Nursing Question

Purpose:

This assignment is designed to familiarize the DNP student with the grant funding and writing process. The DNP student will develop the competencies needed to effect systemic change by being able to seek out alternative funding sources to be used in validating and implementing EBP programs.

Guidelines:

1. Students will work in group of four (4) to develop a . (Due by 2/9)

2. Once the grant proposal summary is developed, students should begin to elicit community support. (Letters of support or affiliation agreements are often required by grantors. Therefore, it is good to work toward this early on.)

3. Funding sources should be researched, and the top 3 viable sources should be reviewed in detail. Review specific forms required for each grantor. One person from the group should submit a to the course faculty member. (Due by 3/9)

4. If required, a letter of interest or concept paper should be written, submitted to the course faculty member for review through this assignment portal, and potentially submitted to the grantor after faculty review. Students should make contact with course faculty by either email or phone to discuss this if it is required.

5. Develop the written proposal. Please refer to the report by Gerli in your Reading Assignments for further instruction.

The proposal should be submitted to the course faculty member for review prior to potential submission to the grantor. If your grant proposal is due before the assignment deadline, and you wish to go all the way through the process, please communicate with the course faculty member early on so that you can work together to get the proposal submitted in a timely manner.

The basic components of a proposal include the items listed below. Your specific guidelines may vary. If this is the case, please communicate with the course faculty for further guidance and/or resources.

• Cover letter
• Proposal summary or abstract
• Introduction describing the grant seeker or organization
• Problem statement (or needs assessment)
• Project objectives
• Project methods or design
• Project evaluation
• Future funding
• Project budget

6. On or before the due date, one student from the group should submit the final grant proposal. Additionally, each student should submit a short self-evaluation of their performance and a peer evaluation on each of their group members. The evaluation should substantiate any claims of exceptional or below acceptable performance, as this will be used in individual grade calculation for the project.

Grant Writing Project Rubric

Grant Writing Project Rubric

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimelinessDeveloped a timeline once the grantor was chosen. Relayed due dates to the course faculty member, and gave them adequate time for turn-around on materials.	5 ptsAcceptable0 ptsUnacceptable	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelf-EvaluationCritically analyzed own performance, identifying strengths and weaknesses. Described any issues thoroughly.	2.5 ptsFull Marks0 ptsUnacceptable	2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePeer EvaluationsFeedback from evaluation by peers demonstrated professionalism, acceptable participation levels, completion of assigned tasks in a timely manner.	7.5 ptsExceptional3 ptsAcceptable 0 ptsUnacceptable	7.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCover LetterCorrect format. A brief outline of needs addressed in the proposal. Demonstrates a familiarity with the agency/foundation and ties the project to those goals.	5 ptsExceptional4 ptsAcceptable 0 ptsUnacceptable	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProposal SummaryTwo to three paragraphs. Includes a definition of the problem, the objectives of the project, an outline of the proposed activities and procedures, a description of the evaluation plan, plans for the project at the end of the grant, and a statement of cost. Any additional funding sources should also be described.	5 ptsExceptional4 ptsAcceptable 0 ptsUnacceptable	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction-Brief history of the organization -Reference to any grants, endorsements, press coverage of the organization -Qualifications of staff, a list of board of directors -Indicate if funds are being sought elsewhere & for what purpose/portion of the project -Individual applicants should include a succinct resume relating to the objectives of the proposal	5 ptsExceptional4 ptsAcceptable 0 ptsUnacceptable	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem Statement or Needs AssessmentLays out the reason for the proposal. Should make a clear, concise, but well-supported statement of the problem. -Purpose -Beneficiaries -Social & economic costs to be affected -Nature of the problem -What is currently being done -Gaps that will be addressed by the proposal -Specific manner in which problems will be solved–review resources needed No more than 2 pages.	15 ptsExceptional12 ptsAcceptable 0 ptsUnacceptable	15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject ObjectivesDefine the population to be served, the time frame of the project, and specific anticipated outcomes. These should be realistic, measurable, and in quantitative terms.	15 ptsExceptional12 ptsAcceptable 0 ptsUnacceptable	15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProgram Methods and DesignFor each objective, a specific plan of action should be laid out including a sequence of justifiable activities, with staffing and a timetable for each task. -Activities & staff needed -Flow chart of the organizational features -Explain any measurable results foreseen from inputs and throughputs. -Consider & justify the time and money needed for each part of the plan -Highlight innovative features -Use appendices whenever possible to improve readability, but provide supportive data	15 ptsExceptional12 ptsAcceptable 0 ptsUnacceptable	15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation: Product and Process AnalysisProcedures and schedules for gathering, analyzing, and reporting should be described for both product and process evaluation.	10 ptsExceptional8 ptsAcceptable 0 ptsUnacceptable	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFuture FundingDescribe what will happen to the program once the grant ends.	5 ptsExceptional4 ptsAcceptable 0 ptsUnacceptable	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject BudgetComplete, well-thought-out budget developed. Begin with a Budget Summary. In outline form, with line items under major headings and subdivisions. Includes personnel and non-personnel costs if applicable.	10 ptsExceptional8 ptsAcceptable 0 ptsUnacceptable	10 pts

Total Points: 100

Sources: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) provides federal funding to expand healthcare services for medically underserved populations, including HIV prevention services such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), laboratory testing, and access to medications. Nonprofit clinics and federally qualified health centers use HRSA funding to strengthen preventive services and reduce health disparities. .

Gilead Sciences Zeroing In: Ending the HIV Epidemic Grant Program provides financial support to community-based organizations implementing HIV prevention and treatment initiatives, including programs that expand access to PrEP medication services. The program prioritizes projects that improve HIV prevention and access to healthcare in underserved communities.

Gilead COMPASS Initiative supports community organizations working to reduce HIV disparities and expand prevention services in communities disproportionately affected by HIV. The initiative focuses on improving access to HIV testing, prevention services, and PrEP care.

Outline

Grant Proposal: Expanding Access to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in a Nonprofit Clinic

Background and Need

• HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective strategy for preventing HIV infection.
• Access to PrEP remains limited in nonprofit and community clinic settings, particularly for uninsured and underinsured populations.
• Financial barriers related to required laboratory testing and PrEP medication costs significantly limit PrEP initiation and continuation (Chinbunchorn et al., 2023).
• Expanding access to PrEP supports the mission of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) to improve access to preventive healthcare services for underserved populations.

Purpose

• To expand access to PrEP in a nonprofit community clinic by supporting the costs of required laboratory testing and PrEP medications.
• To reduce financial barriers that prevent eligible patients from initiating or continuing PrEP.
• To promote equitable access to HIV prevention services through direct clinical support.

Laboratory Testing Support

• Laboratory testing is required for PrEP initiation and ongoing monitoring.
• Recommended tests include:
  • HIV screening
  • Renal function testing (metabolic panel)
  • Sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening
• Laboratory costs are a major barrier to PrEP access in safety-net settings (Chinbunchorn et al., 2023).
• Grant funds will be used to cover baseline and follow-up laboratory testing for uninsured or underinsured patients.

PrEP Medication Support

• PrEP medication costs remain a barrier despite availability of generic formulations.
• Common challenges include insurance gaps, high deductibles, and delays in medication assistance enrollment (Traylor et al., 2024).
• Grant funding will support:
  • PrEP medications for uninsured patients
  • Short-term medication coverage during insurance or assistance program processing
• Medication support will reduce delays in PrEP initiation and interruptions in therapy.

Alignment With Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Priorities

• Reducing financial barriers improves PrEP initiation and continuation among high-risk populations (Bonett et al., 2023).
• Integrating laboratory and medication support into routine primary care strengthens clinic capacity for HIV prevention.
• The project aligns with HRSA priorities by:
  • Expanding access to preventive services
  • Reducing HIV-related health disparities
  • Supporting sustainable service delivery in nonprofit clinics

References

Bonett, S., Mahajan, A., Teixeira da Silva, D., et al. (2023). Advancing the community plan to end the HIV epidemic: Evaluation of low-threshold PrEP services in sexual health clinics. Implementation Science Communications, 4(1), 110.

Chinbunchorn, T., et al. (2023). HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis provision by U.S. health centers in 2021. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 94(3), 245252.

Traylor, D. O., et al. (2024). Barriers and facilitators influencing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis prescribing in primary care. AIDS and Behavior, 28(2), 512523.

• Reply to post from Robin FrazierReply
• Mark as UnreadMark as Unread

WRITE MY PAPER