Communications Question

Submission Type

Single Word doc upload containing: burnout self-assessment score summary, one-page reflection, and Resiliency Plan with two SMART goals; plus one-page infographic (image or Word doc)

Details

Maintaining your well-being is essential for safe patient care. Assess your burnout risk, reflect on stressors, and build a personalized Resiliency Plan with concrete, measurable strategies.


Assignment Components

  • Burnout Risk Self-Assessment (e.g., BAT): Include score summary and brief interpretation.
    • Reflection (one page): surprises from results, primary stressors, and initial ideas to mitigate
    • Resiliency Plan: at least two SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, timely/trackable)
    • Infographic (one page): a visual reminder of your strategies and milestones

    Resources

    • (inventory, scoring, recommendations)

    Submission Checklist

    • Single Word doc: assessment summary + one-page reflection + Resiliency Plan (2 SMART goals)
    • One-page infographic (image or Word doc)

See the rubric for specific grading criteria.

Rubric

Week 2 Resiliency Plan Rubric

Week 2 Resiliency Plan Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent & Comprehensiveness

25 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThoroughly addresses all required elements with depth, accuracy, and clear alignment to objectives.24 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses most required elements with adequate accuracy and alignment to objectives.

23 ptsApproaches ExpectationsAddresses some required elements but lacks depth, detail, or clear alignment to objectives.18 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not adequately address required elements; incomplete or inaccurate.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection & Professional Insight

12 to >3.5 ptsExceeds ExpectationsDemonstrates deep reflection, critical thinking, and strong connection to professional practice.3.5 to >3.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsProvides adequate reflection and some connection to professional practice.

3 to >2.5 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe reflection is superficial with limited connection to practice.2.5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsNo meaningful reflection or professional insight is provided.

12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Clarity

4 to >3.5 ptsExceeds ExpectationsDemonstrates organization and logical flow. The writing is clear and concise, and the format enhances readability.3.5 to >3.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsGenerally, the organization is good with some minor lapses in flow or clarity; formatting is acceptable.

3 to >2.5 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe organization is inconsistent, and writing lacks clarity. Formatting distracts from readability.2.5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsWriting is unclear and disorganized. The format is missing or incorrect.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics & APA

4 to >3.5 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe assignment accurately and consistently follows APA Style. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.3.5 to >3.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe assignment consistently follows APA Style with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes. Mostly meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

3 to >2.5 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe assignment has numerous errors in APA Style. Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style. May not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.2.5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe assignment has significant errors in APA Style. Does not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

4 pts

Total Points: 45


WRITE MY PAPER

Comments

Leave a Reply