Category: uncategorised

For this assignment, please follow the instructions below:

1. Using what you learned in Consequences: The Second Step in the Moral Deliberation Road Map, make a case for why the government officials in New York did the morally right thing by flooding the town of Olive. (You dont have to personally agree with the argument.) Also, explain the counter-argument: Why might someone reasonably think what they did was morally wrong?
2. Using what you learned in Consequences: The Second Step in the Moral Deliberation Road Map, explain what you should do in Per Diem, using only consequentialist arguments. Which action will bring about the best consequences? Remember to consider the following:
3. Long- and short-term consequences
4. Everyone affected by your decision (including people you dont know, like other people in the Fleet and U.S. taxpayers)
5. How much everyone is affected by your decision (e.g., one person might barely be affected, but another person might be strongly helped or hurt)
6. What happens if others learn what you did and imitate your behavior?

Note: Your consequentialist argument might go against the constraints argument you made last week. Thats okay! We will try to put all the arguments together later.Guidelines and Requirements

• This assignment is worth 200 points.
• Your essay should be a minimum of 750 words. Your cover page, citations and bibliography do not count towards the word requirement.
• You will be graded according to the Written Assignment Rubric located in the Details & Information panel on the right.
• Format: 12-point font, Times New Roman, and double-spaced.
• Ensure your essay has a dedicated introduction, conclusion, and references/citations as required.
• Be sure to follow Chicago Manual of Style 17th Edition for citations. For more information on Chicago Style, refer to the or the website.
• Do not use any material outside of the course unless the sources are approved by your instructor.
• Please submit your paper as a Microsoft Word document by placing the cursor in the text box, select the attachment icon (paperclip), and select the file you want to upload. This will allow your paper to be assessed by SafeAssign. Only add the Word document file. Do not include additional text in the textbox.
• Your document file name should include the Course number Section number First initial Last name Module number Assignment type
• For example, 101003SChestnutM5Essay
• Only use letters and numbers in the file name. Do not use any punctuation or special characters.
• Organization and Structure
• Cover page. Failure to include a cover page can incur up to a 20% deduction.
• Complete omission of an introduction or conclusion will incur a 25% deduction with a maximum deduction of 50% in the Organization rubric if both the introduction and conclusion are omitted. (This is only applicable for the complete omission of an introduction and conclusion. Scoring an incomplete introduction and conclusion is determined by the instructor based on the rubric.)
• Sources (Notes (footnotes/endnotes) and Bibliography Section)
• At least three notes and a Bibliography are required to receive full credit in the Sources rubric.
• Failure to provide any notes and a Bibliography will incur a 50% deduction in the Sources rubric.
• Only providing one credible note or a Bibliography will incur a 25% deduction in the Sources rubric.
• Only providing one credible note and a Bibliography will incur a 10% deduction in the Sources rubric.
• Only providing two credible notes and a Bibliography will incur a 5% deduction in the Sources rubric.

LINK TO ARTICLE IN QUESTION FOR 1.:

For this assignment, please follow the instructions below:

1. Using what you learned in Consequences: The Second Step in the Moral Deliberation Road Map, make a case for why the government officials in New York did the morally right thing by flooding the town of Olive. (You dont have to personally agree with the argument.) Also, explain the counter-argument: Why might someone reasonably think what they did was morally wrong?
2. Using what you learned in Consequences: The Second Step in the Moral Deliberation Road Map, explain what you should do in Per Diem, using only consequentialist arguments. Which action will bring about the best consequences? Remember to consider the following:
3. Long- and short-term consequences
4. Everyone affected by your decision (including people you dont know, like other people in the Fleet and U.S. taxpayers)
5. How much everyone is affected by your decision (e.g., one person might barely be affected, but another person might be strongly helped or hurt)
6. What happens if others learn what you did and imitate your behavior?

Note: Your consequentialist argument might go against the constraints argument you made last week. Thats okay! We will try to put all the arguments together later.Guidelines and Requirements

• This assignment is worth 200 points.
• Your essay should be a minimum of 750 words. Your cover page, citations and bibliography do not count towards the word requirement.
• You will be graded according to the Written Assignment Rubric located in the Details & Information panel on the right.
• Format: 12-point font, Times New Roman, and double-spaced.
• Ensure your essay has a dedicated introduction, conclusion, and references/citations as required.
• Be sure to follow Chicago Manual of Style 17th Edition for citations. For more information on Chicago Style, refer to the or the website.
• Do not use any material outside of the course unless the sources are approved by your instructor.
• Please submit your paper as a Microsoft Word document by placing the cursor in the text box, select the attachment icon (paperclip), and select the file you want to upload. This will allow your paper to be assessed by SafeAssign. Only add the Word document file. Do not include additional text in the textbox.
• Your document file name should include the Course number Section number First initial Last name Module number Assignment type
• For example, 101003SChestnutM5Essay
• Only use letters and numbers in the file name. Do not use any punctuation or special characters.
• Organization and Structure
• Cover page. Failure to include a cover page can incur up to a 20% deduction.
• Complete omission of an introduction or conclusion will incur a 25% deduction with a maximum deduction of 50% in the Organization rubric if both the introduction and conclusion are omitted. (This is only applicable for the complete omission of an introduction and conclusion. Scoring an incomplete introduction and conclusion is determined by the instructor based on the rubric.)
• Sources (Notes (footnotes/endnotes) and Bibliography Section)
• At least three notes and a Bibliography are required to receive full credit in the Sources rubric.
• Failure to provide any notes and a Bibliography will incur a 50% deduction in the Sources rubric.
• Only providing one credible note or a Bibliography will incur a 25% deduction in the Sources rubric.
• Only providing one credible note and a Bibliography will incur a 10% deduction in the Sources rubric.
• Only providing two credible notes and a Bibliography will incur a 5% deduction in the Sources rubric.

LINK TO ARTICLE IN QUESTION FOR 1.: