Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Writing Question

    Ive a 5-6 pages essay, Ive already finished. you need to modify it as per feedback. Pics are attached for other 2 assignments, which

    Requirements: As above

  • 5-2 Milestone Two

    Scenario

    You are an employee at a community health center that participates in programs to educate about substance abuse. You have been asked to create a short presentation on a particular substance abuse initiative to share with an audience outside of your community health center. These presentations can be critical in sharing accurate, science-based, and timely information with diverse communities. To create your presentation, you will need to research your topic and document your findings.

    In Milestone One, you selected a substance abuse topic and researched both the current state of the topic and the current types of social initiatives relevant to it. In Milestone Two, your research will include current societal initiatives as well as the humanistic perspective and ethical considerations.

    Directions

    In Milestone Two, you will continue to research a number of topics relevant to selected substance abuse and create a log of your findings. You must include the sources of your research.

    Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

    Societal Initiatives Research

    1. Current InitiativesStrengths: Discuss the strengths of the current societal initiatives impacting the selected substance abuse.

    A. Are the initiatives considered to be effective? Why are they considered effective?

    B. Have the current initiatives been more successful than others in the past?

    2. Current InitiativesLimitations: Discuss the limitations of the current societal initiatives impacting the selected substance abuse.

    A. Are certain demographics underserved by the current societal initiatives? If so, what are some

    possible causes?

    B. Have the current initiatives been less successful than others in the past?

    C. What factors have contributed to the initiatives limitations?

    3. Humanistic Perspective: Describe how the principles of the humanistic perspective have impacted

    the current societal initiatives.

    A. What dispositions or behaviors might be common to someone who experiences substance abuse?

    4. Methods of Treatment: Describe how the principles of the humanistic perspective can impact the selected substance abuse treatment methods.

    5. Ethical Considerations: Discuss any ethical considerations that might impact the current societal initiatives.

    A. How are initiatives monitored to ensure that they are ethical? Who sets those standards? Who

    enforces them?

    B. Can an initiative be considered ethical if it is not equally accessible for all populations? Are the

    current initiatives ethical in this way?

    What to Submit

    Your submission should be a 1- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

  • Micro/short fiction and short story

    Please write 2 stories.

    1 regular short story, any topic any character.

    1 micro/short fiction story

    6 pages each, no cover page or anything else needed just the stories.

  • Class Discussion 1: Project Idea AI Driven Brainstorming

    attached please see example attached and read rubric thoroughly

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Student Exemplar Discussion I Project Idea.docx, AI Generated Brainstorming Ideas (2) (1).docx, Topic- Class Discussion 1- Project Idea AI Driven Brainstorming.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Unit 4: Negotiation: A Faithful Conversation please

    Directions: Please check your Canvas email on Monday (will be sent to you before 5:00 pm) for your CONFIDENTIAL role information and further detailed instructions. Remember, do not share your goals/objectives during the negotiation but rather strive to achieve them. You will have until Saturday night to complete the negotiation and upload the Negotiation Settlement State of Agreement and Negotiation Discussion Questions. The Negotiation Settlement State of Agreement is available on the syllabus and in the course resources. The Negotiation Discussion Questions are at the end of this assignment.

    1. Negotiation: A Faithful Conversation

    Conflict Resolution Negotiation: A Faithful Conversation

    Objective: The objective of this role-playing negotiation exercise is to allow students to explore and practice addressing morally wrong behavior within an interpersonal context based on Christian principles.

    Directions: Please check your Canvas email on Monday (will be sent to you before 5:00 pm) for your CONFIDENTIAL role information and further detailed instructions. Remember, do not share your goals/objectives during the negotiation but rather strive to achieve them. You will have until Sunday night to complete the negotiation and complete the analysis questions that will be included in these instructions.

    Description of the Negotiation:

    Conflict within relationships is often difficult because it involves emotions and feelings that can create an uncomfortable situation between individuals. By nature, people tend to avoid such situations and are often unsure how to initiate or conduct a conversation when issues arise that need to be addressed. When left ignored, problematic behavior can spiral out of control creating havoc and harming personal relationships.

    However, addressing issues, particularly those that are spiritually based is expected as Christians. God wants us to have peace in our lives which can involve having to have difficult conversations. The Bible encourages us to address behavior between brothers and sisters of the Christian faith community as we see in Matthew 18:15 (NIV): If your brother or sister sins, go and point out their fault, just between the two of you. If they listen to you, you have won them over. The problem people face is they do not know how to positively initiate or manage this type of conversation.

    The purpose of this negotiation is to provide an opportunity to practice engaging in a compassionate and constructive conversation within an interpersonal relationship context by addressing the workaholic behavior of a married father of three.

    The Situation:

    David is known for his dedication to his work. He is a highly respected director of sales at a prestigious international technology firm. While his career has brought him success and financial rewards, it has also turned him into a workaholic. David is a married father of three children: Emily (9 months), Steven, (4 years old), and Alex (6 years old). His job often requires him to travel for a week at a time. multiple times a month throughout the year. When he is home, he spends the majority of his time in his office working on the computer or on conference calls and requests that the family not interrupt him. To relax, he spends hours alone outside tending to his garden.

    His wife, Claire, is a stay-at-home mother who takes care of the home and children full-time. She is a dedicated and loving wife who loves her family but often feels overwhelmed with three small very active children and personally neglected without the emotional support and physical presence and attention of her husband. When her husband is home, she is constantly managing the children so that they are not too loud or disrupt their father while he works. This frequently proves difficult as he often takes business calls at various places in the home, as well as the car, keeping Claire constantly alert and anxious as she tries to quiet the children to support and please her husband.

    Ron, a close friend of the family, has noticed that Claire appears to be struggling. She no longer cares about her appearance, loses patience with the children, and lacks the sense of humor and positivity that she has always been known for. She is a very supportive wife who looks to her husband as the spiritual and financial leader, and she strives to maintain a safe and peaceful home environment.

    However, Davids workaholic and neglectful behavior is creating noticeable negative changes in the family dynamics that are not serving the spiritual or emotional well-being of the family, and Claires steadfast view of maintaining a calm and peaceful relationship within the family creates a personal barrier for her, raising issues that could create conflict tension with her husband. Ron has decided it is time to have a faithful conversation with his friend.

    Conflict Resolution Negotiation-A Faithful Conversation

    Discussion Questions:

    Please answer the following questions. Work with your teammate(s) to answer the questions. Each person must submit their individual assignment for grading.

    1. What was the specific issue or behavior that prompted the conflict conversation?
    2. Who were the parties involved in the conversation, and what were their roles and perspectives regarding the issue?
    3. What were the key points and arguments made by each party during the conversation?
    4. Did the conversation follow a structured approach, such as using “I” statements or addressing specific behaviors?
    5. Were there moments of active listening, love, compassion, and empathy displayed by both parties during the conversation with a focus on improvement rather than judgment?
    6. What strategies or techniques were employed to encourage behavior change and resolve the conflict?
    7. How did the conversation address the emotions and feelings of the parties involved?
    8. Did the parties reference any external resources, like books, articles, or professional guidance, to support their arguments?
    9. Were there any compromises or agreements reached during the conversation that would facilitate changes in behavior?
    10. Did the conversation end with a clear action plan for implementing the desired behavior changes?
    11. How did the parties manage resistance or defensiveness, if present, and foster a sense of cooperation?
    12. What was the overall tone of the conversation? Was it respectful, understanding, and geared toward positive change?
    13. Were there any particular moments in the conversation that stand out as particularly effective or ineffective?
    14. Did the parties demonstrate a commitment to reconciliation and improvement?
    15. What lessons can be learned from this analysis that could be applied to future conflict conversations addressing changes in behavior?
    16. Any team participation issues?

    CONFLICT RESOLUTION NEGOTIATION: A FAITHFUL CONVERSATION

    Confidential Role Information for Workaholic (David)

    Davids Perspective

    David believes that his actions and behaviors are justified and required to maintain his position at work. He holds a high-level position as sales director within his company that requires additional work time and is proud of his status. He is dedicated to his career and enjoys the financial rewards he receives. He loves his family but expresses that he needs alone time to release the stress he feels from the work pressure. Additionally, he believes he must be on call all the time to provide the best service to his customers and if that means he takes business calls home or in the car, he expects the family to be understanding and adjust to his needs. He relies on his wife to manage the children and household and has requested that she not contact him during his work hours or travel time as he finds it distracting from his work. He is the sole financial provider for the family and as so, must have the freedom and flexibility to manage his work responsibilities.

    Throughout this role-play conversation, the reaction by David will be defensive and will justify the actions and behaviors. You will explain your dedication to career and financial responsibilities as justification for workaholic tendencies. Listen actively to the issues of the concerned friend and be open to hearing the concerns and arguments without interruption. Acknowledge the concerns raised and express understanding of their perspective. Last, decide whether to resist the advice and continue with the workaholic behavior or be open to reconsidering the current behavior and actions. If you choose to accept the advice, express your willingness to work on changing your behavior and identify specific behavioral changes you will make. Recardo I serve the role as David.

    Requirements: 15

  • Leadership challenges and strategies in healthcare

    1.Leadership Challenge: Change Management and Innovation Healthcare organizations must frequently adjust to regulatory shifts, technological advancements, financial pressures, and rising patient expectations (Kotter, 2012). Although innovation is necessary, it often disrupts established routines and creates uncertainty. Staff may resist new workflows, adoption may vary across units, and poorly managed change can lead to confusion, frustration, and limited improvement in outcomes (Burnes, 2017). Leadership Function Mapping: Operational Leadership Operational leadership aligns closely with the demands of change management because it emphasizes structure, consistency, and accountability (UhlBien et al., 2007). Leaders in this role define clear procedures, coordinate resources, manage workload capacity, and ensure staff receive the training needed to carry out new expectations. Yukl (2013) explains that leaders are responsible for converting strategic ideas into practical, safe, and compliant workflows. Roedel (2020) adds that during uncertain periods, leaders must create clarity and predictability, so teams understand what is changing and why. This stabilizing influence is essential in healthcare environments where safety and reliability are non-negotiable. Healthcare Example A hospital implementing a new electronic health record (EHR) system may rely on operational leadership to structure training programs, standardize documentation protocols, and monitor adoption metrics to ensure consistent use across departments (McAlearney et al., 2012). Key Contribution Operational leadership ensures that innovation is implemented in a way that is dependable, measurable, and sustainable. Complex Leadership Strategies While operational leadership provides necessary structure, complex leadership strategies recognize that healthcare systems behave unpredictably and that change rarely unfolds in a linear fashion (Plsek & Greenhalgh, 2001). These strategies emphasize flexibility, iterative learning, and distributed problemsolving (UhlBien et al., 2007). Roedel (2020) highlights that leaders who empower teams, encourage open dialogue, and foster psychological safety enable staff to make sense of change and contribute meaningfully to innovation. When employees understand the purpose behind new initiatives and feel included in shaping them, adoption improves significantly. Conflict Considerations Change initiatives often generate tension, particularly when staff fear increased workload, loss of autonomy, or unclear expectations (Kotter, 2007). Roedel (2020) notes that when leaders overlook interpersonal dynamics and focus solely on outcomes, unresolved conflict can weaken trust and reduce engagement. Professionally, this can slow implementation, disrupt collaboration, and hinder the success of innovation efforts. 2A.Leadership Challenge: Leadership Gap in Managing Interdisciplinary Teams This leadership gap frequently emerges in complex health care environments, resulting in misaligned priorities among disciplines, ineffective communication, and diminished collaboration that ultimately impacts team performance and patient care. Mapping Leadership Functions to the Challenge To address this leadership gap, multiple leadership functions must be intentionally applied. Operational leadership is needed to clarify roles, workflows, and expectations across disciplines to reduce confusion and inefficiency. Entrepreneurial leadership supports innovation by encouraging interdisciplinary teams to identify and test new approaches to coordination and shared decision-making. Most critically, enabling leadership connects people, perspectives, and information by fostering collaboration and learning across professional boundaries, which is essential when teams are fluid and conditions are constantly changing (Edmondson & Schein, 2012). Leveraging Complex Leadership Strategies Complex leadership strategies emphasize collaboration as an ongoing process rather than a fixed structure. Teaming enables interdisciplinary groups to learn together, adapt quickly, and coordinate care despite uncertainty and shifting team membership (Edmondson & Schein, 2012). Implementing structured communication routines and shared reflection supports alignment while allowing flexibility. Conflict Issues and Relationship Impact When interdisciplinary teams are not effectively managed, conflicts may arise related to role ambiguity, professional hierarchies, and competing departmental priorities. Without early intervention, these conflicts can erode trust, reduce psychological safety, and strain professional relationships. Conflict prevention systems help surface concerns early and provide clear pathways for resolution, preserving collaboration and mutual respect (Lhr et al., 2018). 3T.Using Complex Leadership Strategies Complex leadership strategies recognize that communication problems emerge from interactions within the system rather than individual failures. Leaders can leverage these strategies by promoting shared leadership, encouraging open dialogue, and creating psychologically safe environments where staff feel comfortable speaking up. Facilitating interdisciplinary meetings and learning forums allows teams to reflect on communication failures and co-create solutions. This adaptive approach supports continuous learning and acknowledges that effective communication evolves over time. Potential Conflict Issues Implementing these strategies may lead to conflict, particularly related to professional identity and power dynamics. Physicians or senior staff may resist shared decision-making, while other team members may fear retaliation for voicing concerns. These tensions can strain professional relationships and affect morale if not managed carefully. On a personal level, leaders may experience stress when mediating disagreements or balancing organizational expectations with staff needs. Without transparent communication, mistrust can develop, undermining collaboration. Recommended Strategy To address communication breakdowns, I would implement regular interdisciplinary team huddles supported by enabling leadership. These huddles would provide a structured yet flexible space for sharing concerns, clarifying roles, and addressing emerging issues in real time. By combining operational structure with enabling support, this strategy encourages collaboration, strengthens professional relationships, and improves patient safety outcomes.

  • peer response

    Elyssa Ion Group 1

    1. Identification of the Problem

    On our unit, we are seeing a frustrating trend of falls, specifically when residents try to get up on their own to use the bathroom or reach for things like their glasses or water. As nurses, we know that fall prevention is squarely within our scope of practice and is a major indicator of how safe our unit really is.

    From my perspective as an MDS nurse, I see how these falls are not just physical injuries. They trigger a cascade of administrative requirements, specifically in Section J of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment. This section requires us to meticulously document every fall and any resulting injuries for federal reporting, which adds a significant documentation burden to the nursing staff. More importantly, these events can lead to a decline in ADLs and negatively impact our facilitys Quality Measures, hurting our residents’ quality of life and their sense of independence.

    1. Summary and Evaluation of the Primary Research Article

    APA Reference: Amaechi, A. (2024). Implementing hourly rounding in reducing the rate of falls among older adults in long-term care facilities (DNP Project). Sacred Heart University.

    To address this, I found a recent study by Amaechi (2024) that looked at how a structured hourly rounding protocol, specifically using the 4 Ps of Pain, Potty, Placement, and Positioning, could cut down fall rates. This was a primary research project conducted in a long-term care facility where staff were trained to proactively check on residents every hour. The results were impressive; they saw a 27.8% drop in falls in just 30 days (Amaechi, 2024).

    When I was searching for this, I used the FSW library databases with keywords like “hourly rounding” and “long-term care.” I made sure to look for original data because, as Polit and Beck (2021) point out, appraising original research is the best way to ensure we are using the most reliable evidence for our patients. One specific strength of Amaechi’s (2024) background section is how it uses very recent data to show that reactive tools, like bed alarms, just are not enough on their own. Polit and Beck (2021) mention that a good literature review should provide a solid “state of the science,” and this article does exactly that by proving we need to move toward proactive behaviors rather than just relying on technology.

    1. Application to Nursing Practice

    I believe we could easily bring the 4 Ps protocol to our unit. If our team, both RNs and CNAs, is physically in the room every hour checking on pain and toileting, we catch those residents before they decide to try and get out of bed alone. The biggest benefit is obviously fewer injuries, but it also makes the unit quieter because there are fewer call lights and alarms going off. Of course, the challenge is always staffing. We are all busy, and adding one more thing to the to-do list can feel overwhelming. To make this work, we would need to follow the advice of Polit and Beck (2021) and make sure the intervention is actually feasible. Maybe we can simplify the charting so it is just a quick click in the EHR rather than a separate paper log. The study showed that residents often do not want to “bother” us, so if we are already there, that barrier disappears (Amaechi, 2024).

    1. Supporting Literature (Secondary Research)

    APA Reference: Ojo, E. O., & Thiamwong, L. (2022). Effects of nurse-led fall prevention programs for older adults: A systematic review. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 26(3), 417431.

    I also looked at a systematic review by Ojo and Thiamwong (2022). While my first article gave us a close look at one facility, this review looked at the bigger picture. Polit and Beck (2021) place systematic reviews at the very top of the evidence hierarchy, and this one confirms that nurse-led, multifactorial programs are the most effective way to keep our seniors safe. It really reinforces that the hourly rounding approach in the Amaechi (2024) study is the right path for us to take.

    1. Use of Course Textbook

    Using the Polit and Beck (2021) textbook has helped me understand that Evidence-Based Practice is not just about finding a random article; it is about the “systematic use of the best available evidence” to make clinical decisions. For this discussion, I focused on the “appraisal” phase of the research process. According to Polit and Beck (2021), nursing research must be scrutinized for its “clinical significance,” meaning, does this study actually matter at the bedside? By evaluating Amaechis (2024) study, I learned how to look past just the summary and actually analyze the “Methods” and “Background” to see if the intervention is grounded in logic and high-quality prior evidence. This process ensures that when we propose a policy change on our unit, we are doing so based on proven data rather than just tradition or habit.

    1. References

    Amaechi, A. (2024). Implementing hourly rounding in reducing the rate of falls among older adults in long-term care facilities (DNP Project). Sacred Heart University.

    Ojo, E. O., & Thiamwong, L. (2022). Effects of nurse-led fall prevention programs for older adults: A systematic review. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 26(3), 417431.

    Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

  • SA1: Interview an Accountant/Accounting Firm or a Banker

    In Week 2 your first Short Assignment (SA1) will be an interview assignment which is due by Day 7 Sunday of this week. Choose one of the two interview options and complete the assignment by taking into account of the following questions. Interview feedback can be gathered from face-to-face meeting, phone call, email or online chat.

    a) Review rubric for grading criteria before you start to work on this assignment.

    b) Briefly introduce your interviewee at the beginning to start your interview report.

    c) The formats of your interview conducted by face to face meeting, phone, online chat system or back-and-forth email/letter are all acceptable.

    d) Incorporating the following questions of your chosen option in your interview as basic guideline to engage in your interview dialogue.

    Be reminded also – this is not a short-answer assignment. Please document your takeaway in commentary style.

    e) The intended interview outcome of SA1 is for our students to learn from a hands-on individual who possesses knowledge and experiences in their fields. If you are unable to successfully set up an interview, your report can then be 100% research-based when you also briefly document your experience of scheduling difficulty in your work.

    f) APA standard is required.

    Option 1 Interview an Accountant or Accounting Firm

    Contact an accountant and conduct an interview on forms of businesses, taxes, licenses needed, and so forth.

    1) Which legal structure do you recommend? Why?

    2) Can this legal structure be changed once it has been established?

    3) Should the business be formed in or out of state? Why?

    4) What are the tax implications of the legal structure recommended?

    5) Will I need an employer identification number (EIN)?

    6) Should I open a business bank account, or will my personal account be sufficient? Why?

    7) Do you recommend using accounting software? Why?

    8) What are the strengths and weaknesses of this business form?

    OR,

    Option 2 Interview a Banker

    Contact a bank manager and conduct an interview on loan procedures and qualifications.

    1) What is the current environment like for bank loans for small businesses?

    2) What are the current rates the bank charges for business loans?

    3) What criteria are considered in the determination of the rate of the loan and the amount that can be borrowed?

    4) Are you lending money to new/small businesses?

    5) What is the difference between a line of credit and a loan?

    6) Do you sell your loans?

    7) What financial information is required by the lender?

    8) How do I obtain a loan application?

    9) What types of questions might be asked in addition to those in the loan application?

    10) What types of security might be requested to secure the loan?

    11) What types of businesses normally get loans?

    12) What are the characteristics of successful borrowers?

    Requirements:

  • Self-Comparison

    Discussion: Self-Comparison

    Respond to this prompt in 350 words or more:

    Based on what you know so far about self and social comparison, how do you think comparing ourselves to others influences individual happiness? Under what circumstances might social comparison increase happiness, and when might it decrease it? Give examples.

  • Writing Question

    Requirements: As required