Please edit and enhance the following paper I drafted to meet the writing rubric and directions and ensure that is perfectly APA formatted:
INSTRUCTIONS:
Assignment Directions
For this assignment, learners will review the case studies presented in each school in the activity. Utilizing the course reading materials and the scholarly literature to explore and examine the range of service delivery systems available to school counselors, learners will present an appropriate plan to address the presenting concern.
A strong assignment submission will demonstrate an understanding of the various systems and how a school counselor utilizes those systems to support student success. Utilize the following “menu” of services to support your work on this assignment:
- Direct Student Services.
- School counseling core curriculum, such as classroom lessons.
- Individual student planning, such as appraisal or advising.
- Responsive services, such as individual counseling, group counseling, or crisis counseling.
- Indirect Student Services.
- Referral to other providers, both internal and external to the school.
- Consultation.
- Collaboration.
Part 1: Intervention and Referral Services
Learners will provide an introduction that examines the range of service delivery systems services, including individual counseling, group counseling, peer mediation, individual student planning/career counseling, consultation with the teacher and school counseling core curriculum.
This section is not specific to the cases but should be a concise overview of the services listed in the menu above.
Part 2: Case Studies
Analyze each case study presented in the Blooming Park simulation as if you were the counselor assigned to work with the student. Include the following information:
- Summarize the student, including demographics and developmental information.
- Assess the available information/data and identify the presenting concern(s).
- Propose at least one delivery system service that would be appropriate for the case.
For each case, there is not necessarily a “right” or “wrong” answer; however, a learner must justify the selection of a system based on evidence from the literature.
Requirements
Your assignment should meet the following requirements :
- Written communication: Writing must be scholarly, professional, free of errors, and consistent with expectations for members of the counseling profession.
- Length: 68 double-spaced pages, excluding the cover page and references list. Include page numbers, headings, and running headers.
- References: Minimum of five current, peer-reviewed references. Refer to as needed.
- Format: Use current APA style and formatting per , paying particular attention to citations and references.
- Font and font size: You have the option to use Calibri, 11 point; Arial, 11 point; Lucida Sans Unicode, 10 point; Times New Roman, 12 point; or Georgia, 11 point.
Review the rubric to ensure that you understand the grading criteria for this assignment.
| Week 5 Assignment: Intervention and Referral Services | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| Describe the six delivery system services available to school counselors. |
30 to >25.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes the six delivery system services available to school counselors with exceptional clarity, examples, and support from the literature. 25.5 to >21 pts PROFICIENT Describes the six delivery system services available to school counselors.. 21 to >0 pts BASIC Partially describes the six delivery system services available to school counselors. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe the six delivery system services available to school counselors. |
/ 30 pts |
|
Explain the demographics and developmental factors relevant to each case study. |
40 to >34 pts DISTINGUISHED Explains the demographics and developmental factors relevant to each case study with exceptional clarity. Conclusions are connected to evidence from the literature or information from stakeholder interviews in the media piece. 34 to >28 pts PROFICIENT Explains the demographics and developmental factors relevant to each case study 28 to >0 pts BASIC Partially explains the demographics and developmental factors relevant to each case study. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not explain the demographics and developmental factors relevant to each case study. |
/ 40 pts |
|
Assess each case for presenting concerns and contributing factors. |
40 to >34 pts DISTINGUISHED Assesses each case for presenting concerns and contributing factors. Contributing factors are logically aligned with the presenting concerns and are based on evidence from the literature and/or information from the stakeholder interviews in the media piece. 34 to >28 pts PROFICIENT Assesses each case for presenting concerns and contributing factors. 28 to >0 pts BASIC Partially assesses each case for presenting concerns and contributing factors. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not assess each case for presenting concerns and contributing factors. |
/ 40 pts |
|
Propose an appropriate delivery system for each case. |
60 to >51 pts DISTINGUISHED Proposed an appropriate delivery system service for each case, justifying each proposed service with evidence from the literature. 51 to >42 pts PROFICIENT Proposes an appropriate delivery system for each case. 42 to >0 pts BASIC Proposes a delivery system service for each case, but the proposed service may be inaccurately described or general rather than specific to the case. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not propose an appropriate delivery system for each case. |
/ 60 pts |
|
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and professional, is accurate per APA standards, and is consistent with expectations for members of the counseling professions. |
30 to >25.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Communicates in a manner that is exceptionally scholarly and professional, demonstrates exceptional ability to write using APA standards, and is thoroughly consistent with expectations for members of the counseling professions. 25.5 to >21 pts PROFICIENT Communicates in a manner that is scholarly and professional, is accurate per APA standards, and is consistent with expectations for members of the counseling professions. 21 to >0 pts BASIC Inconsistently communicates in a manner that is scholarly and professional, is accurate per APA standards, and is consistent with expectations for members of the counseling professions. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly or professional, accurate per APA standards, nor consistent with expectations for counseling professions. |
/ 30 pts |
| Total Points: 0 | ||
Intervention and Referral Services Within the ASCA National Model
Kenny Wilson
Capella University
Intervention and Referral Services Within the ASCA National Model
Introduction
The American School Counselor Association (ASCA) National Model emphasizes the importance of comprehensive school counseling programs that support students academic, career, and social-emotional development through direct and indirect services (American School Counselor Association [ASCA], 2019). School counselors utilize evidence-based delivery systems to address student concerns while collaborating with families, teachers, administrators, and community stakeholders to promote equitable educational outcomes. Effective implementation of counseling delivery systems allows school counselors to intervene early, reduce barriers to learning, and improve student achievement and well-being.
Direct student services include school counseling core curriculum lessons, individual student planning, and responsive services such as individual counseling, group counseling, crisis response, and peer mediation. School counseling core curriculum lessons are preventative and developmental interventions delivered to all students in classroom or group settings to enhance academic, career, and social-emotional competencies (Carey & Dimmitt, 2012). Individual student planning involves appraisal and advisement activities that help students establish educational and career goals aligned with their interests and abilities. Responsive services address immediate student concerns such as bullying, grief, mental health symptoms, academic decline, behavioral concerns, and family stressors (ASCA, 2019).
Indirect student services include consultation, collaboration, and referrals to internal or external providers. Consultation occurs when school counselors work with parents, teachers, or administrators to identify strategies that support student success. Collaboration involves coordinated efforts among school personnel, families, and community agencies to address student needs holistically. Referral services are necessary when students require specialized mental health treatment, housing support, medical intervention, or community-based resources beyond the scope of school counseling practice (Sink et al., 2018). Together, these delivery systems create a comprehensive framework for promoting student achievement and emotional wellness.
Case Study One: Amir Malik
Demographics and Developmental Factors
Amir Malik is a 15-year-old ninth-grade Muslim student attending Sylvia Plath High School. He comes from a financially privileged and academically high-achieving family. Amirs parents immigrated from the United Arab Emirates, and his father is the chair of a prestigious university computer science department. Developmentally, Amir is in adolescence, a period characterized by identity formation, increased peer influence, autonomy seeking, and career exploration (Erikson, 1968). Amir appears to be struggling with balancing familial expectations and his emerging personal identity. His older brothers acceptance into an Ivy League university appears to intensify feelings of inadequacy and comparison.
Amirs withdrawal from peers, declining academic performance, loss of motivation, excessive sleeping, and diminished enjoyment in previously meaningful activities may indicate emotional distress and possible depressive symptoms. Research demonstrates that adolescents experiencing high parental pressure and perfectionistic expectations are at increased risk for anxiety, depression, and academic disengagement (Luthar et al., 2020). Cultural expectations surrounding achievement and family honor may also contribute to Amirs internalized stress.
Presenting Concerns and Contributing Factors
Amir presents with declining grades, social withdrawal, low self-esteem, lack of motivation, peer disengagement, and emotional exhaustion. Teacher observations indicate decreased participation and isolation from peers. Amirs mother reports excessive sleeping, reduced involvement in extracurricular activities, and ongoing conflict regarding academic expectations. Amir additionally expresses hopelessness about meeting family expectations and reports that art is his only meaningful interest.
Contributing factors include intense parental pressure, identity conflict, social isolation, cultural expectations regarding academic success, and possible depressive symptomology. Amirs reluctance to communicate openly with peers or family further increases his emotional vulnerability.
Appropriate Delivery System Interventions
The most appropriate delivery system for Amir is responsive services through individual counseling combined with consultation and individual student planning. Individual counseling would provide Amir with a confidential and supportive environment to process stress, explore identity concerns, and develop coping skills. Cognitive behavioral interventions may help challenge negative self-perceptions and perfectionistic thinking patterns (Gerrity & DeLucia-Waack, 2007).
Consultation with Amirs parents and teachers would also be critical. The school counselor could educate Amirs parents about the psychological effects of excessive academic pressure while encouraging a strengths-based approach that validates Amirs artistic interests. Collaboration with teachers could support academic accommodations and emotional monitoring within the classroom.
Individual student planning would further support Amirs career and educational exploration by helping him examine pathways that integrate his interests in art while still maintaining academic rigor. Research indicates that culturally responsive counseling and collaborative family involvement improve outcomes among adolescents from high-achieving families experiencing emotional distress (Bemak & Chung, 2008). Because Amir exhibits possible depressive symptoms, referral to an outside mental health provider may also be warranted if symptoms intensify.
Case Study Two: Jason Bradford
Demographics and Developmental Factors
Jason Bradford is a 13-year-old sixth-grade student attending Madison Middle School. He comes from a low socioeconomic background and has experienced multiple adverse childhood experiences, including parental incarceration, housing instability, poverty, and academic disruption. Jason was retained in second grade and is older than many of his peers, which may contribute to feelings of embarrassment or social disconnection during early adolescence.
Developmentally, middle school students often experience heightened emotional sensitivity, peer comparison, and a growing need for social belonging (Eccles & Roeser, 2011). Jasons exposure to chronic stressors likely impacts his emotional regulation, behavior, and academic functioning. Trauma research demonstrates that unstable housing and family adversity significantly increase the likelihood of behavioral outbursts, academic decline, and school disengagement among adolescents (Cole et al., 2013).
Presenting Concerns and Contributing Factors
Jason presents with aggressive behavior, declining grades, emotional dysregulation, classroom disruption, peer conflict, and school suspension. Teacher reports indicate increased irritability, refusal to complete assignments, and physical aggression toward peers. Jasons father describes significant family instability, including homelessness, financial hardship, and limited supervision due to work demands.
Jasons emotional reactions appear strongly connected to shame surrounding his family circumstances and sensitivity to peer ridicule regarding homelessness and maternal incarceration. His behavioral outbursts may function as protective responses to humiliation, instability, and chronic stress. Housing insecurity, trauma exposure, poverty, inconsistent adult supervision, and social stigma all contribute significantly to Jasons presenting concerns.
Appropriate Delivery System Interventions
The most appropriate delivery systems for Jason include responsive services, consultation, collaboration, and referral services. Individual counseling focused on trauma-informed interventions would help Jason develop emotional regulation skills, healthy coping strategies, and problem-solving abilities. Small-group counseling focused on anger management, resilience, or social skills could also reduce isolation and normalize emotional experiences among peers facing adversity.
Consultation with Jasons teachers would support implementation of trauma-sensitive classroom strategies. Educators should understand that Jasons behaviors may reflect emotional distress rather than intentional defiance. Research supports trauma-informed school approaches that emphasize relationship building, emotional safety, and restorative practices rather than punitive discipline alone (Overstreet & Chafouleas, 2016).
Collaboration with the school social worker, administration, and community agencies would also be essential. Jasons family requires housing assistance, food resources, and potentially transportation support. Referral to community mental health services and housing programs would address barriers outside the school environment that are negatively affecting academic performance and emotional functioning.
Additionally, school counseling core curriculum lessons addressing empathy, bullying prevention, and emotional regulation could support the broader school climate and reduce stigma experienced by vulnerable students like Jason.
Case Study Three: Gwen Katz
Demographics and Developmental Factors
Gwen Katz is a 10-year-old fifth-grade Jewish student attending Max Aasen Elementary School. She comes from a middle-class family and participates in gifted programming for mathematics and language arts. Developmentally, upper elementary students increasingly prioritize peer acceptance and social belonging. Gifted students may experience additional challenges related to perfectionism, asynchronous development, and social isolation (Neihart et al., 2016).
Although Gwen historically maintained strong peer relationships and academic success, she is now experiencing social rejection, bullying, and emotional withdrawal. The transition into early adolescence and changing peer dynamics appear to contribute significantly to her emotional distress.
Presenting Concerns and Contributing Factors
Gwen presents with social withdrawal, academic decline, low motivation, emotional distress, and peer victimization. Teachers report bullying behaviors including exclusion, name-calling, threats, and social isolation. Gwen describes feeling hated by peers and disconnected from former friends. Her avoidance of social interaction and reduced academic engagement suggest that the bullying has significantly impacted her self-esteem and emotional well-being.
Contributing factors include relational aggression among peers, gifted student social dynamics, exclusion from peer groups, and limited emotional expression with parents. Research demonstrates that relational bullying can significantly impact psychological functioning, particularly among adolescent girls who place high value on peer relationships (Rose & Tynes, 2015).
Appropriate Delivery System Interventions
The most appropriate delivery systems for Gwen include responsive services, school counseling core curriculum interventions, consultation, and collaboration. Individual counseling would provide Gwen with emotional support, coping strategies, and opportunities to rebuild self-confidence. Group counseling focused on friendship skills, resilience, or social-emotional learning could additionally foster peer support and reduce feelings of isolation.
School counseling core curriculum lessons addressing bullying prevention, empathy, inclusion, and healthy peer relationships would benefit the broader student population. Preventative classroom interventions are effective in improving school climate and reducing relational aggression among elementary students (Swearer et al., 2010).
Consultation with teachers and administrators would support consistent responses to bullying behaviors and improve monitoring of peer interactions. Collaboration with Gwens parents would help establish emotional support strategies at home while promoting open communication. Because gifted students often benefit from connection with intellectual peers, the counselor could additionally help Gwen identify positive extracurricular opportunities that encourage healthy peer relationships and belonging.
Conclusion
The ASCA National Model provides school counselors with a comprehensive framework for addressing students academic, career, and social-emotional needs through direct and indirect delivery systems. The cases of Amir, Jason, and Gwen illustrate how developmental, environmental, cultural, and relational factors influence student functioning within schools. Effective school counselors must assess presenting concerns holistically while selecting evidence-based interventions tailored to individual student needs.
Responsive services, consultation, collaboration, school counseling core curriculum, referrals, and individual student planning all play essential roles in supporting student success. Comprehensive counseling programs that integrate culturally responsive, trauma-informed, and developmentally appropriate interventions can improve student well-being, strengthen academic outcomes, and foster positive school climates.
References
American School Counselor Association. (2019). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (4th ed.). Author.
Bemak, F., & Chung, R. C. Y. (2008). New professional roles and advocacy strategies for school counselors in a changing multicultural society. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86(3), 372381.
Carey, J., & Dimmitt, C. (2012). School counseling and student outcomes: Summary of six statewide studies. Professional School Counseling, 16(2), 146153.
Cole, S. F., Eisner, A., Gregory, M., & Ristuccia, J. (2013). Helping traumatized children learn: Supportive school environments for children traumatized by family violence. Massachusetts Advocates for Children.
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225241.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton.
Gerrity, D., & DeLucia-Waack, J. (2007). Effectiveness of groups in the schools. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 32(1), 97106.
Luthar, S. S., Kumar, N. L., & Zillmer, N. (2020). High-achieving schools connote risks for adolescents: Problems documented, processes implicated, and directions for interventions. American Psychologist, 75(7), 983995.
Neihart, M., Pfeiffer, S., & Cross, T. (2016). The social and emotional development of gifted children. Routledge.
Overstreet, S., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2016). Trauma-informed schools: Introduction to the special issue. School Mental Health,
Sink, C. A., Cooney, M., & Adkins, C. (2018). The impact of comprehensive school counseling programs on students academic achievement. Professional School Counseling, 22(1), 112.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.