Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Module 3

    Your essay should have at least one direct quotation that includes in-text or parenthetical citation and conforms to MLA standards, including a references page. In a two-page response paper explain how: Early oral versions of Little Red Riding Hood circulated among mixed-age audiences at a time when childhood was not understood as a separate stage of development. Drawing only from the assigned readings and mini-lectures, explain how recognizing this historical context changes our reading of the story? You must draw ONLY from the assigned readings and the mini-lectures. Quarrell, Suzie. Notes on Shavit, Z. (1998). The Concept of Childhood and Children’s Folktales: Test Case-“Little Red Riding Hood”. In M. Werner (Ed.), The Classic Fairytales (pp. 317-323). New York, NY: Norton. Lecture Maria Tatar (1998). Introduction: Little Red Riding Hood. In M.Tatar (Ed.), The Classic Fairytales (pp. 3-10). New York, NY: Norton

  • Writing Question

    Complete the following for 10 extra credit points.

    The cost to advertise in Super Bowl LX is $8million for a 30second spot, with some brands paying more than $10 million, and this doesn’t include the expenses of creating and producing the ad. The ads that dominate discussion leading up to and after the big game do three things exceptionally well. They grab the audience’s attention, hold it, and move them to feel something. Of the ads featured in this year’s Super Bowl, choose one ad that grabbed your attention, held it, and made you feel something. Explain how/why it grabbed your attention, how/why it held your attention, and what emotion the ad made you feel. Finally, do you think the ad was worth $8-$10 million? If so, why? If not, why not?

    Requirements: giu

  • Pada desa agraris mengalami penurunan produktivitas lahan da…

  • Faktor-faktor utama yang menyebabkan penurunan produktivitas pertanian di desa tersebut.
  • Strategi pertanian berkelanjutan yang dapat diterapkan untuk meningkatkan hasil panen dan kesejahteraan petani.

    • Requirements:

  • Social Science Question

    Requirements: 3-5 pages

  • Hi pleas Ineed helpe for my homework

    This is the first of several mini-labs designed to teach you how to use StatCrunch. Later in the course, you will work on more complex labs where you will apply the StatCrunch skills you learned in these early mini-labs.

    Progress Check

    Use this activity to assess whether you and your peers can:

    • Select an appropriate bin width for a histogram and explain your choice.
    • Use a histogram to describe the shape, center, and spread of a distribution of data.

    Directions

    Use the drop-down menu to learn about the three steps needed to complete this assignment.

    Three steps to complete the assignment

    Step 1: Review the Rubric

    • Before you submit your work, review the rubric at the bottom of this assignment.
    • Use the rubric as a checklist to determine whether you are ready to submit your work.

    Step 2: First Draft

    • Commit a good-faith effort to address each item in the Prompt section below.
    • Please be sure to number your responses and include “white space” between problem numbers. This improves the readability and flow of your work. I cannot give feedback and grade jumbled work.
    • Use either of the following options to submit your work.
      OPTION 1: You can submit a text-entry assignment (i.e. typing your answers in Canvas). To learn how to submit a text-entry assignment, use these (opens in a new tab).
      OPTION 2: You can upload your paper-and-pencil work (or the digital equivalent). To learn how to upload your paper-and-pencil work, use these (opens in a new tab). WARNING – some file types may not be visible on my end. So to learn which files you can upload, be sure to use the directions link I provided for this option.
    • Not ready to submit a good-faith effort yet? Avoid frustration – use the link to the Questions, Answers, & Tips discussion board (at the bottom of this page) to post questions about this assignment (or visit the discussion board to answer your classmates’ questions). You can also contact me directly (see the homepage for my contact information).

    Step 3: Optional Final Draft

    • After you submit your good-faith attempt to fully respond to the questions in the Prompt section below, advance to the ANSWER(S) page.
    • You can use the ANSWER(S) page to correct your work and resubmit this assignment any time before I begin grading the problems. However, to earn full credit, you are not required to submit a final draft for this assignment. But if you do submit a final draft, I will only grade it if you submitted a good-faith effort on your first draft.
    • Warning – I will only grade your most recent submission. So if you choose to submit a final draft, please do not leave anything out, and please do not direct me to read an earlier submission. To maximize your score, your most recent submission (at the time I begin grading) must be complete.

    Context

    We will use our unique IAT data sets to learn how to create a histogram using StatCrunch. We will also practice what we’ve learned about describing a histogram. We are interested in describing the distribution of IAT participants’ ages when they took the IAT test.

    Data

    All directions in this assignment open in a new tab.

    • Login and open StatCrunch ().
    • Open your IAT sample data set in StatCrunch ().
    • Create a histogram of the ages of the IAT participants ().
    • Download the StatCrunch output window, your histogram ().

    Prompt

    In your initial post, respond to the following prompt. But first, be sure to complete the work in the Data section above.

    Question 1

    Describe the distribution of IAT participants’ ages in your sample. Your description should include: shape, center, spread, a typical interval of representative ages, and any apparent outliers (unusual ages). Be sure to embed your histogram in the textbox along with your response – and include the Alt Text (). Please do not submit your histogram as an attachment.

    Question 2

    Create a second histogram for the distribution of ages, and adjust the bin width (). Try both smaller and larger bin widths. Choose a bin width so that your second histogram does not look like the first. Also, embed your second histogram in the textbox with your response. Indicate which histogram is better for analyzing the data (your first embedded histogram or your second). Explain why.

    Question 3

    Your random sample was obtained from the population of participants for your chosen IAT data set. Based on the histogram from your random sample, how would you describe the population of participants for your chosen IAT data set? Do you think the IAT population is similar to the U.S. population?

    List of StatCrunch Directions

    Click here for StatCrunch Directions

    Each link will open in a new window. To return to this assignment, either close the new tab or select the tab for this assignment.

    • (You only need to do this once.)
    • (open your random sample)
    • (no screenshots; please use these directions)
    • (no attachments; please use these directions)

    Here is a PDF document with all .

    Module 7 Discussion Board

    Use the Module 7 (opens in a new tab) to ask questions or provide feedback about the problems in any Module 7 activity – including this peer-reviewed assignment.

    Review Feedback

    • Instructor feedback is only available after an assignment is graded.
    • Use these (opens in a new tab) to learn how to review feedback.

    Click the “Next” or > button to continue.

    Content by Cuyamaca College math faculty and licensed under the .

    Rubric

    Formative Assessments w/ StatCrunch

    Formative Assessments w/ StatCrunch
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswering the Prompt

    8 ptsFull CreditThe first submission demonstrates a good-faith effort to address each part of the Prompt. Either in the first draft or the optional final draft, all parts of the “Prompt” are addressed and the responses demonstrate attainment of the learning objectives in the “Progress Check” section of the assignment. The answers are correct. The writing/work is clear. The explanation/work is reasonable, well-organized, and easy to follow.6.5 ptsMostly CorrectThe first submission demonstrates a good-faith effort to address most of the Prompt. In the optional final draft all parts of the “Prompt” are addressed, and the responses demonstrate attainment of the learning objectives in the “Progress Check” section of the assignment. The answers are mostly correct. The writing/work is clear. The explanation/work is reasonable, well-organized, and easy to follow.

    3.5 ptsOne or more incorrectThe first submission demonstrates a good-faith effort to respond to a smaller portion of the Prompt. In the first draft or the optional final draft, one or more parts of the “Prompt” are not addressed or are incorrect. Or, answers do not demonstrate attainment of the learning objectives in the “Progress Check” section of the assignment. Or, answers are correct, but the writing/work is unclear, incorrect, or difficult to follow.0 ptsNo MarksThe first submission does not demonstrate a good-faith effort to address the Prompt.

    8 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStatCrunch

    2 ptsFull CreditStatCrunch graphs and/or tables are correct and embedded with your work.1 ptsPartial CreditStatCrunch graphs and/or tables are incorrect or missing important information.

    0 ptsNo CreditNo StatCrunch information is embedded with your post. Or all StatCrunch work is incorrect.

    2 pts

    Total Points: 10

    Requirements: 6 h

  • Research Proposal

    Topic: How Does cultural Stigma Surrounding Mental Health influence counseling utliization among first generation college students?

    Should be only writing the introduction

    Writing the Introduction

    Draft 1 is will serve as the first version of the introduction for your research proposal. According to APA format, the introduction includes (a) a theoretical framework (i.e., the general topic and theories surrounding your research), (b) significance of the research (i.e., why your research is important), (c) a literature review (i.e., past research that has been done in this area), and (d) your specific hypothesis (for quantitative studies) or aims (for qualitative studies). Draft 1 should be at least two pages with at least five peer-reviewed journal citations. A good introduction is usually between two and four pages long. Examples of previous proposals are provided in the Research Proposal module. Draft 1 includes what you see between the title page and the Methods section.

    Searching for Research Articles

    By now, most of you have had to write a research paper either for one of your undergraduate classes or one of your recent graduate classes. However, some of my students have been out of school (or attended another university) and aren’t sure how to start a search for materials in the library. Therefore, our former librarian, Terrie Sypolt, created a document to help you with your literature search. This resource can be found under the APA Resources link from the home page or by clicking this link:

    .

    Chapter 2 in your textbook also covers how to conduct a literature review. Remember that you must include at least five peer-reviewed sources in the introduction. Educational (e.g., Education Week) or psychological (e.g., Psychology Today) magazines, newspapers (even the New York Times), or organizational webpages (e.g., Center for Disease Control) are not peer-reviewed sources. You may include them as sources, but they will not count as “peer-reviewed” sources.

    Before you begin writing the literature review, I recommend that you complete the Conducting a Literature Review webcourse. To do this, open the link

    in your web browser, enroll in the course, go to the course, and read through the module.

    Grading Rubric for Draft 1

    Although the instructions include what you need to know to complete this assignment, many students lose points for not using APA format. If you are having trouble citing your sources in APA format, consult the APA Manual and the links on APA format under the Research Proposal link from the main page on Webcourses. Most APA format violations will cost you half a point. To avoid the most common mistakes, check your paper for the following:

    • Include the title of the paper at the beginning of the introduction, not “Introduction.”
    • Are in-text author citations in APA format? If you aren’t sure, check.
    • Are numbers in APA format? Be aware that there are different rules for different numbers.
    • Include page numbers and quotation marks when including quotes.
    • Double-space.
    • Make sure that headings are formatted according to the 7th edition of the APA Manual, not earlier editions.
    • If a citation has more than three authors, use “et al.” after the first author’s name instead of writing out all authors’ names. E.g., Hammett et al. (2025) or (Hammett et al., 2025). Do this each time you cite this source.
    • Are ethnicity labels, such as Black and White, in APA format?

    Some students lose points for writing an insufficient literature review. You will need to include at least five peer-reviewed sources in the introduction. Your introduction should be between two and four pages long. It’s OK if it’s a little longer than this. A draft shorter than two pages makes me wonder what’s missing. Short drafts will lose one-half to two points.

    Finally, do not plagiarize! If you are wondering why I keep writing this, it is because I see at least one instance of plagiarism every year. Plagiarism is using any part of another source as if it were your own original writing. If you directly quote from another source, make sure that you include quotation marks around the quoted text and properly cite the source (author name, year of publication, and page number). I will deduct at least 1 point for every sentence that is directly copied from another source without quotation marks and proper citation! For further recommendations on avoiding plagiarism, see the Syllabus, the instructions for this assignment, or the Guidelines and Requirements for the Research Proposal.

    I will help you with APA formatting and style for educational research; however, I expect that you know how to write general research papers by now. If you are having trouble writing clearly or paraphrasing information from other sources, the Writing Center is available to assist you. You can find their hours and locations at .

    Feedback for Draft 1

    Once this assignment is graded, I will give feedback for Draft 1 using a few different formats. To see all the feedback:

    • From the main course page, select Grades from the menu on the left side of the screen.
    • Under Grades for Students, select Draft 1.
    • In the upper right corner, you will see your score out of 10. Just below that, you will see an icon and a Show Rubric link. Select this link to see the grading criteria for this assignment, comments for each criterion, and the number of points that you earned and could have earned.
    • Below the rubric link, you can read the comments I have written about your assignment, but most of my comments are in the rubric.
    • Under Submission Details, you will see your assignment submission. If you submitted a Word document, you will see a link to the right of the title of your submission labeled View Feedback. Clicking on the link will open a pdf file of your draft with additional comments, highlighting, and corrections made by striking out and inserting text in red. Downloading your submission will not allow you to see my corrections. Therefore, you will need to go through the View Feedback link. If you did not upload a Word document, I cannot make comments or corrections directly on your assignment. All of my corrections will be in the comments section of the rubric or under the comments section under your score.

    Frequently Asked Questions for Draft 1

    QUESTION:

    The article that I am reading includes citations from other studies. How do I cite the findings from these other studies that are summarized in the article that I am reading?

    ANSWER:

    When using secondary citations, you may either cite an article as a secondary source or find the paper that was cited and use that as a primary citation. If you use the first version, you would cite it as:

    According to Darwin (2018), golden retrievers are smarter than collies (as cited in Clark, 2023).

    In this example, Clark (2023) is the article that you have read that cites Darwin (2018), and you will only need to include Clark (2023) in your reference list. If you choose to read Darwin (2018) yourself, make your own conclusions from that study, and include Darwin (2018) in your reference list.

    QUESTION:

    How do I know if an article is peer-reviewed?

    ANSWER:

    The easiest way to verify if an article is peer-reviewed is to find the article or journal in UCF’s library catalogue. From the homepage (, select “Articles” under “What do you want to find?” Type your search terms into the window above and click “Search Primo”. The top of the citation should state “Article”. If it is peer-reviewed, you should see a purple icon at the bottom and “Peer Reviewed” next to the icon.

    If you’ve already located an article and want to verify it is from a peer-reviewed journal, choose the “Journals” tab from the library home page and select “Peer Reviewed” under “Show journals that are:” Type the name of the journal in the search field and click “Search Journals”. If it is peer-reviewed, you should see a purple icon and “Peer Reviewed”.

    Another approach is to check the journal’s website. If the homepage includes a “cite score” or “impact factor”, it is peer-reviewed. Some will also give an “average review time”, which also indicates that it is peer-reviewed. ERIC will often label articles as being “journal articles”, which usually means “peer reviewed”.

  • Discussion

    Answer both Questions 200 words each 1) argue in favor of restrictions on the right to counsel or the right to jury trial. Be specific and use information from the opinions in the cases we have covered. 2) argue against restrictions on the right to counsel or the right to jury trial. Again, be specific.

  • PowerPoint presentation review

    PPT review. Feedback to colleague. 1 page apa format + 1 biblio

  • Essay

    My long-term career goal is to become a researcher in biomedical engineering focused on regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. I am particularly interested in developing biomaterial-based systems that can regulate cellular metabolism, mechanical signaling, and microenvironmental conditions to improve tissue repair and regeneration. Through graduate training, I hope to strengthen my ability to integrate experimental biology, biomaterials engineering, and computational modeling to design physiologically relevant regenerative platforms.

    Following completion of my Masters degree, I plan to work in a research-focused role in academia, industry, or a research institute, where I can contribute to the development of translational biomedical technologies. I aim to gain deeper experience in experimental design, quantitative analysis, and interdisciplinary collaboration while contributing to clinically relevant research.

    In the long term, I intend to pursue a PhD in Biomedical Engineering to develop independent research expertise. My ultimate goal is to lead research efforts that translate fundamental biological understanding into therapeutic strategies for tissue repair, particularly in musculoskeletal and cardiovascular applications. I hope to contribute to advancing regenerative therapies that improve patient outcomes and address unmet clinical needs. PLEASE EDIT THIS AND MAKE SURE AI PROOF

  • d3

    • Initial Post (1 point)
    • Minimum 150 words (not counting references)
    • Directly addresses a guiding question or another relevant topic in Module 3
    • Includes reasoning, examples, or evidence to support your points
    • Reply Post (1 point)
    • Minimum 150 words
    • Engages meaningfully with a peers response (beyond I agree)
    • Adds value by expanding, questioning, analyzing, or connecting ideas
    • Due Date
    • Both posts must be submitted by Friday, February 13 at 11:30 PM ET.
    • Late posts will not receive credit.

    Topic-Discuss the significance of the ABO blood group in humans