Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Team work agreement

    Hello! A part of team agreement needs to be written. Create a well-organized document with transitions between paragraphs and sections written in a business writing style, including professional language, a cohesive voice, and concise/focused. Use bullet points, tables, and other visual components as needed to organize your document. Cite sources using Chicago Manual Style, including footnotes within the document and a Bibliography at the end. Please see attached for all the necessary instructions. It Does not have to be an essay, it can be both paragraphs and bullets or bullet paragraphs. Include sources late as the justification or an example of how it is done in other companies rules wise. Termination and guidelines are included attached but these should be used only in one part of the assignment, once again please see attached. The main assignment is the attached image.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Termination and guidelines.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Chapter 12: Artificial Intelligence; Chapter 4: Explanatory…

    Prompt 1: Artificial Intelligence (Chapter 12)

    Directions: Read the attached short story called Nova, the Rogue AI, which was written entirely by Chat GPT artificial intelligence. Ironically, the story is about artificial intelligence gone awry. This prompt has two parts:

    • Drawing on both the short story itself and at least 2 works from Chapter 12, discuss ways in which the plot of the story supports some of the predictions or cautions expressed in the selections of Chapter 12. For instance, do the events in the story mirror any of the fears authors in Chapter 12 have expressed? If so, in what ways? Be specific.
    • What is your stance on the AI revolution? Should we be more cautious with our approach and adoption of AI technologies, or should we continue to embrace these new technologies for the advancement of our society? Please explain your answer.

    Tips: Review Chapter 12, especially the selections that warn against using AI irresponsibly or without regulations. Make sure that you are integrating quotes you use from the 2 sources in Chapter 12 and stating the name of the selection and its author.

    Other Requirements: You must use at least 1 quote per selection from Chapter 12, for a minimum total of 2 quotes. Your response should be at least 250 words. Please double-space your response. Avoid using the internet or any AI-assisted or chat devices.

    Prompt 2: Explanatory Synthesis (Chapter 4)

    Directions: Dominic Basulto writes that complex ethical and philosophical questions [lie] at the heart of AI. In an explanatory synthesis that draws on at least 3 sources from Chapter 12, explain some of these ethical and philosophical questions and discuss their complexity. Below are examples of questions you can ask to get your thoughts flowing:

    • How are recent developments in AI making us reexamine the boundaries between human and machine intelligence?
    • How will AI in healthcare and science fields create additional ethical considerations?
    • How will AI create ethical and philosophical considerations for the future of the workforce (i.e. What will humans do if they no longer need to work?; Will wealth be distributed differently if we continue on our current trajectory of AI evolution?)?
    • What rights should AI be entitled to if it becomes more human?
    • Who will be responsible for AI gone wrong?
    • Is it fair for AI to compete against humans in the workforce or in talent competitions?

    Tips: Review both Chapter 12 and Chapter 4 in the textbook. Be sure to also look over the Explanatory Synthesis lesson in Week 4 Content of D2L. Make sure that you are integrating quotes you use from the 3 sources in Chapter 12 and stating the name of the selection and its author.

    Other Requirements: You must use at least 1 quote per selection from Chapter 12, for a minimum total of 3 quotes. Your response should be at least 350 words. Please double-space your response. Avoid using the internet or any AI-assisted or chat devices as they are discovered through our Turnitin integration.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Real chapter 12.pdf, Nova the Rogue AI Selection for RDG 101 Test 2 (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 6 SOAP note

    Please create a SOAP note on my patient Mark. please be very specific. I have attached a SOAP note guide for reference. Please fill out Soap Note template and be very thorough. I also have attached information about the patient mark that you can add to the SOAP note.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): SOAP NOTES Guide.pdf, 82925 SOAP Notes Template.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Sustainable Construction

    Q1. How can sustainable construction promote the idea of sustainable development? What various forms of contributions can be expected from the construction industry for sustainable development. Also, prioritize these contributions from the most impactful to the least impactful.

    Q2. Biophilia and Biomimicry are identified as design approached for sustainable construction? Mention three examples of actual construction projects for each design approach and explain how these design approaches have been applied in those projects. Do these design approaches address all the dimensions (economic, environmental, and social) of sustainability in construction?

    Q3. Whis is meant by the term Sustainability Indicators? For construction project management, what are the possible sustainability indicators? Also, highlight the importance and purpose of identifying sustainable indicators for construction. Focus on the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development separately while answering this question.

    Notes:

    Questions may have several parts. Please ensure to attempt all parts.

    There is no limit on number of pages.

    Assignments should be neatly executed with use of at least two colors (e.g., headings/table and figure titles in black with rest of the content in blue).

    Assignments should be legible (good writing) and understandable (good English). Failing to meet any one of the criteria will result in ve grading.

    References for data obtained from other sources should be clearly indicated at the end.

    Requirements:

  • Reflection 5

    Kwame Nkrumah suggests we read the history of philosophy through ‘social contention’ rather than as the development of a series of abstract doctrines. Why do you think he has chosen to do this? What are some of the potential benefits of reading philosophy in this way?

    MUST BE MINIMUM OF 200 WORDS. NOOOOO AI. IT MUST BE SCANNED UING TWO SITES. USE AT LEAST 1 PARENTHETICAL CITATION

    https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/98/03/29/specials/baldwin-english.html?source=post_page—————————

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Nkrumah – Philosophy in Retrospect.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • The Power of Interest Groups

    For this assignment, you will choose to focus on one interest group. INTEREST GROUP: Tennessee Education Association. Choose a real interest group and two to five resources regarding the interest group. You will need to choose resources with differing viewpoints. Then, in 500-750 words, do the following:

    1. Describe the type of power the interest group has. Include where the power comes from. Is the power instilled in the organization or does it come from citizens.
    2. Discuss if that power has changed over time. Has the interest group gained or lost power? Include your perceived catalyst of the gain or loss of power.
    3. Discuss the difference between formal and informal interest groups. What type of power does each have?

    Use two to five scholarly resources to support your explanations.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

    https://tnea.org/

  • Divisions of the Mammalian Brain

    Divisions of the Mammalian Brain

    Instructions: This assignment is designed to help you understand the five major brain regions by examining what they do and how they work, how they are applied to real-life examples, and the results of any damaged areas.

    Required Course Text: Pinel, J. P. (2021). Biopsychology (11th ed). Pearson

    Part 1: Define the Five Major Areas

    Describe each brain area in your own words. Support using your course text.

    1. Myelencephalon
    2. Metencephalon
    3. Mesencephalon
    4. Diencephalon
    5. Telencephalon

    Part 2: Structure and Function of the Five Brain Areas

    Explain the structure and function of each of the five brain areas.

    1. Describe each of the regions positions within the brain.
    2. What are their primary functions?
    3. Provide a real-world example of each of the regions roles in behavior or psychological functioning.
    4. Discuss potential deficits or disorders that result from damage to these areas.

    Part 3: Reflection

    1. Which of the five brain regions did you connect with the most? Why?
    2. How does it help you understand a real-life experience youve had?
    3. How has the knowledge youve gained shaped your understanding of brain injuries or disorders?

    Part 4: References

    • Cite your course text and any other source used on the last slide using APA 7 format.

    Submission: PowerPoint Presentation

    • Submit as a presentation (PowerPoint, Google Slides, etc.).
    • Include images, quotes, or visuals to make your slides more engaging.
    • Use as many slides as you need to organize your ideas.

  • Nursing Leadership Reflection

    The textbook reference: Huston, C. J. (2022). Lippincott CoursePoint Enhanced for Marquis and Huston: Leadership Roles and Management Functions in Nursing (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.

    Below are the assignment instructions from the professor:

    Requirements:

    1. Choose two objectives from the list above.
    2. Write a 12 page reflection connecting your selected objectives to nursing leadership, organizational change, or your professional/clinical experiences.
    3. Clearly explain how the objectives apply to improving healthcare delivery and advancing the nursing profession.
    4. Use APA 7th edition format for any references you include (minimum of one scholarly source within the last five years is encouraged).
    5. Submit your reflection in the designated folder by the due date on your class schedule.

    Purpose:

    This reflection will help you critically analyze the nurses role in leading quality care initiatives and responding to organizational change, while reinforcing the connection between theory and practice.

    The two objectives I have chosen are:

    7.1. Describe the nurse leader and managers role as a change agent.

    7.5. Examine strategies for effecting change.

    I am an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Registered Nurse so please relate it to this specialty of nursing whenever possible.

  • Week 6 Written Assignment: OLE Site Reflection (Chronic/Non-…

    Instructions :

    Write a 1-2 page paper connecting your OLE observations to the topics of chronic diseases. In your paper, address the following:

    1. Agency Context
    • Describe how your agency addresses chronic diseases.
    • Identify any programs, services, or strategies they use (e.g., treatment, health education, screenings).
    1. Chronic Disease Perspective
    • Choose one chronic disease (e.g., cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease).
    • Discuss whether your agency directly or indirectly addresses risk factors or prevention of this disease.
    1. Integration with Course Concepts
    • Relate your observations to key concepts from Schneiders chapter on Genetic and Chronic Diseases
    • Be specific: link what you saw or heard at your site to public health strategies described in the textbook.

    Format Requirements:

    • 12 pages, double-spaced
    • APA formatting
    • Reference Schneider (and other sources as needed)

    General Written Assignment Rubric

    General Written Assignment Rubric

    CriteriaRatingsPointsIntroduction and Purpose

    Highly Developed

    Clear, original introduction; purpose fully achieved.

    18.9 to 20 pts

    Developed

    Introduction is clear; purpose mostly achieved.

    17.1 to 18.8 pts

    Developing

    Introduction and purpose of the paper is vague or partially developed.

    15.3 to 17 pts

    Underdeveloped

    No clear introduction or purpose.

    0 to 15.2 pts

    /20 pts

    Organization and Structure

    Highly Developed

    Logical structure; smooth transition

    14.2 to 15 pts

    Developed

    Generally organized; some transitions.

    12.76 to 14.1 pts

    Developing

    Some structure; transitions lacking.

    11.5 to 12.75 pts

    Underdeveloped

    Disorganized or hard to follow.

    0 to 11.4 pts

    /15 pts

    Content and Development

    Highly Developed

    In-depth analysis; strong evidence and examples.

    18.9 to 20 pts

    Developed

    Adequate analysis; some supporting evidence

    17.1 to 18.8 pts

    Developing

    Limited analysis; weak support.

    15.3 to 17 pts

    Underdeveloped

    Minimal or irrelevant content.

    0 to 15.2 pts

    /20 pts

    Follows Assignment

    Highly Developed

    All elements of assignment included in a thorough and accurate manner.

    9.5 to 10 pts

    Developed

    Most elements of assignments included

    8.6 to 9.4 pts

    Developing

    Some elements of the assignment are missing or inaccurate,

    7.7 to 8.5 pts

    Underdeveloped

    Many elements of the assignment are missing or inaccurate.

    0 to 7.6 pts

    /10 pts

    Use of Sources

    Highly Developed

    23 credible sources; well-integrated and cited.v

    9.5 to 10 pts

    Developed

    2 sources used; mostly integrated and cited.

    8.6 to 9.4 pts

    Developing

    1 source or weak integration/citation.

    7.7 to 8.5 pts

    Underdeveloped

    No sources or improperly cited.

    0 to 7.6 pts

    /10 pts

    Critical Thinking

    Highly Developed

    Demonstrates insight and original thought.

    9.5 to 10 pts

    Developed

    Some critical thinking evident

    8.6 to 9.4 pts

    Developing

    Limited critical thinking.

    7.7 to 8.5 pts

    Underdeveloped

    Lacks critical thinking.

    0 to 7.6 pts

    /10 pts

    Grammar and Mechanics

    Highly Developed

    Virtually no errors in grammar or mechanics.

    9.5 to 10 pts

    Developed

    Few minor errors; do not affect clarity.

    8.6 to 9.4 pts

    Developing

    Several errors; somewhat affect clarity.

    7.7 to 8.5 pts

    Underdeveloped

    Frequent errors; hinder understanding.

    0 to 7.6 pts

    /10 pts

    APA Formatting

    Highly Developed

    Perfect APA formatting throughout

    4.8 to 5 pts

    Developed

    Minor APA errors.

    4.3 to 4.7 pts

    Developing

    Multiple APA errors.

    3.9 to 4.2 pts

    Underdeveloped

    No APA formatting.

    0 to 3.8 pts

    /5 pts

  • Past Tense Edit

    I need the paper in the past tense, the methodology and lit review sections especially, but the entire document has to be in past tense.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Dissertation.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.