Bright Academic Experts

Author: admin

  • Essay No.1 – Midterm

    Choose one of these two options. , write 1000 words minimum. List sources at the end of your paper. Do Not Copy and paste information from an outside source. You may quote with citations and paraphrase, but use you own words in the majority of your text.

    Option One

    Tracing the Transition of Italian Art from the High Renaissance to Baroque Naturalism

    — A Comparative study of the Depiction of the Deposition of Christ from the Cross by Raphael, Barocci, and Caravaggio,

    Study the 3 articles below by clicking on them to open the web links:

    1. The Deposition by Raphael:

    2. The Deposition by Federico Barocci

    :

    3. Caravaggio, Deposition

    • The objective is to compare and contrast the style and content of Raphael ‘s Deposition, (see slide show from chapter one) with Baroccis Deposition ( fig 1.12) and Caravaggios Depostion (fig. 1, 33.) Read the textbook as well regarding the transition in style and content. Answer the questions below.
    • 1, What makes the paintings by Barocci and Caravaggio examples of the shift away from High Renaissance Classicism Represented by Raphael’s verion?
    • 2. How do approaches to telling the story in the paintings by Barpcci and Caravaggio reflect the reforming values of counter-reformation theologians?
    • 3. Consider the ways that they appeal to the emotions of the viewer by comparing and contrasting:
    • their use of gestures and facial expressions,
    • body types,
    • manipulation of light and shadow, color, and space.
    • background vs. void
    • overall compositional organization ( how the eye is lead from detail to detail)
    • hard versus soft edges and transitions
    • 4. Consider the issue of idealism, as shown in Raphael and to a certain extend in Barocci, who still shows some Mannerist habits, versus the expression of naturalism as a result of direct observation of the model that marks the style of Caravaggio,
    • _________________________________________________________________________________
    • Option Two
    • Bernini’s Projects at St, Peter’s as Illustrations of the Triumph of the Counter-Reformation

    Study the slide lectures, the textbook and following Videos by clicking on them to open the web links.

    1. Bernini, Saint Peter’s Square

    2. Bernini, Baldacchino

    3. Bernini, Cathedra Petri

    Type into your browser Khan Academy Cathedra Petri and a link should appear to watch a video

    Describe the salient features of each of these three projects at the Vatican designed by Bernini

    1.How does each project advance the idea of the triumph of the Catholic Church after the trauma of the Reformation?

    2, Explain how features like the massive scale. the oval plaza layout and embracing arms of the colonnade work on the emotions of visitors approaching the Vatican complex.

    3.What is the religious significance of the Solomonic columns used for the baldacchino and the representation of the four fathers of the church supporting St, Peter’s chair, especially as they relate to the early foundations of Catholicism?

    4. Which details on the baldacchino indicate the patronage of Pope Urban VIII?

  • Literature Question

    professors responce to last assignment references for this assignment For milestone 3, you have to choose a solution that is feasible to implement and explain how you will do it. This won’t be as simple as safe ratios. Implementing laws and regulations aren’t a feasible project that you could implement somewhere. Make sure you can find solutions in your sources that say how they implemented certain solutions to improve safe care. If this includes ratios, how did they do that without a mandated law like California? This will be key for your last paper as in California this is already mandated law. You will want to speak to ways other places can implement ratios that is feasible. references less than 5 years 🙂

    I will upload my proposal from the first week not too sure if you would like to use any in

    Requirements: 8-10

  • Complete the attached income and submit the completed Excel…

    Requirements: finish excel

  • Multi-dimensional Assessment Case Example

    You will be provided a completed Multi-dimensional Assessment Case Example – David Cruz and you are to explore the information to identify the correct DSM-5-TR diagnosis(es) and treatment plan interventions.

    Watch video

    Before beginning the assignment, review the following video for clarification on how to complete the multi-dimensional assessment:

    – i will drop the file

    Review the case example of David Cruz and submit the completed assignment by the Due Date

    1. Before starting this assignment, please review the above audio instructions and the example assessment of Joe, which was reviewed in Module 2

    2. Then work on either the word or PDF version for this assignment; the case is the same, I included both since students use different software and electronics.

    – i will drop file

    – i will drop file

    3. You will explore the entire case example on David Cruz and complete the DSM-5-TR section and the Treatment Recommendation section. If you have any questions, please email Dr. Bruno.

    Identify and write diagnosis(es) and treatment plan interventions

    • Identify the correct DSM-5- TR diagnosis(es) and treatment plan interventions.
    • Be sure to include justifications for your diagnosis(es) as you explore the information provided.
    • For further guidance on how to write the DSM-5 – TR Dx & recommended treatment review the .
    • i will drop file

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): JOE-CASE EXAMPLES -2021 (1).docx, 606-CaseExampleAssignment-O-S-26 (1) (1).pdf, 606-CaseExampleAssignment-O-S-26 (1) (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Research Methodology

    PLEASE follow the instructions

    Purpose

    This discussion board helps you practice explaining a research plan using ideas from two modules:

    – Module 5: How to sample participants (probabilistic vs. non-probabilistic sampling)
    – Module 6: Observational, case study, and archival research designs

    You will pretend to be a researcher who is being interviewed by a journalist. You will use an AI tool to play the role of the journalist. The journalist will ask you questions about your study, and you will answer them.

    By doing this, you will practice:
    – Choosing an appropriate research design
    – Choosing a sampling method for participants
    – Explaining how data would be collected
    – Naming a basic analysis
    – Stating one clear limit on what your study can conclude

    Part 1 Choose a Topic and Basic Study Idea

    First, choose a simple research topic from psychology, applied behavior analysis (ABA), or speech-language pathology (SLP). Pick something that interests you and is related to real-world behavior.

    Here are three sample topics (you may not use these for your own assignment):
    – Screen time and attention
    – Reinforcement and classroom behavior
    – Parent stress and child sleep

    These examples show you the right type of topic, but you must choose a different topic of your own. Do not choose a private or very personal topic.

    Before using any AI tool, write the following on your own:

    1. Your research topic (1 short phrase)
    2. Your research question (1 clear sentence)
    3. Your design choice (choose one): observational study, case study, or archival study
    4. Your participant sampling method (you must choose one specific method): choose one specific probabilistic method (for example: simple random, stratified, or cluster) or choose one specific non-probabilistic method (for example: convenience, purposive, or snowball)

    You will use all four of these in your AI interview in Part 2.

    Part 2 Use AI as a Journalist to Interview You

    Copy and paste everything in red below into your chosen AI model (such as ChatGPT, CoPilot, Claude, etc.). Replace the words in green [in brackets] with the information you developed in Part 1 before pasting it into AI.

    I am an undergraduate student in a psychology research methods course.
    I am going to pretend to be a researcher who is being interviewed about my own study idea.

    My research topic is: [type your topic here]
    My research question is: [type your research question here]
    My research design is: [observational study, case study, or archival study]
    My participant sampling method is: [type the exact sampling method here]

    Please act like a journalist and interview me about my study plan.

    Your goal is to conduct a natural, real-feeling interview, not a rigid checklist.

    Across the interview, you must make sure that your questions clearly cover all of the following topic areas:
    – Why I chose this research design
    – Who my target population is
    – Why my sampling method makes sense for this study
    – What data I will collect (observations, case data, or archival records)
    – How my key behavior or variable will be measured or defined
    – What basic analysis I would use (for example: frequency, percentage, correlation, or chi-square)
    – One clear limit on what my study can conclude

    You do not have to ask these as seven exact questions. You may combine or split them across multiple questions if that feels more natural.

    You may and should ask appropriate follow-up questions if my answers are unclear, too short, or incomplete.

    Please ask your questions one at a time and wait for my answer before asking the next question.
    I will answer your questions directly to you in this chat as the researcher.

    Do not explain anything for me. Do not improve my answers. Do not suggest better designs or sampling methods. Just act like a journalist asking neutral questions about my study. Continue the interview until you think I demonstrate an appropriate undergraduate-level understanding of the topic.

    Engage with AI throughout the interview, answering the questions directly in the chat. Save the interview/chat because you will be pasting it into your discussion board post later.

    Part 3 Reflect on Your AI Interview and Study Plan

    After you finish the AI interview, read through your full conversation carefully. Think about the questions the AI journalist asked you and the answers you gave.

    Then answer each of the following questions in 12 sentences each. Number your answers clearly (15).

    1. Based on the questions the AI journalist asked you, do you think your research design (observational, case study, or archival) is a good fit for your research question? Why or why not?

    2. Based on how the AI journalist pushed you to explain it, do you think your participant sampling method (your specific probabilistic or non-probabilistic method) makes sense for your study? Why or why not?

    3. What is one weakness in your study plan that became clear to you while answering the AI journalists questions?

    4. What is one thing you cannot conclude from your study because of your design or sampling method, as shown by your interview answers?

    5. How did doing this activity with AI as a journalist help you learn? What did it help you understand better about research design or sampling?

    Your answers must be written in your own words. Do not use AI to write your answers to these five questions.

    Part 4 Post Your Work in the Discussion Board

    You must complete all parts of this assignment in one single discussion board box in Blackboard. Do not upload or attach any Word documents or other files. Everything must be typed or pasted directly.

    Your post must include the following sections, in this exact order:

    1. Your research topic
    2. Your research question
    3. Your research design
    4. Your participant sampling method (name the specific method)
    5. Your full AI conversation (paste the entire prompt and the full interview)
    • Your prompt must include your own topic, question, design, and sampling method
    • You must clearly label which lines are from the AI (journalist) and which lines are your answers. For example:
      • AI Journalist: [question text]
      • Student Researcher: [your answer text]
    1. Your answers to the 5 reflection questions (type or paste your numbered responses from Part 3)
    2. Your AI attribution statement (12 sentences)

    Do not shorten or summarize the AI conversation. Do not leave out any required section.

    Requirements: follow instructions step to step

  • English Question

    I have included the original assignment instructions below for reference. The video and paper have already been completed. While the content of the paper is accurate, strong, and fully aligned with the assignment requirements, it is currently being flagged by AI-detection software.Can you please carefully edit to improve the natural flow, voice, and phrasing so that the paper reflects a more authentic academic writing style and is no longer detected as AI-generated? Please keep the content, ideas, and meaning the same, as the paper itself is already well developed.

    Original Instruction:

    Mock Session 1a (In-Person)

    Person 1 will be paired with a partner to conduct an in-person mock therapy session. During the session, Person 1 will take the role of the therapist, and Person 2 will act as the client. The session will be video recorded.

    With Person 2s permission, Person 1 will select and email 10 minutes of the recorded session.

    In addition, Person 1 will submit a 46 page, double-spaced reflection paper that includes timestamps from the session. The paper should address the following:

    • The therapists intentions at specific moments during the session
    • Areas of the session the you felt proud of
    • What you would have done differently
    • Moments where you felt unsure, stuck, or would like guidance from the instructor

    Requirements: 4-6 pages

  • Hit175

    instructions in images. contact me if you have any more questions

  • Discussion

    I have attached detailed instructions for you to complete this assignment. Also, I am a medical social worker at a hospital for reference. If you have any questions regarding this assignment, please don’t hesitate to reach out. Thank you!

  • Psychology homework

    • A. Briefly summarize in your own words what that other group discovered and conveyed in their presentation slides. Ensure you cite and reference the sources for the information you include (i.e., the sources that the group has drawn ondo not cite the presentation itself!). This means that you will have to go to the source(s) that they cite and reference and ensure that the information you share in your journal entry accurately reflects the source.
    • B. Find and use one high quality source external to the course materials and use it to go beyond the information provided in the target group’s presentation. Your external source must be one good academic/scientific source such as a high quality book chapter or peer-reviewed journal article (by contrast, your source should not be some non-academic/scientific source that is meant for popular consumption). You must read this source, make effective use of it in your writing, and explain how it extends beyond the work in the target group’s presentation. Cite and reference the source in APA format as usual.

  • Trader Joes

    What plans do they have? What plans should they add? What control mechanisms seem to be in place? What control mechanisms do they need to put in place?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): trader joes planning and control.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.