisposing factors.

    (Up to 10 points)

    The student has partially described the infectious disease caused by the assigned microbe.

    (Up to 7 points)

    The student has insufficiently described the infectious disease caused by the assigned microbe.

    (Up to 3 points)

    Component not included or assignment was not submitted.

    (0 points)

    Interaction between Microbe and Host Immune System

    CSLO 5

    All aspects concerning the interactions between the microbe and the human innate and adaptive immune systems were fully addressed. (All items or terms that are listed are described or explained in a very complete manner).

    (Up to 10 points)

    Some aspects concerning the interactions between the microbe and the human host were addressed. (At least one item was missing or not substantially addressed).

    (Up to 7 points)

    Few aspects concerning the interactions between the microbe and the human host were addressed. (Items or terms were listed with very little description or explanation).

    (Up to 3 points)

    Component not included or assignment was not submitted.

    (0 points)

    Principles of Epidemiology

    CSLO 6

    All aspects concerning the epidemiology of the assigned microbe between hosts were fully addressed. (This includes prevalence, incidence, transmission, and, if applicable, reportable disease) (Up to 10 points)

    Some aspects concerning the epidemiology of the assigned microbe between hosts were addressed. (At least one item was missing or not substantially addressed).

    (Up to 7 points)

    Few aspects concerning the epidemiology of the assigned microbe between hosts were addressed.

    (Up to 3 points)

    Component not included or assignment was not submitted.

    (0 points)

    Treatment and Clinical Relevance

    CSLO 8

    All aspects concerning the chemotherapeutic options, treatment mode of action, and multidrug resistance (if applicable) for the assigned microbe were fully addressed.

    (Up to 10 points)

    Some aspects concerning the chemotherapeutic options, treatment mode of action, and multidrug resistance for the assigned microbe were addressed. (At least one item was missing or not substantially addressed).

    (Up to 7 points)

    Few aspects concerning the chemotherapeutic options, treatment mode of action, and multidrug resistance for the assigned microbe were addressed.

    (Up to 3 points)

    Component not included or assignment was not submitted.

    (0 points)

    Prevention and Clinical Relevance

    CSLO 1

    All aspects concerning the prevention and clinical relevance (including infectious disease control, patient education, and public health reporting) of the assigned microbe were fully addressed.

    (Up to 10 points)

    Some aspects concerning the prevention and clinical relevance of the assigned microbe were addressed. (At least one item was missing or not substantially addressed).

    (Up to 7 points)

    Few aspects concerning the prevention and clinical relevance of the assigned microbe were addressed

    (Up to 3 points)

    Component not included or assignment was not submitted.

    (0 points)

    Scientific Literacy

    GEC 6

    Student can accurately interpret and communicate information using scientific vocabulary, in their own words, using written and/or graphical means consistently throughout the assignment.

    (Up to 20 points)

    Student can accurately interpret and communicate information using scientific vocabulary using written and graphical means mostly throughout the assignment.

    (Up to 15 points)

    Student showed some clear misunderstandings or inaccurate interpretation and communication or the scientific vocabulary. Significant deficiencies were noted in at least one section.

    (Up to 10 points)

    Student did not accurately interpret and communicate information using scientific vocabulary using written and/or graphical means throughout the assignment, or student used excessive quotes.

    (Up to 5 points)

    Component not included or assignment was not submitted.

    (0 points)

    Overall Presentation

    Overall presentation is 100% complete, orderly, and demonstrates scholarly achievement including APA format, proper scientific nomenclature, proper grammar, and punctuation.

    (Up to 10 points)

    Overall presentation is mostly complete and orderly but is missing scholarly achievement in one of the following: APA format, proper scientific nomenclature, proper grammar, or punctuation.

    (Up to 7 points)

    Overall presentation is missing scholarly achievement in two or more of the following: APA format, proper scientific nomenclature, proper grammar, or punctuation.

    (Up to 4 points)

    Component not included or assignment was not submitted.

    (0 points)

    References

    At least 4 sources have been referenced and references are from scholarly sources. Relevant in-text citations are present in each section.

    (Up to 10 points)

    At least 3 sources have been referenced and references are from scholarly sources. In-text citations are missing from at least one section.

    (Up to 7 points)

    Insufficient number of sources were referenced, in-text citations are missing in more than one section, or references are from inappropriate sources.

    (Up to 4 points)

    Component not included or assignment was not submitted.

    (0 points)

    Requirements:

  • Writing Question

    need an assignment done

    Requirements: 1 page

  • Womens lived experiences of burnout in achieving society

    ## Chapter 2 Literature Review **Title:** *Im Just a Girl: Womens Lived Experiences of Burnout in Achieving Society* **Length:** 2530 full double-spaced pages (8,0009,500 words) **Format:** APA 7th edition **Sources:** 4060 peer-reviewed journal articles (20212026 preferred; none before 2016 unless foundational theory) **Methodology Context:** Qualitative phenomenological study; semi-structured interviews with 10 women; thematic coding — # NON-NEGOTIABLE STANDARDS * Doctoral-level critical synthesis (not article summaries). * No study-by-study listing. * Organize by themes, not authors. * Demonstrate contradictions and debates in literature. * Identify methodological gaps. * Explicitly build toward the research gap from Chapter 1. * Strong transitions between sections. * No bullet points in final draft. * Avoid fluff and repetitive burnout definitions. — # REQUIRED STRUCTURE — ## 1. Introduction to the Literature Review (23 pages) This section must: * Restate the purpose of the study. * Briefly restate the problem. * Explain how the literature review is organized. * Clarify inclusion criteria (peer-reviewed, 20212026 priority). * Establish the conceptual flow of the chapter. End with a roadmap of themes. — ## 2. Theoretical Framework Foundations (45 pages) Deeply analyze: ### A. Job DemandsResources (JD-R) Model * Origins and major scholars. * How JD-R conceptualizes burnout. * Strengths and critiques. * Application in women-focused research. ### B. Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory * Core assumptions. * Resource loss cycles. * Empirical applications to gendered stress. ### C. Gender Role Theory / Feminist Standpoint Theory * Socialization of achievement. * Emotional labor expectations. * Gendered performance standards. * Intersectional considerations. Requirements: * Compare and contrast theories. * Identify theoretical blind spots. * Explain why integration is necessary. * Show how these theories guide interpretation of lived experience. This section must be analytical, not descriptive. — ## 3. Burnout in Contemporary Research (56 pages) Synthesize research on: * Burnout prevalence across industries. * Gender disparities in burnout. * Emotional exhaustion vs. depersonalization. * Post-pandemic workplace intensification. * Psychological toll of constant productivity. Include: * Statistical trends. * Debates about burnout measurement (MBI vs newer tools). * Critiques of overly quantitative burnout research. End by noting lack of phenomenological depth. — ## 4. Women, Achievement, and Hustle Culture (56 pages) This is where your originality lives. Synthesize research on: * Achievement identity formation. * Internalized productivity norms. * Social media and performative success. * Superwoman schema. * Work-family role conflict. * Neoliberal self-optimization culture. Requirements: * Show how achievement is gendered. * Identify how productivity culture uniquely impacts women. * Highlight contradictions in empowerment narratives. * Critically analyze having it all discourse. — ## 5. Emotional Labor and Invisible Labor (34 pages) Examine: * Emotional regulation in professional settings. * Caretaking expectations. * Invisible cognitive load. * Organizational expectations of warmth and competence. Connect directly to burnout development. — ## 6. Soft Life Ideology as Cultural Resistance (34 pages) Explore: * Emerging scholarship on soft life. * Rest as resistance frameworks. * Black feminist rest theory (if applicable). * Boundary setting and intentional withdrawal from hustle culture. Critically analyze: * Is soft life coping or transformation? * Is it privilege-dependent? * How does it intersect with burnout recovery? This section should demonstrate conceptual sophistication. — ## 7. Methodological Gaps in Existing Research (23 pages) This section is crucial. Identify: * Overreliance on survey instruments. * Lack of phenomenological studies. * Limited narrative research centering womens voices. * Underexplored cultural discourse around achievement. * Lack of integration between burnout theory and gender theory. Explicitly articulate what is missing. — ## 8. Summary and Synthesis of the Literature (23 pages) This is not a recap. This section must: * Synthesize across all themes. * Reinforce contradictions. * Highlight unresolved tensions. * Clearly articulate the research gap. * Transition directly into your study. End with a strong statement positioning your qualitative study as necessary. — # SOURCE REQUIREMENTS * 4060 peer-reviewed sources. * At least 70% from 20212026. * High-quality journals preferred (organizational psychology, leadership, gender studies, sociology, higher education). * Include foundational theory sources where necessary. * APA 7 formatting required. * Full reference list required. — # WRITING EXPECTATIONS * Demonstrate synthesis, not summary. * Avoid repetitive phrasing. * Build logical argument progression. * Use strong topic sentences. * Avoid excessive direct quotes. * Maintain cohesive academic tone. — # ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTION TO WRITER The literature review must clearly build toward the central gap: There is insufficient qualitative phenomenological research exploring how women interpret and narrate their lived experiences of burnout within the sociocultural framework of achieving society. The final section must logically justify the necessity of this study.

  • Child welfare

    The two theories to be used for essay are Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) and Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT)

    also please thoroughly explain each style

    *Please No AI or Plagiarism

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): instructions.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Managing and Mitigating Risks in AI Integration

    This is a 6pg report. Instructions will be in the files I have provided.

  • Health & Medical Question

    This assignment provides students with an opportunity to synthesize and reflect on leadership experiences encountered during the terminal clinical rotation. Students will critically analyze a real clinical leadership situation, examining their role, leadership behaviors, decision-making processes, and professional growth as they transition toward entry-level registered nurse practice. Emphasis is placed on transformational leadership, critical thinking, professional communication, and alignment with ethical, legal, and quality standards in complex healthcare environments.

    As a terminal clinical assignment, this reflection is intended to demonstrate readiness for practice by integrating leadership principles with real-world clinical application and self-assessment.

    Learning Objectives

    • Analyze a clinical leadership experience using principles of transformational leadership and interdisciplinary collaboration.
    • Evaluate personal leadership behaviors and decision-making in relation to patient safety, quality outcomes, and professional standards.
    • Reflect critically on professional growth, identifying strengths and areas for continued development as an entry-level registered nurse.
    • Communicate professionally using clear organization, scholarly support, and APA 7th edition formatting.

    Assignment Guidelines

    Required Sections

    1. Introduction

    • State the purpose of the paper.
    • Identify the clinical setting and leadership context of the experience.

    2. Description of the Leadership Experience

    • Describe a specific leadership situation observed and/or participated in during clinical.
    • Include relevant details such as:
      • Your role and responsibilities
      • The patient care or unit context
      • Members of the healthcare team involved

    3. Application of Leadership Principles

    • Identify leadership behaviors demonstrated or observed.
    • Apply transformational leadership concepts (e.g., communication, delegation, advocacy, collaboration, decision-making).
    • Explain how these leadership actions influenced patient care, team function, or outcomes.

    4. Critical Reflection and Professional Growth

    • Reflect on what you learned from the experience.
    • Address the following:
      • What went well
      • What you would do differently
      • How the experience influenced your development as a future registered nurse

    5. Conclusion

    • Summarize key insights from the experience.
    • Reaffirm how this leadership experience contributed to your readiness for entry-level practice.

    Formatting and Submission Requirements

    • Length: 2-3 pages excluding title and reference pages
    • Format: APA 7th edition
    • Minimum of one (1) peer-reviewed reference

    Requirements: 2-3 page

  • Msn 563 Assignment – Reflection in Action Paper

    Assignment Prompt The purpose of Reflection-in-Action is to reflect upon what one has learned or how one has performed as compared with one’s expectations or goals. This assignment will provide an opportunity for students to share their experiences, thoughts, feelings and learning moments from this course. Self understanding through reflection on life experiences, feelings, etc., is a core concept in Dr. Jean Watsons Theory of Human Caring. The Reflection for this course must address at least three (3) of the following topics: Learning moments or activities from this course Thoughts on evidence-based practice Evidence supporting Jean Watsons Theory of Human Caring Ethics in research Protecting human subjects in quality improvement or evidence-based practice projects Understanding or comfort level with statistics in nursing research and other research reports Perception of MSN graduates role in nursing research Creating and sustaining an Evidence-Based nursing environment Asking compelling, clinical questions Lessons learned while conducting evidence-based literature review Expectations Due: Monday, 11:59 pm PT Length: A minimum of two and maximum of four pages (excluding the title and reference pages). Submissions not meeting the minimum and maximum page requirements will receive a grade of zero. Format: Formal paper, APA 7th ed format for body of paper and all citations

  • signal and systems

    7 questions

    Requirements: answer the questions

  • introduction to sociology

    Touchstone 1: Developing a Research Plan

    SCENARIO: Imagine that you work for a nonprofit organization that is focused on increasing diversity in community groups in your area. Your supervisor asks you to develop a sociological study concerning topics of diversity and collaboration in a specific community group of your choice. Eventually, you will prepare to share your research with colleagues.

    ASSIGNMENT: For Touchstone 1, you will begin by formulating a question about diversity in a community group that you have access to. Then you will use the steps of the scientific method to prepare a research plan, including a bibliography for a literature review. As you learned, sociologists follow the scientific method so that their results are both scientifically valid and useful to the greater sociological community. A literature review allows researchers to learn from completed studies and to build upon their conclusions.

    hint

    For Touchstone 3 which will be completed later in Unit 3, you must incorporate your selected community group and research question from Touchstone 1 to conduct a literature review and develop your hypothesis and research plan.
    Use the following Touchstone 1 template to fill in your research plan as you develop it. When you have finished, submit this template to move on to the next unit. You may also download an example of a completed touchstone.

    download

    Helpful Links:

    A. Directions

    Step 1: Pick a Topic

    Select a community group to study. Some examples of community groups you might explore include:

    • An activity-based group like a book club, a soccer team, or a community choir
    • A religious or ideological community such as a church congregation or a local political party
    • A community organization like a Parent Teacher Association (PTA), a neighborhood association, or the volunteer committee at a local soup kitchen
    • An identity-based organization such as a social club for veterans or a fraternal type organization

    It should be a group in which membership is voluntary and recreational.

    Avoid the following:

    • Families
    • Workplaces
    • Ethnic or racial categories
    • Friend groups

    You might wish to choose a group that you are a part of, or you might not. You can use your personal experience with the group to form the basis of your research question. Or you can ask members of the group about their experiences, which will help you develop your research question.

    In the template, write a paragraph (approximately 6-8 sentences) describing the community group you have chosen. In particular, be sure to answer the following questions:

    • What is the community group?
    • What are the attributes or characteristics of this community group? (e.g. What activities does this group do together? What element of the members’ interests or identities brings them together? How is membership in the group defined, if at all?)
    • What kind of experience with or access to this community group do you have?

    hint

    You will use this same topic in Touchstone 3 when you present your research plan.

    Step 2: Ask a Question

    Next, you will formulate a question related to this group, and to topics related to diversity and/or collaboration. You might think about diversity in terms of race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, religion, socioeconomic status, or along multiple intersecting identities. Be sure to use what you learned in Unit 1 about the ways sociologists ask questions.

    Examples:

    • What are the challenges of a moms community organization in appealing to moms with children of different ages?
    • How does a group of car enthusiasts reach out to the surrounding community to get support for their events?
    • How has the Boy Scouts accepting girls impacted their mission and programs?
    • Do gender segregated sports teams for kids help maintain traditional gender roles?

    In the template, write the question you have formulated for your study. Be sure to identify the Independent and Dependent variables and identify them correctly. (HINT: Refer back to and for help.)

    Step 3: Prepare a Bibliography

    Finally, you will begin developing a bibliography for a review of the existing literature that relates to your question. Before conducting a full literature review, a sociologist will build a bibliography, or a list of potential sources that they will read and study in greater depth in the review.

    Collect 4-6 articles, books, or other resources that relate to your question and list them in your template. You dont have to look into these materials in depth right now! Youll review this literature more closely in Touchstone 3, and you will also be exposed to additional relevant research and frameworks in Unit 3. Youll also be able to add to or amend your bibliography before you submit Touchstone 3 in Unit 3.

    Attributes of good readings for your literature review:

    • They are academic, scholarly works about research findings or they are reliable journalistic reporting based on scientifically credible and reliable data.
    • They should have been published in the last 10 yearsunless they are a landmark work on the topic and provide important background or as a comparison.
    • They look at different sides of the argument and a variety of perspectives.
    • They do not have to be written by sociologists or published in sociology journals, but they should be academic and not popular works.

    Where to find readings:
    More than likely you will use a major search engine like Google Scholar. Start your search by identifying key search terms related to your research question, to generate relevant results. specifically searches scholarly literature. However, keep in mind that much of this literature may have limited or paid access. Another good place to search is in a public library or university library catalog or database. You might also want to try regular Google, but you will have to be careful to screen your results and make sure you only select academic sources. Whichever way you choose to search, make sure that you are selecting credible sources.

    What makes a source credible?
    Credible sources are written by authors who are well known in their field. They are based on scientific datanot opinions or with biased observations. Sources should be from reliable outlets, like major publishers, universities, think tanks, and credentialed current practitioners. (HINT: Refer back to for more guidance.)

    How to format sources in your bibliography:
    Sociologists use American Psychological Association (APA) format for their research. However, you will use a more simplified method to format sources for your bibliography. You will include five key elements for each source, with each element separated by a period:

    • Authors name(s)
    • Publisher and publication date
    • Title of the source, in quotation marks
    • Page numbers (if applicable)
    • Source’s location for web-based texts (URL)

    EXAMPLE

    Alireza Behtoui. Journal of Sociology, 2015. “Beyond social ties: The impact of social capital on labour market outcomes for young Swedish people.” p. 711-724.

    Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

    1. Identify Community Group
    Have you identified and described a voluntary, recreational community group?
    Have you provided group attributes/characteristics of this group?
    Have you discussed your experience with or access to this group?

    2. Research Question
    Have you selected a research question that is sufficiently specific to be researchable while tying in to broader themes in sociology?
    Have you clearly identified independent and dependent variables?
    Are your independent and dependent variables in the correct relationship?

    3. Bibliography
    Have you provided 4-6 credible, relevant, recent, and properly cited sources?
    Did you properly format these sources and include the five key elements for each source, with each element separated by a period:

    • Authors name(s)
    • Publisher and publication date
    • Title of the source, in quotation marks
    • Page numbers (if applicable)
    • Source’s location for web-based texts (URL)

    4. Conventions
    Have you proofread your essay for grammatical and mechanical errors?
    Have you used spell check or another method to check spelling?

    5. Before You Submit
    Have you included your name and date at the top left of the page?

    Requirements: what it ask

  • Writing Question

    Research Paper Guidelines:
    Choose a disease process

    1. Paper should be two full pages in content length. It should be typed and double-spaced. Each paragraph must have 5 complete sentences.
    2. Paper should have a cover sheet that includes name, course title, instructor, paper title, and date.
    3. Page numbers should be inserted on each page at the top right-hand corner.
    4. Any reference used should be cited on the Reference page.
    5. The Reference page should be a separate page that lists all of your sources from which you retrieved your information. You must have at least two sources; please exclude your textbook. In listing your references, anyone should be able to find the information you are referring to simply by using your listed reference information, regardless of the type of content (eg. internet, journal article, book, etc.).
    6. References should be listed on the reference page in alphabetical order by author’s last name.
    7. I will not require an in-text citation for this paper, as this is a learning tool for the world of paper writing.
    8. Font should be 12-point Times New Roman.
    9. Paper should be uploaded to Canvas. Please submit early to get feedback on your paper from the Student Success Center.
    10. word count 500
    11. Citation: At least 2 citations in correct format

    Requirements: