This week’s deliverables require one phase or step for the main post and one phase for the TWO peer responses (Using the Peer Review Check Sheet). Please follow these instructions BELOW for the main post and peer reviews, and use the Peer Review Check Sheet below for both peers’ posts that are chosen to peer review. Post your peer review checklist in the DB. DO NOT attach it. Again, your draft for another student to review should be attached, and remember to add notes in the Main post that are relevant to your attached draft as a summary to prepare the reader. This summary should be 150-200 words (no more or less), which is acceptable since the peer review will accomplish additional word count: Primary Task Response: The discussion assignment for this week will be a review of the Key Assignment Draft from other students. Your first task is to post your own draft to the Discussion Board so that other students will be able to review your work. Attach your document to your main discussion post, and include any notes that you feel are appropriate in the post of no more than 150-200 words. You are not being graded on your Key Assignment Draft at this point. The purpose of this assignment is to help improve the quality of your Key Assignment Unit 3IP based on feedback from your peers.
This should include the draft of the Course paper outline with TBD sections on separate blank pages as instructed in Unit 1IP assignment details with the completed Title page, Introduction, Literature review, and 18-20 references properly formatted using APA 7th edition guidelines. Your grade will be based on the quality of your responses to your classmates with respect to their papers.
Responses to Other Students: Review at least 2 other students’ draft reports, and provide meaningful feedback using the Peer-Review Check Sheet (below). Refrain from generic feedback, such as simply stating “good job.” Your feedback to other students will be most helpful if you not only point out weak areas, but also offer suggestions for improvement. The best feedback takes a 3-stage approach to identify what was done well, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.
Dr. Cousar
Peer-Review Check Sheet (Better formatted version)
| Section | Criteria / Guiding Questions | Reviewer Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Reviewer Information | Reviewer Name: | |
| Student Name: | ||
| Report Title: | ||
| Date: | ||
| 1. Strengths | What was done well in the draft? Provide specific examples. | |
| Clarity and Focus: Is the purpose of the report clear? Are ideas easy to follow? | ||
| Organization: Does the report have a logical structure (introduction, body, conclusion)? | ||
| Content Quality: Are points well-supported with evidence, examples, or data? | ||
| Formatting & Professionalism: Does the draft follow formatting guidelines and maintain a professional tone? | ||
| Examples (optional): e.g., The introduction clearly states the problem | ||
| 2. Weaknesses | Identify specific areas that need improvement. | |
| Clarity and Focus: Are any parts confusing or unclear? | ||
| Organization: Are sections disjointed or out of place? | ||
| Content Gaps: Are there unsupported claims or missing evidence? | ||
| APA Formatting: Issues with citations, references, or formatting? | ||
| Examples (optional): e.g., Paragraph lacks citation support | ||
| 3. Suggestions for Improvement | Provide actionable recommendations. | |
| Content: How can ideas be clarified, expanded, or strengthened? | ||
| Organization: Suggestions to improve flow or structure? | ||
| APA Compliance: How can formatting/citations be corrected? | ||
| Writing Style: Grammar, tone, or clarity improvements? | ||
| Examples (optional): e.g., Combine paragraphs to improve flow | ||
| 4. Overall Comments | Provide a summary of overall quality and key improvements needed. | |
| Reviewer Checklist | The report has a clear purpose and focus. | Yes No |
| The structure is logical and easy to follow. | Yes No | |
| Claims are supported with evidence or data. | Yes No | |
| The draft follows APA formatting guidelines. | Yes No | |
| Writing is professional and grammatically correct. | Yes No |
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.