Category: uncategorised

  • Annotated Bib

    his bibliography must include 4+ print sources.

    These are sources that you have come across in preliminary research related to the development of your essay 1 thesis outline.

    These may or may not be sources you eventually incorporate into the final draft of the essay/thesis outline.

    Avoid reference sources such as “top 10/best of…” articles, encyclopedias, Wikipedia, Quotes.com, or Quora.

    If your source does not have an author or the title is a question (“What is…? How does ____ work?”), the source may be reference.

    Be sure you are clear on how to identify reference sources vs general periodical sources.

    The instructor will take notice of bibliographies that include these type of sources in grading.

    Check the following instructional video on reference sources if you are unclear:

    Annotations in this assignment must be 1 complete paragraph (4+ sentences) that describes the source (subject, author, publication), briefly explains if this source is relevant or useful in relation to your essay or outline, and why each source is relevant or useful or not.

    Be sure you are completing annotations properly.

    Citations must follow MLA and be arranged properly (alphabetical order? indentation?).

    Be sure you are clear on the difference between an annotated bibliography and a works cited list.

    Check the following instructional video if you are unclear on how to develop annotated bibliographies (MLA):

    The instructor has provided links/resources on the development of annotated bibliographies in the unit.

    Punctuation and format matters in annotated bibliographies so check these carefully as you develop and revise.

    Students who complete poor annotated bibliographies may be asked to revise by the instructor.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): anno bib.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Analysis: Prisoner Re-Entry and Restorative Justice Assignme…

    NO AI

    Assignment instructions, template, and rubric are attached in the file section

    Abstract should be 150 words only

    Please use the martison what works report attached in the file section as well

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Analysis Prisoner Re-Entry and Restorative Justice Template (1).docx, Analysis Prisoner Re-Entry and Restorative Justice Assignment Instructions (1).docx, What_Works-Questions_and_Answ (1).pdf, Analysis Grading Rubric.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Emotional Intelligence Assignment

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/shij42rcxsm8yzy57u91x/Recording-2025-05-21-113037.mp4?rlkey=cewhftmynk55qvzpjdp1uodfg&st=hdufv53y&dl=0

    The link attached is the video mentioned in the assignment below.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Emotional Intelligence Assignment.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Management Question

    Instructions: The assignment for this chapter provides you some autonomy and flexibility. Convey what you have learned about communicating effectively with employees however you see fit (write your responses, record audio, create slides,…your choice). Please use CHAPTER 9 in the textbook as well as scholarly outside sources.

    Here are the learning objectives provided in the textbook. Whatever you do, be sure to address each learning objective.

    9.1 Communication Strategies

    1. Explain the concept of emotional intelligence.
    2. Describe the four types of communication in the workplace.
    3. Explain the various communication styles and identify your own style.
    4. Define nonverbal communication and describe the importance of it in an HR setting.

    9.2 Management Styles

    1. Define the various types of management styles.
    2. Explain how we can determine which style to use in a variety of situations.

    Requirements: ~4 pages

  • Brand Development Proposal

    You will assume the role of a branding consultant who has been invited to pitch for a
    brand development project. The goal of CW1 is to prepare a brand development
    proposal in response to a request for proposal (RFPs). You have the option to
    choose between 1 of 4 RFP

    Requirements: 2000 words

  • 5-1: Module Five Assignment One

    CJ 120 Module Five Assignment One Guidelines and Rubric

    Overview

    In this assignment, you will look at Lodens Wheel of Diversity factors and identify the pertinent information that frequently impacts interactions throughout the criminal justice system, specifically in relation to policing, courts, and corrections.

    Prompt

    In Modules Three and Four, you examined , which portrays the lens through which people process information and the assumptions it can lead to about others. These assumptions drive our own behaviors and can ultimately have a negative (or sometimes positive) impact on others. The wheel consists of five Diversity Dimensions: Personality, Internal, External, Organizational, and Era. Each dimension contains its own set of attributes or factors. While some factors are out of our control (e.g., internal dimension), others may change over time and are the basis for our decision making. Being able to identify these unique characteristics along with the specific dimension can help you gain a better understanding of the factors that influence our behaviors as well as the impact they have on interactions within the criminal justice system. This will also assist you as you consider individual biases in Project Two, which you will complete in Module Seven.

    In this assignment, include the following:

    Prevalent Factors

    First, review Lodens Wheel of Diversity.

    • Identify at least five factors you think would be most prevalent in influencing interactions within the criminal justice system.
    • Take careful note of which dimension each factor belongs to in order to determine whether or not it is within our control.

    Identify Quotes: Sharanda Jones Case

    Now that you have predicted which factors you think would be the most prevalent, you will need to identify quotes that provide evidence of each factor.

    • First, read the Sharanda Jones case and the supporting materials/resources associated with this case.
    • Reading:
    • This article explains details of the Sharanda Jones case.
    • Reading:
    • This article explains details of the Sharanda Jones case.
    • Next, using the Milestone Two Table Template document provided, identify at least three quotes (or specific information) from the case that connect to your identified Lodens Wheel factors.

    Additional Factors

    Look over Lodens Wheel again. What additional factors might influence interactions within the criminal justice system?

    • Identify at least three additional factors. Do not use the same factors you already identified.

    Identify Quotes: Sharanda Jones/Other

    • Identify quotes from the Sharanda Jones case or other course resources that connect to each of the Lodens Wheel factors you identified.
    • Note: You should have at least one quote (or specific information) to support each prevalent and additional factor you identified.

    Reflect

    Finally, consider the factors you chose and the quotes (or specific information) you found to support each factor. In one to two paragraphs, consider the following:

    • How easily did the quotes (or information) you found align to the factors you initially predicted?
    • Was it more difficult to find examples for certain factors? Why or why not?
    • Did you find multiple examples for any factors (even if you didnt include those examples in your table)?
    • Why do you think it might have been easier to find examples for certain factors?

    Specifically, the following rubric criteria must be addressed:

    1. Identify factors most prevalent in influencing interactions within the criminal justice system.
    2. Identify additional factors that might influence interactions within the criminal justice system.
    3. Identify quotes or specific information that connect to all Lodens Wheel factors you identified.
    4. Reflect on the connection between the factors and the quotes or information you found.

    What to Submit

    This assignment must be completed using the . All references should be cited in APA format. (For more information on APA style, review the .) Your reflection should be included in the same document in the reflection section.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): CJ 120 Module Five Assignment One Table Template.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • 5-2: Module Five Assignment Two

    CJ 120 Module Five Assignment Two Guidelines and Rubric

    Overview

    In this assignment, you will be able to describe different cultures views on criminal justice professionals and identify incidents of misunderstandings. You will also be able to explain the current professional practices as well as the best practices that can help create cultural sensitivity in criminal justice professionals.

    Prompt

    At the beginning of the term, you discussed Culture in Communication and the ways in which individual implicit bias and stereotyping can lead to negative interactions between law enforcement professionals and members of the community. You then developed your own diversity training to assist sworn officers in reducing these incidents. Understanding the need for cultural awareness and sensitivity in law enforcement can help bridge the gap as well as build trust between sworn professionals and the community. This will also assist you in completed Module Five Assignment One in this module.

    In Project One, you chose a civilian role. In Project Three, your success in the first project has been recognized, and you will be asked to provide a report to the Office of Accountability, which would like to hear your thoughts on other relevant issues.

    To help prepare you for this report, in this assignment you will focus on one culture or subculture and how its views of and past misunderstandings with criminal justice professionals might impact interactions between the groups. Choose a culture or subculture group other than your own that you would like to examine further. For each section below, provide the following:

    Views

    Summarize, in 150300 words, an example of each of the following:

    • Viewpoints your chosen culture or subculture group might have about criminal justice professionals
    • An explanation of why this group might hold those views

    Misunderstandings

    Provide an example of a misunderstanding this culture or subculture group has had with criminal justice professionals. You may wish to consider one of the following areas. (Hint: You will need to provide an example of each of these areas in Project Three, so you may want to choose one of them now.)

    • Language
    • Religion/Beliefs
    • Deafness
    • Illiteracy

    Professional Practices

    Next, explore each of the professional practices listed below. For each practice, in 50100 words, describe the practice and then bullet point some of the possible outcomes of instituting it. This will help prepare you to explore each of these practices and make recommendations to the Office of Accountability in Project Three. Refer to the document for expectations and formatting guidelines for this section of the assignment.

    • Understanding the public
    • Diversity training
    • Procedural justice
    • Police legitimacy
    • Diverse hiring practices

    Specifically, the following rubric criteria must be addressed:

    1. Explore the viewpoints of a culture or subculture group and why that group might hold those views.
    2. Provide an example of a misunderstanding between a culture or subculture group and criminal justice professionals.
    3. Describe professional practices and possible outcomes.

    What to Submit

    This assignment must be completed in written format. Any references must be cited in APA format. For more information on APA style, review the .

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): CJ 120 Professional Practices Example.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Applied Mathematics Question

    Main Research Question

    How do truncation errors, rounding errors, and conditioning collectively influence the stability of numerical algorithms, and under what theoretical conditions can an unstable algorithm still produce acceptable results?


    SECTION I: Foundations of Error Theory (Conceptual + Theoretical Demonstration)

    1. Truncation Error

    Students should:

    a) Define truncation error formally.
    b) Derive truncation error for at least one example:

    • Taylor series approximation
    • Finite difference derivative
    • Numerical integration formula

    c) Show how truncation error depends on step size hh.
    d) Prove the order of accuracy for the chosen method.

    Expected demonstration:
    Mathematical derivation using Taylor expansion and Big-O notation.


    2. Rounding Error

    Students should:

    a) Define floating-point representation and machine epsilon.
    b) Explain how rounding errors accumulate in iterative algorithms.
    c) Derive error bounds caused by floating-point arithmetic.
    d) Provide an example (e.g., subtraction of nearly equal numbers).

    Expected demonstration:
    Model floating-point arithmetic as:

    fl(x)=x(1+),??machinefl(x)=x(1+),??machine

    and propagate this through an algorithm.


    3. Conditioning of a Problem

    Students should:

    a) Define well-conditioned vs ill-conditioned problems.
    b) Define the condition number of a function and of a matrix.
    c) Derive the condition number for:

    • Scalar function f(x)f(x)
    • Linear system Ax=bAx=b

    d) Interpret geometrically what a large condition number implies.

    Expected demonstration:

    (A)=AA1(A)=AA1

    Show sensitivity of solution to perturbations.


    SECTION II: Stability of Algorithms

    4. Distinguish Conditioning vs Stability

    Students must:

    a) Explain why conditioning is a property of the problem.
    b) Explain why stability is a property of the algorithm.
    c) Provide examples where:

    • Well-conditioned problem + unstable algorithm
    • Ill-conditioned problem + stable algorithm

    Expected demonstration:
    Formal reasoning, possibly using linear systems.


    5. Forward and Backward Error Analysis

    Students should:

    a) Define forward error.
    b) Define backward error.
    c) Show how backward stability is used to assess algorithms.
    d) Demonstrate backward error analysis for:

    • Gaussian elimination
      OR
    • Newtons method

    Expected demonstration:
    Prove that computed solution solves a slightly perturbed problem.


    SECTION III: Interaction Between the Three Concepts

    6. Combined Error Model

    Students must:

    a) Construct a total error model:

    Total Error=Truncation Error+Rounding ErrorTotal Error=Truncation Error+Rounding Error

    b) Show how decreasing step size reduces truncation error but increases rounding error.
    c) Derive an expression for optimal step size balancing both errors.

    Expected demonstration:
    Minimize error expression using calculus.


    7. Case Study Analysis

    Students should analyze one algorithm (choose one):

    • Numerical differentiation
    • Gaussian elimination
    • Eulers method
    • Iterative solvers

    They must:

    a) Identify all three error sources.
    b) Analyze how they interact.
    c) Discuss stability implications.


    SECTION IV: When Can an Unstable Algorithm Still Work?

    This is the deeper theoretical part.

    Students must investigate:

    8. Theoretical Conditions for Acceptable Results

    They should analyze and justify:

    1. If the problem is very well-conditioned.
    2. If perturbations remain small relative to solution scale.
    3. If instability grows slowly (e.g., sub-exponentially).
    4. If input data is low-noise.
    5. If error cancellation occurs.
    6. If instability is dominated by truncation error.

    They must:

    a) Provide at least one mathematical example.
    b) Use error bounds to justify conclusions.
    c) Provide a counterexample where instability destroys accuracy.


    SECTION V: Critical Reflection

    Students should conclude by addressing:

    • Can a stable algorithm solve an ill-conditioned problem accurately?
    • Is backward stability sufficient for reliability?
    • How does finite precision arithmetic limit theoretical guarantees?

    Optional Grading Structure

    Section Weight
    Error Theory 20%
    Conditioning 15%
    Stability Analysis 20%
    Combined Error Modeling 20%
    Case Study 15%
    Critical Reflection 10%

    Requirements: 2000

  • Attack & Defense in Cyberspace

    This assignment is about building a secure network for a company with three offices (New York, Abu Dhabi, and London). You must create the network in Packet Tracer, configure static routing, and then set up Site-to-Site IPsec VPN tunnels between all offices. After that, you must test and verify that the VPN works and that traffic is encrypted. Finally, you write a report explaining your work and what you learned.

    Requirements: 0000

  • 5-2 Project Draft: Background and Deconstruction

    Module Five Project Draft Guidelines and Rubric

    Overview

    Your local community has decided to create a statue to commemorate an event. As part of this statue, a time capsule will be included, the contents of which will be opened in 50 years. You have been asked, as the community expert on the historical event related to this statue, to create a document that will be included as part of the time capsule that includes information about the event being commemorated. The people opening this time capsule in 50 years will then be able to reflect on your insight into the event as you have described it.

    In this assignment, you will draft a background and historical narrative for the paper. This draft will include the Background of the Topic and Deconstructing the Historical Narrative sections. This assignment is a continuation of the work that youve already submitted in the previous modules. Be certain to review your instructors comments on those assignments to ensure that you are incorporating that feedback as you move forward towards the completion of the project.

    The project consists of multiple draft assignments leading up to a final document. You will complete the following assignments:

    • Module Two Topic Proposal: You will revise your work on this proposal to form Part One (Introduction) of your project.
    • Module Three Collection of Sources: This assignment will inform multiple parts of your evaluation of sources for the project.
    • Module Four Discussion: This assignment will provide a summary of your chosen project topic.
    • Module Five Project Draft: You will revise your work on this draft to form Part Two (Background of the Topic) and Part Three (Deconstructing the Historical Narrative) of the project.
    • Module Six Discussion: You will describe your personal experience with your chosen topic.
    • Module Seven Project: You will submit your revised Parts One through Three along with Part Four (Changing the Narrative of History).

    You will use the Project Template linked in the Supporting Materials section below to complete all drafts and the final document.

    Directions

    Use Part Two and Part Three of the Project Template linked in the Supporting Materials section below to draft the background and historical narrative of the paper. Note that you must adhere to this template in order to be eligible for full credit.

    Specifically, you must address the following parts:

    Part Two: Background of the Topic

    In this section, you will examine the historical background of a particular narrative or discourse relevant to your topic, particularly voices or perspectives that have been overlooked or minimized. As you work on Part Two, keep in mind that your mission in the next section, Part Three, will be to deconstruct and critique the narrative.

    1. Types of Sources: Describe the types of sources that were used to create the most common narrative surrounding the topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    2. What types of media were used to broadcast information about the event as it was occurring?
    3. What types of media were used to publicize the event after it had occurred?
    4. Context: Describe the context of the sources you chose about your chosen topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    5. Are they primary sources or secondhand interpretive accounts?
    6. How is the content in the sources presented? Do the writers appear to take sides or simply give facts?
    7. Components: Explain the components of the narrative of your topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    8. How was the topic portrayed in media as it was unfolding?
    9. How has media portrayed your topic at different points along the historical timeline since?
    10. What information or perspectives could have been presented about your topic but were not?
    11. Perspective: Apply a historical perspective to provide a context for your selected topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    12. What other historical events were unfolding at the same time as your chosen topic?
    13. What other sociocultural historical factors have an impact on how your topic is represented in your selected sources?
    14. Validity: Determine the validity of the traditional historical narrative of the topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    15. How does factual information about your topic affect how the historical narrative is portrayed? Do the facts reinforce the information highlighted in the narrative?
    16. How has the narrative around your topic changed as new information has been discovered?

    Part Three: Deconstructing the Historical Narrative

    In Part Three, you will actively deconstruct the historical narrative concerning your topic and determine the overall validity of the narrative. Your objective here is to write a new narrative that provides a more holistic, inclusive version of history.

    1. Credibility: Determine the credibility of the sources you selected for your chosen topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    2. How do you determine credibility for the sources you chose?
    3. Does it vary from source to source?
    4. Bias: Describe potential bias in your selected sources for your chosen topic. You should address the following question:
    5. How do an authors beliefs and agenda impact the information they present in their account?
    6. Power Structures: Identify the power structures that influence the development of the historical narrative surrounding your chosen topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    7. Who held the power in society when events related to your topic took place?
    8. Who benefits from the traditional version of the story?
    9. Variations: Explain why there are variations in the narrative of the event presented by your selected sources. You should address the following questions:
    10. How do your selected sources present information about the topic in varied ways?
    11. What information is presented in some sources but omitted in other sources?
    12. Information Gaps: Explain why information gaps occur in the sources you selected for your chosen topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    13. Why was information included or excluded about this topic in your selected sources? What purpose does this serve?
    14. When new information about an event related to the topic came to light, was there any opportunity for your selected sources to include or correct excluded information in what they originally presented?

    What to Submit

    Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Use at least three sources from the Shapiro Library, remembering that one of them must be a primary source. Sources should be cited according to APA style both throughout and at the end of your draft.

    Although Brightspace allows the addition of video notes in assignment submissions, you may not use the Video Note tool to complete this assignment.

    Supporting Materials

    The following resource supports your work on the project:

    Template:

    This template provides an outline for Parts One through Four of your paper.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): HIS 217 Project Template (2).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.