Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Reflection #5

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Reflection 5.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • reflection

    Please submit a brief reflection in about 250 words where you explore the importance of close-reading and annotating texts. Please go into detail about how you used the practices thus far and how you might be able to apply these tools in future classes or situations. Some questions you might ask yourself are: How can you use close-reading and annotating in your future career? How can you use close-reading and annotating in future classes? Why does one need to use close-reading and annotating for understanding a text? You do not need to answer all or any of the suggested questions. However, you do need to reflect on close-reading and annotating in some way.

  • Discussion

    1. How do customs surrounding birth reflect culture, and how has childbirth changed in developed countries? Further, how do you think that bonding with parents is different in the U.S. compared to other countries/cultures? What is better? What is worse? Why/How?

    1. Responses must include 2+ references to the readings, videos, and/or activities assigned for the week.

    Please reference from this book:

    A Child’s World: Infancy through Adolescence Papalia, Diane; Feldman, Ruth

  • 5-2 Final Project Milestone Three: CPT and E/M Coding

    In this milestone, you will practice coding CPT and E/M, which will prepare you for the final project. You will identify the proper procedures and main terms for each procedure, and code CPT and E/M. Use . In Milestone One, you reviewed an outpatient record, but for Milestones Two and Three, you will work with an inpatient record to prepare you for the final project. This is a good time to iron out any specific issues you are having and to contact your instructor with questions. There is a great deal of information in the patient record, so to help you focus on the CPT and E/M coding, the relevant sections of the record are highlighted. The following steps will also help you review the record:

    • Begin by reviewing the entire record.
    • Evaluate the face sheet for any diagnosis and/or procedures.
    • Proceed to the discharge summary to evaluate whether anything further is discussed or explained as far as the patient’s treatment is concerned.
    • Proceed to the history and physical section. It should be reflective of the discharge summary; however, pay close attention to anything that you did not see in the discharge summary.
    • The progress note is a step-by-step, day-by-day breakdown of the history/physical section. Much of it will duplicate what you have already reviewed; however, it is important to review it to ensure that nothing else should be coded.
    • The reports at the end validate the procedures that were completed. If you find an emergency report, you should review it for consistency with the history/physical section and the discharge summary.

    Note: The patient record you will use in this milestone is not the same record you will use for the final project.

    Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

    1. CPT: In this section, you will review the patient medical record and apply the appropriate CPT coding to the procedure(s). You will also be asked to provide your rationale for how you arrived at a particular code.
      1. Review the chart notes and determine a CPT procedure. Explain how you arrived at your determination.
      2. Identify the main term(s) for each CPT procedure and provide a rationale to support your identification.
      3. Use an encoder and search for the main term of the CPT procedure. Describe the results of the search and the process applied to effectively use the encoder.
      4. Describe how you narrowed down your CPT procedure selection based on descriptions and adjectives while using the encoder. Provide the narrowed-down list to support your response.
      5. Assign the CPT procedure code to the record and explain why this code is the most appropriate for this procedure.

    Requirements:

  • Post v. The Pines Horse Farm

    Please write a brief for the case Post v. The Pines Horse Farms. Define the (1) facts; (2) parties and prior holdings in the case: (3) legal issues presented; (4) rules and /or prior holdings; (5) reasoning; and (5) result. The brief should be about one page. This work is to be pledged and this assignment cannot use artificial intelligence or outside materials.

  • HCM 5-1

    Your journal assignment should be 2 to 4 paragraphs in length. Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12- point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): HCM ASSIGNMENT 5-1.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • sjhflsfskfjs;s

    Dataset

    Use a public dataset from the approved list (Chicago Crime dataset selected)

    Assignment Requirements

    Q1: Problem Identification & Data Collection

    In the notebook:

    1. Clearly define a real-world problem suitable for EDA and ML
    2. Describe the dataset and source (link included)
    3. Identify:
      • Target variable
      • Feature variables
    4. Show dataset shape and preview

    Q2: Exploratory Data Analysis (Manual EDA)

    Using the SAME dataset:

    1. Comment on data quality (missing values, duplicates, data types)
    2. Descriptive statistics and interpretation
    3. Identify and remove outliers
    4. Check feature distributions
    5. Correlation analysis
    6. Clearly list:
      • Dependent variable
      • Independent variables
    7. Drop unnecessary independent features
    8. Check skewness using p-value
    9. Apply:
      • Standardization
      • Normalization
    10. Save:
    • Cleaned dataset
    • Standardized dataset
    • Normalized dataset

    Q3: Automated EDA (Sweetviz)

    Using the SAME dataset in the SAME notebook:

    1. Install and use Sweetviz (must work in Google Colab)
    2. Generate:
      • analyze() report for raw dataset
      • analyze() report for cleaned dataset
      • compare() report (raw vs cleaned)
      • compare_intra() report (e.g., class-based comparison)
    3. Display and save Sweetviz HTML reports
    4. Provide written explanations comparing:
      • Raw vs cleaned dataset
      • Insights from analyze, compare, compare_intra
    5. Discuss how dataset quality affects Linear Regression performance (conceptual explanation)

    Submission Expectations

    • ONE clean, well-structured .ipynb notebook
    • Clear markdown explanations (student level)
    • Code must run successfully in Google Colab
    • Proper handling of Sweetviz + NumPy compatibility
    • No plagiarism

    What I Expect From You

    Complete end-to-end solution
    Same dataset across Q1, Q2, Q3
    Ready to submit with no errors

    Requirements: as long | Python

  • Module 4: Assignment Orgl 3311

    Write a 2-page response following the prompt below. Please use your critical thinking skills

    Response Prompt

    • How does a new leader make the judgment about the need for change and the pace of change in the institution?
    • How can one change the culture of an institution and how is the appropriate pace of change determined?
    • How does a new leader convey he/she understands the culture of the institution?
    • How does a new leader, who recognizes the need for institutional change, work productively with an institutional culture and/or sub-cultures that are resistant to change?
    • Each institution has an authentic culture. How does a new leader identify what is authentic and bridge rather than break the path forward for the institution?

    Sources:

    Links:

    Chapter 1. Learning the Culture and Setting Expectations

    National Association of System Heads’ Transformation Agenda

    Playing as a Unit: How to Win by Harnessing the Culture

    Developing Trust & Being Trustworthy

  • Available orders

  • DAP assigment

    Week 5 DAP Assignment: Simulated Patient and Therapy Note

    Instructions

    Submit a Therapy DAP Note.

    Rubric

    Therapy DAP Note

    Therapy DAP Note

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Subjective

    15 pts

    Accomplished

    Symptom analysis is well organized, with C/C, OLDCART, pertinent negatives, and pertinent positives. All data needed to support the diagnosis & differential are present. Is complete, concise, relevant with no extraneous data.

    13 pts

    Satisfactory

    Symptom analysis well organized with C/C, OLDCART, pertinent negatives, and pertinent positives. Some extraneous data present and/or one minor data point missing.

    11 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Symptom analysis is not well organized. Data is missing. There is too much extraneous data and/or 2-3 minor data points missing.

    9 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    Symptom analysis is inadequate, is not organized. Objective or other data is mixed into the subjective data. Important data is missing.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Objective

    15 to >13.0 pts

    Accomplished

    Complete, concise, well organized and well written and includes pertinent positive and pertinent negative physical findings. Organized by body system in list format. No extraneous data.

    13 to >11.0 pts

    Satisfactory

    All relevant exams were done thoroughly but extraneous exams were also done. Somewhat organized in list format.

    11 to >9.0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Omitted important relevant exams and/or not in list format.

    9 to >0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    Omitted important relevant exams and/or subjective data are included. Lacking organization.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Assessment

    15 to >13.0 pts

    Accomplished

    Diagnosis and differential dx are correct with ICD code and supported by subjective and objective data.

    13 to >11.0 pts

    Satisfactory

    Diagnosis is correct with ICD codes and is supported by subjective and objective data, however the most accurate differential diagnosis not listed according to subjective and objective data.

    11 to >9.0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Diagnosis is correct but either does not include ICD code or is missing two or more important differential diagnoses according to the subjective and objective data provided.

    9 to >0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    Diagnosis is not correct, is not provided or is not reflective of the subjective and objective data provided.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Plan

    15 to >13.0 pts

    Accomplished

    Plan is organized, complete and evidence-based according to National Standards of Care. Addresses each diagnosis and is individualized to the specific patient and includes medication teaching and all 5 components: (Dx plan, Tx plan, patient education, referral/follow-up, health maintenance).

    13 to >11.0 pts

    Satisfactory

    Plan is organized, complete and evidence-based according to National Standards of Care. Addresses each diagnosis and is individualized to the specific patient and includes medication teaching but may be missing 1-2 minor points.

    11 to >9.0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Plan is less organized and not based on evidence according to National Standards of Care. Does not address each diagnosis or may not be individualized to the specific patient. Missing medication teaching or one of the 5 components.

    9 to >0 pts

    Unsatisfactory

    No Plan provided or is not organized. Does not address all diagnoses identified and/or does not include all 5 components of plan, including medication teaching.

    15 pts