Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Ethics in Research

    Papers submitted up to 48 hours after the due date will receive a 30-point deduction.

    Papers submitted more than 48 hours late will receive a zero for the assignment.

    Evidence of plagiarism will result in a zero for this assignment.

    Your Copyleaks score is generated automatically when you submit to the Dropbox. Your score will be available in the gradebook and should be no greater than the 15% mark. If the similarity is above 15%, please resubmit with revisions before the due date.

    This assignment consists of two parts:

    1. Write at least 250 words on which specific
    2. ethical standards were not utilized in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Be sure you use citations and references.
    3. Find an article on ethical dilemmas, transgressions, or misconduct related to a research study; using a minimum of 250 words explain the ethical dilemma in the study with sufficient information that the article doesn’t need to be reviewed to understand your comments. Be sure you use citations and references.

    Please ensure that your paper

    1. is in APA format. Click on the link to see a sample paper.
    4. This is a generic paper–introductory/conclusion paragraph, abstract, charts, and graphs are not required.
    5. includes a title page and reference page per APA (no abstract required).
    6. is written in scholarly language (refrain from using first-person pronouns such as “I” or “you”).
    7. at least 500 words in length (not including title or reference page).
    8. has a Copyleaks Score of 15% or less.
    9. includes at least three scholarly peer-reviewed references from the last five years.

  • Masters of Social Work Professional Statement University of…

    Applicants will be required to respond to two different questions below. The combined statements should be no more than 500 words total. We are looking for your ability to demonstrate your understanding of the social work profession, ethics/values, and your suitability for our program. Visit the National Association of Social Workers website to learn more about social work ethics and values. Please answer the following questions (500 word combined maximum. When creating a Word document, make it two pages, use 12pt font, and double-space; cite sources where appropriate): 1. Identify one value from the NASW code of ethics (e.g., social justice, dignity and worth of the person, importance of human relationships, etc.) and how it relates to your desire to complete/acquire an M.S.W. degree. Tip: Refer to the NASW Code of Ethics. 2. The USF School of Social Work is committed to social justice. We stand against discrimination of all groups. Please comment on what these statements mean to you and your desire to be a social worker.

  • Black power essay

    Please choose one of the following questions to address in your essay. Essays should be 4-5 double-spaced pages in length, must include a title and a thesis statement, and use specific examples from your course materials to support your assertions. All sources of information referenced in your paper should be cited using Turabian format footnotes and bibliography. Outside research may NOT be used for this assignment; however, you may reference any assigned readings, films, and class lectures to support your analysis.

    Submissions that do not meet these basic requirements will NOT receive credit.

    Essays will be evaluated based on the execution and effectiveness of your argument, analysis, and writing. Please write for a non-specialist audience and be sure to explain the historical context and your ideas fully. Essays that analyze specific examples from written texts and/or draw examples from multiple sources as evidence to support the argument will be more successful than essays that do not incorporate clear evidence or rely only on films or class lectures as sources.

    Please save your essay in Microsoft Word (.doc or dox) or .pdf format

    Essay Questions:

    1. What were some of the key concerns for Black Power activists in the mid-2oth century? What disabilities did African Americans face in society, and what solutions did they seek to improve their status?

    2. How did Black activists understand their position in American society and the sources of their oppression? In what ways did activists embrace or reject the language of democracy and American national myths/ideologies to understand their position or claim their rights?

    3. What factors contributed to the development of Black Power activism before Stokely Carmichael popularized the term “Black Power” in 1966? How did the national and international political context impact the strategies employed by Black activists in the 1950s and early 1960s?

    in microsoft word there should be a way to include footnotes and citations, could you write the essay in a way of a first year college student, I kind of think the 1st question is easy but you’re free to do whatever, all sources do not have to be used

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Wendt_RootsBP.pdf, williamsnegroeswithguns.pdf, Joseph_ReimaginingBPM.pdf, Wendt_RootsBP.pdf, pTIzKz-Morgan_Rights.pdf, Morgan_Rights.pdf, King_Negro is Your Brother_Aug1963.pdf, Malcolm X_Message to the Grassroots_1963.pdf, Martin_Luther_King_I_Have_a_Dream.pdf, Malcolm X_On Racial Separation_QA_1963.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Health & Medical Question

    Post Discussion: Chapter 1 and Reply to a Classmate

    Watch this video.

    Then, post your thoughts (hit the reply button below) on Sport Nutrition and whether or not it applies to the topic in the video. Be very specific and compare to one of the specific topics covered in the video. After your post, reply to at least one of your classmates original post (hit the reply button below their original post). Do not reply to a reply.

    20 points for your original post and 10 points for replying to your classmates.

    As a reminder on your replies:

    10 points for your replies to a classmate original posts, not on a reply they left for another classmate. (Click “Reply” at the bottom of their main post):

    Your reply to a classmate must be at least 3 substantial sentences. The items below are example of brief, vague or “throw-away” response statements and will not receive credit. It is okay to include them in addition to your 3 substantial sentences, but not instead of your 3 substantial sentences.

          • Hi David.
          • Nice to meet you.
          • I like your post.
          • Have a good semester.
          • I posted the same thing.
    2. Your replies must be written in proper sentence for with emojis, emoticons, or text abbreviations (e.g. LOL)
    3. Your reply must relate to what they posted, not only what you posted.
    4. Your reply must be respectful, but may disagree.
    5. If you post that you agree, disagree, like, or dislike something in their post, you must state what the item was and why you felt that the way you did.
    6. Vague or short replies will receive very little credit.
    7. Asking a question does not count as one of your 3 sentences, but you may ask a question in addition to your required response

    Requirements: 150-200

  • Being a millennial

    The purpose of this assignment will be for students to reflect on the theories covered in class this week related to adulthood and what this phase in the life span entails as they reflect on their own lived experience. Doing so will deepen their understanding of the theoretical material as well as continue building on their skills of applying theory. Instructions Broadly, students will be exploring what it means to be a “millennial” in America today. In order to answer this question students will have to demonstrate understanding of this generational label by integrating examples from popular culture, evidence from their text, and any additional materials that are useful in supporting your arguments. Initial Post Prompt: For your initial post please reflect on the generational label “millennial” and: Define what this label is and who would fall into this generational cohort. Identify the defining characteristics of this generational cohort and support this using scholarly sources as well as those gathered from popular media. Discuss how this label either does or does not apply to you by reflecting on your own lived experiences and characteristics and scholarly evidence.

  • Masters of Social Work Personal Statement Essay University o…

    Provide a narrative essay addressing the following areas (as applicable) Why is the USF MSW program a good fit for you and for achieving your goals? Why is now the right time to apply to our MSW program? If you have a GPA below the minimum requirement, please discuss issues you faced at that time and why you now have the readiness for graduate education

    make up something good for the 1st question, for the second question right now is a good time because i graduated with my BSW in december 2025 and after taking a semester off and getting some field experience im ready to get back into learning more. my gpa is not below the minimum requirement.

  • Discussion Board

    Which value would you opt for option value for wildlife or Non consumptive use value? and why.

    Please commet and reply to two of your classmates.

  • Paper (1)

    NO COVER PAGE PLEASE Your paper should be 5-6 pages long (double-spaced, 12 font) not including the references and title page). You should have a reference page of at least eight (8)academic sources, including at least five (5) primary research sources that specifically answer the review question. Use APA format for references and citations. All papers must be submitted to be reviewed for similarity, any paper with a score of 20% or higher in the similarity index, will receive an automatic 0, and will not be reviewed until the similarity score is below 20%. Step by step directions and a rubric is posted below. After your paper has been corrected and graded, you have the option to revise your literature review paper in order to improve your writing and correct your mistakes. If there is a significant improvement, the grade will be increased. Revisions are due a week after receiving feedback. Instructions: Your paper needs to follow the following criteria: 1 Choose a problem faced by clients in your practice area that you think is important and would like to learn more about (Use Activity 1 to identify the problem). 2 Use your knowledge of PICO to develop a well-built narrow clinical question. For example: In adult patients with total hip replacements (P), how effective is pain medication (I) compared to aerobic stretching (C) in controlling post-operative pain (O)? (the development of the PICO question should not be included in the paper) (Use discussion 2 & 3). 3 Write a five (5) to six (6) page literature review paper on the standing knowledge of the chosen question. 4 Include a minimum of five (5) journal articles, at least three (3) from nursing journals. However, make sure that the (5) journals are the ones analyzed and synthesized in the results and discussion sections. 5 The body of the paper should be made of the following titled sections: Title (introduction), Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. 6 Provide a specific and concise tentative title for your literature review paper (You may use the results or at least the variables in the title). 7 The abstract is not required 8 Include a 1-page introduction of your topic (background information), the focus/aim of your review. The introduction should include a statement of the problem, briefly explain the significance of your topic study, and act to introduce the reader to your definitions and background. Must include your main statement (i.e. the purpose of this review is…{PICO Question}). 9 The method section should include sources, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, levels of evidence, and other information that establishes credibility to your paper (Use discussion 4 & 5). 10 The results should summarize the findings of studies that have been conducted on your topic. For each study, you should briefly explain its purpose, procedure for data collection, and major findings. This is the section where you will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of studies (Use discussion 6 and activity 2). 11 Submit a table of the studies as per the matrix development (see discussion 7). 12 The discussion should be like a conclusion portion of an essay paper. It serves as a summary of the body of your literature review and should highlight the most important findings. Your analysis should help you to draw conclusions. In this section, you would discuss any consensus or disagreement on the topic. It can also include any strengths and weaknesses in general of the research area. If you believe there is more to research, you may include that here. 13 Finally, you will need to conclude your paper. At this point, you have put substantial effort into your paper. Close this chapter with a summary of the paper, major findings, and any major recommendations for the profession. 14 In general, your paper should show a sense of direction and contain a definite central idea supported with evidence. The writing should be logical, and the ideas should be linked together in a logical sequence. The ideas need to be put together clearly for the writer and for the reader. 15 Papers will be graded by rubric. When preparing to work on an assignment it is a good idea to review the rubric for the assignment. The rubric identifies the important points that will be graded as well as the description of the information that should be provided to receive all of the points in each section of the assignment. Reviewing the rubric before you begin a paper and then once again as you complete the paper will give you confidence that you included the required information and will receive maximum points for each section. See the grading rubric for this assignment. 16 Format references and citations using APA guidelines.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): table lesson 7 student (1).pdf, Lesson 6 activity (1).pdf, discussion 2-7 (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Preparing to hire

    Preparing for recruitment involves several mandatory steps to prevent liabilities to the agency. This includes considering recruitment methods, screening exams, and background checks. However, it is important to understand the legalities of these processes. Their use can violate antidiscrimination laws if an employer uses them to discriminate based on race, color, sex, national origin, religion, disability, or age (40 or older). Unless the employer can justify the test or procedure under the law, the use of these tests can also violate antidiscrimination laws if they disproportionately exclude people in a particular protected group. For this assignment, as the HR director of “For The People IT Design Center” or your selected organization, prepare the hiring manager to recruit for a position of your choice. In a 34 page paper: Compare the different types of recruitment methods. Select one to use in your company and describe why this is your chosen method. Compare two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. How will you show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test? What is the purpose of content validity tests? Analyze the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process. Discuss the policies and practices that should be in place for internal candidates applying for the position. Describe inadvisable preemployment inquiries as you are preparing for the interview phase. Explain how these could lead to hiring liabilities and what policies you will have in place to avoid any perceived risks. Describe what should be included in the offer to the selectee. Describe your documentation process and explain how long documents should be retained. Additional Requirements Your paper should also meet the following requirements: Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. Standard formatting: Include one-inch margins, appropriate headers, and a title page. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting. Review the Evidence and APA Links to an external site. section of the Writing Center for guidance. Length: 34 typed, double-spaced pages, excluding title page and reference page. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. Review the Preparing to Hire rubric to familiarize yourself with the required criteria for this assignment. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria: Competency 1: Examine the effect of the employment process on current work environments. Compare the different types of recruitment methods. Select one to use in the company and describe why this is the chosen method. Discuss the policies and practices for internal candidates applying for the position. Competency 2: Analyze trends and changes in the laws on diversity, gender, and harassment. Compare two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. Discusses how it will show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test. Discusses the purpose of content validity tests. Competency 3: Apply the laws and safety issues in the workplace. Analyze the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process. Describe what should be included in the offer to the selectee, describe the documentation process, and explain how long documents should be retained. Competency 5: Create strategies for recovery from exposure to liabilities. Describe inadvisable preemployment inquiries, explain how these could lead to hiring liabilities, and include the policies that have to be in place to avoid any perceived risks. Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the human resources profession. Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the human resources profession. Week 4 Assignment: Preparing to Hire Week 4 Assignment: Preparing to Hire Criteria Ratings Pts Compare the different types of recruitment methods. Select one to use in the company and describe why this is the chosen method. 22.5 to >19.13 pts DISTINGUISHED Evaluates the different types of recruitment methods. Selects one to use in your company and discusses why this is your chosen method and supports with details from scholarly sources. 19.13 to >15.75 pts PROFICIENT Compares the different types of recruitment methods. Select one to use in your company and describe why this is your chosen method. 15.75 to >0 pts BASIC Lists the different types of recruitment methods. Selects one to use in your company and describe why this is your chosen method and key information is missing. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not compare the different types of recruitment methods or does not select one to use in your company or does not describe why this is your chosen method. / 22.5 pts Compare two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. Discusses how it will show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test. Discusses the purpose of content validity tests. 19.5 to >16.58 pts DISTINGUISHED Analyzes two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. Discusses how it will you show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test. Discusses the purpose of content validity tests. Supports ideas with details from scholarly sources. 16.58 to >13.65 pts PROFICIENT Compares two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. Discusses how it will you show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test. Discusses the purpose of content validity tests. 13.65 to >0 pts BASIC Discusses two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. Lists how it will you show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test. Shares the purpose of content validity tests. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not compare two different employment screening exams required for job-relatedness and business necessity. Does not discuss how it will you show evidence of job relatedness (validity) for each test. Does not discuss the purpose of content validity tests. / 19.5 pts Analyze the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process. 19.5 to >16.58 pts DISTINGUISHED Evaluates the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process and supports with details from scholarly sources. 16.58 to >13.65 pts PROFICIENT Analyzes the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process. 13.65 to >0 pts BASIC Discusses the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process and key information is missing. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not analyze the legalities of the employment screening exams used during the hiring process. / 19.5 pts Discuss the policies and practices for internal candidates applying for the position. 19.5 to >16.58 pts DISTINGUISHED Discusses and analyzes the policies and practices for internal candidates applying for the position and supports with details from scholarly sources. 16.58 to >13.65 pts PROFICIENT Discusses the policies and practices for internal candidates applying for the position. 13.65 to >0 pts BASIC Lists the policies and practices for internal candidates applying for the position and key information is missing. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not list the policies and practices for internal candidates applying for the position. / 19.5 pts Describe inadvisable preemployment inquiries, explain how these could lead to hiring liabilities, and include the policies that have to be in place to avoid any perceived risks. 19.5 to >16.58 pts DISTINGUISHED Discusses inadvisable preemployment inquiries, explains how these could lead to hiring liabilities, includes the policies that have to be in place to avoid any perceived risks, and supports with details from scholarly sources. 16.58 to >13.65 pts PROFICIENT Describes inadvisable preemployment inquiries, explains how these could lead to hiring liabilities, and includes the policies that have to be in place to avoid any perceived risks. 13.65 to >0 pts BASIC Itemizes inadvisable preemployment inquiries, discusses how these could lead to hiring liabilities, and includes the policies that have to be in place to avoid any perceived risks, but key information is missing. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not itemize inadvisable preemployment inquiries, discuss how these could lead to hiring liabilities, or include the policies that have to be in place to avoid any perceived risks. / 19.5 pts Describe what should be included in the offer to the selectee, describe the documentation process, and explain how long documents should be retained. 19.5 to >16.58 pts DISTINGUISHED Discusses what should be included in the offer to the selectee, describes the documentation process, explains how long documents should be retained, and supports with details from scholarly sources. 16.58 to >13.65 pts PROFICIENT Describes what should be included in the offer to the selectee, describes the documentation process, and explains how long documents should be retained. 13.65 to >0 pts BASIC Lists what should be included in the offer to the selectee, describes the documentation process, and explains how long documents should be retained, but key information is missing. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not list what should be included in the offer to the selectee, describe the documentation process, or explain how long documents should be retained. / 19.5 pts Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the human resources profession. 30 to >25.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Communicates in a manner that is scholarly and professional that addresses the intended audience and is free of grammatical and mechanical errors. 25.5 to >21 pts PROFICIENT Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the human resources profession. 21 to >0 pts BASIC Communicates in a manner that is professional for members of the human resources profession, but manner is not scholarly as there is inconsistency with grammar and mechanics. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the human resources profession. / 30 pts Total Points: 0 Choose

  • Policy Topic Research Article Critique

    Projects submitted up to 48 hours after due date will receive a 30-point deduction.

    Projects submitted more than 48 hours late will receive a zero for the assignment.

    Evidence of plagiarism will result in a zero for this assignment and or disciplinary actions.

    Your Copyleaks score is generated automatically when you submit to the Dropbox. Your score will be available in the gradebook and should be no greater than the 15% mark. If it is higher than 15% similarity, please re-submit with revisions prior to the due date.

    Please wait to begin this assignment until your Policy topic is approved.

    For this assignment, please critique one peer-reviewed journal article that has a research focus that pertains to the policy topic you have selected for this course. Using the guidelines outlined in the assignment rubric (see below), your paper should:

    Use the following as a guide as you write your paper and use these as headers for your assignment. Review APA formatting for proper formatting for headers.

    • Include a summary of the article
    • Discuss/critique the research methodology and how conclusions were reached
    • State whether or not it supports your policy
    • State how authors could disseminate this information to the public.

    Please ensure that your paper

    1. is in APA format. Click on the link to see a sample paper
    4. This is a generic paper–introductory/conclusion paragraph, abstract, charts, and graphs are not required)
    5. Includes a title page and reference page per APA (no abstract required).
    6. Is written in scholarly language (refrain from using first-person such as “I” or “you”).
    7. At least 600 words in length (not including title or reference page).
    8. Is from a scholarly/peer-reviewed healthcare or nursing journal from the last five years (
    10. )
    11. Has a Copyleaks Score of 15% or less.
    12. Cite your article in correct APA format and submit a PDF copy of your article as an attachment to the assignment.

    the topic is Maternal Health disparities

    copy leaks less than 15%