Assignment: Real-World Business Ethics Case Study
Overview:
For this assignment, you will select a real-world business ethics problem and analyze it using concepts and theories from class. The paper should be no more than 3 pages (double-spaced) and should demonstrate your ability to explain, evaluate, and propose solutions to ethical challenges in business.
Instructions:
- Choose a Case
- Find a real-life business ethics problem. This could involve workplace rights, corporate governance, environmental responsibility, marketing, AI, globalization, or another topic from our syllabus.
- Provide a working link to a credible news article, report, or other reliable source that describes the case.
- Explain the Problem
- Summarize the situation clearly in your own words. Who is involved? What happened?
- Identify the ethical dilemma and why it is morally significant.
- Methodology
- Briefly explain how you researched your case and how you approached the analysis.
- Mention which ethical theory (utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, etc.) or framework you used to guide your evaluation.
- Propose a Solution
- Offer one or more possible solutions to the ethical problem.
- Support your answer with reasoning: Why is this solution the most ethical? Who benefits or is harmed? Is it practical to implement?
Format:
- Length: Maximum of 3 pages, double-spaced (excluding citations).
- Include the link to your source at the end of the paper.
- Use clear, organized writing and reference ethical theories where appropriate.
Real-World Business Ethics Case Study Rubric (100 points total)
| Criteria | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Selection & Explanation (30 pts) | 2730: Case is clearly identified, highly relevant, and thoroughly explained with key actors and ethical dilemma described. | 2326: Case is clear and relevant but explanation lacks some depth or detail. | 1922: Case is identified but vague or incomplete explanation. | 018: Case missing, unclear, or irrelevant to business ethics. |
| Ethical Analysis (30 pts) | 2730: Strong application of ethical theories (utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, etc.); deep understanding and well-reasoned analysis. | 2326: Good application of theory but somewhat general or uneven. | 1922: Limited or superficial use of ethical theory; weak connections. | 018: No meaningful analysis or incorrect use of ethical concepts. |
| Proposed Solution (30 pts) | 2730: Thoughtful, well-reasoned, practical solution(s) clearly tied to ethical analysis. | 2326: Reasonable solution(s) but not fully developed or justified. | 1922: Vague or unrealistic solution weakly connected to analysis. | 018: No solution offered or irrelevant solution. |
| Methodology & Presentation (10 pts) | 910: Methodology clearly explained; writing well-organized, clear, free of major errors; source link included. | 78: Methodology present but minimal detail; writing mostly clear with minor issues. | 56: Weak or unclear methodology; disorganized writing; missing/incomplete source. | 04: Methodology absent; writing unclear; no source link. |
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
✔Secure Service ✔ Plagiarism Free ✔On-time Delivery
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.