Nursing Question

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionYou must include research on the dangers and explain the recommended safety measures in a tornado emergency.

30 to >26.0 ptsProficientThe introduction is clear, thorough, and accurately supported by significant research on the dangers of a tornado. Explains realistic safety measures and survival strategies for a tornado emergency, displaying a significant understanding of the course content.26 to >23.0 ptsAcceptableThe introduction is accurate and includes adequate research on the dangers of a tornado. Explains some details for a tornado emergency, but some ideas may be vague, or incomplete, suggesting adequate understanding of the course content.

23 to >22.0 ptsDevelopingThe introduction includes minimal research on the dangers of a tornado. Explains some content for a tornado emergency that is unsupported and/or inaccurate. suggesting a general understanding of the course content.22 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThe introduction lacks research on the dangers of a tornado. Explanation is general and lacking in detail for a tornado emergency or is off-topic, suggesting a lack of understanding of the course content.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlanningWhat is your plan? Identify a safe place in your home. Provide realistic examples and explain how you would apply the safety and survival measures you learned in your research.

45 to >40.0 ptsProficientIdentifies a safe location to shelter in place in your residence. Makes a clear connection with the tornado safety introduction. Provide realistic examples and explain how you would apply the safety and survival measures you learned in your research of a tornado emergency to your specific living arrangements. Includes 5-6 safety measures displaying significant understanding of the course content.40 to >36.0 ptsAcceptableIdentifies an appropriate location to shelter in place in your residence Makes a connection with the tornado safety introduction. Provide realistic examples and explain how you would apply the safety and survival measures you learned in your research of a tornado emergency to your specific living arrangements. Includes 3-4 safety measures suggesting adequate understanding of the course content.

36 to >34.0 ptsDevelopingIdentifies an inappropriate location to shelter in place in your residence. Does not make a connection with the tornado safety introduction. Provide realistic examples and explain how you would apply the safety and survival measures you learned in your research of a tornado emergency to your specific living arrangements. Includes 1-2 safety measures suggesting a general understanding of the course content.34 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryUnable to identify a safe location to shelter in place in your residence. Does not make a connection with the tornado safety introduction. Provide realistic examples and explain how you would apply the safety and survival measures you learned in your research of a tornado emergency to your specific living arrangements. No safety measures suggesting lack of understanding of the course content.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePreparednessHow prepared are you in the event of a disaster?

30 to >26.0 ptsProficientThoroughly and thoughtfully evaluates ones level of preparedness, giving specific examples in all 3 of the following areas: Potential disasters in their area Their 72-hour go-bag assignment. Family Disaster Plan Checklist.26 to >23.0 ptsAcceptableEvaluates ones level of preparedness, giving general examples in 3 of the following areas: Potential disasters in their area Their 72-hour go-bag assignment. Family Disaster Plan Checklist.

23 to >22.0 ptsDevelopingEvaluates ones level of preparedness but does not give examples in at least 2 of the following areas: 1. Potential disasters in their area 2. Their 72-hour go-bag assignment. 3. Family Disaster Plan Checklist.22 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryVaguely evaluates ones level of preparedness but does not give examples in at least 2 of the following areas: 1. Potential disasters in their area 2. Their 72-hour go-bag assignment. 3. Family Disaster Plan Checklist.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection/ConclusionReflect on how prepared you were before this class and compare it with how prepared you are now.

35 to >31.0 ptsProficientReflects thoughtfully and in-depth on personal growth in disaster preparedness throughout the course, offering examples and details for evidence. Provides specific examples from ones personal situation to support the evaluation with evidence. Provides specific examples of newly acquired emergency items or wish list items. Provides specific examples of any additional training or certification courses for the future. Provides specific examples of knowledge that was shared with friends and family. Draws several conclusions and makes reasonable predictions on how this new knowledge will impact you as a nurse.31 to >27.0 ptsAcceptableReflects on personal growth in disaster preparedness throughout the course. Provides general examples to support the evaluation. Provides general examples of newly acquired emergency items or wish list items. Provides general examples of any additional training or certification courses for the future. Provides general examples of knowledge that was shared with friends and family. Draws conclusions and makes a connection on how this new knowledge will impact you as a nurse.

27 to >26.0 ptsDevelopingDoes not reflect on personal growth in disaster preparedness throughout the course or is vague in reflection. Provides general examples but they are inadequate in supporting the evaluation. Provides vague examples of newly acquired emergency items or wish list items. Provides vague examples of any additional training or certification courses for the future. Provides vague examples of knowledge that was shared with friends and family. Draws conclusions on how this new knowledge will impact you as a nurse.26 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDoes not reflect on personal growth in disaster preparedness throughout the course or is vague in reflection. Provides vague examples, and they are inadequate in supporting the evaluation. Does not provide examples of newly acquired emergency items or wish list items. Does not provide examples of any additional training or certification courses for the future. Does not provide examples of knowledge that was shared with friends and family. Does not draw conclusions on how this new knowledge will impact you as a nurse.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APACorrect spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Uses current APA Style throughout the paper, including title page and references. Cites appropriate number of scholarly sources.

10 to >9.0 ptsProficientThe assignment has no errors using the 7th edition student APA formatting (including cover page, introduction, body of paper, reference page and in-text citations). Includes two or more scholarly resources with in-text citations to support safety and survival strategies. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. 500 or more word count.9 to >8.0 ptsAcceptableThe assignment consistently follows the 7th edition student APA formatting (including cover page, introduction, body of paper, reference page and in-text citations). Includes two scholarly resources with in-text citations, but they may not clearly support the safety measures presented. Contains only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few (1-2) grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. 400-499 word count.

8 to >7.0 ptsDevelopingThe assignment does not consistently follow the 7th edition student APA formatting (including cover page, introduction, body of paper, reference page and in-text citations). Includes only one scholarly resource and is missing in-text citations, to support safety measures. There are several grammatical (3-6), spelling, or punctuation errors. 300-399 word count.7 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThe assignment minimally follows the 7th edition student APA formatting (including cover page, introduction, body of paper, reference page and in-text citations). One or no scholarly resources are cited or referenced. There are numerous grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors (7+). 299 or less word count.

10 pts