Category: uncategorised

  • Meeting the Recruitment and Training needs for a Canadian ba…

    Content:

    Report objectives: the report will not tell:

    • I plan to do this, …” kind of a story.

    It needs to rather be more like this:

    • I changed this, I designed this, I partially built this, I fixed this, here is the evidence, and here is what is left to be done to achieve the originally set goals, etc…

    Progressoriented: show visuals of the things you did, including plans, drawings, systems, charts, excel, etc. This assignment is about reporting progress. You no longer need to talk about why you are doing this. Rather, focus on what you have already done, and what to do until Aug.

    Intro: use the first page, no more, to remind us of the company, project, issues, solutions, etc.

    Scope: if changes are made to the original scope, please clarify, and show the original process submitted in the proposal, then highlight the changes. How does that change the rest of the project?

    Schedule: the report should show where you are in your original Gantt Chart and whether milestones have shifted around. Some had a very basic Gantt Chart in the proposal. The interim report needs to be a very detailed one.

    Financials: the report should have a financial table of expenses incurred up to date. This is not money you personally spent. These are expenses your stakeholder has spent/incurred so far. Classify expenses in financial terms (operational, capital, etc.). Present financial calculations of IRR, cash flow, NPV, where needed (Not everyone needs this).

    Include all expenses: nobody works for free. If an employee in your company spent 3hr on a task. That is worth the money. Estimate their hr rate and include it in your financials. Everything is worth $. If your company already has software and pays $X/year in license fees, and you are using 10% of it for your project, your operational cost for using this software is $0.1X/year. It is not free.

    Budget note for start-ups: you may have spent $ on your project; this would be part of your financials as well.

    Pilot: what is the status of the pilot/partial implementation, if applicable?

    Stakeholders: who has done what so far? Please dont say we did this and that …. I need to know what your role was, and what other people on your team did.

    Procurement: if your solution necessities the procurement of equipment/software/service, and they are too large/expensive to be procured by April (due to budget, company restrictions), then at least, show your procurement strategy, selection criteria, compare suppliers, requirements, and present formal quotes (mandatory for all to-be-procured goods/services).

    Creative visuals: some find it difficult to explain certain things in simple words. Try visuals. There are a lot of free tools online: block diagrams, flow charts, tables, and figures, where possible. Please explain them! Many lost marks in the proposal because visuals were not explained.

    Project Challenges: list any challenges you have faced so far, and propose solutions

    For start-up projects: your website/store/product needs to be fully ready to show to customers. You will have the period May-Aug to market only. But, from now until April, you are to build a fully working ready-to-sell, store. I expect that you also have a formal logo and a working www domain. If this start-up is going to be a real project for you, please legally register your company.

    Strategic analysis (independent projects): I expect that all background work, literature review, analysis, and full stakeholder engagement are complete. Initial recommendations should also be formulated. I expect that during the May-Aug period, you will be working on finalizing and carrying out your recommendations, at least on a partial/pilot scale.

    References: I will be stricter on references, in-text citations, and APA styling. Plagiarism will be taken more seriously.

    Content from Proposal

    Do not re-submit any content you have submitted already in the proposal. This is a fresh report and I expect fresh content. Re-submitting content is considered plagiarism.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Capstone Prospectus_DE.pdf, Capstone_proposal_DE.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Interdisciplinary healthcare team plan and collaboration

    I need 8-12 PowerPoint presentation

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Powerpoint assignment.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Homework 2 – FI 8462

    Hi my name is Diya Patel. I have attached all the PDF’s required fort this assignment. Screenshots are required for each question after each step. Hence the page count will vary. 6 pages is NOT the limit.

  • Book Review

    This 3-5 page book review will be of David Alan Black’s textbook: Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: 4 Views. The book review should conform to the guidelines given and to the current edition of Truetts Christian Studies Turabians Style Guide and the Book Review Style sheet guide. Attached is the style guide for the book review.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): SimpleStorage.pdf, CrowdFunding_v2.pdf, TransferMoney.pdf, Voting_v2.pdf, Homework 2 FI 8462.docx, Guide to Using the Remix Ethereum Environment.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Community Green Park Development

    Please put this in the template uploaded. Project Budget [Community Green Park Development] 2012-2014 Vertex42 LLC Project Lead: [Your Name] BUDGET ACTUAL Under(Over) Project Budget Template Start Date: [Today’s Date] Total $250,000 $0 $250,000 Labor Materials Fixed WBS Task Hrs Rate Units $/Unit Costs Budget Actual Under(Over) 1 Project Management 75 $40.00 $3,000 $15,000 $0 $15,000 1.1 Land Acquisition 200.0 $15.00 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000 $0 $150,000 1.2 Design Phase 80.0 $50.00 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000 $0 $5,000 1.3 Environmental Compliance 16.0 $40.00 3 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000 $0 $3,000 1.4 Community Engagement 30.0 $20.00 5 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500 $0 $1,500 1.5 Construction 500.0 $25.00 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $35,000 $0 $35,000 1.6 Marketing and Communication 20.0 $30.00 $600.00 $600 $0 $600 2 Materials and Supplies 0 0 0 2.1 Landscaping Materials 1 $15,000.00 $15,000 $0 $15,000 2.2 Construction Materials 1 $30,000.00 $30,000 $0 $30,000 2.3 Office Supplies 500.00 $500 $0 $500 2.4 Legal Fees 1 $5,000.00 $5,000 $0 $5,000 2.5 Miscellaneous Expenses 5% Contingency $12,500.00 $12,500 $0 $12,500 3 Overheads 0 0 0 3.1 Utility Costs 1 $3,000.00 $3,000 $0 $3,000 3.2 Contractor Fees 1 $10,000.00 $10,000 $0 $10,000 4 Total Costs $250,000 $0 $250,000

  • Week 6 Assignment

    For this week, continuing in the Word document you have been working on, you will summarize the qualitative article assigned in 1-2 paragraphs. Make sure to include the question, design, sample, data collection method, data analysis and aspects of trustworthiness along with the results for the article.

    • Continue to use the same Word document template you have been adding to.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): SimpleStorage.pdf, CrowdFunding_v2.pdf, TransferMoney.pdf, Voting_v2.pdf, Homework 2 FI 8462.docx, Guide to Using the Remix Ethereum Environment.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Module 7 Cyber Cafe Muddiest Points and Sharing Forum 7

    Muddiest Points and Sharing Forum 7

    Please use this discussion forum to post any questions you may have about the course or your clinicals. If you do not have any questions, post about something that happened during your clinicals this week, where you learned something new, or think it is a fun story to share.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post can be either a video or text.
    • In the spirit of collaboration, feel free to support and assist your colleagues by answering their posts.
    • This discussion forum is graded as Complete/Incomplete.
    • Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Wednesday.

    Discussion Rubric

    Discussion Rubric

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Critical Analysis

    5 to >4.0 pts

    Distinguished

    Discussion postings display an excellent understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts including correct use of terminology. Postings integrate an outside resource, or relevant research, or specific real-life application (work experience, prior coursework, etc.) to support important points. Well-edited quotes are cited appropriately. No more than 10% of the posting is a direct quotation.

    4 to >3.0 pts

    Excellent

    Discussion postings display an understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts including correct use of terminology and proper citation.

    3 to >0.0 pts

    Fair

    Discussion postings repeat and summarize basic, correct information, but do not link readings to outside references, relevant research or specific real-life application and do not consider alternative perspectives or connections between ideas. There is an attempt at proper citation, but there are formatting errors.

    0 pts

    Poor

    Discussion postings show little or no evidence that readings were completed or understood. Postings are largely personal opinions or feelings, or “I agree” or “Great idea,” without supporting statements with concepts from the readings, outside resources, relevant research, or specific real-life application. Sources are not cited. Or nothing was posted.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Participation in the Learning Community

    3 to >2.0 pts

    Distinguished

    Discussion postings actively stimulate and sustain further discussion by building on peers’ responses including building a focused argument around a specific issue, asking a new related question, or making an oppositional statement supported by personal experience or related research. Discussion postings are distributed throughout the module (not posted all on one day or only at the beginning or only on the last day of the module). Student responds to all queries from the instructor.

    2 to >1.0 pts

    Excellent

    Discussion postings contribute to the class’ ongoing conversations as evidenced by affirming statements, references to relevant research, asking related questions, or making an oppositional statement supported by any personal experience or related research. Discussion postings respond to most postings of peers within a 48-hour period.

    1 to >0.0 pts

    Fair

    Discussion postings sometimes contribute to ongoing conversations as evidenced by affirming statements or references to relevant research, asking related questions, or making an oppositional statement supported by any personal experience or related research. Discussion postings respond to most postings of peers several days after the initial discussion.

    0 pts

    Poor

    Discussion postings do not contribute to ongoing conversations or respond to peers’ postings. There is no evidence of replies to questions. Discussion postings are at midpoint or later in the module or contributions are only posted on the last day of the module. Written interactions on the discussion board show disrespect for the viewpoints of others. Or nothing was posted.

    3 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Quality of Writing and Proofreading

    2 to >1.5 pts

    Distinguished

    Responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors (when applicable). The style of writing or speaking facilitates communication.

    1.5 to >1.0 pts

    Excellent

    Responses are largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors (when applicable). The style of writing or speaking generally facilitates communication.

    1 to >0.0 pts

    Fair

    Responses include some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors (when applicable) that distract the reader/listener.

    0 pts

    Poor

    Responses contain numerous grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors (when applicable). The style of writing or speaking does not facilitate communication. Or nothing was posted.

    2 pts

    Total Points: 10

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Capstone Prospectus_DE.pdf, Capstone_proposal_DE.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • discussion replies –

    Each reply must be 250 words

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): discussion replies 2-8.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Fundamentals of project management

    Assignment:

    Submit a 2-3 page paper on one of the topics below. You should cite at least three scholarly sources other than the textbook and title page is required. For guidance, it is suggested to have 1-2 quotes with source citations per page. Include a references page (not counted in the 23-page length requirement). Use the APA material at the top of the course site to help with formatting.

    Topic:

    1. How does the WBS differ from the project network?
    2. How are WBS and project networks linked?

    Requirements: 2-3 pages

  • math talk #2

    PART ONE

    1. Attached our two documents below. Follow the instructions.

    PART TWO

    2. Read Ellen G. White, Ministry of Healing, Chapter 26, Stimulants and Narcotics, and write a one-page reflection paper

    link:

    Requirements: 2 pages