Part 1
The differences between inferences and assumptions are:
- Assumption: This is a piece of information or a belief we take for granted as true. We usually apply this to our thinking to develop an inference.
- Inference: This occurs when deciding that something is true in light of some other piece(s) of knowledge (or assumptions) being true or present in the field. It is also known as a conclusion.
Both assumptions and inferences can be logical or not and justified or not.
Read and complete the Inference and assumption without discussing your responses with anyone else. After you complete the exercise, your faculty member will provide the answers.
Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:
- Discuss the Inferences and Assumptions Exercise. Identify and rationalize any underlying assumptions and inferences you made.
Part 2
please provide feedback to the following post based on part 1
Post 1
The Inference and Assumption Exercise gave me an opportunity to think about how quickly my mind completes a picture (even with incomplete details) as I read through each of the statements. I observed that many of my first impressions were based on automatic assumptions rather than on direct quotes or sentences from the passage itself. This aligns with Paul and Elder’s (2014) explanation that the mind naturally fills in gaps using unexamined assumptions unless we intentionally slow down our thinking. For instance, I thought the man who came into the store was probably the robber because he asked for money and ran out, although the passage didn’t label him as such. That seemed like a rational conclusion; however, it relied on the assumption that anyone asking for money in a dark room must be robbing you.
I assumed that the owner of the store took the money. Although the passage simply states “The owner opened a cash register,” and “He scooped up the contents,” my mind made the connection between these two things because the author did not provide information about who was responsible for taking the money. As Cooper (2018) points out, we are inclined to infer meaning based upon both what has been written and our expectations; this is an example of what occurred here.
Additionally, when I read the statement “The owner shut off the lights”, I instantly inferred that it was nighttime. Even though the author never stated the time of day, my inference was based on the fact that if someone shuts off all the lights in their store, I would naturally assume it is dark. This demonstrated how easily contextual clues can cause us to make mental shortcuts. I also originally assumed there were just three people in this situation – the owner, the man demanding money, and the police officer. Ultimately, this experience reiterated why we need to take the time to separate and acknowledge everything that is explicitly stated within a passage from anything that I personally add mentally. Additionally, “rational” inferences will sometimes depend on some form of assumption that we have failed to consider or evaluate. Therefore, it is important for us to recognize this reality when making decisions academically and professionally.
Reference:
Cooper, T. (2018). Toward a creative criticality: Revisiting critical thinking. Integral Leadership Review, 18(1), 4148.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools (7th ed.). Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Part 3
Read Toward a Creative Criticality: Revisiting Critical Thinking
Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:
- Discuss the context of the article and your perceptions on the authors symbiotic approach.
Part4
post a feedback to the following post based on part 3
Post 2
In Coopers (2018) article, “Toward a Creative Criticality: Revisiting Critical Thinking,” the author advocates for an integrative approach to critical thinking that emphasizes the coalescence of analytical rigor and creative insight. This perspective is situated within the broader discourse on leadership development and cognitive flexibility, emphasizing that effective criticality must transcend traditional dichotomies that separate skepticism from imagination. Cooper argues that cultivating a creative criticality facilitates more adaptive and innovative thinking an essential competency in complex, dynamic environments. The approach underscores that critical thinking is not merely about deconstructing ideas but also about constructing novel interpretations and solutions through creative engagement.
My perception aligns with Coopers emphasis on the synergetic relationship between critique and creativity. This approach resonates with the notion that sophisticated reasoning involves metacognitive awareness recognizing the limitations of conventional critical strategies while actively fostering innovative thought processes. The integration of creativity into critical thinking challenges educators and leaders to design practices that nurture both critical analysis and inventive problem-solving, thereby fostering a more holistic cognitive development (Cooper, 2018). Moreover, this paradigm shift encourages a reflexive stance whereby practitioners continuously question underlying assumptions and expand their epistemological frameworks, ultimately enhancing their capacity for nuanced judgment and adaptive leadership.
In sum, Coopers conceptualization of creative criticality provides a compelling framework that aligns with advanced scholarly pursuits. It advocates for a redefinition of critical thinking as a dynamic, integrative process one that is vital for addressing the complexities of contemporary leadership and knowledge production.
Reference:
Cooper, T. (2018). Toward a creative criticality: Revisiting critical thinking. Integral Leadership Review, 18(1), 4148.
Part 5
View the Models of thinking Presentations
Choose 1 model of thinking from the presentation that most likely represents your model of thinking while you were reading and answering the questions from the Inferences and Assumptions Exercise in the Wk 3 Discussion 1 – Inferences and Assumptions.
write a 500- to 700-word reflective discussion in which you:
- Identify the model of thinking you chose.
- Explain the model and any underlying assumptions and inferences you made while rationalizing the scenario presented in the Inferences and Assumptions Exercise.
- Explain what thought processes you used to draw conclusions from the scenario in the exercise.
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.