Category: uncategorised

  • Wood

    Please polish the writing and reduce the AI-generated tone. The structure of my content does not need to be changed.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): content.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Research & Summaries Question

    1. Edit my research paper according to the corrections my professor has made.

    2. Follow APA format throughout the paper.

    3. Follow instructions as per the template provided.

    Requirements: 10

  • Poster prep

    Hi there,

    I hope you are well.

    I am looking for assistance in creating a professional conference poster. I will attach the Microsoft Word document containing all the required content, and I would like all of the information to be incorporated into the poster in a clear, well-structured, and visually professional manner.

    Please ensure that everything is included, including the graph and the reference list. You are welcome to choose the colour scheme, font style, and overall design; however, it should be professional and appropriate for a medical conference. The layout can be simple, but it needs to look polished and high quality.

    I would appreciate it if you could prepare at least three different poster design options in PowerPoint format, all in A0 landscape layout, as I will be printing on A0 paper.

    Please let me know if you would be able to help and if you require any further information from me.

    Many thanks in advance.

    Requirements: 4h

  • Estimating and Budget Development

    Estimating & Budget Development Homework Assignment 2: Conceptual Estimate, Cost Breakdown Goal: Apply estimating principles to develop a reasonable construction cost estimate and identify cost drivers. Project Deliverables (2-4 pages + attachments): Conceptual Estimate (ROM Budget) Choose a method: SF estimate, unit cost, or assembly-level Show calculations and source(s) for unit costs, i.e., RS Means, Google Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS) Organized by CSI Divisions or assemblies Cost Drivers & Value Alternatives Identify the top 5 cost drivers Propose 3 value engineering options Contingency & Allowances Plan Justify contingency percentage (design stage, risk level) Cost Summary Table Total hard costs and soft cost estimate (if appropriate) Submission Format: PDF narrative and Excel/Google Sheet estimate spreadsheet see file attached for reference

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Proposal Week 1.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Nursing Question

    Purpose

    The purpose of this assignment is to explore the role of emerging technologies in healthcare. These skills support the professional formation of the advanced nursing role.

    Course Outcomes

    This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

    • CO 2: Evaluate evidence-based practices related to information use and management, technology selection, communication, and resource allocation. (POs 1, 5)
    • CO 3: Appraise ethical, legal, regulatory, and professional standards for using information and communication technologies. (POs 3, 4)
    • CO 5: Develop professional competencies in information and communication technologies to advance healthcare outcomes and equity. (PO 5)

    Due Date

    Studentsmustcomplete the Week 6 assignment and submit it to the dropbox by Sundayat11:59p.m.MT.

    Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with a penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late. After that point,a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

    Total Points Possible

    This assignment is worth 200 points.

    Preparing the Assignment

    Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

    General Instructions

    Visit the .

    1. Select an article or white paper published on the HIMSS Healthcare IT News homepage within the past 6 months related to artificial intelligence or precision medicine. News articles and editorials may be used to find an example of an emerging technology and must be appropriately cited. News articles are typically editorials and blogs, which do not meet the standards for acceptable scholarly sources. Please review the .
    2. Download the . Use of the template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name.
    3. Write 1000 1500 words (excluding title and reference pages).
    4. Use APA in-text citations and complete references to support your writing.
    5. Follow APA current edition rules for grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scholarly writing.
    6. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.

    Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric):

    1. Article Selection
      1. Select an article or white paper published on the HIMSS Healthcare IT News homepage within the past 6 months related to artificial intelligence or precision medicine.
    2. Article Summary
      1. Provide a clear summary of the article.
      2. Identify and define the emerging technology described in the article.
      3. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
    3. Example of Technology
      1. Describe your intended area of practice.
      2. Provide an example of how the emerging technology could be used in your future area of nursing practice.
      3. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
    4. Ethical, Legal, and Safety Issues
      1. Describe at least one legal issue related to the emerging technology.
      2. Describe at least one ethical concern related to the emerging technology.
      3. Describe at least one client safety concern related to the emerging technology.
      4. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
    5. Mitigating Strategies
      1. Describe a mitigating strategy for the identified legal issue related to the emerging technology.
      2. Describe a mitigating strategy for the identified ethical concern related to the emerging technology.
      3. Describe a mitigating strategy for the identified client safety concern related to the emerging technology.
      4. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
    6. Reflection
      1. Identify whether you support the use of the technology in healthcare.
      2. Provide a rationale for why or why not.
      3. Reflect on how the knowledge will improve your effectiveness as an advanced practice nurse.

    Submitting Work to Turnitin

    This assignment will be uploaded automatically to Turnitin upon submission to verify this is your original work. The directions to submit your assignment are:

    1. Click the orange Start Assignmentbutton at the top of the page to open the upload window.
    2. Under the File Upload tab, click on Upload File to select the assignment file you want to upload.
    3. Check the box to agree to the Turnitin End-User License Agreement.
    4. Click Submit Assignment.
    5. Your Turnitin report will be visible in the Assignment Details or Grades section of your course.

    Requirements: 1-2

  • Sociology Question

    Prompt: In 400 – 500 words, write a reflective essay based on Chapter 2 of The Sociology of Ethnicity (pp. 1331). Reflect on how the chapters discussion of classical sociological thinkers (e.g., Marx, Durkheim, Simmel, Weber) changes, challenges, or deepens your understanding of ethnicity as a social phenomenon

    Here are notes you can use to answer this essay:

    Chapter 2: Sociology of Ethnicities Notes

    Core insight from the chapter (big takeaway)

    • The chapter pushes back on the claim that the classics had nothing to say about ethnicity. It argues the opposite: Marx, Durkheim, Simmel, and Weber each had a coherent theory of ethnicity, even if they didnt use the modern word ethnicity.
    • Key idea: the classics discussed ethnicity through other termsnation, race, nationality, culturally distinct peoples, common descent, collective rituals, status, social closureso you have to dig deeper to see their ethnic theories.
    • Another important lens: early sociology assumed modernization would make ethnic attachments decline or transform, so the classics tried to explain why (class struggle, solidarity shifts, differentiation, status/politics).

    Marx (ethnicity as tied to capitalism and class)

    • Ethnicity is mostly part of the superstructure: its shaped by the economic base (capitalist production).
    • Ethnic conflict is not natural cultural dislike, but often a tool of capitalism: elites keep workers divided (English vs. Irish example) to prevent class unity.
    • Emancipation cant be just for one group inside capitalism; true liberation requires changing the whole structure (political vs. human emancipation).
    • Reflection angle: Marx deepens ethnicity for you by showing it as material and political, not just identityethnic hostility can function like a mask for class power.

    Durkheim (ethnicity as moral community + ritual solidarity)

    • Ethnicity matters as a form of collective solidarity and moral community, maintained through shared rituals and symbols.
    • Modernity shifts societies from mechanical solidarity (similarity/kinship-like bonds) to organic solidarity(interdependence through division of labor).
    • Ethnic hostility can flare during anomie (norm breakdown in transition periods).
    • Reflection angle: Durkheim challenges any ethnicity is only politics viewhe makes it about belonging, meaning, and moral order, sustained through repeated group practices (commemorations, shared gestures).

    Simmel (ethnicity as boundaries + the stranger)

    • Ethnicity is a form of sociation (pattern of interaction), especially visible when a group meets the other.
    • The stranger is near and far: not fully inside, but essential for defining who we are.
    • Boundaries are sociological first, spatial second: group lines become real through social meaning.
    • Conflict can be integrative: it creates interaction and can reorganize unity.
    • Reflection angle: Simmel makes ethnicity feel relationalit isnt just something you are, its something that forms through everyday interactions and boundaries.

    Weber (ethnicity as belief + status + political action)

    • Ethnicity is based on a subjective belief in common descent, even if its not biologically true.
    • Ethnic groups operate like status groups (honor, prestige, lifestyle), often producing social closure (excluding outsiders from resources/opportunities).
    • Political community and shared political experience often produce ethnic consciousnesspolitics doesnt just express ethnicity, it can create it.
    • Reflection angle: Weber deepens ethnicity as strategic and institutional, shaped by honor, competition, and political mobilization.

    Comparison you can use in the essay (pick one tension)

    Marx vs. Weber

    • Marx: ethnicity is largely secondary to class and capitalisms structure; ethnic division often serves ruling-class interests.
    • Weber: ethnicity can be independent power through status honor + social closure, and its intensified by politics and competition for resources.
    • You can argue: Weber explains why ethnicity persists even when class interests are shared, while Marx explains why elites benefit from ethnic division.

    Durkheim vs. Simmel

    • Durkheim: ethnicity holds people together through shared rituals and collective conscience (group unity).
    • Simmel: ethnicity is produced at boundaries and through the presence of strangers (group definition through difference).
    • You can argue: Durkheim emphasizes internal glue; Simmel emphasizes relational edges.

    Real-world connection ideas (choose one concrete example)

    • Anti-immigrant rhetoric during economic insecurity Marx (division helps elites), Weber (competition/social closure), Simmel (stranger boundary-making).
    • Campus cultural clubs / heritage events Durkheim (rituals reaffirm identity), Simmel (group boundaries), Weber (status/honor).
    • Housing/employment gatekeeping Weber (social closure) + Marx (structural inequality shaping group conflict).

    Strong concluding reflection (what you can say)

    • Your understanding shifts from seeing ethnicity as culture/heritage to seeing it as structured (Marx), moral/ritual (Durkheim), interactional/boundary-based (Simmel), and status/political (Weber).
    • Ethnicity isnt one single thingits a social phenomenon that changes depending on economic conditions, social integration, everyday encounters, and political mobilization.

    Directions:Answer the entire prompt utilizing the notes and book attached. The referenced reading is from Chapter 2 of The Sociology of Ethnicity (pp. 1331) which is attached here. Use book examples and use in-text citations when needed to support your answer.

    Requirements: 500 words

  • Personality theory reflection

    Note: This assignment asks you to pull on your personal experiences – past and present – as a way of demonstrating how your personal personality theory has evolved. You are not required to share anything you are not comfortable with. We want these papers to be personally resonant, but you should not feel pressured. Remember that University of Maryland instructors are required to report ongoing or past child abuse and neglect, even when the former victim is now an adult and even when the former alleged abuser is deceased. If you disclose past or ongoing abuse/neglect, your instructor is required by law to report it. In this course, we cover nearly twenty theories of personality. Some will have more scientific support than others. Some will resonate with you, clear as a bell, whereas others just wont. Some theories may strike you as foundational, while others might simply be interesting but not wholly consequential. At the end of the semester, youll coalesce your thoughts, reactions, and research into these theories and select a few to include in a toolkit that you will carry with you into your life and career. It will include the perspectives you found most logical, necessary, and useful, and youll test the merits of this toolkit by applying it to the world around you. But thats getting ahead of ourselves a bit! The toolkit assignment will be submitted in Unit 7. What about now? What can we do to prepare ourselves for this task ahead, making it a meaningful learning moment for us? To find value to your learning and meaning in your toolkit, we need a point of comparison a point of contrast. Thats what well create here for your Unit 3 Assignment. Before you fully immerse yourself in the personality theories covered in this course, lets take a moment to consider your own personality theory what you believe to be true about how we develop into the people we are. According to George Kelly (whose theory youll learn more about in Unit 5!), we are all natural-born social scientists; we want to understand the world around us, predict what will happen next, and create our own theories that explain it all. We even go a step further, testing our personal constructs to make sure they hold up across most situations. So, thats what we are going to do here in this assignment reflect upon your personality construct, the personality theory youve been operating on to this point in your life, without the influence of Freud, Jung, Sullivan, Erikson, Bandura, etc. (all those theorists you have learned or will learn about in this course). How did your personality theory develop? What was it influenced by? What does it propose about why people are the way they are? How have you tested that theory, and what evidence do you have for it? How has it served you? These are the questions youll explore in this essay assignment. The details of which are listed below. Ideally, the due date for this assignment would land closer to the beginning of class before you were influenced by Freud and the neo/post-Freudians. However, its a lot to ask of students to turn in an essay assignment in those first couple of weeks, when we are just getting our sea legs and orienting ourselves to expectations and time management requirements. So, weve pushed the due date here into Unit 3. Hopefully, the checklist nudges have helped you begin brainstorming and planning this piece early, allowing you to remain in touch with the you-before-335. If you are beginning this assignment in Unit 3, thats okay. Just take a step back from the computer screen and spend a little time thinking about you-as-scientist and what youve always believed about why we are the way we are. Assignment Instructions: Write a 1,200-word reflective essay that answers the following questions. An outline for organizing your work is provided below. Avoid generalities in this essay; ground your ideas in concrete examples that resonate with your unique and central point of view. There is no right answer to this assignment. What you are being evaluated on is the depth and breadth of your exploration, your offering of this unique and centralized point of view, and how you set yourself up to succeed in your Unit 7 project with this interesting, personalized contrast point. See Section on Generative AI below for more information on what is meant by “centralized point of view.” Also see the Example Paper to orient yourself to the tone, style, and intent of this piece. Prior to taking this course, what did you fundamentally believe about why people are the way they are? Consider nature and nurture aspects, the fluidity vs. stability debate, but dont be limited by these factors explore everything youve believed to be true about how we become the people we do. How did your personality theory develop? What influenced it? Consider the effect of cultural factors, family upbringing, your education, etc. How does that personal construct (your own personality theory) manifest in your own life? In other words, looking at your own personality, how does it reflect your beliefs about how people become who they are? How have you tested this theory? What data did you collect? Were there ever any moments that did not fit? In other words, did your own actions or the actions of another person stand out because it contradicted what you knew to be true about the nature and development of personality? How has your personality theory served you thus far in your life? In what ways have you used it to understand, predict, and control your own behavior or interpersonal interactions youve had? Consider to what extent you are willing/able to add to, change, or shift your views on personality development to include ideas you learn in this course. What challenges might this create for you, if any? Or is it something you are excited to do? As you look through our syllabus/course calendar or click through each Units content, what theories do you think are going to align with your personal personality theory? Which will diverge? Consider this outline to help you conceptualize and write your paper. Use creative subject headings throughout your essay to visually organize your points for both you and your reader. The word count listed for each section is approximate, but the estimates do suggest the level of detail needed. The finished paper should reach the 1,200-word mark (title page and any references not included). Going over some is fine, but not to exceed the 1,500-word mark. Introduction (100+ words) Introduce your work with a compelling start Summarize for your reader what you will share. Body Section: My Personal Personality Theory and How it Developed (300+ words) Corresponding with bullet points 1 & 2 above Body Section: Case Study for My Theory (200+ words) Corresponding with bullet point 3 above Body Section: How I’ve Tested My Theory (200+ words) Corresponding with bullet point 4 above Body Section: How Has My Personality Theory Served Me? (200+ words) Corresponding with bullet point 5 above Body Section: Adapting My Views and Looking Ahead (100+ words) Corresponding with bullet points 6 & 7 above Conclusion (100+words) Synthesize your take-home message for your reader, ending on a satisfying note. Paper Writing Guidelines: Paper should meet the 1,200-word mark, not to surpass 1,500 words (title page and any references do not count toward the length requirement). The paper should be written in APA 7 style, including a title page and document formatting (1-inch margins, double-spaced, 12-point font, etc.). An abstract is not required. References are not required. This is a reflective essay that emphasizes depth of thought and personal application. However, if you do use references, you must cite them in your text with APA-formatted in-text citations and include an APA-formatted reference section. Apply sound writing mechanics: write with clarity and pay attention to spelling/grammar. Consider reading your paper out loud or having a friend, family member, or dictation software read it back to you for a different perspective. Using subject headings to visually organize your paper for you and your reader. Submit the completed document by the assigned due date. Remember to read the Example Paper to orient you to the tone and specificity we are going for in this piece. Appropriate use of ChatGPT/Generative AI Generative AI programs like ChatGPT can produce content that, on the surface, appears to be a good effort on this assignment. However, because this assignment requires you reflect on your personal perspectives, beliefs, examples, and take aways all from your unique student perspective – AI databanks do not have the insights necessary to provide the attention to nuance, critical thinking, and authenticity needed to do well on this assignment. It will offer vague connections and overgeneralized commentary, but not the level of specificity, creative/critical thinking, and genuineness we are looking for here (it also does not produce good writing using overly flowery, expansive, over-used language [i.e., AI-tells] so characteristic of its algorithm). So, in this instance, over-reliance on AI generative tools will not satisfy this assignment. AI simply doesnt do a good job with it. You could potentially use ChatGPT and other generative AI software to think through your general writing strategy or to ask a pointed question (i.e., Whats a synonym for enormity?), but in your writing, you must speak from the point of view of the scholar of psychology that you are and bring in points that authentically represent your reflective and application skills. In other words, the written, submitted text must be exclusively your own.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Unit 3 Assignment – Personality Theory Reflection – PSYC 335 6982 Theories of Personality (2262) – UMGC Learning Management System.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Unit 4 Neuroscience

    This assignment provides the opportunity to deepen your understanding of addiction and its profound effects on the brain. Through this presentation, you will learn to identify the main classes of drugs, such as stimulants, depressants, and hallucinogens, and grasp their distinctive impacts on the nervous system. By delving into the specific effects of each drug class, you will be better equipped to predict the behavioral consequences associated with drug use, linking these outcomes to the neural systems they affect. This knowledge will enable you to appreciate how addiction transforms the brain through the concept of neuroplasticity, a concept introduced in the unit reading and Seminar, and covered within this assignment. You also have the chance to explore various neuroimaging techniques, such as CT scans, MRI, fMRI and PET scans, which play a pivotal role in understanding the structural and functional changes that occur in the addicted brain. Finally, you will gain insight into the importance of utilizing neuroimaging research to better understand addiction and its consequences.

    You will use the and you will be using the articles located last week in your review of research literature. Assess whether the resource is directly relevant to the topic of addiction and its effects on the brain. Ensure that the content aligns with the main objectives of your assignment, which include identifying drug classes, understanding their impacts on the nervous system, and exploring the concept of neuroplasticity.

    Slide 1: Title

    • Title: Exploring the Neuroscience of Drug Effects and Addiction
    • Your Name
    • Purdue University Global
    • PS215-Section Number-Unit 4 Assignment
    • Instructor Name
    • Date

    Slide 2: Introduction

    • Briefly introduce the topic.

    Slide 3: Main Classes of Drugs

    • Define and classify drugs into major categories (depressants, stimulants, hallucinogens, opioids).
    • Speaker notes – Give examples of drugs from each class.

    Slide 4-5: Effects on the Nervous System

    • Slides for each major drug class.
    • Speaker notes – Describe the specific effects of each drug class on the nervous system.

    Slide 6: Predicting Behavioral Consequences

    • Discuss the concept of addiction and its impact on the brain.
    • Speaker notes – Include information on neuroplasticity and reward pathways.

    Slide 7: Brain Changes in Addiction

    • Discuss the long-term consequences of addiction on the brain.

    Slide 8: The Reward Circuit and Dopamine

    • Explain the role of the reward circuit in addiction.
    • Speaker notes – Highlight the release of dopamine and its association with drug addiction.

    Slide 9: Structural Neuroimaging Techniques

    • Describe various structural neuroimaging methods (e.g., MRI, CT scans).

    Slide 10: Functional Neuroimaging Techniques

    • Describe various functional neuroimaging methods (e.g., fMRI, PET scans).

    Slide 11: Neuroimaging Techniques

    • Describe the differences between structural and functional imaging.
    • Speaker notes – Describe the best uses for each type of imaging.

    Slide 12-14: Neuroimaging Research Findings

    • Use specific examples from research journal articles to showcase how neuroimaging has revealed changes in the addicted brain.
    • Discuss findings – was this a structural and functional test?

    Slide 15: References

    • List the sources and references used in your presentation.

    Please review and follow the assignment requirements in the next tab titled Assignment Details.

  • Assignment 4

    please make it 4.5 pages long, the reference page counts as a page.
  • Management Question

    MBA Assignment: Review of Literature

    Assignment Title:

    Students are expected to analyze, compare, and synthesizeexisting research.

    Assignment Task

    You are required to prepare a Review of Literature (ROL) on the topic:

    An analysis of the impact of digital transformation on business strategy in consulting firms.

    The review should critically examine existing academic studies, reports, and credible industry publications to understand how digital transformation reshapes consulting firms strategies.

    Length and Format

    Word Count: 1,000 words (excluding references)

    Referencing Style: APA 7th edition

    Turnitin Similarity: Must be below 15% (excluding references)

    Minimum References:

    At least 1520 scholarly sources

    Majority should be published within the last 810 years

    Important Instructions

    Do not copy text directly from sources

    Paraphrase and cite appropriately

    Avoid blog-style or opinion-based writing

    Every claim must be supported by literature

    Submit through BLACKBOARD in Word format

    Requirements: Question