Category: uncategorised

  • Summarize and Respond to Research

    What You Will Learn: In this Touchstone, you will practice your critical reading skills by summarizing and responding to the source you found in Touchstone 1.1. You will deepen your ability to engage with scholarly or credible information, build your analytical thinking, and prepare for future academic writing (including your final paper for this course).

    Why It Matters: Learning to carefully summarize and thoughtfully respond to sources is critical for academic and real-world success. Whether you’re supporting a business plan, drafting a research paper, or making personal decisions, being able to accurately understand and critically evaluate information helps you communicate more effectively and make stronger arguments.

    What You Will Hand In: A 23-page paper that provides a detailed summary of the source’s argument. You’ll also respond to that argument with your own thoughts based on the source, including examples from the source (quotes or paraphrases of specific lines). See Step 2 for more details.

    Keys to Success:

    • Develop and submit your own original work.
    • Read your source a few times and take notes using the SQ3R strategy you learned.
    • Summarize the key arguments of the source.
    • Provide your analysis and reflections based on the source.

    Helpful Links:

    Instructions

    Step 1: Read and Process Your Source

    Your source should offer clear, trustworthy information that helps you understand your topic more deeply. Using SQ3R helps you stay engaged, remember more, and prepare for future assignments where youll build on your research. To read your source critically and effectively, use the SQ3R method, which stands for:

    • Survey: Skim the source to get a general idea of its structure and content. Look at headings, subheadings, visuals, and the introduction and conclusion.
    • Question: Turn headings and key points into questions. What do you want to learn? What does the title make you curious about?
    • Read: Read the source carefully to find answers to your questions. Take notes as you go.
    • Recite: Summarize key points in your own words. Try saying them out loud or jotting them down without looking back.
    • Review: Revisit your notes and the source. What were the most important ideas? How do they help you understand your topic?

    You should also review the tutorials that introduce how to think about and understand what you read: , , , .

    Step 2: Write a Summary and Response of the Article (23 pages)

    Your essay should include three parts:

    • Summary: What is the authors main point? What question(s) are the author(s) trying to answer, and what are their findings? What is the central argument? What kind of evidence supports their claims? Is there a place where you noted a strong argument or one that could be better developed?
    • Analysis: Write a short analysis of the article. Is the argument well-reasoned and supported by evidence? Do you notice any biases or assumptions? What is your response to the ideas in the article? You can agree, disagree, extend, or question ideas in the source.
    • Usefulness: Evaluate how well the source would support a student research project. How can this source contribute to a future essay that you might write? Do you have further questions, including ones for future research? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counterclaim)?

    Step 3: Review and Submit

    • Review the rubric to confirm that you have met all the requirements of the Touchstone. Once you are happy with it, you can submit it as a Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) file. Your submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your assignment.
  • Power point

    How do historians learn about the past? Are they psychic? Are they geniuses? Are they time travelers? In addition to the historical content you’re learning this week by reading your textbook, we’re also learning about how historians do history. This means how historians interpret the past and create a historical interpretation of the past based on primary and secondary sources. DIRECTIONS After watching and reading the sources below, scroll down to see the questions and then reply with your answers. Watch – Historical Sources – How to History (5-minute watch) Read – UMB – Primary & Secondary Sources Watch – Josie Smith – What Does a Historian Do? (6-minute watch) ASSIGNMENT Create an infographic or slide (Canva, Google, PowerPoint) demonstrating what you learned from the three videos above. Make sure to: Include an image of 1 (one) primary source found in this week’s assigned reading. You don’t need to analyze or identify it. Just demonstrate that you know what a primary source is by sourcing one from the textbook. Provide citations from each of the required videos above. Create a stand-alone image. This means your product should clearly and specifically explain what you learned, without you having to explain it. Upload your file as an attachment only. No links. Google Slides should be saved as PDFs and submitted as attachments, not links. Questions? Reach out in the Pronto main chat so that everyone can benefit from the answer.
  • help me to to edit my work.

    MAKE SURE ALL YOUR WORDS ARE WRITTEN BY YOU. to pass the AI test.

    i need everything to fit in 5 pages (excluding cover page and references)

    and try to put some reference.

    you need to read files first.

    and make sure my paper has all reairments.

    • Answers to all questions (Q1Q4)
    • Business interpretation
    • Tables and figures
    • No more than 5 pages (excluding cover page and references)
    • No code in this document.

    https://www.sec.gov/search-filings/standard-industrial-classification-sic-code-list

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Module 1 Assignment copy.docx, Copy of Module 1 Assignment_ Corporate Risk Narratives in Form 10-Kipynb – Colab.pdf, Module 1 Assignment_ Corporate Risk Narratives in Form 10-K AD 698 Applied Generative AI Business Analytics.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Being an Effective Manager

    References are mandatory. Provide a list of references either at the end of your work or in-paragraph reference format. Please use proper reference citations. 4-5 references for the discussions. please follow APA guidelines. Below I provided a few sources.

    What do you believe constitutes “career derailment”? Please provide examples of situations that may lead to a setback in one’s career trajectory.

    How can personal choices or other factors contriute to thee situations?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Keep a Promising Career on Track amp Prevent Derailment from Center for Creative Leadership.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Promoting and Implementation of EBP Paper

    Week 7 Assignment: Promoting and Implementation of EBP Paper

    Submission Type:

    Two to three page paper

    Details:

    1. Selecting EBP Model for your EBP Question
    2. Select one of the common EBP models that you think it best fits your PICOT question and then explain/justify your selection considering the following:
    • The clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization
    • The diagrammatic representation of the model and the ability to assimilate the concepts and organizes the step of the desired EBP changes
    • The comprehensiveness of the model from the beginning stages to implementation and evaluation of outcomes
    • The easiness of the use when concepts are applied to direct EBP changes and practice issues in clinical settings
    • The flexibility of the model to be applied to various populations of patients, EBP projects, initiatives, and programs
    • The use and popularity of the model in the published literature
    1. This assignment should be no more than 2-3 pages (not including the title or references pages).
    2. Common EBP Models:
    3. The Stetler Model of Evidence-Based Practice
    4. The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to promote quality care
    5. The Model for Evidence-Based Practice Change
    6. The Advancing Research and Clinical practice through close Collaboration (ARCC) model for implementation and sustainability of EBP
    7. The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework
    8. The Clinical Scholar model
    9. The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice model
    10. The ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation

    See the rubric for specific grading criteria.

    Rubric

    Week 7 Selecting EBP Model for your EBP Question Rubric

    Week 7 Selecting EBP Model for your EBP Question Rubric

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    The selected model

    5 pts

    Meets expectations

    Selects one of the EBP common models

    0 pts

    Does Not Meet Expectations

    Selects uncommon model, or does not select any model

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Models clarity and conciseness

    15 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    Proficiently analyzes the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and addresses in details how they can support answering their PICOT question

    12 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Analyzes the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and addresses with some details how they can support answering their PICOT question

    9 pts

    Approaches Expectations

    Describes the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and partially addresses how it relates to their PICOT question

    3 pts

    Does Not Meet Expectations

    Inadequately addresses the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization or does not relate them to their PICOT question

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Models diagrammatic representation

    12 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    Thoroughly evaluates the model’s diagram, addressing how it enhances understanding and applies to the PICOT question, while discussing its clarity, comprehensiveness, and relevance for clinical practice or evidence-based implementation.

    10 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Describes the diagram, noting its basic features and its connection to the PICOT question, though lacking deep analysis of how the diagram enhances understanding.

    8 pts

    Approaches Expectations

    The diagram is mentioned, but the description is vague or lacks connection to the PICOT question.

    4 pts

    Does Not Meet Expectations

    Fails to provide a meaningful evaluation of the diagram or its relevance to the PICOT question.

    12 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Models comprehensiveness

    12 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    Evaluates how well the model addresses all aspects of the PICOT question (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, time) and explains its broad, holistic approach to solving the clinical problem.

    10 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Assesses how well the model addresses most aspects of the PICOT question, though some elements may not be fully covered.

    8 pts

    Approaches Expectations

    Provides limited analysis of how the model covers the PICOT question, with a focus on only a few elements.

    4 pts

    Does Not Meet Expectations

    Does not adequately discuss how the model applies to or addresses the PICOT question.

    12 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Models easiness

    12 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    Thoroughly assesses the ease of understanding and applying the model in clinical practice. Considers factors such as simplicity, user-friendliness, and accessibility for healthcare professionals.

    10 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Discusses how easy or difficult the model is to understand and implement but lacks sufficient details regarding its ease of use in clinical settings.

    8 pts

    Approaches Expectations

    Provides minimal or unclear evaluation regarding the ease of applying the model.

    4 pts

    Does Not Meet Expectations

    Does not address the ease of understanding or applying the model.

    12 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Models flexibility

    12 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    Examines the models adaptability across various clinical settings or populations. Describes how the model can be modified or applied to different situations and still maintain its effectiveness.

    10 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Notes that the model may be flexible but does not explain in detail how it can be applied in diverse settings or populations.

    8 pts

    Approaches Expectations

    Describes limited flexibility or applies it only to a specific scenario without considering broader applications.

    4 pts

    Does Not Meet Expectations

    Does not discuss the flexibility of the model.

    12 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Models use and popularity

    12 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    Provides a detailed evaluation of the models current use in practice and its popularity among healthcare professionals. References evidence of its widespread adoption or endorsement in research or clinical settings.

    10 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Mentions the models use in practice but lacks substantial evidence or discussion of its popularity or widespread use.

    8 pts

    Approaches Expectations

    Briefly addresses the use of the model but lacks depth in discussing its popularity or application in practice.

    4 pts

    Does Not Meet Expectations

    Fails to provide any meaningful discussion on the models use or popularity.

    12 pts

    Total Points: 80

  • NURS 6030 Population Health Human Diversity and Social Issue…

    Module 4 Discussion: Strategies to Address Population Health: Structural and Institutional Change

    Societal and institutional structures influence the health of populations. Based on this module’s readings, external resources and your own insights, please discuss:

    • Please identify a conceptual framing made in the assigned reading regarding the role of structural determinants of health. Does this represent a new perspective or claim to you or not? Do you agree or disagree with this conceptual framing and related claims? Why? Please substantiate. (1 para)
    • Please give a real or hypothetical example that illustrates the impact of a structural determinant on health outcomes. (1 para)
    • How do you see the role of nursing in relationship to addressing structural determinants of health (please include a reflection on the role of policy change related actions)? What is the potential? Are there risks or downsides? (1 para)
    • What do you think are the barriers and facilitators to fuller nursing involvement in addressing structural determinants of health (policy change and otherwise)? (1 para)

    Requirements: 1- 3 pages

  • Childhood obesity

    Your replied response should not exceed 200-250 words; and you are strongly encouraged to incorporate scholarly sources to support your thoughts and ideas, using in-text or narrative citations along with a references list

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): christina king.pdf, shannee.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Nursing

    Sampling, Ethical Conduct, and Data Collection Instructions: In this assignment you are asked to design and appraise the following components of your hypothetical quantitative research study: Sampling Plan: Sampling methodology Study site Study population Recruitment process Ethical considerations of sampling Data Collection Plan: Identification of data needs Selecting types of measures-valid and reliable tool Ethical consideration of data collection Detailed process Implementation Plan for Data Collection: Selecting Research Personnel Training Data Collectors Implementation Plan for Evidence-Based Intervention Projects Detailed description of your implementation phase of the project Indicate all stakeholders to be impacted by the intervention Discuss how you will ensure buy-in from the stakeholders OR Implementation Plan for Cause/Effect Correlational Projects Detailed description of your implementation phase of the project Indicate all stakeholders to be impacted by the project Discuss how you will ensure buy-in from the stakeholders Your paper should be 4-6 pages in length, not including the reference list and title page. Additional Instructions: 1. All submissions should have a title page and reference page. 2. Utilize a minimum of five scholarly resources. 3. Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria. 4. Adhere to APA compliance guidelines. Topic to based of medical field or preferably nursing.

  • Business Case

    The only portion of this assignment that I’m responsible for is the portion: Analysis of the people needed for your project

    Be sure to identify your stakeholders, beneficiaries and subject-matter

    experts. Who fits each of these categories within your organization and

    why?

    Include who has influence in the decision-making process and who might

    be a project champion. Be sure to include the objectives and strategic

    priorities of these individuals and how your projects aligns with those

    objectives and priorities.

    Discuss who might be on your cross-functional team for implementation

    and why.

    Tables might be a good way to present this information.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Business Case IdeaTeam 6 (2).docx, HAPPI_KidsTown_Pediatrics_Business_Case_Abstract.pdf, HA620 Health Care Financial Management Business Case Project Description as PDF-1.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 6 MGT350

    For this assignment, which supports the final in module 8, provide a profile of the target company you are using throughout this course. Articulate at least three long-term company goals. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the companys strategies and policies. Are the companys strategies and policies ethical, and sustainable, and do they demonstrate good corporate social responsibility given the companys long-term goals? Why or why not?

    Your paper should be 5-6 pages in length and align with APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (link available in the left-hand navigation panel). Include at least 2 credible references including the course textbook. The CSU Global Library is a good place to find these references (link available in the left-hand navigation panel).

    Rubric

    MGT350_M06_PM

    MGT350_M06_PM

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Requirements

    10 to >8.0 pts

    Meets Expectation

    Includes all the required components as specified in the assignment.

    8 to >6.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation

    Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

    6 to >4.0 pts

    Below Expectation

    Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

    4 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence

    Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Content

    10 to >8.0 pts

    Meets Expectation

    Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of a company’s long-term strategy for growth; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

    8 to >6.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation

    Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

    6 to >4.0 pts

    Below Expectation

    Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

    4 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence

    Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Critical Analysis

    20 to >16.0 pts

    Meets Expectation

    CLO5: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of an organizations policies and strategies.

    16 to >12.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation

    Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

    12 to >8.0 pts

    Below Expectation

    Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

    8 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence

    Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Sources / Examples

    5 to >4.0 pts

    Meets Expectation

    Cites and integrates at least three credible sources as specified in description. Sources meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

    4 to >3.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation

    Cites and integrates two credible sources as specified in description. Sources meet required criteria but are lessthan adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

    3 to >2.0 pts

    Below Expectation

    Cites and integrates one credible source as specified in description. Source is poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

    2 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence

    Cites and integrates no credible sources. Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style || Demonstrates proper use of APA style

    5 to >4.0 pts

    Meets Expectation

    Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar, spelling and APA formatting.

    4 to >3.0 pts

    Approaches Expectation

    Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar, spelling and APA formatting.

    3 to >2.0 pts

    Below Expectation

    Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar, spelling and APA formatting.

    2 to >0 pts

    Limited Evidence

    Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling and APA formatting.

    5 pts